|
|
Registros recuperados : 5,421 | |
221. | | MONTOSSI, F.; DE BARBIERI, I.; RAMOS, Z.; MEDEROS, A.; PÉREZ JONES, J.; DONAGARAY, F.; FROS, O.; DUTRA, F.; FROS, A.; GRATTAROLA, M.; GIMENO, D.; CIAPPESONI, G. Veinte años de una innovación institucional para el beneficio de la cadena textil-lanera del Uruguay. [Resumen]. In: CONGRESO ASOCIACIÓN URUGUAYA DE PRODUCCIÓN ANIMAL (6º, Marzo, 2018, Tacuarembó, Uruguay). Resúmenes. Tacuarembó: AUPA, 2018. p. 39Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
223. | | CABRERA, D.; RODRIGUEZ, P.; UBERTI, A.; ZOPPOLO, R.; CONIBERTI, A.; DISEGNA, E. Williams pear (Pyrus communis L.) productivity and fruit quality, grafted onto different rootstocks. [abstract of poster] In: Zoppolo, R. Cabrera, D. (Eds.). Growing in diversity. Proceedings of the International Pear Symposium, 13, Dec. 4-7th 2018, Montevideo, Uruguay. p. 84.Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
227. | | PEREYRA, S.; GERMAN, S.; GONZÁLEZ, S.N.; CASTRO, A.; GAMBA, F.; GUTIERREZ, L. Advances in the integrated management of leaf blotches in Uruguay. In: International Workshop on Barley Leaf Diseases , 2o. Rabat, Morocco: The International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), April 5-7, 2017. p. 46.Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
234. | | RAMÍREZ, N.; SIMETO, S.; BALMELLI, G.; BENTANCUR, O.; DUONG, T.; WINGFIELD, M.; PÉREZ, C.A. Caracterización de la población de Teratosphaeria pseudoeucalypti, patógeno del eucalipto recientemente introducido a Uruguay // Population structure of Teratosphaeria pseudoeucalypti, a eucalypts pathogen recently introduced to Uruguay. In: Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánia, 2017, v. 52, p. 309, Córdoba, Argentina. Jornadas Argentinas de Botánica, 36., Mendoza, 18-22 de setiembre, 2017.Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
235. | | RAMÍREZ, N.; SIMETO, S.; BALMELLI, G.; BENTANCUR, O.; WINGFIELD, M.; PÉREZ, C.A. Caracterización de la población de Teratosphaeria pseudoeucalypti y evaluación de resistencia genética en germoplasmas de interés para el sector agroforestal de Uruguay. [Presentación oral]. In: Jornadas Argentinas, 3., Binacionales de Sanidad Forestal, 1., Universidad Nacional de Luján, 10 de Agosto, 2017Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
238. | | FAGHERAZZI, A.F.; KRESTZSCHMAR. A.A.; MACEDO, T.A.; VIGNOLO, G.K.; ANTUNES, L.E.C.; KIRSCHBAUM, D.S.; GIMÉNEZ, G.; ZOPPOLO, R.; JOFRE, F.; RUFATO, L. La coltivazione dei piccoli frutti in Sud America: non solo mirtilli. Economia e Tecnica. Rivista di Frutticoltura e Ortofloricoltura, 2017, v.44 (7-8): 44-47.Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
239. | | VICENTE-SERRANO, S.M.; BIDEGAIN, M.; TOMAS-BURGUERA, M.; DOMÍNGUEZ-CASTRO, F.; EL KENAWY, A.; MCVICAR, T.R.; AZORIN-MOLINA, C.; LÓPEZ-MORENO, J.I.; NIETO, R.; GIMENO, L.; GIMÉNEZ, A. A comparison of temporal variability of observed and model-based pan evaporation over Uruguay (1973?2014). International Journal of Climatology, 2017 Article history: Received 16 March 2017; Revised 8 May 2017; Accepted 23 May 2017Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 5,421 | |
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
07/03/2022 |
Actualizado : |
30/11/2022 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
VASEN, F.; SIERRA, M. |
Afiliación : |
FEDERICO VASEN, Universidad de Buenos Aires-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; MIGUEL OSCAR SIERRA PEREIRO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
"The Hardest Task"-peer review and the evaluation of technological activities. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Minerva, 2022, Volume 60, Issue 3, pages 375-395. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09461-0 |
ISSN : |
0026-4695 (print); 1573-1871 (electronic) |
DOI : |
10.1007/s11024-022-09461-0 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Accepted 24 January 2022; Published 07 March 2022; To be published September 2022. -- Corresponding author: Federico Vasen, fvasen@uba.ar ---
This work was supported by Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria and Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica [grant PICT2018-2794]. |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- Technology development and innovation are fundamentally different from scientific research. However, in many circumstances, they are evaluated jointly and by the same processes. In these cases, peer review -the most usual procedure for evaluating research - is also applied to the evaluation of technological products and innovation activities. This can lead to unfair results and end up discouraging the involvement of researchers in these fields. This paper analyzes the evaluation processes in Uruguay's National System of Researchers. In this system, all members' activities, both scientific and technological, are evaluated by peer committees. Based on documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews, the difficulties faced by evaluators in assessing technology products are explored. The article highlights the persistence of a linear conception of the link between science and technology and describes the obstacles to assimilate the particularities of technological activities. Refereed publications are presented as the only uncontested product. Other types of output are reviewed with suspicion. This study emphasizes the need for specific mechanisms to evaluate technological production within academic careers.
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022 |
Palabras claves : |
Latin America; National system of researchers; Peer review; Research evaluation; Technological outputs; Uruguay. |
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
Marc : |
LEADER 02398naa a2200241 a 4500 001 1062792 005 2022-11-30 008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0026-4695 (print); 1573-1871 (electronic) 024 7 $a10.1007/s11024-022-09461-0$2DOI 100 1 $aVASEN, F. 245 $a"The Hardest Task"-peer review and the evaluation of technological activities.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2022 500 $aArticle history: Accepted 24 January 2022; Published 07 March 2022; To be published September 2022. -- Corresponding author: Federico Vasen, fvasen@uba.ar --- This work was supported by Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria and Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica [grant PICT2018-2794]. 520 $aABSTRACT.- Technology development and innovation are fundamentally different from scientific research. However, in many circumstances, they are evaluated jointly and by the same processes. In these cases, peer review -the most usual procedure for evaluating research - is also applied to the evaluation of technological products and innovation activities. This can lead to unfair results and end up discouraging the involvement of researchers in these fields. This paper analyzes the evaluation processes in Uruguay's National System of Researchers. In this system, all members' activities, both scientific and technological, are evaluated by peer committees. Based on documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews, the difficulties faced by evaluators in assessing technology products are explored. The article highlights the persistence of a linear conception of the link between science and technology and describes the obstacles to assimilate the particularities of technological activities. Refereed publications are presented as the only uncontested product. Other types of output are reviewed with suspicion. This study emphasizes the need for specific mechanisms to evaluate technological production within academic careers. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022 653 $aLatin America 653 $aNational system of researchers 653 $aPeer review 653 $aResearch evaluation 653 $aTechnological outputs 653 $aUruguay 700 1 $aSIERRA, M. 773 $tMinerva, 2022, Volume 60, Issue 3, pages 375-395. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09461-0
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|