|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
Fecha : |
21/02/2014 |
Actualizado : |
19/10/2017 |
Autor : |
PETERSON, W; GIJSBERS, G.; WILKS, M. |
Afiliación : |
International Service for National Agricultural Research (ISNAR); International Service for National Agricultural Research (ISNAR); International Service for National Agricultural Research (ISNAR). |
Título : |
An organizational performance assessment system for agricultural researc organizations: concepts, methods, and procedures. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2003 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
The Hague (The Netherlands): ISNAR, 2003. |
Páginas : |
59 p. |
Serie : |
(Research Management Guideles; 7) |
ISBN : |
92-9118-068-8 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Contiene CD |
Thesagro : |
AGRICULTURA; ANALISIS DE DATOS; DESARROLLO AGRICOLA; EVALUACION; EVALUACION DE PROYECTOS; INSTITUCIONES DE INVESTIGACION; INVESTIGACION; PROYECTOS DE DESARROLLO. |
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
Marc : |
LEADER 00813nam a2200265 a 4500 001 1029793 005 2017-10-19 008 2003 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 020 $a92-9118-068-8 100 1 $aPETERSON, W 245 $aAn organizational performance assessment system for agricultural researc organizations$bconcepts, methods, and procedures. 260 $aThe Hague (The Netherlands): ISNAR$c2003 300 $a59 p. 490 $a(Research Management Guideles; 7) 500 $aContiene CD 650 $aAGRICULTURA 650 $aANALISIS DE DATOS 650 $aDESARROLLO AGRICOLA 650 $aEVALUACION 650 $aEVALUACION DE PROYECTOS 650 $aINSTITUCIONES DE INVESTIGACION 650 $aINVESTIGACION 650 $aPROYECTOS DE DESARROLLO 700 1 $aGIJSBERS, G. 700 1 $aWILKS, M.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
10/08/2016 |
Actualizado : |
28/05/2018 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Trabajos en Congresos/Conferencias |
Autor : |
ALBICETTE, M.M.; LEONI, C.; RUGGIA, A.; SCARLATO, S.; ALBIN, A.; AGUERRE, V. |
Afiliación : |
MARIA MARTA ALBICETTE BASTRERI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CAROLINA LEONI VELAZCO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANDREA PAOLA RUGGIA CHIESA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SANTIAGO SCARLATO GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ALFREDO SANTIAGO ALBIN FERREIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIA VERONICA AGUERRE ANTIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
A co-innovation approach in family-farming livestock systems in Rocha - Uruguay: A three-year learning process. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2016 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: EUROPEAN IFSA SYMPOSIUM, 12th., "Social and technological transformation of farming systems: Diverging and converging pathways", Symposium Handbook, Harper Adams University, UK, 12-15 July 2016. |
Páginas : |
13 p. |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
There are opportunities to improve livestock family farms (LFF) sustainability in Uruguay by changing management practices and incorporating technologies, using the co-innovation approach. To harness these opportunities, between 2012 and 2015 a research project was implemented in Eastern Uruguay, where three simultaneous processes occurred at three levels: farm, region and research team. At farm level, the work was carried out in seven LFF as case studies. Through monthly visits to the farms by a field agronomist the process followed three phases using the Evaluation of Natural Resource Management Systems Incorporating Sustainability Indicators (MESMIS) framework: (i) characterization and diagnosis, (ii) re-design, (iii) implementation, monitoring and evaluation. As a result, farmer knowledge and skills for farm management improved and the farms increased their meat production and net income (23 and 56% on average, respectively) while preserving natural resources. At regional level, a participatory approach to planning, monitoring and evaluating the project´s progress with regional stakeholders was adapted from a Participatory Analysis of Impact Pathways (PIPA) method. An Interinstitutional network was consolidated, which developed a common vision and expected project outcomes and designed a communication plan to disseminate the results. At team level, a Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach was carried out. A transdisciplinary team was consolidated through cyclic processes of research, reflection and action. Consensus on the objectives and methods
allowed combining knowledge to solve practice-oriented problems. The three-year process demonstrated effectiveness in improving LFF sustainability, opening a learning space with
stakeholders and contributing with a novel model of rural development: co-innovation. MenosABSTRACT.
There are opportunities to improve livestock family farms (LFF) sustainability in Uruguay by changing management practices and incorporating technologies, using the co-innovation approach. To harness these opportunities, between 2012 and 2015 a research project was implemented in Eastern Uruguay, where three simultaneous processes occurred at three levels: farm, region and research team. At farm level, the work was carried out in seven LFF as case studies. Through monthly visits to the farms by a field agronomist the process followed three phases using the Evaluation of Natural Resource Management Systems Incorporating Sustainability Indicators (MESMIS) framework: (i) characterization and diagnosis, (ii) re-design, (iii) implementation, monitoring and evaluation. As a result, farmer knowledge and skills for farm management improved and the farms increased their meat production and net income (23 and 56% on average, respectively) while preserving natural resources. At regional level, a participatory approach to planning, monitoring and evaluating the project´s progress with regional stakeholders was adapted from a Participatory Analysis of Impact Pathways (PIPA) method. An Interinstitutional network was consolidated, which developed a common vision and expected project outcomes and designed a communication plan to disseminate the results. At team level, a Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach was carried out. A transdisciplinary team was consolidated throug... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
CO-INNOVATION; MESMIS; METHODOLOGY; MONITORING AND EVALUATION; PAR; PIPA; SYSTEMIC APPROACH. |
Thesagro : |
AGRICULTURA FAMILIAR; ENFOQUE DE SISTEMAS; GANADERÍA FAMILIAR; URUGUAY. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/8202/1/1.3-Albicette-2016-IFSA-Conference-paper.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02891nam a2200313 a 4500 001 1055219 005 2018-05-28 008 2016 bl uuuu u01u1 u #d 100 1 $aALBICETTE, M.M. 245 $aA co-innovation approach in family-farming livestock systems in Rocha - Uruguay$bA three-year learning process.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aIn: EUROPEAN IFSA SYMPOSIUM, 12th., "Social and technological transformation of farming systems: Diverging and converging pathways", Symposium Handbook, Harper Adams University, UK, 12-15 July 2016.$c2016 300 $a13 p. 520 $aABSTRACT. There are opportunities to improve livestock family farms (LFF) sustainability in Uruguay by changing management practices and incorporating technologies, using the co-innovation approach. To harness these opportunities, between 2012 and 2015 a research project was implemented in Eastern Uruguay, where three simultaneous processes occurred at three levels: farm, region and research team. At farm level, the work was carried out in seven LFF as case studies. Through monthly visits to the farms by a field agronomist the process followed three phases using the Evaluation of Natural Resource Management Systems Incorporating Sustainability Indicators (MESMIS) framework: (i) characterization and diagnosis, (ii) re-design, (iii) implementation, monitoring and evaluation. As a result, farmer knowledge and skills for farm management improved and the farms increased their meat production and net income (23 and 56% on average, respectively) while preserving natural resources. At regional level, a participatory approach to planning, monitoring and evaluating the project´s progress with regional stakeholders was adapted from a Participatory Analysis of Impact Pathways (PIPA) method. An Interinstitutional network was consolidated, which developed a common vision and expected project outcomes and designed a communication plan to disseminate the results. At team level, a Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach was carried out. A transdisciplinary team was consolidated through cyclic processes of research, reflection and action. Consensus on the objectives and methods allowed combining knowledge to solve practice-oriented problems. The three-year process demonstrated effectiveness in improving LFF sustainability, opening a learning space with stakeholders and contributing with a novel model of rural development: co-innovation. 650 $aAGRICULTURA FAMILIAR 650 $aENFOQUE DE SISTEMAS 650 $aGANADERÍA FAMILIAR 650 $aURUGUAY 653 $aCO-INNOVATION 653 $aMESMIS 653 $aMETHODOLOGY 653 $aMONITORING AND EVALUATION 653 $aPAR 653 $aPIPA 653 $aSYSTEMIC APPROACH 700 1 $aLEONI, C. 700 1 $aRUGGIA, A. 700 1 $aSCARLATO, S. 700 1 $aALBIN, A. 700 1 $aAGUERRE, V.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|