| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
20/05/2022 |
|
Actualizado : |
20/05/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
SESSIM, A. G.; CANOZZI, M.E.A.; PEREIRA, G. R.; CASTILHO, E. M.; BARCELLOS, J. O. J. |
|
Afiliación : |
AMIR GIL SESSIM, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MARÍA EUGENIA ANDRIGHETTO CANOZZI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GABRIEL RIBAS PEREIRA, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; EDUARDO MADEIRA CASTILHO, Federal University of Pelotas, UFPEL, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Pelotas, Brazil; JÚLIO OTÁVIO JARDIM BARCELLOS, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil. |
|
Título : |
Financial performance and opportunistic commercialization of beef production systems in southern Brazil. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Pecuarias, 2022, Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 127 - 144. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v13i1.5888 |
|
ISSN : |
2007-1124; e-ISSN: 2448-6698 |
|
DOI : |
10.22319/RMCP.V13I1.5888 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 3 December 2020; Accepted 07 June 2021; Published January 2022.
Publisher: INIFAP-CENID Parasitologia Veterinaria. Corresponding author: Sessim, A.G.; Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; email:amirsessim@hotmail.com -- This study was supported by the Brazilian Council of Scientific and Technological Development (Project CNPq No. 133454/2014-2) and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel/CAPES, Brazil (Project CAPES/PNPD No. 2842/2010). Licencia: licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- This study compares the technical and financial performance of different beef cattle production systems and assesses the opportunistic commercialization practiced in these systems. It was evaluated data from four production units located in southern Brazil: cow-calf in native pastures (CCNP; 1,155 ha; 1,529 animals); cow-calf with agriculture (CCA; 1,008 ha; 1,313 animals); rearing-fattening (RFU; 360 ha; 435 animals); and fattening (FU; 205 ha; 168 animals) as well as an integrated system simulating the physical and economic parameters of the four units (IAS; 2,728 ha; 3,445 animals). The four independent units were considered as opportunistic commercialization and IAS as non-opportunistic. The highest yield was obtained for RFU (297 kg/ha), followed by IAS (114 kg/ha), FU (98 kg/ha), CCNP (87 kg/ha), and CCA (83 kg/ha). The CCNP was the most economically efficient, considering the gross margin per kilogram (GM/kg) (US$ 0.93). The GM/kg value of IAS (US$ 0.74) was 37 % higher compared to the sum of the average of the four units (US$ 0.54), and IAS had the lowest total production costs per kg (22.5 %). It was concluded that each independent unit could increase GM/kg (37 %) and GM/ha (3.8 %) and use calves in a rearing-fattening unit for further sale. Hence, the integration of beef production systems increases the gross margin of firms, presenting a profitable business advantage to rural entrepreneurs through non-opportunistic commercialization.
© 2022 INIFAP-CENID Parasitologia Veterinaria. All rights reserved. MenosABSTRACT.- This study compares the technical and financial performance of different beef cattle production systems and assesses the opportunistic commercialization practiced in these systems. It was evaluated data from four production units located in southern Brazil: cow-calf in native pastures (CCNP; 1,155 ha; 1,529 animals); cow-calf with agriculture (CCA; 1,008 ha; 1,313 animals); rearing-fattening (RFU; 360 ha; 435 animals); and fattening (FU; 205 ha; 168 animals) as well as an integrated system simulating the physical and economic parameters of the four units (IAS; 2,728 ha; 3,445 animals). The four independent units were considered as opportunistic commercialization and IAS as non-opportunistic. The highest yield was obtained for RFU (297 kg/ha), followed by IAS (114 kg/ha), FU (98 kg/ha), CCNP (87 kg/ha), and CCA (83 kg/ha). The CCNP was the most economically efficient, considering the gross margin per kilogram (GM/kg) (US$ 0.93). The GM/kg value of IAS (US$ 0.74) was 37 % higher compared to the sum of the average of the four units (US$ 0.54), and IAS had the lowest total production costs per kg (22.5 %). It was concluded that each independent unit could increase GM/kg (37 %) and GM/ha (3.8 %) and use calves in a rearing-fattening unit for further sale. Hence, the integration of beef production systems increases the gross margin of firms, presenting a profitable business advantage to rural entrepreneurs through non-opportunistic commercialization.
© 2022 INIFAP-CENI... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Animal production; Economy; Gross revenue; Integration; PLATAFORMA SALUD ANINMAL; Production cost. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
|
URL : |
https://cienciaspecuarias.inifap.gob.mx/index.php/Pecuarias/article/download/5888/4707
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03152naa a2200277 a 4500
001 1063153
005 2022-05-20
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a2007-1124; e-ISSN: 2448-6698
024 7 $a10.22319/RMCP.V13I1.5888$2DOI
100 1 $aSESSIM, A. G.
245 $aFinancial performance and opportunistic commercialization of beef production systems in southern Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aArticle history: Received 3 December 2020; Accepted 07 June 2021; Published January 2022. Publisher: INIFAP-CENID Parasitologia Veterinaria. Corresponding author: Sessim, A.G.; Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; email:amirsessim@hotmail.com -- This study was supported by the Brazilian Council of Scientific and Technological Development (Project CNPq No. 133454/2014-2) and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel/CAPES, Brazil (Project CAPES/PNPD No. 2842/2010). Licencia: licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.
520 $aABSTRACT.- This study compares the technical and financial performance of different beef cattle production systems and assesses the opportunistic commercialization practiced in these systems. It was evaluated data from four production units located in southern Brazil: cow-calf in native pastures (CCNP; 1,155 ha; 1,529 animals); cow-calf with agriculture (CCA; 1,008 ha; 1,313 animals); rearing-fattening (RFU; 360 ha; 435 animals); and fattening (FU; 205 ha; 168 animals) as well as an integrated system simulating the physical and economic parameters of the four units (IAS; 2,728 ha; 3,445 animals). The four independent units were considered as opportunistic commercialization and IAS as non-opportunistic. The highest yield was obtained for RFU (297 kg/ha), followed by IAS (114 kg/ha), FU (98 kg/ha), CCNP (87 kg/ha), and CCA (83 kg/ha). The CCNP was the most economically efficient, considering the gross margin per kilogram (GM/kg) (US$ 0.93). The GM/kg value of IAS (US$ 0.74) was 37 % higher compared to the sum of the average of the four units (US$ 0.54), and IAS had the lowest total production costs per kg (22.5 %). It was concluded that each independent unit could increase GM/kg (37 %) and GM/ha (3.8 %) and use calves in a rearing-fattening unit for further sale. Hence, the integration of beef production systems increases the gross margin of firms, presenting a profitable business advantage to rural entrepreneurs through non-opportunistic commercialization. © 2022 INIFAP-CENID Parasitologia Veterinaria. All rights reserved.
653 $aAnimal production
653 $aEconomy
653 $aGross revenue
653 $aIntegration
653 $aPLATAFORMA SALUD ANINMAL
653 $aProduction cost
700 1 $aCANOZZI, M.E.A.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, G. R.
700 1 $aCASTILHO, E. M.
700 1 $aBARCELLOS, J. O. J.
773 $tRevista Mexicana De Ciencias Pecuarias, 2022, Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 127 - 144. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v13i1.5888
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha actual : |
13/03/2017 |
|
Actualizado : |
09/10/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
HARRIET, J.; CAMPÁ, J.P.; GRAJALES, M.; LHÉRITIERC, CH.; GÓMEZ PAJUELOD, A.; MENDOZA, Y.; CARRASCO-LETELIER, L. |
|
Afiliación : |
JORGE HARRIET, MGAP-DILAVE .Sección Apicultura, Montevideo, Uruguay.; JUAN PABLO CAMPÁ, MGAP -DILAVE .Sección Apicultura, Montevideo, Uruguay.; MAURICIO GRAJALES, Apícola Integral Las Piedras, Canelones, Uruguay; CHRISTOPHE LHÉRITIERC, Asociación de Exportadores de Miel, Uruguay.; ANTONIO GÓMEZ PAJUELOD, Pajuelo Consultores Apícolas, Sant Miquel 14, 12004 Castellón, España.; YAMANDU MENDOZA SPINA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; LEONIDAS CARRASCO-LETELIER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Agricultural pesticides and veterinary substances in Uruguayan beeswax. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2017 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Chemosphere, v.177, p.77-83, 2017. |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.02.131 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article History: Received 4 November 2016 // Revised 10 February 2017// Accepted 25 February 2017 // Available online 28 February 2017. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract
Over the last decade, Uruguay has expanded and intensified its rainfed crop production. This process has affected beekeeping in several ways: for example, by reducing the space available. This has increased the density of apiaries, the risk of varroosis and acaricide use. Additionally, the dominance of no-tillage crops has increased the frequencies of application and of loads of pesticides in regions where such crops share the land with beekeeping and honey production. Therefore, the exposure of bees to xenobiotics (agricultural pesticides and veterinary products) has increased in line with pollution of hives and their products. To document pollution from hive exposure to pesticides, we surveyed the presence of 30 xenobiotics normally used in Uruguay, in recycled beeswax (RB) and in honey cappings (HC) from the main Uruguayan beekeeping regions. There was contamination of all the analyzed samples (RB and HC) with the herbicide atrazine at a range of 1–2 ng g?1. At least three or four additional xenobiotics were detected: insecticides (chlorpyrifos-ethyl and thiacloprid); fungicides (azoxystrobin and tebuconazole); and veterinary products (coumaphos, ethion, and tau-fluvalinate). The frequency of detection of chlorpyrifos-ethyl and coumaphos in RB samples was higher than in those of HC. Moreover, the concentrations of azoxystrobin, coumaphos, and tebuconazole in RB samples were higher than in HC samples. Therefore, we suggest the use of HC to produce recycled printed beeswax films for use in hives to minimize pollution transfer. MenosAbstract
Over the last decade, Uruguay has expanded and intensified its rainfed crop production. This process has affected beekeeping in several ways: for example, by reducing the space available. This has increased the density of apiaries, the risk of varroosis and acaricide use. Additionally, the dominance of no-tillage crops has increased the frequencies of application and of loads of pesticides in regions where such crops share the land with beekeeping and honey production. Therefore, the exposure of bees to xenobiotics (agricultural pesticides and veterinary products) has increased in line with pollution of hives and their products. To document pollution from hive exposure to pesticides, we surveyed the presence of 30 xenobiotics normally used in Uruguay, in recycled beeswax (RB) and in honey cappings (HC) from the main Uruguayan beekeeping regions. There was contamination of all the analyzed samples (RB and HC) with the herbicide atrazine at a range of 1–2 ng g?1. At least three or four additional xenobiotics were detected: insecticides (chlorpyrifos-ethyl and thiacloprid); fungicides (azoxystrobin and tebuconazole); and veterinary products (coumaphos, ethion, and tau-fluvalinate). The frequency of detection of chlorpyrifos-ethyl and coumaphos in RB samples was higher than in those of HC. Moreover, the concentrations of azoxystrobin, coumaphos, and tebuconazole in RB samples were higher than in HC samples. Therefore, we suggest the use of HC to produce recycled printe... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
ABEJA DE LA MIEL; CERA DE ABEJAS; SALUD DE LA COLMENA. |
|
Thesagro : |
ABEJAS; ACARICIDAS; PLAGUICIDAS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02493naa a2200289 a 4500
001 1056823
005 2019-10-09
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.02.131$2DOI
100 1 $aHARRIET, J.
245 $aAgricultural pesticides and veterinary substances in Uruguayan beeswax.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2017
500 $aArticle History: Received 4 November 2016 // Revised 10 February 2017// Accepted 25 February 2017 // Available online 28 February 2017.
520 $aAbstract Over the last decade, Uruguay has expanded and intensified its rainfed crop production. This process has affected beekeeping in several ways: for example, by reducing the space available. This has increased the density of apiaries, the risk of varroosis and acaricide use. Additionally, the dominance of no-tillage crops has increased the frequencies of application and of loads of pesticides in regions where such crops share the land with beekeeping and honey production. Therefore, the exposure of bees to xenobiotics (agricultural pesticides and veterinary products) has increased in line with pollution of hives and their products. To document pollution from hive exposure to pesticides, we surveyed the presence of 30 xenobiotics normally used in Uruguay, in recycled beeswax (RB) and in honey cappings (HC) from the main Uruguayan beekeeping regions. There was contamination of all the analyzed samples (RB and HC) with the herbicide atrazine at a range of 1–2 ng g?1. At least three or four additional xenobiotics were detected: insecticides (chlorpyrifos-ethyl and thiacloprid); fungicides (azoxystrobin and tebuconazole); and veterinary products (coumaphos, ethion, and tau-fluvalinate). The frequency of detection of chlorpyrifos-ethyl and coumaphos in RB samples was higher than in those of HC. Moreover, the concentrations of azoxystrobin, coumaphos, and tebuconazole in RB samples were higher than in HC samples. Therefore, we suggest the use of HC to produce recycled printed beeswax films for use in hives to minimize pollution transfer.
650 $aABEJAS
650 $aACARICIDAS
650 $aPLAGUICIDAS
653 $aABEJA DE LA MIEL
653 $aCERA DE ABEJAS
653 $aSALUD DE LA COLMENA
700 1 $aCAMPÁ, J.P.
700 1 $aGRAJALES, M.
700 1 $aLHÉRITIERC, CH.
700 1 $aGÓMEZ PAJUELOD, A.
700 1 $aMENDOZA, Y.
700 1 $aCARRASCO-LETELIER, L.
773 $tChemosphere$gv.177, p.77-83, 2017.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
