| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
25/04/2017 |
|
Actualizado : |
11/08/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Capítulo en Libro Técnico-Científico |
|
Autor : |
LEONI, C.; ROSSING, W.; VAN BRUGGEN, A.H.C. |
|
Afiliación : |
CAROLINA LEONI VELAZCO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; WALTER ROSSING, Wageningen University; ARIENA H.C. VAN BRUGGEN, University of Florida, USA. |
|
Título : |
Crop rotation. (Chapter 4.2). |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2015 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: Plant Diseases and their Management in Organic Agriculture, ed. by Finckh MR, van Bruggen AHC and Tamm L. APS Press, St Paul, MN, 127-140 pp. 2015. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1094/9780890544785.011 |
|
ISBN : |
978-0-89054-478-5 |
|
DOI : |
10.1094/9780890544785.011 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT - Crop rotation is one of the oldest management strategies in agriculture and has two main purposes: plant nutrition and management of weeds, pests, and diseases, particularly soilborne diseases. Not only is it a long-term strategy for organic agriculture, it is a strong recommendation and a requirement in some countries. One of the consequences of crop rotation in farming systems is the mosaic of crops at farm and landscape levels. With an increasing number of crops in a rotation, the fields on a particular farm usually become smaller. This increases the agrobiodiversity at the landscape level. The size and complexity of the mosaics in space and time have a tremendous influence on the development of plant disease epidemics and pests. Here, we focus on the temporal variation in crops and its consequences for plant disease development. The succession of a variety of crops can affect both foliar and root diseases. The effects on foliar diseases are, however, primarily determined by the spatial pattern in crops, especially when pathogen inoculum is spread over medium or large distances. We limit this chapter to effects on soilborne pathogens with local inoculum spread; this includes splash-dispersed soilborne pathogens that affect the lower stem and foliage as well as root-infecting pathogens. |
|
Palabras claves : |
CROP ROTATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; FARMING SYSTEMS; MICROORGANISMS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02040naa a2200217 a 4500
001 1057132
005 2021-08-11
008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
020 $a978-0-89054-478-5
024 7 $a10.1094/9780890544785.011$2DOI
100 1 $aLEONI, C.
245 $aCrop rotation. (Chapter 4.2).
260 $c2015
520 $aABSTRACT - Crop rotation is one of the oldest management strategies in agriculture and has two main purposes: plant nutrition and management of weeds, pests, and diseases, particularly soilborne diseases. Not only is it a long-term strategy for organic agriculture, it is a strong recommendation and a requirement in some countries. One of the consequences of crop rotation in farming systems is the mosaic of crops at farm and landscape levels. With an increasing number of crops in a rotation, the fields on a particular farm usually become smaller. This increases the agrobiodiversity at the landscape level. The size and complexity of the mosaics in space and time have a tremendous influence on the development of plant disease epidemics and pests. Here, we focus on the temporal variation in crops and its consequences for plant disease development. The succession of a variety of crops can affect both foliar and root diseases. The effects on foliar diseases are, however, primarily determined by the spatial pattern in crops, especially when pathogen inoculum is spread over medium or large distances. We limit this chapter to effects on soilborne pathogens with local inoculum spread; this includes splash-dispersed soilborne pathogens that affect the lower stem and foliage as well as root-infecting pathogens.
653 $aCROP ROTATION
653 $aECOSYSTEM SERVICES
653 $aFARMING SYSTEMS
653 $aMICROORGANISMS
700 1 $aROSSING, W.
700 1 $aVAN BRUGGEN, A.H.C.
773 $tIn: Plant Diseases and their Management in Organic Agriculture, ed. by Finckh MR, van Bruggen AHC and Tamm L. APS Press, St Paul, MN, 127-140 pp. 2015. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1094/9780890544785.011
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Treinta y Tres. Por información adicional contacte bibliott@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha actual : |
18/02/2019 |
|
Actualizado : |
20/02/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
-- - -- |
|
Autor : |
BLUMETTO, O.; CASTAGNA, A.; CARDOZO, G.; GARCIA, F.; TISCORNIA, G.; RUGGIA, A.; SCARLATO, S.; ALBICETTE, M.M.; AGUERRE, V.; ALBÍN, A. |
|
Afiliación : |
OSCAR RICARDO BLUMETTO VELAZCO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANDRES CASTAGNA DU PRE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GERONIMO AGUSTIN CARDOZO CABANELAS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FELIPE LUIS GARCIA OLASO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GUADALUPE TISCORNIA TOSAR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANDREA PAOLA RUGGIA CHIESA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SANTIAGO SCARLATO GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIA MARTA ALBICETTE BASTRERI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIA VERONICA AGUERRE ANTIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ALFREDO SANTIAGO ALBÍN FERREIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Ecosystem integrity index, an innovative environmental evaluation tool for agricultural production systems. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2019 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Ecological indicators, 2019, v. 101, p. 725-733. |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.01.077 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 4 July 2018; Received in revised form 9 January 2019; Accepted 29 January 2019. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT: Environmental assessment of agricultural production systems is an increasing concern within the international community. When evaluation involves biodiversity indicators, as richness or diversity in certain taxa or their roles in ecosystems, the participation of specialists is required to identify, classify and interpret diversity at the level of species, communities and ecosystems. Due to costs and time demand, this can be an important obstacle when a widespread use of these assessments is needed to contribute to policy making and evaluation, field
management decision-making or implementation of a specific technology. We developed a new index that combines different environmental characteristics which can be evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively with a basic training, can be implemented quickly and each index component is directly associated with key aspects for the assessment of ecosystem capacity to sustain wildlife and ecosystem services. The Ecosystem Integrity Index (EII) evaluates the status of a specific ecosystem under agricultural use, referred to an optimal condition that must be established for the ecoregion. Its application involves a qualitative and quantitative visual evaluation considering four components: vegetation structure, plant species, soil and riparian areas. Each component is valued on a 0?5 scale, where 5 is the best possible condition. EII is a simple and robust tool for evaluating and monitoring integrity of groecosystems and the primary validation demonstrates good correlation with other environmental variables such as wildlife diversity and soil organic carbon. MenosABSTRACT: Environmental assessment of agricultural production systems is an increasing concern within the international community. When evaluation involves biodiversity indicators, as richness or diversity in certain taxa or their roles in ecosystems, the participation of specialists is required to identify, classify and interpret diversity at the level of species, communities and ecosystems. Due to costs and time demand, this can be an important obstacle when a widespread use of these assessments is needed to contribute to policy making and evaluation, field
management decision-making or implementation of a specific technology. We developed a new index that combines different environmental characteristics which can be evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively with a basic training, can be implemented quickly and each index component is directly associated with key aspects for the assessment of ecosystem capacity to sustain wildlife and ecosystem services. The Ecosystem Integrity Index (EII) evaluates the status of a specific ecosystem under agricultural use, referred to an optimal condition that must be established for the ecoregion. Its application involves a qualitative and quantitative visual evaluation considering four components: vegetation structure, plant species, soil and riparian areas. Each component is valued on a 0?5 scale, where 5 is the best possible condition. EII is a simple and robust tool for evaluating and monitoring integrity of groecosystems and the pr... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; GRAZING MANAGEMENT; RIPARIAN ECOSYSTEM; SUSTAINABILITY; VEGETATION STRUCTURE. |
|
Thesagro : |
BIODIVERSIDAD; ECOSISTEMAS; MANEJO DE PASTOREO; SUSTENTABILIDAD. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F40 Ecología vegetal |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02790naa a2200373 a 4500
001 1059498
005 2020-02-20
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.01.077$2DOI
100 1 $aBLUMETTO, O.
245 $aEcosystem integrity index, an innovative environmental evaluation tool for agricultural production systems.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2019
500 $aArticle history: Received 4 July 2018; Received in revised form 9 January 2019; Accepted 29 January 2019.
520 $aABSTRACT: Environmental assessment of agricultural production systems is an increasing concern within the international community. When evaluation involves biodiversity indicators, as richness or diversity in certain taxa or their roles in ecosystems, the participation of specialists is required to identify, classify and interpret diversity at the level of species, communities and ecosystems. Due to costs and time demand, this can be an important obstacle when a widespread use of these assessments is needed to contribute to policy making and evaluation, field management decision-making or implementation of a specific technology. We developed a new index that combines different environmental characteristics which can be evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively with a basic training, can be implemented quickly and each index component is directly associated with key aspects for the assessment of ecosystem capacity to sustain wildlife and ecosystem services. The Ecosystem Integrity Index (EII) evaluates the status of a specific ecosystem under agricultural use, referred to an optimal condition that must be established for the ecoregion. Its application involves a qualitative and quantitative visual evaluation considering four components: vegetation structure, plant species, soil and riparian areas. Each component is valued on a 0?5 scale, where 5 is the best possible condition. EII is a simple and robust tool for evaluating and monitoring integrity of groecosystems and the primary validation demonstrates good correlation with other environmental variables such as wildlife diversity and soil organic carbon.
650 $aBIODIVERSIDAD
650 $aECOSISTEMAS
650 $aMANEJO DE PASTOREO
650 $aSUSTENTABILIDAD
653 $aBIODIVERSITY
653 $aECOSYSTEM SERVICES
653 $aGRAZING MANAGEMENT
653 $aRIPARIAN ECOSYSTEM
653 $aSUSTAINABILITY
653 $aVEGETATION STRUCTURE
700 1 $aCASTAGNA, A.
700 1 $aCARDOZO, G.
700 1 $aGARCIA, F.
700 1 $aTISCORNIA, G.
700 1 $aRUGGIA, A.
700 1 $aSCARLATO, S.
700 1 $aALBICETTE, M.M.
700 1 $aAGUERRE, V.
700 1 $aALBÍN, A.
773 $tEcological indicators, 2019$gv. 101, p. 725-733.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
