|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Treinta y Tres. Por información adicional contacte bibliott@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
Fecha : |
21/02/2014 |
Actualizado : |
28/06/2021 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
TERRA, J.A.; SHAW, N.J.; REEVES, D.W.; RAPER, R.L.; VAN SANTEN, E.; MASK, P.L. |
Afiliación : |
JOSÉ ALFREDO TERRA FERNÁNDEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Soil Carbon relationships with terrain attributes, electrical conductivity, and a soil survey in a coastal plain landscape. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2004 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Soil Science, 2004, V. 169, No. 12, p. 819-831. |
DOI : |
10.1097/00010694-200412000-00001 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received May 3, 2004 // Accepted Sept. 30, 2004, Publishing Dec. 2004. |
Contenido : |
Soil organic carbon (SOC) estimation at the landscape level is critical for assessing impacts of management practices on C sequestration and soil quality. We determined relationships between SOC, terrain attributes, field scale soil electrical conductivity (EC), soil texture and soil survey map units in a 9 ha coastal plain field (Aquic and Typic Paleudults) historically managed by conventional means. The site was composite sampled for SOC (0-30 cm) within 18.3 × 8.5-m grids (n = 496), and two data sets were created from the original data. Ordinary kriging, co-kriging, regression kriging and multiple regression were used to develop SOC surfaces that were validated with an independent data set (n = 24) using the mean square error (MSE). The SOC was relatively low (26.13 Mg ha?1) and only moderately variable (CV = 21%), and showed high spatial dependence. Interpolation techniques produced similar SOC maps but the best predictor was ordinary kriging (MSE = 9.11 Mg2 ha?2) while regression was the worst (MSE = 20.65 Mg2 ha?2). Factor analysis indicated that the first three factors explained 57% of field variability; compound topographic index (CTI), slope, EC and soil textural fractions dominated these components. Elevation, slope, CTI, silt content and EC explained up to 50% of the SOC variability (P ? 0.01) suggesting that topography and historical erosion played a significant role in SOC distribution. Field subdivision into soil map units or k-mean clusters similarly decreased SOC variance (about 30%). The study suggests that terrain attributes and EC surveys can be used to differentiate zones of variable SOC content, which may be used as bench marks to evaluate field-level impact of management practices on C sequestration. MenosSoil organic carbon (SOC) estimation at the landscape level is critical for assessing impacts of management practices on C sequestration and soil quality. We determined relationships between SOC, terrain attributes, field scale soil electrical conductivity (EC), soil texture and soil survey map units in a 9 ha coastal plain field (Aquic and Typic Paleudults) historically managed by conventional means. The site was composite sampled for SOC (0-30 cm) within 18.3 × 8.5-m grids (n = 496), and two data sets were created from the original data. Ordinary kriging, co-kriging, regression kriging and multiple regression were used to develop SOC surfaces that were validated with an independent data set (n = 24) using the mean square error (MSE). The SOC was relatively low (26.13 Mg ha?1) and only moderately variable (CV = 21%), and showed high spatial dependence. Interpolation techniques produced similar SOC maps but the best predictor was ordinary kriging (MSE = 9.11 Mg2 ha?2) while regression was the worst (MSE = 20.65 Mg2 ha?2). Factor analysis indicated that the first three factors explained 57% of field variability; compound topographic index (CTI), slope, EC and soil textural fractions dominated these components. Elevation, slope, CTI, silt content and EC explained up to 50% of the SOC variability (P ? 0.01) suggesting that topography and historical erosion played a significant role in SOC distribution. Field subdivision into soil map units or k-mean clusters similarly decreased... Presentar Todo |
Thesagro : |
MANEJO DEL SUELO; SUELO. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
Marc : |
LEADER 02522naa a2200229 a 4500 001 1032966 005 2021-06-28 008 2004 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1097/00010694-200412000-00001$2DOI 100 1 $aTERRA, J.A. 245 $aSoil Carbon relationships with terrain attributes, electrical conductivity, and a soil survey in a coastal plain landscape.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2004 500 $aArticle history: Received May 3, 2004 // Accepted Sept. 30, 2004, Publishing Dec. 2004. 520 $aSoil organic carbon (SOC) estimation at the landscape level is critical for assessing impacts of management practices on C sequestration and soil quality. We determined relationships between SOC, terrain attributes, field scale soil electrical conductivity (EC), soil texture and soil survey map units in a 9 ha coastal plain field (Aquic and Typic Paleudults) historically managed by conventional means. The site was composite sampled for SOC (0-30 cm) within 18.3 × 8.5-m grids (n = 496), and two data sets were created from the original data. Ordinary kriging, co-kriging, regression kriging and multiple regression were used to develop SOC surfaces that were validated with an independent data set (n = 24) using the mean square error (MSE). The SOC was relatively low (26.13 Mg ha?1) and only moderately variable (CV = 21%), and showed high spatial dependence. Interpolation techniques produced similar SOC maps but the best predictor was ordinary kriging (MSE = 9.11 Mg2 ha?2) while regression was the worst (MSE = 20.65 Mg2 ha?2). Factor analysis indicated that the first three factors explained 57% of field variability; compound topographic index (CTI), slope, EC and soil textural fractions dominated these components. Elevation, slope, CTI, silt content and EC explained up to 50% of the SOC variability (P ? 0.01) suggesting that topography and historical erosion played a significant role in SOC distribution. Field subdivision into soil map units or k-mean clusters similarly decreased SOC variance (about 30%). The study suggests that terrain attributes and EC surveys can be used to differentiate zones of variable SOC content, which may be used as bench marks to evaluate field-level impact of management practices on C sequestration. 650 $aMANEJO DEL SUELO 650 $aSUELO 700 1 $aSHAW, N.J. 700 1 $aREEVES, D.W. 700 1 $aRAPER, R.L. 700 1 $aVAN SANTEN, E. 700 1 $aMASK, P.L. 773 $tSoil Science, 2004, V. 169, No. 12, p. 819-831.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
26/11/2015 |
Actualizado : |
15/10/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
CARDOSO, F. F.; GOMES, C.C.G.; SOLLERO, B. P.; OLIVEIRA, M. M.; ROSO, V. M.; PICCOLI, M. L.; HIGA, R. H.; YOKOO, M. J.; CAETANO, A. R.; AGUILAR, I. |
Afiliación : |
F. F. CARDOSO, EMBRAPA (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária); Universidad Federal de Pelotas; C.C.G. GOMES, EMBRAPA (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária); B. P. SOLLERO, EMBRAPA (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária); M.M. OLIVEIRA, EMBRAPA (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária); V.M. ROSO, Gensys Associated Consulants; M.L. PICCOLI, EMBRAPA (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária); R.H. HIGA, Gensys Associated Consulants; Universidad Federal de Rio Grande Do Sul (UFRGS); M.J. YOKKO, EMBRAPA (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária); A.R. CAETANO, EMBRAPA (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária); IGNACIO AGUILAR GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Genomic prediction for tick resistance in Braford and Hereford cattle. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2015 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Journal of Animal Science, 2015. v. 95, p. 2693-2705. Published June 25, 2015 |
DOI : |
10.2527/jas2014-8832 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received December 19, 2014 / Accepted April 6, 2015. |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
One of the main animal health problems in tropical and subtropical cattle production is the bovine tick, which causes decreased performance, hide devaluation, increased production costs with acaricide treatments, and transmission of infectious diseases. This study investigated the utility of genomic prediction as a tool to select Braford (BO) and Hereford (HH) cattle resistant to ticks. The accuracy and bias of different methods for direct and blended genomic prediction was assessed using 10,673 tick counts obtained from 3,435 BO and
928 HH cattle belonging to the Delta G Connection breeding program. A subset of 2,803 BO and 652 HH samples were genotyped and 41,045 markers remained after quality control. Log transformed records were adjusted by a pedigree repeatability model to estimate variance components, genetic parameters, and breeding values (EBV) and subsequently used to obtain deregressed EBV. Estimated heritability and repeatability for tick counts were 0.19 ± 0.03 and 0.29 ± 0.01, respectively. Data were split into 5 subsets using k-means and random clustering for cross-validation of genomic predictions. Depending on the method, direct genomic value (DGV) prediction accuracies ranged from 0.35 with Bayes least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) to 0.39 with BayesB for k-means clustering and between 0.42 with BayesLASSO and 0.45 with BayesC for random clustering. All genomic methods were superior to pedigree BLUP (PBLUP) accuracies of 0.26 for k-means and 0.29 for random groups, with highest accuracy gains obtained with BayesB (39%) for k-means and BayesC (55%) for random groups. Blending of historical phenotypic and pedigree information by different methods further increased DGV
accuracies by values between 0.03 and 0.05 for direct prediction methods. However, highest accuracy was observed with single-step genomic BLUP with values of 0.48 for k-means and 0.56, which represent, respectively, 84 and 93% improvement over PBLUP. Observed random clustering cross-validation breedspecific accuracies ranged between 0.29 and 0.36 for HH and between 0.55 and 0.61 for BO, depending on the blending method. These moderately high values for BO demonstrate that genomic predictions could be used as a practical tool to improve genetic resistance to ticks and in the development of resistant lines of this breed. For HH, accuracies are still in the low to moderate side and this breed training population needs to be increased before genomic selection could be reliably applied to improve tick resistance.
© 2015 American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. MenosABSTRACT.
One of the main animal health problems in tropical and subtropical cattle production is the bovine tick, which causes decreased performance, hide devaluation, increased production costs with acaricide treatments, and transmission of infectious diseases. This study investigated the utility of genomic prediction as a tool to select Braford (BO) and Hereford (HH) cattle resistant to ticks. The accuracy and bias of different methods for direct and blended genomic prediction was assessed using 10,673 tick counts obtained from 3,435 BO and
928 HH cattle belonging to the Delta G Connection breeding program. A subset of 2,803 BO and 652 HH samples were genotyped and 41,045 markers remained after quality control. Log transformed records were adjusted by a pedigree repeatability model to estimate variance components, genetic parameters, and breeding values (EBV) and subsequently used to obtain deregressed EBV. Estimated heritability and repeatability for tick counts were 0.19 ± 0.03 and 0.29 ± 0.01, respectively. Data were split into 5 subsets using k-means and random clustering for cross-validation of genomic predictions. Depending on the method, direct genomic value (DGV) prediction accuracies ranged from 0.35 with Bayes least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) to 0.39 with BayesB for k-means clustering and between 0.42 with BayesLASSO and 0.45 with BayesC for random clustering. All genomic methods were superior to pedigree BLUP (PBLUP) accuracies of 0.26 f... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
BEEF CATLLE; GENOMIC SELECTION; HEALTH; TICK RESISTANCE. |
Thesagro : |
GANADO DE CARNE; MEJORAMIENTO GENETICO ANIMAL; SALUD. |
Asunto categoría : |
L10 Genética y mejoramiento animal |
Marc : |
LEADER 03639naa a2200337 a 4500 001 1054002 005 2019-10-15 008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.2527/jas2014-8832$2DOI 100 1 $aCARDOSO, F. F. 245 $aGenomic prediction for tick resistance in Braford and Hereford cattle.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2015 500 $aArticle history: Received December 19, 2014 / Accepted April 6, 2015. 520 $aABSTRACT. One of the main animal health problems in tropical and subtropical cattle production is the bovine tick, which causes decreased performance, hide devaluation, increased production costs with acaricide treatments, and transmission of infectious diseases. This study investigated the utility of genomic prediction as a tool to select Braford (BO) and Hereford (HH) cattle resistant to ticks. The accuracy and bias of different methods for direct and blended genomic prediction was assessed using 10,673 tick counts obtained from 3,435 BO and 928 HH cattle belonging to the Delta G Connection breeding program. A subset of 2,803 BO and 652 HH samples were genotyped and 41,045 markers remained after quality control. Log transformed records were adjusted by a pedigree repeatability model to estimate variance components, genetic parameters, and breeding values (EBV) and subsequently used to obtain deregressed EBV. Estimated heritability and repeatability for tick counts were 0.19 ± 0.03 and 0.29 ± 0.01, respectively. Data were split into 5 subsets using k-means and random clustering for cross-validation of genomic predictions. Depending on the method, direct genomic value (DGV) prediction accuracies ranged from 0.35 with Bayes least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) to 0.39 with BayesB for k-means clustering and between 0.42 with BayesLASSO and 0.45 with BayesC for random clustering. All genomic methods were superior to pedigree BLUP (PBLUP) accuracies of 0.26 for k-means and 0.29 for random groups, with highest accuracy gains obtained with BayesB (39%) for k-means and BayesC (55%) for random groups. Blending of historical phenotypic and pedigree information by different methods further increased DGV accuracies by values between 0.03 and 0.05 for direct prediction methods. However, highest accuracy was observed with single-step genomic BLUP with values of 0.48 for k-means and 0.56, which represent, respectively, 84 and 93% improvement over PBLUP. Observed random clustering cross-validation breedspecific accuracies ranged between 0.29 and 0.36 for HH and between 0.55 and 0.61 for BO, depending on the blending method. These moderately high values for BO demonstrate that genomic predictions could be used as a practical tool to improve genetic resistance to ticks and in the development of resistant lines of this breed. For HH, accuracies are still in the low to moderate side and this breed training population needs to be increased before genomic selection could be reliably applied to improve tick resistance. © 2015 American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. 650 $aGANADO DE CARNE 650 $aMEJORAMIENTO GENETICO ANIMAL 650 $aSALUD 653 $aBEEF CATLLE 653 $aGENOMIC SELECTION 653 $aHEALTH 653 $aTICK RESISTANCE 700 1 $aGOMES, C.C.G. 700 1 $aSOLLERO, B. P. 700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, M. M. 700 1 $aROSO, V. M. 700 1 $aPICCOLI, M. L. 700 1 $aHIGA, R. H. 700 1 $aYOKOO, M. J. 700 1 $aCAETANO, A. R. 700 1 $aAGUILAR, I. 773 $tJournal of Animal Science, 2015.$gv. 95, p. 2693-2705. Published June 25, 2015
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|