|
|
![](/consulta/web/img/deny.png) | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Treinta y Tres. Por información adicional contacte bibliott@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
Fecha : |
27/11/2019 |
Actualizado : |
10/02/2020 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
BONNECARRERE, V.; ROSAS, J.E.; FERRARO, B. |
Afiliación : |
MARIA VICTORIA BONNECARRERE MARTINEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JUAN EDUARDO ROSAS CAISSIOLS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; BRUNO FERRARO ALBERTONI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Economic impact of marker-assisted selection and rapid generation advance on breeding programs. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2019 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Euphytica, 2019, v. 215, a. 197. 11 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-019-2529-8 |
DOI : |
10.1007/s10681-019-2529-8 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 19 August 2019 / Accepted: 5 November 2019 / Published online: 12 November 2019. |
Contenido : |
Abstract Plant breeding for the generation of cultivars adapted to local conditions has been an important and strategic concern of developing countries with
agriculture-based economies. Considering economic constraints, breeders must improve genetic gain to increase the delivery of better cultivars with lower costs, through the implementation of molecular breeding and rapid generation advance. The aim of this work is to assess the actual economic impact of the implementation of these technologies on genetic gain for yield, rice blast disease resistance, and grain amylose content in a conventional rice breeding program. This analysis is intended as a case study of public breeding programs in developing countries. To accomplish this objective, cost analyses and genetic gain estimations were performed for four rice breeding scenarios: conventional and marker-assisted selection, with and without rapid generation advance. These estimations were then used to develop a cost index reflecting the breeding efficiency. The most efficient method was found to depend on the objective trait considered. For yield, there are small variations in genetic gain, but in terms of costs, the application of technology increases the breeding efficiency. For rice blast resistance, marker-assisted selection is not an efficient option when not using rapid generation advance. Conversely, the efficiency of marker-assisted selection increases when using rapid generation advance. For grain amylose content, the greatest
effect on genetic gain is obtained when using marker-assisted selection. Rapid generation advance always increases the breeding efficiency. The use of new technological tools is recommended in terms of the cost?benefit function. MenosAbstract Plant breeding for the generation of cultivars adapted to local conditions has been an important and strategic concern of developing countries with
agriculture-based economies. Considering economic constraints, breeders must improve genetic gain to increase the delivery of better cultivars with lower costs, through the implementation of molecular breeding and rapid generation advance. The aim of this work is to assess the actual economic impact of the implementation of these technologies on genetic gain for yield, rice blast disease resistance, and grain amylose content in a conventional rice breeding program. This analysis is intended as a case study of public breeding programs in developing countries. To accomplish this objective, cost analyses and genetic gain estimations were performed for four rice breeding scenarios: conventional and marker-assisted selection, with and without rapid generation advance. These estimations were then used to develop a cost index reflecting the breeding efficiency. The most efficient method was found to depend on the objective trait considered. For yield, there are small variations in genetic gain, but in terms of costs, the application of technology increases the breeding efficiency. For rice blast resistance, marker-assisted selection is not an efficient option when not using rapid generation advance. Conversely, the efficiency of marker-assisted selection increases when using rapid generation advance. For grain amylose content, ... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
BREEDING EFFICIENCY; COST INDEX; GENETIC GAIN; MAS; PLANT BREEDING; RGA. |
Asunto categoría : |
F30 Genética vegetal y fitomejoramiento |
Marc : |
LEADER 02560naa a2200241 a 4500 001 1060469 005 2020-02-10 008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1007/s10681-019-2529-8$2DOI 100 1 $aBONNECARRERE, V. 245 $aEconomic impact of marker-assisted selection and rapid generation advance on breeding programs.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2019 500 $aArticle history: Received: 19 August 2019 / Accepted: 5 November 2019 / Published online: 12 November 2019. 520 $aAbstract Plant breeding for the generation of cultivars adapted to local conditions has been an important and strategic concern of developing countries with agriculture-based economies. Considering economic constraints, breeders must improve genetic gain to increase the delivery of better cultivars with lower costs, through the implementation of molecular breeding and rapid generation advance. The aim of this work is to assess the actual economic impact of the implementation of these technologies on genetic gain for yield, rice blast disease resistance, and grain amylose content in a conventional rice breeding program. This analysis is intended as a case study of public breeding programs in developing countries. To accomplish this objective, cost analyses and genetic gain estimations were performed for four rice breeding scenarios: conventional and marker-assisted selection, with and without rapid generation advance. These estimations were then used to develop a cost index reflecting the breeding efficiency. The most efficient method was found to depend on the objective trait considered. For yield, there are small variations in genetic gain, but in terms of costs, the application of technology increases the breeding efficiency. For rice blast resistance, marker-assisted selection is not an efficient option when not using rapid generation advance. Conversely, the efficiency of marker-assisted selection increases when using rapid generation advance. For grain amylose content, the greatest effect on genetic gain is obtained when using marker-assisted selection. Rapid generation advance always increases the breeding efficiency. The use of new technological tools is recommended in terms of the cost?benefit function. 653 $aBREEDING EFFICIENCY 653 $aCOST INDEX 653 $aGENETIC GAIN 653 $aMAS 653 $aPLANT BREEDING 653 $aRGA 700 1 $aROSAS, J.E. 700 1 $aFERRARO, B. 773 $tEuphytica, 2019$gv. 215, a. 197. 11 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-019-2529-8
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
Fecha actual : |
19/07/2015 |
Actualizado : |
15/10/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Revista INIA |
Autor : |
INIA (INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA) |
Título : |
Revista INIA Uruguay. (No.36, Marzo 2014). |
Fecha de publicación : |
2014 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 2014. |
Páginas : |
64 p. |
Serie : |
(Revista INIA; 36) |
ISSN : |
1510-9011 |
Idioma : |
Español |
Thesagro : |
ARROZ; BIOTECNOLOGIA; BOVINOS DE CARNE; CAMBIO CLIMÁTICO; CIENCIA; CITRUS; CLIMA; CLIMATOLOGIA; COMUNICACIÓN; CONTROL DE ENFERMEDADES; CULTIVOS DE GRANO; CULTIVOS DE SECANO; ENTOMOLOGIA; ESPECIES FORRAJERAS; EUCALYPTUS; EXPLOTACION AGRICOLA FAMILIAR; FITOPATOLOGÍA; FORESTALES; FORRAJES; FRUTALES; FRUTICULTURA; GANADO BOVINO; GRANOS; GRAS; HORTALIZAS; HORTICULTURA; INIA; INNOVACION; INVESTIGACIÓN; LECHERÍA; LEGUMINOSAS FORRAJERAS; MANEJO DEL CULTIVO; MEJORAMIENTO ANIMAL; METEOROLOGIA; MICROBIOLOGÍA; OVINOS; PASTURAS; PRODUCCIÓN ANIMAL; PRODUCCION DE LANA; PRODUCCION DE LECHE; PRODUCCION LECHERA; REVISTA INIA 2014; SEMILLAS; SOJA; SUELOS; SUINOS; SUSTENTABILIDAD AMBIENTAL; TECNOLOGÍA; TRANSFERENCIA DE TECNOLOGIA; VARIEDADES; VITICULTURA. |
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/4851/1/revista-INIA-36.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01905nam a2200745 a 4500 001 1053101 005 2019-10-15 008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1510-9011 100 1 $aINIA (INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA) 245 $aRevista INIA Uruguay. (No.36, Marzo 2014). 260 $aMontevideo (Uruguay): INIA$c2014 300 $a64 p. 490 $a(Revista INIA; 36) 650 $aARROZ 650 $aBIOTECNOLOGIA 650 $aBOVINOS DE CARNE 650 $aCAMBIO CLIMÁTICO 650 $aCIENCIA 650 $aCITRUS 650 $aCLIMA 650 $aCLIMATOLOGIA 650 $aCOMUNICACIÓN 650 $aCONTROL DE ENFERMEDADES 650 $aCULTIVOS DE GRANO 650 $aCULTIVOS DE SECANO 650 $aENTOMOLOGIA 650 $aESPECIES FORRAJERAS 650 $aEUCALYPTUS 650 $aEXPLOTACION AGRICOLA FAMILIAR 650 $aFITOPATOLOGÍA 650 $aFORESTALES 650 $aFORRAJES 650 $aFRUTALES 650 $aFRUTICULTURA 650 $aGANADO BOVINO 650 $aGRANOS 650 $aGRAS 650 $aHORTALIZAS 650 $aHORTICULTURA 650 $aINIA 650 $aINNOVACION 650 $aINVESTIGACIÓN 650 $aLECHERÍA 650 $aLEGUMINOSAS FORRAJERAS 650 $aMANEJO DEL CULTIVO 650 $aMEJORAMIENTO ANIMAL 650 $aMETEOROLOGIA 650 $aMICROBIOLOGÍA 650 $aOVINOS 650 $aPASTURAS 650 $aPRODUCCIÓN ANIMAL 650 $aPRODUCCION DE LANA 650 $aPRODUCCION DE LECHE 650 $aPRODUCCION LECHERA 650 $aREVISTA INIA 2014 650 $aSEMILLAS 650 $aSOJA 650 $aSUELOS 650 $aSUINOS 650 $aSUSTENTABILIDAD AMBIENTAL 650 $aTECNOLOGÍA 650 $aTRANSFERENCIA DE TECNOLOGIA 650 $aVARIEDADES 650 $aVITICULTURA
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|