| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha : |
04/07/2019 |
|
Actualizado : |
04/12/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
MILKOVIC, M.; PARUELO, J.; NOSETTO, M.D. |
|
Afiliación : |
MAYRA MILKOVIC, Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina, Defensa 251 6K, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.; JOSÉ PARUELO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay.//IFEVA and Dep. Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información, Facultad de Agronomía, Buenos Aires and CONICET. /IECA. Facultad de Ciencias. Universidad de la República, Uruguay.; MARCELO D NOSETTO, Grupo de Estudios Ambientales, Instituto de Matemática Aplicada San Luis, IMASL, CONICET and Universidad Nacional de San Luis./Cátedra de Climatología Agrícola (FCA-UNER), Ruta 11, km 10, Oro verde, Entre Ríos, Argentina. |
|
Título : |
Hydrological impacts of afforestation in the semi-arid Patagonia: a modeling approach. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2019 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Ecohydrology, 2019, Article number e2113, 2019. |
|
DOI : |
10.1002/eco.2113 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 15 November 2018 / Revised: 13 May 2019 / Accepted: 19 May 2019. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract:
Afforestation has been widely encouraged with different goals, including as a strategy to tackle global warming. However, the side?effects of this land?use transformation have been in many cases underestimated. Particularly, the hydrological impacts may become relevant in (semi)arid regions where water is a key element. In this work, we evaluated the hydrological effects triggered by afforestation with ponderosa pine in the semiarid Argentine Patagonia that is currently a focus of afforestation programs. For this purpose, we used complementary approaches that included hydrological modelling (DINAQUA model), satellite image analysis, and soil wetness data. All analyses provided convergent results into hydrological effects of afforestation. The modelling results showed that afforestation significantly increased transpiration in relation to native grass?shrub steppe. In the steppe in degraded condition, transpiration accounted for only 10% (40 mm year?1) of total water flux, whereas in adult pine plantations, it accounted for up to 73% (277 mm year?1). Deep drainage was also severely affected by afforestation as it decreased from 182 mm year?1 in the steppe to zero in adult plantations, according to model simulations. Estimates from Landsat images also showed that evapotranspiration was higher in plantations compared with the steppe. Soil wetness data also revealed significantly drier soils in plantations. Our results indicate that pine plantations in the semiarid Patagonia evaporate all rainfall inputs, resulting in zero deep drainage and groundwater recharge. If the afforested area in the region increases, downstream meadow ecosystems, which are hotspots of primary productivity, may be negatively impacted. MenosAbstract:
Afforestation has been widely encouraged with different goals, including as a strategy to tackle global warming. However, the side?effects of this land?use transformation have been in many cases underestimated. Particularly, the hydrological impacts may become relevant in (semi)arid regions where water is a key element. In this work, we evaluated the hydrological effects triggered by afforestation with ponderosa pine in the semiarid Argentine Patagonia that is currently a focus of afforestation programs. For this purpose, we used complementary approaches that included hydrological modelling (DINAQUA model), satellite image analysis, and soil wetness data. All analyses provided convergent results into hydrological effects of afforestation. The modelling results showed that afforestation significantly increased transpiration in relation to native grass?shrub steppe. In the steppe in degraded condition, transpiration accounted for only 10% (40 mm year?1) of total water flux, whereas in adult pine plantations, it accounted for up to 73% (277 mm year?1). Deep drainage was also severely affected by afforestation as it decreased from 182 mm year?1 in the steppe to zero in adult plantations, according to model simulations. Estimates from Landsat images also showed that evapotranspiration was higher in plantations compared with the steppe. Soil wetness data also revealed significantly drier soils in plantations. Our results indicate that pine plantations in the semiarid Pat... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
AGUA SUBTERRANEA; ALBEDO; GROUNDWATER; MEADOWS; PINUS; PINUS PONDEROSA; SURFACE TEMPERATURE. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02525naa a2200253 a 4500
001 1059929
005 2019-12-04
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1002/eco.2113$2DOI
100 1 $aMILKOVIC, M.
245 $aHydrological impacts of afforestation in the semi-arid Patagonia$ba modeling approach.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2019
500 $aArticle history: Received: 15 November 2018 / Revised: 13 May 2019 / Accepted: 19 May 2019.
520 $aAbstract: Afforestation has been widely encouraged with different goals, including as a strategy to tackle global warming. However, the side?effects of this land?use transformation have been in many cases underestimated. Particularly, the hydrological impacts may become relevant in (semi)arid regions where water is a key element. In this work, we evaluated the hydrological effects triggered by afforestation with ponderosa pine in the semiarid Argentine Patagonia that is currently a focus of afforestation programs. For this purpose, we used complementary approaches that included hydrological modelling (DINAQUA model), satellite image analysis, and soil wetness data. All analyses provided convergent results into hydrological effects of afforestation. The modelling results showed that afforestation significantly increased transpiration in relation to native grass?shrub steppe. In the steppe in degraded condition, transpiration accounted for only 10% (40 mm year?1) of total water flux, whereas in adult pine plantations, it accounted for up to 73% (277 mm year?1). Deep drainage was also severely affected by afforestation as it decreased from 182 mm year?1 in the steppe to zero in adult plantations, according to model simulations. Estimates from Landsat images also showed that evapotranspiration was higher in plantations compared with the steppe. Soil wetness data also revealed significantly drier soils in plantations. Our results indicate that pine plantations in the semiarid Patagonia evaporate all rainfall inputs, resulting in zero deep drainage and groundwater recharge. If the afforested area in the region increases, downstream meadow ecosystems, which are hotspots of primary productivity, may be negatively impacted.
653 $aAGUA SUBTERRANEA
653 $aALBEDO
653 $aGROUNDWATER
653 $aMEADOWS
653 $aPINUS
653 $aPINUS PONDEROSA
653 $aSURFACE TEMPERATURE
700 1 $aPARUELO, J.
700 1 $aNOSETTO, M.D.
773 $tEcohydrology, 2019, Article number e2113, 2019.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha actual : |
22/10/2021 |
|
Actualizado : |
22/10/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
-- - -- |
|
Autor : |
RIVERO, M. J.; EVANS, A.C.O.; BERNADT, A.; CARTMILL, A.; DOWSEY, A.; FARRUGIA, A.; MIGNOLET, C.; ENRIQUEZ-HIDALGO, D.; CHADWICK, D.; MCCRACKEN, D. I.; BUSCH, D.; PEREYRA GODAY, F.; MARTIN, G. B.; SANDFORD, G. R.; SHERIDAN, H.; WRIGHT, I.; BRUNET, L.; EISLER, M. C.; LOPEZ,VILLALOBOS, N.; ROVIRA, P.J.; HARRIS, P.; MURPHY, P.; WILLIAMS, A. P.; JACKSON, R. D.; MACHADO, R.; SURAJ, P. T.; PUECH, T.; BOLAND, T. M.; AYALA, W.; LEE, M. R. F. |
|
Afiliación : |
M. JORDANA RIVERO, Sustainable Agriculture Sciences, Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB, UK; ALEX C. O. EVANS, School of Agriculture & Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland; ALEXANDRE BERNADT, Embrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos, São Paulo 13560-970, Brazil.; ANDREW CARTMILL, School of Agriculture, University of Wisconsin–Platteville, Platteville, WI 53818, USA; ANDREW DOWSEY, Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford, Somerset BS40 5DU, UK.; ANNE FARRUGIA, INRAE—ACT UE 0057 DSLP, 17450 Saint Laurent de la Prée, France.; CATHERINE MIGNOLET, INRAE—ACT, UR 0055 ASTER, 88500 Mirecourt, France.; DANIEL ENRIQUEZ-HIDALGO, Sustainable Agriculture Sciences, Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB, UK. //Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford, Somerset BS40 5DU, UK; DAVE CHADWICK, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2UW, UK.; DAVY I. MCCRACKEN, Hill & Mountain Research Centre, SRUC: Scotland’s Rural College, Kirkton Farm, Crianlarich FK20 8RU, UK.; DENNIS BUSCH, School of Agriculture, University of Wisconsin–Platteville, Platteville, WI 53818, USA.; FABIANA PEREYRA GODAY, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GRAEME B. MARTIN, UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Crawley 6009, Australia.; GREGG R. SANFORD, Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.; HELEN SHERIDAN, School of Agriculture & Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.; IAIN WRIGHT, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Nairobi, Kenya.; LAURENT BRUNET, INRAE—ACT, UR 0055 ASTER, 88500 Mirecourt, France.; MARK C. EISLER, Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford, Somerset BS40 5DU, UK.; NICOLÁS LÓPEZ-VILLALOBOS, School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4410, New Zealand.; PABLO JUAN ROVIRA SANZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; PAUL HARRIS, Sustainable Agriculture Sciences, Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB, UK.; PAUL MURPHY, School of Agriculture & Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.; A. PRYSOR WILLIAMS, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2UW, UK.; RANDALL D. JACKSON, Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.; RUI MACHADO, Embrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos, São Paulo 13560-970, Brazil.; P.T. JURAJ, Livestock Research Station Thiruvazamkunnu, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Kerala-678601, India; THOMAS PUECH, INRAE—ACT, UR 0055 ASTER, 88500 Mirecourt, France.; TOMMY M. BOLAND, School of Agriculture & Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.; WALTER FELIZARDO AYALA SILVERA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MICHAEL R. F. LEE, Harper Adams University, Newport, Shropshire TF10 8NB, UK. |
|
Título : |
Taking the steps toward sustainable livestock: our multidisciplinary global farm platform journey. [Open Access]. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Animal Frontiers, Volume 11, Issue 5, October 2021, Pages 52?58, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfab048 |
|
ISSN : |
Online 2160-6064 |
|
DOI : |
10.1093/af/vfab048 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
The Global Farm Platform initiative (www.globalfarmplatform.org) is a network of research farms and institute members working collaboratively to enhance the sustainability of ruminant livestock systems through the development of transformational regional solutions to global challenges and promote their adoption. This multidisciplinary international network will provide a
unique combination of research and practice for diverse ruminant production systems in a wide range of cultural, socioeconomic, and climatic zones. |
|
Contenido : |
Ruminant livestock are a vital global source of highquality protein and bioavailable minerals and vitamins. They support healthy dietary choices by providing milk and meat produced from less productive land and food industry byproducts. However, despite the contribution of ruminants to food systems and the circular bioeconomy, ruminant production systems are increasingly questioned due to their environmental impact, particularly their significant contribution to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and associated global warming. There is a need, therefore, to identify a pathway to sustainable global ruminant production. In 2014, our group defined eight strategies or ?steps? (Eisler et al., 2014), to mitigate the environmental impacts
of ruminant production while optimizing the quantity and quality of the food they produce. To realize these goals, we established the ?Global Farm Platform? initiative (www.globalfarmplatform.org), a network of ?farm platforms? or research farms (RFs), to explore multidisciplinary strategies and evaluate different production systems around the
globe (Table 1). Here, we provide a perspective on our approach and the steps we are taking to realize the ambition of supporting sustainable ruminant livestock production as a part of future food systems contributing to both human and planetary health. |
|
Palabras claves : |
CIRCULARITY; GRAZING SYSTEMS; MIXED FARMING; PRECISION FARMING; RESEARCH FARMS; RUMINANT LIVESTOCK; SISTEMAS DE PRODUCCIÓN. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16077/1/Animal-Frontiers-Rivero-2021.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03500naa a2200589 a 4500
001 1062492
005 2021-10-22
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $aOnline 2160-6064
024 7 $a10.1093/af/vfab048$2DOI
100 1 $aRIVERO, M. J.
245 $aTaking the steps toward sustainable livestock$bour multidisciplinary global farm platform journey. [Open Access].$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
500 $aThe Global Farm Platform initiative (www.globalfarmplatform.org) is a network of research farms and institute members working collaboratively to enhance the sustainability of ruminant livestock systems through the development of transformational regional solutions to global challenges and promote their adoption. This multidisciplinary international network will provide a unique combination of research and practice for diverse ruminant production systems in a wide range of cultural, socioeconomic, and climatic zones.
520 $aRuminant livestock are a vital global source of highquality protein and bioavailable minerals and vitamins. They support healthy dietary choices by providing milk and meat produced from less productive land and food industry byproducts. However, despite the contribution of ruminants to food systems and the circular bioeconomy, ruminant production systems are increasingly questioned due to their environmental impact, particularly their significant contribution to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and associated global warming. There is a need, therefore, to identify a pathway to sustainable global ruminant production. In 2014, our group defined eight strategies or ?steps? (Eisler et al., 2014), to mitigate the environmental impacts of ruminant production while optimizing the quantity and quality of the food they produce. To realize these goals, we established the ?Global Farm Platform? initiative (www.globalfarmplatform.org), a network of ?farm platforms? or research farms (RFs), to explore multidisciplinary strategies and evaluate different production systems around the globe (Table 1). Here, we provide a perspective on our approach and the steps we are taking to realize the ambition of supporting sustainable ruminant livestock production as a part of future food systems contributing to both human and planetary health.
653 $aCIRCULARITY
653 $aGRAZING SYSTEMS
653 $aMIXED FARMING
653 $aPRECISION FARMING
653 $aRESEARCH FARMS
653 $aRUMINANT LIVESTOCK
653 $aSISTEMAS DE PRODUCCIÓN
700 1 $aEVANS, A.C.O.
700 1 $aBERNADT, A.
700 1 $aCARTMILL, A.
700 1 $aDOWSEY, A.
700 1 $aFARRUGIA, A.
700 1 $aMIGNOLET, C.
700 1 $aENRIQUEZ-HIDALGO, D.
700 1 $aCHADWICK, D.
700 1 $aMCCRACKEN, D. I.
700 1 $aBUSCH, D.
700 1 $aPEREYRA GODAY, F.
700 1 $aMARTIN, G. B.
700 1 $aSANDFORD, G. R.
700 1 $aSHERIDAN, H.
700 1 $aWRIGHT, I.
700 1 $aBRUNET, L.
700 1 $aEISLER, M. C.
700 1 $aLOPEZ,VILLALOBOS, N.
700 1 $aROVIRA, P.J.
700 1 $aHARRIS, P.
700 1 $aMURPHY, P.
700 1 $aWILLIAMS, A. P.
700 1 $aJACKSON, R. D.
700 1 $aMACHADO, R.
700 1 $aSURAJ, P. T.
700 1 $aPUECH, T.
700 1 $aBOLAND, T. M.
700 1 $aAYALA, W.
700 1 $aLEE, M. R. F.
773 $tAnimal Frontiers, Volume 11, Issue 5, October 2021, Pages 52?58, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfab048
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
