|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
Fecha : |
02/08/2016 |
Actualizado : |
29/10/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Documentos |
Autor : |
BENNADJI, Z. |
Afiliación : |
ZOHRA BENNADJI SOUALHIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Elección y uso de semillas forestales de calidad: un proceso factible en Uruguay.[2005]. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2005 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Suplemento Tecnológico INIA, 2005, p. 10-11. |
Idioma : |
Español |
Palabras claves : |
EUCALIPTO; EUCALIPTUS; EUCALYPTUS GRANDIS. |
Thesagro : |
EUCALYPTUS GLOBULUS; FORESTACIÓN; PINUS; SEMILLAS. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/5831/1/Suplemento-Tecnologico-ExpoPrado-2005.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 00548nam a2200181 a 4500 001 1055142 005 2019-10-29 008 2005 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d 100 1 $aBENNADJI, Z. 245 $aElección y uso de semillas forestales de calidad$bun proceso factible en Uruguay.[2005].$h[electronic resource] 260 $aSuplemento Tecnológico INIA, 2005, p. 10-11.$c2005 650 $aEUCALYPTUS GLOBULUS 650 $aFORESTACIÓN 650 $aPINUS 650 $aSEMILLAS 653 $aEUCALIPTO 653 $aEUCALIPTUS 653 $aEUCALYPTUS GRANDIS
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Tacuarembó. Por información adicional contacte bibliotb@tb.inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
Fecha actual : |
27/08/2018 |
Actualizado : |
25/02/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
MIRABALLES, C.; RIET-CORREA, F. |
Afiliación : |
MÓNICA MIRABALLES FERRER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FRANKLIN RIET-CORREA AMARAL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
A review of the history of research and control of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis in Uruguay. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Experimental and Applied Acarology, 2018, v. 75, no. 4, p. 383-398. |
DOI : |
10.1007/s10493-018-0278-3 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 13 May 2018 / Accepted: 30 July 2018. |
Contenido : |
Abstract: In Uruguay, control of Rhipicephalus microplus began in 1910. In 1941 the eradication of R. micoplus throughout the country was declared mandatory, although this attempt was unsuccessful. Since 2008 the country was divided into two regions: the south-western region, which is free of ticks; and a region of tick control that includes all departments to the north of the Rio Negro and five departments in the eastern region. In Uruguay, investigations on R. microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis started in 1921, and in the 1970s, studies of the epidemiology of R. microplus determined that from 2 to 3.5 generations can be produced annually and that the country is in an area of enzootic instability for babesiosis and anaplasmosis. Knowledge of tick epidemiology and of tick resistance to different acaricides led to the development of efficient methods of control or eradication, including integrated control and generational treatment. Although research results have led to a legal framework regarding R. microplus control, these measures have had variable results. This can be attributed to several factors, such as the discontinuation of the control measures,
variable financial resources, changes in the dynamics of livestock movement, failure to adopt available technology for tick control by farmers, climate change, environmental alterations such as forestation and the increasing resistance of ticks to acaricides, which led to the development of multiresistant ticks. This paper reviews the history of R. microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis in Uruguay and proposes alternatives for their control. MenosAbstract: In Uruguay, control of Rhipicephalus microplus began in 1910. In 1941 the eradication of R. micoplus throughout the country was declared mandatory, although this attempt was unsuccessful. Since 2008 the country was divided into two regions: the south-western region, which is free of ticks; and a region of tick control that includes all departments to the north of the Rio Negro and five departments in the eastern region. In Uruguay, investigations on R. microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis started in 1921, and in the 1970s, studies of the epidemiology of R. microplus determined that from 2 to 3.5 generations can be produced annually and that the country is in an area of enzootic instability for babesiosis and anaplasmosis. Knowledge of tick epidemiology and of tick resistance to different acaricides led to the development of efficient methods of control or eradication, including integrated control and generational treatment. Although research results have led to a legal framework regarding R. microplus control, these measures have had variable results. This can be attributed to several factors, such as the discontinuation of the control measures,
variable financial resources, changes in the dynamics of livestock movement, failure to adopt available technology for tick control by farmers, climate change, environmental alterations such as forestation and the increasing resistance of ticks to acaricides, which led to the development of multiresistant ticks. This pape... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
ANAPLAMOSIS; BABESIOSIS; CATTLE TICK; CONTROL. |
Thesagro : |
URUGUAY. |
Asunto categoría : |
L73 Enfermedades de los animales |
Marc : |
LEADER 02354naa a2200217 a 4500 001 1058946 005 2019-02-25 008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1007/s10493-018-0278-3$2DOI 100 1 $aMIRABALLES, C. 245 $aA review of the history of research and control of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis in Uruguay.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2018 500 $aArticle history: Received: 13 May 2018 / Accepted: 30 July 2018. 520 $aAbstract: In Uruguay, control of Rhipicephalus microplus began in 1910. In 1941 the eradication of R. micoplus throughout the country was declared mandatory, although this attempt was unsuccessful. Since 2008 the country was divided into two regions: the south-western region, which is free of ticks; and a region of tick control that includes all departments to the north of the Rio Negro and five departments in the eastern region. In Uruguay, investigations on R. microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis started in 1921, and in the 1970s, studies of the epidemiology of R. microplus determined that from 2 to 3.5 generations can be produced annually and that the country is in an area of enzootic instability for babesiosis and anaplasmosis. Knowledge of tick epidemiology and of tick resistance to different acaricides led to the development of efficient methods of control or eradication, including integrated control and generational treatment. Although research results have led to a legal framework regarding R. microplus control, these measures have had variable results. This can be attributed to several factors, such as the discontinuation of the control measures, variable financial resources, changes in the dynamics of livestock movement, failure to adopt available technology for tick control by farmers, climate change, environmental alterations such as forestation and the increasing resistance of ticks to acaricides, which led to the development of multiresistant ticks. This paper reviews the history of R. microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis in Uruguay and proposes alternatives for their control. 650 $aURUGUAY 653 $aANAPLAMOSIS 653 $aBABESIOSIS 653 $aCATTLE TICK 653 $aCONTROL 700 1 $aRIET-CORREA, F. 773 $tExperimental and Applied Acarology, 2018$gv. 75, no. 4, p. 383-398.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|