|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha : |
11/07/2022 |
Actualizado : |
11/07/2022 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
TURNER, J.A.; GUESMI, B.; GIL, J. M.; HEANUE, K.; SIERRA, M.; PERCY, H.; BORTAGARAY, I.; CHAMS, N.; MILNE, C. |
Afiliación : |
JAMES A TURNER, Farms Systems and Environment, AgResearch, 10 Bisley Rd, Hamilton 3214, New Zealand; BOUALI GUESMI, Center for Agro-Food Economics and Development (CREDA-UPC-IRTA). Parc Mediterrani de la Tecnologia, Edifici ESAB, 08860 Castelldefels (Barcelona), Spain; JOSÉ M. GIL, Center for Agro-Food Economics and Development (CREDA-UPC-IRTA). Parc Mediterrani de la Tecnologia, Edifici ESAB, 08860 Castelldefels (Barcelona), Spain; KEVIN HEANUE, Evaluation Unit, Teagasc, Mellows Campus, Athenry, Co. Galway H65 R718, Ireland; MIGUEL OSCAR SIERRA PEREIRO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; HELEN PERCY, Adoption and Practice Change, AgResearch, 10 Bisley Rd, Hamilton 3214, New Zealand; ISABEL BORTAGARAY SABARROS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; Instituto de Desarrollo Sostenible, Innovación e Inclusión Social - IDIIS, Universidad de la República, Uruguay; NOUR CHAMS, Center for Agro-Food Economics and Development (CREDA-UPC-IRTA). Parc Mediterrani de la Tecnologia, Edifici ESAB, 08860 Castelldefels (Barcelona), Spain; University Ramon Llull - IQS School of Management Via Augusta 390, 08017, Barcelona, Spain; CATH MILNE, Formerly SRUC, Peter Wilson Building, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK. |
Título : |
Evaluation capacity building in response to the agricultural research impact agenda: Emerging insights from Ireland, Catalonia (Spain), New Zealand, and Uruguay. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Evaluation and Program Planning, October 2022, Volume 94, 102127. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102127 |
ISSN : |
0149-7189 |
DOI : |
10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102127 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 6 August 2021, Revised 27 April 2022, Accepted 25 June 2022, Available online 28 June 2022, Version of Record 6 July 2022.
Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: james.turner@agresearch.co.nz (J.A. Turner), bouali.guesmi@upc.edu (B. Guesmi), chema.gil@upc.edu (J.M. Gil), kevin.heanue@teagasc.ie
(K. Heanue), msierra@inia.org.uy (M. Sierra), helen.percy@agresearch.co.nz (H. Percy), isabelbortagaray@gmail.com (I. Bortagaray), nour.chams@upc.edu
(N. Chams), cemilne@live.com (C. Milne). -- This work was supported by the Strategic Partnership; Strategic Science Investment Fund, New Zealand; Scottish Government; Teagasc; Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA) in Uruguay; and the Societal Impact of R&D Investments [IRTA project-61095]. |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- Performance-based funding and calls for public-funded science to demonstrate societal impact are encouraging public research organisations to evaluate impact, the so-called impact agenda. This paper explores evaluation methods of four fully or partially public-funded agricultural research organisations and how they are building evaluative capacity to respond to the impact agenda. Drawing on cross-organisational comparison of the readiness of each organisation to implement evaluation, the implications for improving evaluative capacity building (ECB) are discussed. This study extends the current literature on ECB, as very little has focussed on research organisations in general, and particularly agricultural research. Driven by the impact agenda, the organisations are beginning to emphasise summative evaluation. Organisational leaders valuing the demonstration of impact and commitment to building evaluation capacity are important precursors to other aspects of organisational readiness to implement evaluation. However, organisational emphasis remains on using evaluation for accountability and to improve efficiency and allocation of funding. The organisations have yet to systematically embed evaluation processes and capabilities for learning at programme and organisation-levels. There is, therefore, an opportunity to develop organisation and programme-level evaluation processes that inform each other and the pathways to impact from science. To realise this opportunity, organisations could strengthen internal and external networks of evaluation practitioners and academics to bridge the gap between the theory and practice of monitoring and evaluation for learning (MEL) and to begin to reshape organisational culture by using evaluation methods that are grounded in co-production and integrated scientific and societal values.
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. MenosABSTRACT.- Performance-based funding and calls for public-funded science to demonstrate societal impact are encouraging public research organisations to evaluate impact, the so-called impact agenda. This paper explores evaluation methods of four fully or partially public-funded agricultural research organisations and how they are building evaluative capacity to respond to the impact agenda. Drawing on cross-organisational comparison of the readiness of each organisation to implement evaluation, the implications for improving evaluative capacity building (ECB) are discussed. This study extends the current literature on ECB, as very little has focussed on research organisations in general, and particularly agricultural research. Driven by the impact agenda, the organisations are beginning to emphasise summative evaluation. Organisational leaders valuing the demonstration of impact and commitment to building evaluation capacity are important precursors to other aspects of organisational readiness to implement evaluation. However, organisational emphasis remains on using evaluation for accountability and to improve efficiency and allocation of funding. The organisations have yet to systematically embed evaluation processes and capabilities for learning at programme and organisation-levels. There is, therefore, an opportunity to develop organisation and programme-level evaluation processes that inform each other and the pathways to impact from science. To realise this opportunity... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
Agricultural research impact; Building; Monitoring and evaluation, evaluation capacity. |
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
Marc : |
LEADER 03662naa a2200289 a 4500 001 1063412 005 2022-07-11 008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0149-7189 024 7 $a10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102127$2DOI 100 1 $aTURNER, J.A. 245 $aEvaluation capacity building in response to the agricultural research impact agenda$bEmerging insights from Ireland, Catalonia (Spain), New Zealand, and Uruguay.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2022 500 $aArticle history: Received 6 August 2021, Revised 27 April 2022, Accepted 25 June 2022, Available online 28 June 2022, Version of Record 6 July 2022. Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: james.turner@agresearch.co.nz (J.A. Turner), bouali.guesmi@upc.edu (B. Guesmi), chema.gil@upc.edu (J.M. Gil), kevin.heanue@teagasc.ie (K. Heanue), msierra@inia.org.uy (M. Sierra), helen.percy@agresearch.co.nz (H. Percy), isabelbortagaray@gmail.com (I. Bortagaray), nour.chams@upc.edu (N. Chams), cemilne@live.com (C. Milne). -- This work was supported by the Strategic Partnership; Strategic Science Investment Fund, New Zealand; Scottish Government; Teagasc; Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA) in Uruguay; and the Societal Impact of R&D Investments [IRTA project-61095]. 520 $aABSTRACT.- Performance-based funding and calls for public-funded science to demonstrate societal impact are encouraging public research organisations to evaluate impact, the so-called impact agenda. This paper explores evaluation methods of four fully or partially public-funded agricultural research organisations and how they are building evaluative capacity to respond to the impact agenda. Drawing on cross-organisational comparison of the readiness of each organisation to implement evaluation, the implications for improving evaluative capacity building (ECB) are discussed. This study extends the current literature on ECB, as very little has focussed on research organisations in general, and particularly agricultural research. Driven by the impact agenda, the organisations are beginning to emphasise summative evaluation. Organisational leaders valuing the demonstration of impact and commitment to building evaluation capacity are important precursors to other aspects of organisational readiness to implement evaluation. However, organisational emphasis remains on using evaluation for accountability and to improve efficiency and allocation of funding. The organisations have yet to systematically embed evaluation processes and capabilities for learning at programme and organisation-levels. There is, therefore, an opportunity to develop organisation and programme-level evaluation processes that inform each other and the pathways to impact from science. To realise this opportunity, organisations could strengthen internal and external networks of evaluation practitioners and academics to bridge the gap between the theory and practice of monitoring and evaluation for learning (MEL) and to begin to reshape organisational culture by using evaluation methods that are grounded in co-production and integrated scientific and societal values. © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 653 $aAgricultural research impact 653 $aBuilding 653 $aMonitoring and evaluation, evaluation capacity 700 1 $aGUESMI, B. 700 1 $aGIL, J. M. 700 1 $aHEANUE, K. 700 1 $aSIERRA, M. 700 1 $aPERCY, H. 700 1 $aBORTAGARAY, I. 700 1 $aCHAMS, N. 700 1 $aMILNE, C. 773 $tEvaluation and Program Planning, October 2022, Volume 94, 102127. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102127
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
Fecha actual : |
21/02/2014 |
Actualizado : |
14/06/2017 |
Autor : |
SANTOS, J. DOS; RICCETO, J.; RIOS, C. |
Afiliación : |
JOSÉ A. DOS SANTOS; JUAN P. RICCETO; CÉSAR M. RÍOS. |
Título : |
Efecto del método de pastoreo, relación ovino-bovino y dotación sobre la productividad de pasturas naturales. |
Fecha de publicación : |
1988 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
ln: REUNIÓN DEL GRUPO TÉCNICO REGIONAL DEL CONO SUR EN MEJORAMIENTO Y UTILIZACIÓN DE LOS RECURSOS FORRAJEROS DEL ÁREA TROPICAL Y SUB-TROPICAL. GRUPOS CAMPOS Y CHACO, 9., 1987, TACUAREMBÓ, URUGUAY.; SILVA, J. (Ed.). Memoria. Montevideo (Uruguay): CIAAB, 1988. |
Páginas : |
p. 73-78 |
Idioma : |
Español |
Contenido : |
En la Unidad Experimental Demostrativa de Producción Molles del Queguay (Estación Experimental del Norte), se comenzó a evaluar a partir de noviembre de 1984 la evolución de una pastura natural sobre suelos de Basalto a través de su composicibn botánica, calidad y productividad (rendimiento de materia seca y producción animal). |
Palabras claves : |
GRASSLAND; PASTURE. |
Thesagro : |
BOVINAE; CAMPO NATURAL; OVINOS; PASTIZAL NATURAL; PRODUCCION ANIMAL; SISTEMAS DE PASTOREO; SUELO BASALTICO; TIPOS DE SUELOS; URUGUAY. |
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/6882/1/EFECTO-DEL-METODO-DOS-SANTOS.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01311nam a2200277 a 4500 001 1023944 005 2017-06-14 008 1988 bl uuuu u01u1 u #d 100 1 $aSANTOS, J. DOS 245 $aEfecto del método de pastoreo, relación ovino-bovino y dotación sobre la productividad de pasturas naturales. 260 $aln: REUNIÓN DEL GRUPO TÉCNICO REGIONAL DEL CONO SUR EN MEJORAMIENTO Y UTILIZACIÓN DE LOS RECURSOS FORRAJEROS DEL ÁREA TROPICAL Y SUB-TROPICAL. GRUPOS CAMPOS Y CHACO, 9., 1987, TACUAREMBÓ, URUGUAY.; SILVA, J. (Ed.). Memoria. Montevideo (Uruguay): CIAAB$c1988 300 $ap. 73-78 520 $aEn la Unidad Experimental Demostrativa de Producción Molles del Queguay (Estación Experimental del Norte), se comenzó a evaluar a partir de noviembre de 1984 la evolución de una pastura natural sobre suelos de Basalto a través de su composicibn botánica, calidad y productividad (rendimiento de materia seca y producción animal). 650 $aBOVINAE 650 $aCAMPO NATURAL 650 $aOVINOS 650 $aPASTIZAL NATURAL 650 $aPRODUCCION ANIMAL 650 $aSISTEMAS DE PASTOREO 650 $aSUELO BASALTICO 650 $aTIPOS DE SUELOS 650 $aURUGUAY 653 $aGRASSLAND 653 $aPASTURE 700 1 $aRICCETO, J. 700 1 $aRIOS, C.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|