| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
24/11/2022 |
|
Actualizado : |
25/11/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
SOSA , M.C.; LUTZ, M.C.; LÓDOLO, X.; BASSO, C. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARÍA CRISTINA SOSA, Lab. Fitopatología, Inst. Biotecnología Agropecuaria del Comahue (IBAC), Fac. Ciencias Agrarias, CITAAC-CONICET - Univ. Nac. del Comahue, Río Negro, Argentina; Fac. Ciencias Agrarias, Univ. Nac. Del Comahue, Río Negro, Argentina.; MARÍA CECILIA LUTZ, Lab. Fitopatología, Inst. Biotecnología Agropecuaria del Comahue (IBAC), Fac. Ciencias Agrarias, CITAAC-CONICET - Univ. Nac. del Comahue, Río Negro, Argentina; Fac. Ciencias Agrarias, Univ. Nac. Del Comahue, Río Negro, Argentina.; XIMENA LÓDOLO, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Cinco Saltos, Río Negro, Argentina; CARLA NAHIR BASSO, Laboratorio de Fitopatología, Instituto de Biotecnología Agropecuaria del Comahue (IBAC), Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, CITAA C CONICET – Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Cinco Saltos, Río Negro, Argentina. |
|
Título : |
In vitro and in vivo activity of chemical fungicides and a biofungicide for the control of wood diseases caused by botryosphaeriales fungi in apple and pear. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
International Journal of Pest Management, 2022, vol. 68, issue 4: "Uruguayan Society of Phytopathology (SUFIT): Plant protection for a sustainable agriculture", p.328-338. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2022.2116660 |
|
ISSN : |
1366-5863 (online) |
|
DOI : |
10.1080/09670874.2022.2116660 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 17 Mar 2022, Accepted 19 August 2022, Published online: 11 November 2022. -- Funding: This work was supported by Secretaría de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad Nacional del Comahue (PIA 04/118 and PIA 04/136), Neuquén, Argentina. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- Dieback and canker disease caused by species of Botryosphaeriales affect the productivity of pome fruit orchards. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of fungicides and biofungicide for controlling canker and dieback diseases in apple and pear using in vitro and field trials. Isolates of Diplodia seriata, D. mutila, and Dothiorella omnivora from apple, and of D. seriata and Aplosporella aquifolii from pear were used. Cercobin® (thiophanate-methyl), followed by Bellis® (pyraclostrobin + boscalid), and Nativo® (tebuconazole + trifloxystrobin) inhibited mycelial growth, conidial germination and pycnidia formation in vitro in all fungal isolates. T. harzianum produced mycelial growth inhibition and mycoparasitism in dual culture assays. Thiophanate-methyl and T. harzianum fully inhibited pycnidia production, while pyraclostrobin + boscalid and tebuconazole + trifloxystrobin were most effective against conidia germination. In the orchard assays, protective sprays of the fungicides on pruning wounds reduced incidence by up to 20%, while T. harzianum and tebuconazole + trifloxystrobin reduced the lesion severity up 37 and 41%, respectively. This study represents the first evaluation of fungicides and biofungicide effectiveness for the control of canker and dieback diseases of apples and pears in Argentina. © 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group |
|
Palabras claves : |
Aplosporella; Control; Diplodia; Dothiorella; Fungicides; Trichoderma harzianum. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
H20 Enfermedades de las plantas |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02635naa a2200265 a 4500
001 1063779
005 2022-11-25
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1366-5863 (online)
024 7 $a10.1080/09670874.2022.2116660$2DOI
100 1 $aSOSA , M.C.
245 $aIn vitro and in vivo activity of chemical fungicides and a biofungicide for the control of wood diseases caused by botryosphaeriales fungi in apple and pear.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aArticle history: Received 17 Mar 2022, Accepted 19 August 2022, Published online: 11 November 2022. -- Funding: This work was supported by Secretaría de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad Nacional del Comahue (PIA 04/118 and PIA 04/136), Neuquén, Argentina.
520 $aABSTRACT.- Dieback and canker disease caused by species of Botryosphaeriales affect the productivity of pome fruit orchards. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of fungicides and biofungicide for controlling canker and dieback diseases in apple and pear using in vitro and field trials. Isolates of Diplodia seriata, D. mutila, and Dothiorella omnivora from apple, and of D. seriata and Aplosporella aquifolii from pear were used. Cercobin® (thiophanate-methyl), followed by Bellis® (pyraclostrobin + boscalid), and Nativo® (tebuconazole + trifloxystrobin) inhibited mycelial growth, conidial germination and pycnidia formation in vitro in all fungal isolates. T. harzianum produced mycelial growth inhibition and mycoparasitism in dual culture assays. Thiophanate-methyl and T. harzianum fully inhibited pycnidia production, while pyraclostrobin + boscalid and tebuconazole + trifloxystrobin were most effective against conidia germination. In the orchard assays, protective sprays of the fungicides on pruning wounds reduced incidence by up to 20%, while T. harzianum and tebuconazole + trifloxystrobin reduced the lesion severity up 37 and 41%, respectively. This study represents the first evaluation of fungicides and biofungicide effectiveness for the control of canker and dieback diseases of apples and pears in Argentina. © 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
653 $aAplosporella
653 $aControl
653 $aDiplodia
653 $aDothiorella
653 $aFungicides
653 $aTrichoderma harzianum
700 1 $aLUTZ, M.C.
700 1 $aLÓDOLO, X.
700 1 $aBASSO, C.
773 $tInternational Journal of Pest Management, 2022, vol. 68, issue 4: "Uruguayan Society of Phytopathology (SUFIT): Plant protection for a sustainable agriculture", p.328-338. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2022.2116660
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
04/02/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
04/02/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
B - 1 |
|
Autor : |
DEBLITZ, C.; BORBELY, C.; CHARRY, A.A.; COSTA, F.P.; VON DAVIER, Z.; FERNANDEZ, E.; GRABNER, R.; HASHMI, A.H.; IZQUIERDO, L.; JAKOBE, P.; KLAPKA, J.; MAHMOOD, K.; OSTROWSKI, B.; PARTON. K.; PEREIRA, M.; RAS, C.H.; REYES, E.; RICHARDSON, J.W.; SARZEAUD, P.; SWITLYK, M.; SZABO, K.; THORNE, F.; WILCZYNSKI, A. |
|
Afiliación : |
C. DEBLITZ, Institute of Farm Economics, FAL, Bundesallee 50, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany; C. BORBELY, University of Kaposvár, Kaposvár, Hungary; A. A. CHARRY, University of Sydney, Faculty of Rural Management, Orange, NSW, Australia; F. P. COSTA, EMBRAPA Gado de Corte, Embrapa Beef Cattle, Campo Grande, Brazil; Z. VON DAVIER, FAL Fed. Agric. Research Centre, Institute of Farm Economics, Braunschweig, Germany; ENRIQUE GENARO FERNANDEZ RODRIGUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; R. GRABNER, Chamber of Agriculture Styria, Weiz, Austria; A. H. HASHMI, Small and Medium Entpr. Devmt. Auth., Pakistan; L. IZQUIERDO, FAL Fed. Agric. Research Centre, Institute of Farm Economics, Braunschweig, Germany; P. JAKOBE, Res. Inst. of Agricultural Economics, Praha, Czech Republic; J. KLAPKA, J., Agricultural Research Institute, Kromeríz, Czech Republic; K. MAHMOOD, Agric. Policy Studies Institute, Lahore, Pakistan; B. OSTROWSKI, Cátedra de Admin. Rural, Facultad de Agronomia, Universidad Buenos Aires (UBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina; K. PARTON, University of Sydney, Faculty of Rural Management, Orange, NSW, Australia; M. PEREIRA, EMBRAPA Gado de Corte, Embrapa Beef Cattle, Campo Grande, Brazil; C. H. RAS, Cátedra de Admin. Rural, Facultad de Agronomia, Universidad Buenos Aires (UBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina; E. REYES, Animal Health and Livestock Services, TRAGSEGA, Madrid, Spain; J. W. RICHARDSON, Texas A and M University, Agricultural Food Policy Centre, Department of Agricultural Economics, College Station, TX, United States; P. SARZEAUD, Dept. Action Régionale, Institut de l'Élevage, Rennes, France; M. SWITLYK, University of Szczecin, Institute of Management, Szczecin, Poland; K. SZABO, University of Kaposvár, Kaposvár, Hungary; F. THORNE, TEAGASC, Dublin, Ireland; A. WILCZYNSKI, University of Szczecin, Institute of Management, Szczecin, Poland. |
|
Título : |
Status quo and prospects of beef production world-wide. (Review) |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2004 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Landbauforschung Völkenrode, December 2004, Volume 54, Issue 4, Pages 237-249. |
|
Descripción física : |
2-s2.0-9944252565 |
|
ISSN : |
0458-6859 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
The purpose of this paper is to provide an idea about the market shares of important beef producers, to analyse the competitive situation of beef production on the farm-level and to assess the potential of beef production in a worldwide context. The global players in beef production are North America, Brazil, Argentina, Australia and the EU-25. In value-terms, the main exporters are North America, Australia, Brazil and Argentina. Main importers are again North America, Japan and the Far East. Within the framework of the International Farm Comparison Network (IFCN), and using harmonised methods for analysis, a total of 29 typical beef finishing farms in 15 important beef producing countries were analysed. The farms show significant differences in production systems and productivity levels. The highest cost of beef production is found in the EU-countries (US$ 350-500 per 100 kg carcass weight), the lowest in Argentina, Uruguay and Pakistan (US$ 100-130). In the case of trade liberalisation, farms with low cost of production have an incentive to export to markets with higher price levels. The potential to increase production depends on numerous factors, amongst them the availability of additional land, the possibilities to intensify production and the competition with other land uses. The development of beef production in the EU is mainly determined by the impact of the latest CAP-reform. In many countries (like Brazil, the U.S., Canada and Australia) the main potential lays in intensification rather than making additional land resources available for beef production. In the next ten years, a world-wide increase of beef production as well as world trade can be expected. In some countries the increases of production are likely to be at least partially offset by consumption in the short term (China) or over the long term (Brazil). MenosABSTRACT.
The purpose of this paper is to provide an idea about the market shares of important beef producers, to analyse the competitive situation of beef production on the farm-level and to assess the potential of beef production in a worldwide context. The global players in beef production are North America, Brazil, Argentina, Australia and the EU-25. In value-terms, the main exporters are North America, Australia, Brazil and Argentina. Main importers are again North America, Japan and the Far East. Within the framework of the International Farm Comparison Network (IFCN), and using harmonised methods for analysis, a total of 29 typical beef finishing farms in 15 important beef producing countries were analysed. The farms show significant differences in production systems and productivity levels. The highest cost of beef production is found in the EU-countries (US$ 350-500 per 100 kg carcass weight), the lowest in Argentina, Uruguay and Pakistan (US$ 100-130). In the case of trade liberalisation, farms with low cost of production have an incentive to export to markets with higher price levels. The potential to increase production depends on numerous factors, amongst them the availability of additional land, the possibilities to intensify production and the competition with other land uses. The development of beef production in the EU is mainly determined by the impact of the latest CAP-reform. In many countries (like Brazil, the U.S., Canada and Australia) the main potenti... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Beef production; International competitiveness. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03052naa a2200445 a 4500
001 1060762
005 2020-02-04
008 2004 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0458-6859
100 1 $aDEBLITZ, C.
245 $aStatus quo and prospects of beef production world-wide. (Review)$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2004
300 $c2-s2.0-9944252565
500 $aArticle history:
520 $aABSTRACT. The purpose of this paper is to provide an idea about the market shares of important beef producers, to analyse the competitive situation of beef production on the farm-level and to assess the potential of beef production in a worldwide context. The global players in beef production are North America, Brazil, Argentina, Australia and the EU-25. In value-terms, the main exporters are North America, Australia, Brazil and Argentina. Main importers are again North America, Japan and the Far East. Within the framework of the International Farm Comparison Network (IFCN), and using harmonised methods for analysis, a total of 29 typical beef finishing farms in 15 important beef producing countries were analysed. The farms show significant differences in production systems and productivity levels. The highest cost of beef production is found in the EU-countries (US$ 350-500 per 100 kg carcass weight), the lowest in Argentina, Uruguay and Pakistan (US$ 100-130). In the case of trade liberalisation, farms with low cost of production have an incentive to export to markets with higher price levels. The potential to increase production depends on numerous factors, amongst them the availability of additional land, the possibilities to intensify production and the competition with other land uses. The development of beef production in the EU is mainly determined by the impact of the latest CAP-reform. In many countries (like Brazil, the U.S., Canada and Australia) the main potential lays in intensification rather than making additional land resources available for beef production. In the next ten years, a world-wide increase of beef production as well as world trade can be expected. In some countries the increases of production are likely to be at least partially offset by consumption in the short term (China) or over the long term (Brazil).
653 $aBeef production
653 $aInternational competitiveness
700 1 $aBORBELY, C.
700 1 $aCHARRY, A.A.
700 1 $aCOSTA, F.P.
700 1 $aVON DAVIER, Z.
700 1 $aFERNANDEZ, E.
700 1 $aGRABNER, R.
700 1 $aHASHMI, A.H.
700 1 $aIZQUIERDO, L.
700 1 $aJAKOBE, P.
700 1 $aKLAPKA, J.
700 1 $aMAHMOOD, K.
700 1 $aOSTROWSKI, B.
700 1 $aPARTON. K.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, M.
700 1 $aRAS, C.H.
700 1 $aREYES, E.
700 1 $aRICHARDSON, J.W.
700 1 $aSARZEAUD, P.
700 1 $aSWITLYK, M.
700 1 $aSZABO, K.
700 1 $aTHORNE, F.
700 1 $aWILCZYNSKI, A.
773 $tLandbauforschung Völkenrode, December 2004, Volume 54, Issue 4, Pages 237-249.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
