| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
05/08/2021 |
|
Actualizado : |
02/12/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
DI SALVO, L.; GARCÍA, J.E.; PUENTE, M.L.; AMIGO, J.; ANRIQUEZ, A.; BARLOCCO, C.; BENINTENDE, S.; BOCHATAY, T.; BORTOLATO, M.; CASSÁN, F.; CASTAÑO, C.; CATAFESTA, M.; CONIGLIO, A.; DÍAZ, M.; GALIÁN, L.R.; GALLACE, E.; GARCÍA, P.; GARCÍA DE SALAMONE, I.E.; LANDA, M.; LIERNUR, G.; MANEIRO, M.L.; MASSA, R.; MALINVERNI, J.; MARCHESSI, N.; MONTELEONE, E.; OVIEDO, S.; POBLITI, L.; PORTELA, G.; RADOVANCICH, D; RIGHES, S.; ROCHA, R.; RODRÍGUEZ CÁCERES, E.; ROSSI, A.; SANTELLA, G.; TORTORA, M.L.; TREJO, N.; VALENZUELA, J.A.; VALLEJO, D. |
|
Afiliación : |
LUCIANA DI SALVO, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Agronomía, Departamento de Biología Aplicada y Alimentos, Cátedra de Microbiología Agrícola, Buenos Aires, Argentina; CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.; JULIA E. GARCÍA, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Instituto de Microbiología y Zoología Agrícola, Argentina.; MARIANA L. PUENTE, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Instituto de Microbiología y Zoología Agrícola, Argentina.; JOSEFINA AMIGO, Laboratorio de Control de Inoculantes (LABOCOIN)-Cátedra de Microbiología Agrícola-Facultad de Agronomía y Zootecnia-Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Argentina.; ANALÍA ANRIQUEZ, Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero, Facultad de Agronomía y Agroindustrias, Cátedra de Microbiología Agrícola,Santiago del Estero, Argentina.; CLAUDIA GABRIELA BARLOCCO LOPEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SILVIA BENINTENDE, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias UNER, Cátedra Microbiología Agrícola, Argentina.; TATIANA BOCHATAY, BASF Agricultural Specialities S.A., Santo Tomé, Santa Fé, Argentina.; MARTA BORTOLATO, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Departamento de Ciencias de la Tierra y Tecnología, Cátedra de Microbiología Agrícola, Santa Fe, Argentina.; FABRICIO CASSÁN, Laboratorio de Fisiología Vegetal e Interacción Planta-Microorganismo, Instituto de Investigaciones Agrobiotecnológicas (INIAB-CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto, Río Cuarto, Córdoba, Argentina.; CAROLINA CASTANO, Laboratorio de Microbiología Agrícola, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional La Pampa, Argentina.; MELINA CATAFESTA, Bio Nova - Nova S.A., Cañada de Gómez, Santa Fe, Argentina.; ANAHÍ CONIGLIO, Laboratorio de Fisiología Vegetal e Interacción Planta-Microorganismo, Instituto de Investigaciones Agrobiotecnológicas (INIAB-CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto, Río Cuarto, Córdoba, Argentina.; MARISA DÍAZ, Rizobacter Argentina S.A., Pergamino, Buenos Aires, Argentina.; LILIANA R. GALIÁN, Laboratorio de Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Lomas de Zamora, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina.; EUGENIA GALLACE, Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, Facultad de Agronomía, Área de Recursos Naturales, Cátedra de Microbiología Agrícola, La Pampa, Argentina.; PATRICIA GARCÍA, Laboratorio de Microbiología Agrícola, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional La Pampa, Argentina.; INÉS E. GARCÍA DE SALAMONE, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Agronomía, Departamento de Biología Aplicada y Alimentos, Cátedra de Microbiología Agrícola, Buenos Aires, Argentina.; MARIANELA LANDA, Laboratorio de Bacteriología, Coordinación de Plagas, Enfermedades de las plantas y Bioinsumos, SENASA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.; GERMÁN LIERNUR, Private Advisor.; MARÍA LAURA MANEIRO, Rizobacter Argentina S.A., Pergamino, Buenos Aires, Argentina.; ROSANA MASSA, Stoller Biociencias S.R.L., Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.; JULIETA MALINVERNI, Laboratorio de Bacteriología, Coordinación de Plagas, Enfermedades de las plantas y Bioinsumos, SENASA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.; NICOLÁS MARCHESSI, Laboratorio de Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Lomas de Zamora, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina.; EMILIA MONTELEONE, Nitrasoil Argentina S.A., Quilmes, Buenos Aires, Argentina.; SILVINA OVIEDO, Rizobacter Argentina S.A., Pergamino, Buenos Aires, Argentina.; LUCRECIA POBLITI, Barenbrug Argentina, Pergamino, Buenos Aires, Argentina.; GABRIELA PORTELA, Laboratorio Integrado de Microbiología Agrícola y de los Alimentos (LIMAyA), Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Azul, Buenos Aires, Argentina.; DÉBORA RADOVANCICH, Laformed S.A., Laboratorio de Especialidades Medicinales y Veterinarias, Formosa, Argentina.; SILVIA RIGHES, Marketing Agrícola S.R.L., Córdoba, Argentina.; ROSINA ROCHA, ALTER-BIO S.A., Bragado, Buenos Aires, Argentina.; ENRIQUE RODRÍGUEZ CÁCERES, Private Advisor.; ALEJANDRO ROSSI, Rizobacter Argentina S.A., Pergamino, Buenos Aires, Argentina.; GISELA SANTELLA, Novozymes BioAg S.A., Pilar, Buenos Aires, Argentina.; MARÍA LAURA TORTORA, Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres (EEAOC), Sección Caña de Azúcar, Subprograma Agronomía, Argentina.; NORA TREJO, Laboratorio de Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Lomas de Zamora, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina.; JOSÉ A. VALENZUELA, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales y Agrimensura, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste; IMIT-CONICET, Argentina.; DANIELA VALLEJO, Laboratorio de Control de Inoculantes (LABOCOIN)-Cátedra de Microbiología Agrícola-Facultad de Agronomía y Zootecnia-Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Argentina. |
|
Título : |
The drop plate method as an alternative for Azospirillum spp viable cell enumeration within the consensus protocol of the REDCAI network. (Brief report). [La técnica de la microgota como alternativa para el recuento de Azospirillum spp. dentro del protocolo de la Red de Control de Calidad de Inoculantes (REDCAI).] |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Revista Argentina de Microbiología, 2022, Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages 152-157. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2021.05.002 |
|
ISSN : |
0325-754 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.ram.2021.05.002 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 24 November 2020, Accepted 12 May 2021, Available online 7 July 2021. -- Corresponding author. M.L. Puente, e-mail address: puente.mariana@inta.gob.ar -- LICENSE: Este es un artículo Open Access bajo la licencia CC BY-NC-ND (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT - Quality evaluation of commercial inoculants is essential to warrant an adequate crop response to inoculation within a biosecurity framework. In this sense, this work is aimed at standardizing and validating the drop plate method for the enumeration of Azospirillum viable cells as an alternative to the spread plate technique, which is currently proposed in the consensus protocol of the REDCAI network. Between 14 and 25 private and public laboratories participated in three independent trials. We obtained consistent and robust results that allowed to confirm that both techniques are equivalent, concluding that the drop plate method is an alternative enumeration technique that is adequate to be included in the abovementioned consensus protocol.
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.
RESUMEN - La evaluación de la calidad de los inoculantes comerciales es fundamental para garantizar una adecuada respuesta de los cultivos a la inoculación dentro de un marco de bioseguridad. En este sentido, el objetivo de este trabajo fue la estandarización y validación de la técnica de la microgota para la cuantificación de Azospirillum como metodología alternativa a la técnica de siembra en superficie, propuesta actualmente en el protocolo consenso de la Red de Calidad de Inoculantes, REDCAI. Entre 14 y 25 laboratorios, tanto privados como públicos, participaron de tres ensayos independientes. A partir de ellos se obtuvieron resultados reproducibles y robustos que permiten confirmar que ambas técnicas son equivalentes y concluir que la técnica de recuento por la microgota es una alternativa adecuada para ser incluida dentro del mencionado protocolo consenso.
© 2021 Asociación Argentina de Microbiología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. MenosABSTRACT - Quality evaluation of commercial inoculants is essential to warrant an adequate crop response to inoculation within a biosecurity framework. In this sense, this work is aimed at standardizing and validating the drop plate method for the enumeration of Azospirillum viable cells as an alternative to the spread plate technique, which is currently proposed in the consensus protocol of the REDCAI network. Between 14 and 25 private and public laboratories participated in three independent trials. We obtained consistent and robust results that allowed to confirm that both techniques are equivalent, concluding that the drop plate method is an alternative enumeration technique that is adequate to be included in the abovementioned consensus protocol.
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.
RESUMEN - La evaluación de la calidad de los inoculantes comerciales es fundamental para garantizar una adecuada respuesta de los cultivos a la inoculación dentro de un marco de bioseguridad. En este sentido, el objetivo de este trabajo fue la estandarización y validación de la técnica de la microgota para la cuantificación de Azospirillum como metodología alternativa a la técnica de siembra en superficie, propuesta actualmente en el protocolo consenso de la Red de Calidad de Inoculantes, REDCAI. Entre 14 y 25 laboratorios, tanto privados como públicos, participaron de tres ensayos independientes. A partir de ellos se obtuvieron resultados reproducibles y robustos que permiten confirmar que ambas técnic... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Bioinputs; Bioinsumos; Evaluación de calidad; Microbiological procedures; PGPR; Procedimientos microbiológicos; Quality evaluation; Recuento en placa; Spread plate technique. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16905/1/10.1016-j.ram.2021.05.002.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 04247naa a2200709 a 4500
001 1062338
005 2022-12-02
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0325-754
024 7 $a10.1016/j.ram.2021.05.002$2DOI
100 1 $aDI SALVO, L.
245 $aThe drop plate method as an alternative for Azospirillum spp viable cell enumeration within the consensus protocol of the REDCAI network. (Brief report). [La técnica de la microgota como alternativa para el recuento de Azospirillum spp. dentro del protocolo de la Red de Control de Calidad de Inoculantes (REDCAI).]$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aArticle history: Received 24 November 2020, Accepted 12 May 2021, Available online 7 July 2021. -- Corresponding author. M.L. Puente, e-mail address: puente.mariana@inta.gob.ar -- LICENSE: Este es un artículo Open Access bajo la licencia CC BY-NC-ND (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
520 $aABSTRACT - Quality evaluation of commercial inoculants is essential to warrant an adequate crop response to inoculation within a biosecurity framework. In this sense, this work is aimed at standardizing and validating the drop plate method for the enumeration of Azospirillum viable cells as an alternative to the spread plate technique, which is currently proposed in the consensus protocol of the REDCAI network. Between 14 and 25 private and public laboratories participated in three independent trials. We obtained consistent and robust results that allowed to confirm that both techniques are equivalent, concluding that the drop plate method is an alternative enumeration technique that is adequate to be included in the abovementioned consensus protocol. .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-. RESUMEN - La evaluación de la calidad de los inoculantes comerciales es fundamental para garantizar una adecuada respuesta de los cultivos a la inoculación dentro de un marco de bioseguridad. En este sentido, el objetivo de este trabajo fue la estandarización y validación de la técnica de la microgota para la cuantificación de Azospirillum como metodología alternativa a la técnica de siembra en superficie, propuesta actualmente en el protocolo consenso de la Red de Calidad de Inoculantes, REDCAI. Entre 14 y 25 laboratorios, tanto privados como públicos, participaron de tres ensayos independientes. A partir de ellos se obtuvieron resultados reproducibles y robustos que permiten confirmar que ambas técnicas son equivalentes y concluir que la técnica de recuento por la microgota es una alternativa adecuada para ser incluida dentro del mencionado protocolo consenso. © 2021 Asociación Argentina de Microbiología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U.
653 $aBioinputs
653 $aBioinsumos
653 $aEvaluación de calidad
653 $aMicrobiological procedures
653 $aPGPR
653 $aProcedimientos microbiológicos
653 $aQuality evaluation
653 $aRecuento en placa
653 $aSpread plate technique
700 1 $aGARCÍA, J.E.
700 1 $aPUENTE, M.L.
700 1 $aAMIGO, J.
700 1 $aANRIQUEZ, A.
700 1 $aBARLOCCO, C.
700 1 $aBENINTENDE, S.
700 1 $aBOCHATAY, T.
700 1 $aBORTOLATO, M.
700 1 $aCASSÁN, F.
700 1 $aCASTAÑO, C.
700 1 $aCATAFESTA, M.
700 1 $aCONIGLIO, A.
700 1 $aDÍAZ, M.
700 1 $aGALIÁN, L.R.
700 1 $aGALLACE, E.
700 1 $aGARCÍA, P.
700 1 $aGARCÍA DE SALAMONE, I.E.
700 1 $aLANDA, M.
700 1 $aLIERNUR, G.
700 1 $aMANEIRO, M.L.
700 1 $aMASSA, R.
700 1 $aMALINVERNI, J.
700 1 $aMARCHESSI, N.
700 1 $aMONTELEONE, E.
700 1 $aOVIEDO, S.
700 1 $aPOBLITI, L.
700 1 $aPORTELA, G.
700 1 $aRADOVANCICH, D
700 1 $aRIGHES, S.
700 1 $aROCHA, R.
700 1 $aRODRÍGUEZ CÁCERES, E.
700 1 $aROSSI, A.
700 1 $aSANTELLA, G.
700 1 $aTORTORA, M.L.
700 1 $aTREJO, N.
700 1 $aVALENZUELA, J.A.
700 1 $aVALLEJO, D.
773 $tRevista Argentina de Microbiología, 2022, Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages 152-157. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2021.05.002
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Tacuarembó. Por información adicional contacte bibliotb@tb.inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha actual : |
23/05/2018 |
|
Actualizado : |
23/03/2023 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
CANOZZI, M.E.A.; MEDEROS, A.; TURNER, S.; MANTECA, X.; MCMANNUS, C.; MENEGASSI, S.R.; BARCELLOS, J.O. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARÍA EUGENIA ANDRIGHETTO CANOZZI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; AMERICA ESTHER MEDEROS SILVEIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SIMON TURNER, Animal and Veterinary Sciences Group, Scotland’s Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh, UK.; XAVIER MANTECA, Department of Animal and Food Science, School of Veterinary Science, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.; CONCEPTA MCMANNUS, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brazil.; SILVIO RENATO MENEGASSI, Centre for Research on Production Systems and Beef Cattle Supply Chain (NESPro/UFRGS), Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.; JULIO OTÁVIO BARCELLOS, Centre for Research on Production Systems and Beef Cattle Supply Chain (NESPro/UFRGS), Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil. |
|
Título : |
Dehorning and welfare indicators in beef cattle: A meta-analysis. |
|
Complemento del título : |
Review. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2019 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Animal Production Science, 2019, Volume 59, Issue 5, p. 801-814. doi: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17752 |
|
DOI : |
10.1071/AN17752 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
History Article: Received 27 January 2017 // accepted 11 April 2018 // published online 30 May 2018. -- Corresponding author: Barcellos, J.O.J.; Centre for Research on Production Systems and Beef Cattle Supply Chain (NESPro/UFRGS), Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande Do sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil; email:julio.barcellos@ufrgs.br -- |
|
Contenido : |
Dehorning is a common practice in cattle farming. Researchers suggest that pain during dehorning can be mitigated, although there is no conclusive evidence about the best technique and the best manner of pain relief. A systematic review-meta-analysis was performed to clarify the effect of dehorning on welfare indicators (cortisol concentration or average daily gain [ADG] or vocalisation) in beef cattle up to 12 months of age. Five electronic databases were systematically searched, as well as conference proceedings and experts were contacted electronically. Pre-defined protocols were applied during all steps of the systematic review process. A random effect meta-analysis was conducted for each indicator separately with the mean of the control and treated groups. Four publications reporting 7 studies and 69 trials were included in the MA involving 287 cattle. Heterogeneity between studies was observed for cortisol (I2 = 50.5%), ADG (I2 = 70.5%), and vocalisation (I2 = 91.9%). When comparing the non-dehorned group with amputation dehorning, the cortisol concentration was lower 30 min (P < 0.0001) and 120 min (P = 0.023) after procedure (0.767 nmol/L and 0.680 nmol/L, respectively). Local anaesthesia did not show a reduction in cortisol concentration at 30 min after dehorning by amputation. Non-dehorned animals had a tendency to decrease the number of vocalisation (P = 0.081; MD = 0.929) compared with the group dehorned by amputation. These results suggest that dehorning is a painful experience and that local anaesthesia did not alleviate short-term pain following dehorning. Further investigation into pain relief is required to improve confident decision making under practical conditions. © 2019 CSIRO. MenosDehorning is a common practice in cattle farming. Researchers suggest that pain during dehorning can be mitigated, although there is no conclusive evidence about the best technique and the best manner of pain relief. A systematic review-meta-analysis was performed to clarify the effect of dehorning on welfare indicators (cortisol concentration or average daily gain [ADG] or vocalisation) in beef cattle up to 12 months of age. Five electronic databases were systematically searched, as well as conference proceedings and experts were contacted electronically. Pre-defined protocols were applied during all steps of the systematic review process. A random effect meta-analysis was conducted for each indicator separately with the mean of the control and treated groups. Four publications reporting 7 studies and 69 trials were included in the MA involving 287 cattle. Heterogeneity between studies was observed for cortisol (I2 = 50.5%), ADG (I2 = 70.5%), and vocalisation (I2 = 91.9%). When comparing the non-dehorned group with amputation dehorning, the cortisol concentration was lower 30 min (P < 0.0001) and 120 min (P = 0.023) after procedure (0.767 nmol/L and 0.680 nmol/L, respectively). Local anaesthesia did not show a reduction in cortisol concentration at 30 min after dehorning by amputation. Non-dehorned animals had a tendency to decrease the number of vocalisation (P = 0.081; MD = 0.929) compared with the group dehorned by amputation. These results suggest that dehorning is a pa... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
ANIMAL ANALGESICS; ANIMAL PAIN; ANIMAL WELFARE; BEEF CATTLE; CATTLE. |
|
Thesagro : |
BIENESTAR ANIMAL. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02911naa a2200289 a 4500
001 1058621
005 2023-03-23
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1071/AN17752$2DOI
100 1 $aCANOZZI, M.E.A.
245 $aDehorning and welfare indicators in beef cattle$bA meta-analysis.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2019
500 $aHistory Article: Received 27 January 2017 // accepted 11 April 2018 // published online 30 May 2018. -- Corresponding author: Barcellos, J.O.J.; Centre for Research on Production Systems and Beef Cattle Supply Chain (NESPro/UFRGS), Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande Do sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil; email:julio.barcellos@ufrgs.br --
520 $aDehorning is a common practice in cattle farming. Researchers suggest that pain during dehorning can be mitigated, although there is no conclusive evidence about the best technique and the best manner of pain relief. A systematic review-meta-analysis was performed to clarify the effect of dehorning on welfare indicators (cortisol concentration or average daily gain [ADG] or vocalisation) in beef cattle up to 12 months of age. Five electronic databases were systematically searched, as well as conference proceedings and experts were contacted electronically. Pre-defined protocols were applied during all steps of the systematic review process. A random effect meta-analysis was conducted for each indicator separately with the mean of the control and treated groups. Four publications reporting 7 studies and 69 trials were included in the MA involving 287 cattle. Heterogeneity between studies was observed for cortisol (I2 = 50.5%), ADG (I2 = 70.5%), and vocalisation (I2 = 91.9%). When comparing the non-dehorned group with amputation dehorning, the cortisol concentration was lower 30 min (P < 0.0001) and 120 min (P = 0.023) after procedure (0.767 nmol/L and 0.680 nmol/L, respectively). Local anaesthesia did not show a reduction in cortisol concentration at 30 min after dehorning by amputation. Non-dehorned animals had a tendency to decrease the number of vocalisation (P = 0.081; MD = 0.929) compared with the group dehorned by amputation. These results suggest that dehorning is a painful experience and that local anaesthesia did not alleviate short-term pain following dehorning. Further investigation into pain relief is required to improve confident decision making under practical conditions. © 2019 CSIRO.
650 $aBIENESTAR ANIMAL
653 $aANIMAL ANALGESICS
653 $aANIMAL PAIN
653 $aANIMAL WELFARE
653 $aBEEF CATTLE
653 $aCATTLE
700 1 $aMEDEROS, A.
700 1 $aTURNER, S.
700 1 $aMANTECA, X.
700 1 $aMCMANNUS, C.
700 1 $aMENEGASSI, S.R.
700 1 $aBARCELLOS, J.O.
773 $tAnimal Production Science, 2019, Volume 59, Issue 5, p. 801-814. doi: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17752
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
