| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
15/11/2015 |
|
Actualizado : |
15/11/2015 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Nacionales |
|
Autor : |
BERRUETA, C.; DOGLIOTTI, S.; FRANCO, J. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARIA CECILIA BERRUETA MOREIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Análisis y jerarquización de factores determinantes del rendimiento de tomate para industria en Uruguay. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2012 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agrociencia Uruguay, 2012, v.16, no.2, p. 39-48. |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Contenido : |
RESUMEN.
El rendimiento potencial del cultivo de tomate para industria en el Uruguay según experimentos en el país es de 90 Mg ha-1. En contraposición, la productividad promedio del cultivo a nivel comercial no supera los 50 Mg ha-1. Este trabajo tiene por objetivo determinar cuales son las causas principales que determinan las diferencias de rendimiento entre productores de tomate para industria, estableciendo un orden jerárquico de factores determinantes. Para esto, se realizó un análisis de los factores que afectaron el rendimiento en los sistemas de producción en la zafra 2007/08. La metodología se basó en un muestreo estratificado de productores. Se formó una muestra de 22 productores, en los cuales se relevaron variables relacionadas al sistema de producción, al sistema de manejo y se midió el rendimiento. Dichas variables se clasificaron en niveles para realizar el análisis de varianza y las que resultaron significativas se incluyeron en un modelo mixto. A partir del análisis, se concluyó que la variable que explicó en mayor medida las diferencias en rendimiento para la zafra en estudio fue el agua disponible (43% de la variación total). La aplicación de cama de pollo siguió en importancia y explicó el 21% de la variación de rendimiento. Otras variables significativas fueron la densidad de plantas y la variedad.
SUMMARY. Analysis and Hierarchy of Yield Determinant Factors on Tomato for Processing in Uruguay.
The potential yield of tomato crops grown for processing in Uruguay is 90 Mg ha-1, according to experiments in the country. In contrast, the average productivity of commercial farmers does not exceed 50 Mg ha-1. This study aims to explain the main causes of the differences in yield among growers of tomato for processing, establishing a hierarchical order of the determinant factors. For this, we performed an analysis of factors affecting performance in production systems in 2007/08 harvest. The methodology was based on a stratified sample of producers. Within this sample of 22 farmers, we measured and collected information on several variables related to the farming systems, the crop management systems and the performance of the crop. These variables were classified into levels for the analysis of variance, and the ones that were significant were included in a mixed model. From this analysis, we concluded that the variable that explained further the differences in yield for the crop under study was the water available (43% of total variation). The application of poultry litter followed in importance and explained 21% of yield variation. Other significant variables were plant density and variety. MenosRESUMEN.
El rendimiento potencial del cultivo de tomate para industria en el Uruguay según experimentos en el país es de 90 Mg ha-1. En contraposición, la productividad promedio del cultivo a nivel comercial no supera los 50 Mg ha-1. Este trabajo tiene por objetivo determinar cuales son las causas principales que determinan las diferencias de rendimiento entre productores de tomate para industria, estableciendo un orden jerárquico de factores determinantes. Para esto, se realizó un análisis de los factores que afectaron el rendimiento en los sistemas de producción en la zafra 2007/08. La metodología se basó en un muestreo estratificado de productores. Se formó una muestra de 22 productores, en los cuales se relevaron variables relacionadas al sistema de producción, al sistema de manejo y se midió el rendimiento. Dichas variables se clasificaron en niveles para realizar el análisis de varianza y las que resultaron significativas se incluyeron en un modelo mixto. A partir del análisis, se concluyó que la variable que explicó en mayor medida las diferencias en rendimiento para la zafra en estudio fue el agua disponible (43% de la variación total). La aplicación de cama de pollo siguió en importancia y explicó el 21% de la variación de rendimiento. Otras variables significativas fueron la densidad de plantas y la variedad.
SUMMARY. Analysis and Hierarchy of Yield Determinant Factors on Tomato for Processing in Uruguay.
The potential yield of tomato crops grown for processing ... Presentar Todo |
|
Thesagro : |
BRECHAS DE RENDIMIENTO; CAMA DE POLLO; DEFICIT HIDRICO; SISTEMAS DE CULTIVO; SOLANUM LYCOPERSICUM; TOMATE. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/5207/1/Berrueta-C.-2012.-Agrociencia-v.162-p.39-48.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03307naa a2200217 a 4500
001 1053904
005 2015-11-15
008 2012 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aBERRUETA, C.
245 $aAnálisis y jerarquización de factores determinantes del rendimiento de tomate para industria en Uruguay.
260 $c2012
520 $aRESUMEN. El rendimiento potencial del cultivo de tomate para industria en el Uruguay según experimentos en el país es de 90 Mg ha-1. En contraposición, la productividad promedio del cultivo a nivel comercial no supera los 50 Mg ha-1. Este trabajo tiene por objetivo determinar cuales son las causas principales que determinan las diferencias de rendimiento entre productores de tomate para industria, estableciendo un orden jerárquico de factores determinantes. Para esto, se realizó un análisis de los factores que afectaron el rendimiento en los sistemas de producción en la zafra 2007/08. La metodología se basó en un muestreo estratificado de productores. Se formó una muestra de 22 productores, en los cuales se relevaron variables relacionadas al sistema de producción, al sistema de manejo y se midió el rendimiento. Dichas variables se clasificaron en niveles para realizar el análisis de varianza y las que resultaron significativas se incluyeron en un modelo mixto. A partir del análisis, se concluyó que la variable que explicó en mayor medida las diferencias en rendimiento para la zafra en estudio fue el agua disponible (43% de la variación total). La aplicación de cama de pollo siguió en importancia y explicó el 21% de la variación de rendimiento. Otras variables significativas fueron la densidad de plantas y la variedad. SUMMARY. Analysis and Hierarchy of Yield Determinant Factors on Tomato for Processing in Uruguay. The potential yield of tomato crops grown for processing in Uruguay is 90 Mg ha-1, according to experiments in the country. In contrast, the average productivity of commercial farmers does not exceed 50 Mg ha-1. This study aims to explain the main causes of the differences in yield among growers of tomato for processing, establishing a hierarchical order of the determinant factors. For this, we performed an analysis of factors affecting performance in production systems in 2007/08 harvest. The methodology was based on a stratified sample of producers. Within this sample of 22 farmers, we measured and collected information on several variables related to the farming systems, the crop management systems and the performance of the crop. These variables were classified into levels for the analysis of variance, and the ones that were significant were included in a mixed model. From this analysis, we concluded that the variable that explained further the differences in yield for the crop under study was the water available (43% of total variation). The application of poultry litter followed in importance and explained 21% of yield variation. Other significant variables were plant density and variety.
650 $aBRECHAS DE RENDIMIENTO
650 $aCAMA DE POLLO
650 $aDEFICIT HIDRICO
650 $aSISTEMAS DE CULTIVO
650 $aSOLANUM LYCOPERSICUM
650 $aTOMATE
700 1 $aDOGLIOTTI, S.
700 1 $aFRANCO, J.
773 $tAgrociencia Uruguay, 2012$gv.16, no.2, p. 39-48.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Treinta y Tres. Por información adicional contacte bibliott@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha actual : |
12/09/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
29/01/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
B - 1 |
|
Autor : |
UNGERFELD, R.; QUINTANS, G.; ENRÍQUEZ, D.H.; HÖTZEL, M.J. |
|
Afiliación : |
GRACIELA QUINTANS ILARIA, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Behavioural changes at weaning in 6-month-old beef calves reared by cows of high or low milk yield. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2009 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Animal Production Science, 2009, v. 49, no. 8, p. 637-642. |
|
DOI : |
10.1071/AN09037 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Manuscript received 5 March 2009, accepted 9 May 2009. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract:
The objective of this experiment was to determine the differences in behavioural changes observed in 6-month-old beef calves at weaning in relation to milk yield availability from their dams. Eighteen Hereford or Hereford· Angus crossbred primiparous cows from a single herd remained with their calves suckling until the beginning of the experiment (194.1 1.9 days after calving). On day 0, calves were moved to a 100-m2 corral far from their mothers, which were taken to a field more than 1000 m away, and returned to the original paddock on day 1. Milk production was determined monthly during the lactation period in 14 of the 18 cows. Calves? behaviour was recorded using instantaneous sampling of individual animals in each group every 10 min from 0800 to 0950, 1200 to 1350, and 1600 to 1750 hours. Recordings were performed from day ?3 to day 5, except on day 0. The calves from the five cows with higher milk yield (HMY) and the calves from the five cows with lower milk yield (LMY) were considered for data analysis. Milk yield was greater in HMY than LMY cows throughout all the lactation. HMY calves tended to suckle more frequently than LMY calves. There were no differences in average daily gain after weaning between HMY and LMY calves. However, HMY calves were heavier at weaning than LMY calves. The frequency of grazing, ruminating, walking and standing differed between HMY and LMY calves, and was affected by weaning. For example, calves from HMY cows spent less time grazing before and after weaning than calves from LMY cows. There were also interactions between group and time on the frequency of these behaviours. Overall, we conclude that the behaviour of 6-month-old beef calves at weaning differed according to their mothers? milk yield, and their developmental growth stage. MenosAbstract:
The objective of this experiment was to determine the differences in behavioural changes observed in 6-month-old beef calves at weaning in relation to milk yield availability from their dams. Eighteen Hereford or Hereford· Angus crossbred primiparous cows from a single herd remained with their calves suckling until the beginning of the experiment (194.1 1.9 days after calving). On day 0, calves were moved to a 100-m2 corral far from their mothers, which were taken to a field more than 1000 m away, and returned to the original paddock on day 1. Milk production was determined monthly during the lactation period in 14 of the 18 cows. Calves? behaviour was recorded using instantaneous sampling of individual animals in each group every 10 min from 0800 to 0950, 1200 to 1350, and 1600 to 1750 hours. Recordings were performed from day ?3 to day 5, except on day 0. The calves from the five cows with higher milk yield (HMY) and the calves from the five cows with lower milk yield (LMY) were considered for data analysis. Milk yield was greater in HMY than LMY cows throughout all the lactation. HMY calves tended to suckle more frequently than LMY calves. There were no differences in average daily gain after weaning between HMY and LMY calves. However, HMY calves were heavier at weaning than LMY calves. The frequency of grazing, ruminating, walking and standing differed between HMY and LMY calves, and was affected by weaning. For example, calves from HMY cows spent less time g... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
BEEF CALVES. |
|
Thesagro : |
DESTETE PRECOZ; GANADO LECHERO; TERNEROS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L02 Alimentación animal |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02548naa a2200229 a 4500
001 1050221
005 2020-01-29
008 2009 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1071/AN09037$2DOI
100 1 $aUNGERFELD, R.
245 $aBehavioural changes at weaning in 6-month-old beef calves reared by cows of high or low milk yield.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2009
500 $aArticle history: Manuscript received 5 March 2009, accepted 9 May 2009.
520 $aAbstract: The objective of this experiment was to determine the differences in behavioural changes observed in 6-month-old beef calves at weaning in relation to milk yield availability from their dams. Eighteen Hereford or Hereford· Angus crossbred primiparous cows from a single herd remained with their calves suckling until the beginning of the experiment (194.1 1.9 days after calving). On day 0, calves were moved to a 100-m2 corral far from their mothers, which were taken to a field more than 1000 m away, and returned to the original paddock on day 1. Milk production was determined monthly during the lactation period in 14 of the 18 cows. Calves? behaviour was recorded using instantaneous sampling of individual animals in each group every 10 min from 0800 to 0950, 1200 to 1350, and 1600 to 1750 hours. Recordings were performed from day ?3 to day 5, except on day 0. The calves from the five cows with higher milk yield (HMY) and the calves from the five cows with lower milk yield (LMY) were considered for data analysis. Milk yield was greater in HMY than LMY cows throughout all the lactation. HMY calves tended to suckle more frequently than LMY calves. There were no differences in average daily gain after weaning between HMY and LMY calves. However, HMY calves were heavier at weaning than LMY calves. The frequency of grazing, ruminating, walking and standing differed between HMY and LMY calves, and was affected by weaning. For example, calves from HMY cows spent less time grazing before and after weaning than calves from LMY cows. There were also interactions between group and time on the frequency of these behaviours. Overall, we conclude that the behaviour of 6-month-old beef calves at weaning differed according to their mothers? milk yield, and their developmental growth stage.
650 $aDESTETE PRECOZ
650 $aGANADO LECHERO
650 $aTERNEROS
653 $aBEEF CALVES
700 1 $aQUINTANS, G.
700 1 $aENRÍQUEZ, D.H.
700 1 $aHÖTZEL, M.J.
773 $tAnimal Production Science, 2009$gv. 49, no. 8, p. 637-642.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
