|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Treinta y Tres. Por información adicional contacte bibliott@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
Fecha : |
16/10/2018 |
Actualizado : |
11/02/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
BORGES, A.; GONZÁLEZ-REYMUNDEZ, A.; ERNST, O.; CADENAZZI, M.; TERRA, J.A.; GUTIÉRREZ, L. |
Afiliación : |
ALEJANDRA BORGES, Departamento de Estadística. Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR.; AGUSTÍN GONZÁLEZ-REYMUNDEZ, Departamento de Estadística. Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR.; OSVALDO, ERNST, Departamento de Producción de Cultivos. EEMAC, Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR.; MÓNICA CADENAZZI, Departamento de Estadística. Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR.; JOSÉ ALFREDO TERRA FERNÁNDEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; LUCÍA GUTIÉRREZ, Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin. |
Título : |
Can spatial modeling substitute experimental design in agricultural experiments? |
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Crop Science, 2018, v. 59, no. 1, p. 1-10. |
DOI : |
10.2135/cropsci2018.03.0177 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Accepted paper, posted 10/05/18. Published online December, 13. 2018. |
Contenido : |
Abstract:
One of the most critical aspects of agricultural experimentation is the proper choice of experimental design to control field heterogeneity, especially for large experiments. However, even with complex experimental designs, spatial variability may not be properly controlled if it occurs at scales smaller than blocks. Therefore, modeling spatial variability can be beneficial and some studies even propose spatial modeling instead of experimental design. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of experimental design, spatial modeling, and a combination of both under real field conditions using GIS and simulating experiments. Yield data from cultivars was simulated using real spatial variability from a large uniformity trial of one hundred independent locations and different sizes of experiments for four experimental designs: completely randomized design (CRD), randomized complete block design (RCBD), alpha-lattice incomplete block design (ALPHA), and partially replicated design (PREP). Each realization was analyzed using different levels of spatial correction. Models were compared by precision, accuracy, and the recovery of superior genotypes. For moderate and large experiment sizes, ALPHA was the best experimental design in terms of precision and accuracy. In most situations, models that included spatial correlation were better than models with no spatial correlation but they did not outperformed better experimental designs. Therefore, spatial modeling is not a substitute for good experimental design. MenosAbstract:
One of the most critical aspects of agricultural experimentation is the proper choice of experimental design to control field heterogeneity, especially for large experiments. However, even with complex experimental designs, spatial variability may not be properly controlled if it occurs at scales smaller than blocks. Therefore, modeling spatial variability can be beneficial and some studies even propose spatial modeling instead of experimental design. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of experimental design, spatial modeling, and a combination of both under real field conditions using GIS and simulating experiments. Yield data from cultivars was simulated using real spatial variability from a large uniformity trial of one hundred independent locations and different sizes of experiments for four experimental designs: completely randomized design (CRD), randomized complete block design (RCBD), alpha-lattice incomplete block design (ALPHA), and partially replicated design (PREP). Each realization was analyzed using different levels of spatial correction. Models were compared by precision, accuracy, and the recovery of superior genotypes. For moderate and large experiment sizes, ALPHA was the best experimental design in terms of precision and accuracy. In most situations, models that included spatial correlation were better than models with no spatial correlation but they did not outperformed better experimental designs. Therefore, spatial modeling is not a substitut... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
EFFICIENCY STATISTICS; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FIELD VARIABILITY; SPATIAL MODELS; UNIFORMITY TRIAL. |
Thesagro : |
DISENO ESTADISTICO; DISENO EXPERIMENTAL; MODELOS ESTADISTICOS; VARIABILIDAD. |
Asunto categoría : |
U30 Métodos de investigación |
Marc : |
LEADER 02512naa a2200313 a 4500 001 1059193 005 2019-02-11 008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.2135/cropsci2018.03.0177$2DOI 100 1 $aBORGES, A. 245 $aCan spatial modeling substitute experimental design in agricultural experiments?$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2018 500 $aArticle history: Accepted paper, posted 10/05/18. Published online December, 13. 2018. 520 $aAbstract: One of the most critical aspects of agricultural experimentation is the proper choice of experimental design to control field heterogeneity, especially for large experiments. However, even with complex experimental designs, spatial variability may not be properly controlled if it occurs at scales smaller than blocks. Therefore, modeling spatial variability can be beneficial and some studies even propose spatial modeling instead of experimental design. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of experimental design, spatial modeling, and a combination of both under real field conditions using GIS and simulating experiments. Yield data from cultivars was simulated using real spatial variability from a large uniformity trial of one hundred independent locations and different sizes of experiments for four experimental designs: completely randomized design (CRD), randomized complete block design (RCBD), alpha-lattice incomplete block design (ALPHA), and partially replicated design (PREP). Each realization was analyzed using different levels of spatial correction. Models were compared by precision, accuracy, and the recovery of superior genotypes. For moderate and large experiment sizes, ALPHA was the best experimental design in terms of precision and accuracy. In most situations, models that included spatial correlation were better than models with no spatial correlation but they did not outperformed better experimental designs. Therefore, spatial modeling is not a substitute for good experimental design. 650 $aDISENO ESTADISTICO 650 $aDISENO EXPERIMENTAL 650 $aMODELOS ESTADISTICOS 650 $aVARIABILIDAD 653 $aEFFICIENCY STATISTICS 653 $aEXPERIMENTAL DESIGN 653 $aFIELD VARIABILITY 653 $aSPATIAL MODELS 653 $aUNIFORMITY TRIAL 700 1 $aGONZÁLEZ-REYMUNDEZ, A. 700 1 $aERNST, O. 700 1 $aCADENAZZI, M. 700 1 $aTERRA, J.A. 700 1 $aGUTIÉRREZ, L. 773 $tCrop Science, 2018$gv. 59, no. 1, p. 1-10.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
08/02/2023 |
Actualizado : |
08/02/2023 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
BERMANN, M.; AGUILAR, I.; LOURENCO , D.; MISZTAL, I.; LEGARRA, A. |
Afiliación : |
MATIAS BERMANN, Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA; IGNACIO AGUILAR GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; DANIELA LOURENCO, Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA; IGNACY MISZTAL, Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA; ANDRES LEGARRA, Present address: Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding, Bowie, MD, 20716, USA; GenPhySE, INRAE, ENVT, Université de Toulouse, 31326, Castanet-Tolosan, France. |
Título : |
Reliabilities of estimated breeding values in models with metafounders. |
Complemento del título : |
Research article. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2023 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Genetics, Selection, Evolution : GSE, 2023, volume55, issue 1, article 6. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-023-00778-2 |
ISSN : |
1297-9686 |
DOI : |
10.1186/s12711-023-00778-2 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 29 June 2022; Accepted 04 January 2023; Published 23 January 2023. -- Corresponding author: Matias Bermann, Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA, email: mbermann@uga.edu -- FUNDING: This study was partially funded by Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant No. 2020-67015-31030 from the US Department of Agriculture?s National Institute of Food and Agriculture. This project has received funding from the European Unions' Horizon 2020 Research & Innovation program under Grant Agreement No. 772787-SMARTER. -- Document type: Article Gold Open Access, Green Open Access. -- LICENSE: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- Conclusions: This work provides a general method to obtain reliabilities for both BLUP and ssGBLUP when several base populations are included through metafounders. © 2023, The Author(s). |
Palabras claves : |
Best linear unbiased predictions (BLUP); Biological model; Breeding; Correlation; GENOME; Numerical model; Sheep; SISTEMA GANADERO EXTENSIVO - INIA. |
Asunto categoría : |
L10 Genética y mejoramiento animal |
URL : |
https://gsejournal.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s12711-023-00778-2.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02138naa a2200301 a 4500 001 1063956 005 2023-02-08 008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1297-9686 024 7 $a10.1186/s12711-023-00778-2$2DOI 100 1 $aBERMANN, M. 245 $aReliabilities of estimated breeding values in models with metafounders.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2023 500 $aArticle history: Received 29 June 2022; Accepted 04 January 2023; Published 23 January 2023. -- Corresponding author: Matias Bermann, Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA, email: mbermann@uga.edu -- FUNDING: This study was partially funded by Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant No. 2020-67015-31030 from the US Department of Agriculture?s National Institute of Food and Agriculture. This project has received funding from the European Unions' Horizon 2020 Research & Innovation program under Grant Agreement No. 772787-SMARTER. -- Document type: Article Gold Open Access, Green Open Access. -- LICENSE: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. 520 $aABSTRACT.- Conclusions: This work provides a general method to obtain reliabilities for both BLUP and ssGBLUP when several base populations are included through metafounders. © 2023, The Author(s). 653 $aBest linear unbiased predictions (BLUP) 653 $aBiological model 653 $aBreeding 653 $aCorrelation 653 $aGENOME 653 $aNumerical model 653 $aSheep 653 $aSISTEMA GANADERO EXTENSIVO - INIA 700 1 $aAGUILAR, I. 700 1 $aLOURENCO , D. 700 1 $aMISZTAL, I. 700 1 $aLEGARRA, A. 773 $tGenetics, Selection, Evolution : GSE, 2023, volume55, issue 1, article 6. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-023-00778-2
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|