| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 225 | |
| 148. |  | SALVO, L.; TERRA, J.A.; AYALA, W.; BERMÚDEZ, R.; CORREA, J.; AVILA, P.; HERNÁNDEZ, J. Impacts of long-term phosphorus fertilization and addition of perennial legumes on temperate natural grassland. II. Total and particulate soil organic carbon. Abstract. ln: International Grassland Congress, 22nd; International Rangeland Congress, 8th. Proceedings. Multifunctional in a changing world. 2008. Hohhot (China): Guangdong People´s Publishing House. v. 1, p. 382 p.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|    |
| 149. | | RICCETTO, S.; MACEDO, I.; GASO, D.; SALDAIN, N.E.; TERRA, J.A. Potencial productivo del cultivo de soja sin limitantes de agua. ln: [JORNADA ANUAL] ARROZ-SOJA, 2015, Treinta y Tres, UY. Resultados experimentales 2014-2015. Treinta y Tres: INIA, 2015. Cap. 6, p. 7-9. (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión; 748)| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 150. | | TERRA, J.A.; CANTOU, G.; OXLEY, A.; FURTADO, I.; BORDAGORRI, P.; SAWCHIK, J. Potencial productivo del cultivo de soja sin limitantes de agua. In: PROGRAMA NACIONAL PRODUCCIÓN DE ARROZ; JORNADA ANUAL ARROZ-SOJA, 2013, INIA TREINTA Y TRES, UY. Arroz-soja: resultados experimentales 2012-2013. Treinta y Tres: INIA, 2013. c. 9, p. 19-21. (Serie Actividades de Difusión, 713).| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 153. | | BERGTOLD, J.S.; TERRA, J.A.; REVEES, D.W.; BALKCOM, K.S.; RAPER, R.L. Profitability and risk asociated with alternative mixtures of high-residues cover crops. ln: Oral Proceedings, Southem Conservation Tillage Systems Conference, Clemson University, 2005, [s.l.]: [s.n.], 2005. p. 113-121| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 154. | | PRAVIA, V.; SAHA, D.; QUINCKE, A.; TERRA, J.A.; KEMANIAN, A.R. Soil carbon saturation controls soil carbon decomposition and carbon retention of decomposing residues. In: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SOIL ORGANIC MATTER (6., 3-7 Sep. 2017, HARPENDER, UK9. Proceedings. Harpender, UK: BSSS, 2017. p. 204 Session 4 a. Mass spectrometry - The key to the soil organic matter "Black Box".| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|  |
| 155. | | PRAVIA, V.; KEMANIAN, A. R.; TERRA, J.A.; SHI, Y.; MACEDO, I.; GOSLEE, S. Soil carbon saturation, productivity, and carbon and nitrogen cycling in crop-pasture rotations. Agricultural Systems, May 2019, volume 171, pages 13-22. Article history: Received 30 December 2017 // Received in revised form 2 November 2018 // Accepted 2 November 2018.
Funding for this work was provided by the Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA-Uruguay) and the USDA-ARS...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 160. | | PÉREZ-BIDEGAIN, M.; HILL, M.; CLERICI, C.; TERRA, J.A.; SAWCHIK, J.; GARCÍA-PRÉCHAC, F. Regulatory utilization of USLE/RUSLE erosion rate estimates in Uruguay: a policy coincident with the UN sustainable development goals. In: Lal, R.; Horn, R.; Kosaki, T., eds. Soil and sustainable development goals. Stuttgar, Germany: Catena-Scheweizerbar. 2018, p. 82-91.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 225 | |
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Treinta y Tres. Por información adicional contacte bibliott@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha actual : |
21/02/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
11/10/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
A - 1 |
|
Autor : |
GARCÍA-PRÉCHAC, F.; ERNST, O.; SIRI-PRIETO, G.; TERRA, J.A. |
|
Afiliación : |
JOSÉ ALFREDO TERRA FERNÁNDEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Integrating no-till into crop-pasture rotations in Uruguay: review. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2004 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Soil & Tillage Research, 2004, v. 77, p. 1-13. |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.still.2003.12.002 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history:Received 21 February 2003 ; received in revised form 27 November 2003 ; accepted 9 December 2003.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2003.12.002 |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract
Crop pasture rotations (CPR) are unusual around the world but have been the predominant cropping system in Uruguay since the 1960s. Uruguay has a temperate sub-humid climate, 80% of its landscape (16 Mha) is climax grasslands C3 and C4 species. Beef, wool, and dairy are the main commodities. Crops occupy a portion of the remaining 20% land area, primarily on Argiudolls and Vertisols, rotated with seeded grass and legume pastures. Continuous cropping (CC) with conventional tillage (CT) has proven unsustainable due to decreased soil productivity. Seeded pasture periods increased soil productivity. CPR adoption created less variable inter-annual economic results, but soil degradation remained a major concern during the crop cycle using CT. Farmers and technicians became interested in no-till (NT) to reduce erosion and production cost. Currently,
approximately 52% of crop producing farms and 25% of dairy farms have adopted NT. This paper synthesizes research results (mainly from long-term experiments) contrasting CC versus CPR with CT (1960?1990) and NT (from 1990). Soil erosion was reduced more than six times with NT in CC, and almost three times in CPR compared with CC using CT; but combining the use of CPR and NT resulted in the same low erosion rate as under natural pasture. The transition from CT to NT is not always easy. The time between herbicide application to pasture and planting of the first crop of the rotation crop cycle with NT is a critical transition factor to optimize N and water availability, and soil tilth. Chiseling or paraplowing can alleviate plow-pans inherited by NT from previous CT; but higher soil strength at the soil surface under NT contributes to better forage utilization
under grazing. Soil organic carbon (SOC) content in CC decreased with CT, and was maintained with NT only if grain was harvested. In CC systems with harvested forage, SOC decreased even with NT. CPR with NT maintained or increased the original SOC content. The paper concludes with a discussion on the relative sustainability of CC versus CPR with NT. Both are sustainable from the soil quality and productivity standpoints. But compared with CC, CPR is a more economically and climatically buffered system, due to higher diversity. Also, CPR systems are more environmentally sustainable since fuel and agrochemicals usage is reduced approximately 50%. MenosAbstract
Crop pasture rotations (CPR) are unusual around the world but have been the predominant cropping system in Uruguay since the 1960s. Uruguay has a temperate sub-humid climate, 80% of its landscape (16 Mha) is climax grasslands C3 and C4 species. Beef, wool, and dairy are the main commodities. Crops occupy a portion of the remaining 20% land area, primarily on Argiudolls and Vertisols, rotated with seeded grass and legume pastures. Continuous cropping (CC) with conventional tillage (CT) has proven unsustainable due to decreased soil productivity. Seeded pasture periods increased soil productivity. CPR adoption created less variable inter-annual economic results, but soil degradation remained a major concern during the crop cycle using CT. Farmers and technicians became interested in no-till (NT) to reduce erosion and production cost. Currently,
approximately 52% of crop producing farms and 25% of dairy farms have adopted NT. This paper synthesizes research results (mainly from long-term experiments) contrasting CC versus CPR with CT (1960?1990) and NT (from 1990). Soil erosion was reduced more than six times with NT in CC, and almost three times in CPR compared with CC using CT; but combining the use of CPR and NT resulted in the same low erosion rate as under natural pasture. The transition from CT to NT is not always easy. The time between herbicide application to pasture and planting of the first crop of the rotation crop cycle with NT is a critical transition fact... Presentar Todo |
|
Thesagro : |
COMPACTACIÓN DEL SUELO; EROSIÓN DEL SUELO; PASTURAS; ROTACION DE CULTIVOS; URUGUAY. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03223naa a2200241 a 4500
001 1032788
005 2019-10-11
008 2004 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.still.2003.12.002$2DOI
100 1 $aGARCÍA-PRÉCHAC, F.
245 $aIntegrating no-till into crop-pasture rotations in Uruguay$breview.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2004
500 $aArticle history:Received 21 February 2003 ; received in revised form 27 November 2003 ; accepted 9 December 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2003.12.002
520 $aAbstract Crop pasture rotations (CPR) are unusual around the world but have been the predominant cropping system in Uruguay since the 1960s. Uruguay has a temperate sub-humid climate, 80% of its landscape (16 Mha) is climax grasslands C3 and C4 species. Beef, wool, and dairy are the main commodities. Crops occupy a portion of the remaining 20% land area, primarily on Argiudolls and Vertisols, rotated with seeded grass and legume pastures. Continuous cropping (CC) with conventional tillage (CT) has proven unsustainable due to decreased soil productivity. Seeded pasture periods increased soil productivity. CPR adoption created less variable inter-annual economic results, but soil degradation remained a major concern during the crop cycle using CT. Farmers and technicians became interested in no-till (NT) to reduce erosion and production cost. Currently, approximately 52% of crop producing farms and 25% of dairy farms have adopted NT. This paper synthesizes research results (mainly from long-term experiments) contrasting CC versus CPR with CT (1960?1990) and NT (from 1990). Soil erosion was reduced more than six times with NT in CC, and almost three times in CPR compared with CC using CT; but combining the use of CPR and NT resulted in the same low erosion rate as under natural pasture. The transition from CT to NT is not always easy. The time between herbicide application to pasture and planting of the first crop of the rotation crop cycle with NT is a critical transition factor to optimize N and water availability, and soil tilth. Chiseling or paraplowing can alleviate plow-pans inherited by NT from previous CT; but higher soil strength at the soil surface under NT contributes to better forage utilization under grazing. Soil organic carbon (SOC) content in CC decreased with CT, and was maintained with NT only if grain was harvested. In CC systems with harvested forage, SOC decreased even with NT. CPR with NT maintained or increased the original SOC content. The paper concludes with a discussion on the relative sustainability of CC versus CPR with NT. Both are sustainable from the soil quality and productivity standpoints. But compared with CC, CPR is a more economically and climatically buffered system, due to higher diversity. Also, CPR systems are more environmentally sustainable since fuel and agrochemicals usage is reduced approximately 50%.
650 $aCOMPACTACIÓN DEL SUELO
650 $aEROSIÓN DEL SUELO
650 $aPASTURAS
650 $aROTACION DE CULTIVOS
650 $aURUGUAY
700 1 $aERNST, O.
700 1 $aSIRI-PRIETO, G.
700 1 $aTERRA, J.A.
773 $tSoil & Tillage Research, 2004$gv. 77, p. 1-13.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
