| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Treinta y Tres. Por información adicional contacte bibliott@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha : |
21/02/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
11/10/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
TERRA, J.A.; SHAW, J.; REEVES, D. W.; RAPER, R.L.; VAN SANTEN, E.; SCHWAB, E.B.; MASK, P.L. |
|
Afiliación : |
JOSÉ ALFREDO TERRA FERNÁNDEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Soil management and landscape variability affects field-scale cotton productivity. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2006 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2006, v.70 (1), p. 98-107. |
|
ISSN : |
0361-5995 |
|
DOI : |
10.2136/sssaj2005.0179 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Artilce history: Received 8 June 2005 // Published Jan. 2006. |
|
Contenido : |
A better understanding of interactions between soil management and landscape variability and their effects on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) productivity is needed for precision management. We assessed management practices and landscape variability effects on seed cotton yield in a 9-ha, Alabama field (Typic and Aquic Paleudults) during 2001–2003. We hypothesize that landscapes have major effects on cotton productivity, but these effects vary based on management and climate. Treatments were established in replicated strips traversing the landscape in a corn (Zea mays L.)–cotton rotation.
Treatments included a conventional system with or without 10 Mg ha21 yr21 dairy manure (CTmanure or CT), and a conservation system with and without manure (NTmanure or NT). Conventional systems consisted of chisel plowing/disking 1 in-row subsoiling without cover crops. Conservation systems combined no surface tillage with in-row subsoiling and winter cover crops. A soil survey, topographic survey, and interpolated surfaces of soil electrical conductivity (EC), soil organic carbon (SOC), and surface soil texture were used to delineate five zones using fuzzy k-means clustering. Overall (2001–2003), conservation systems improved cotton yield compared with conventional systems (2710 vs. 2380 kg ha21 ); neither manure nor treatment 3 year interactions were significant. The conservation system was more
productive than the conventional system in 87% of the cluster 3 year combinations. Slope, EC, SOC, and clay content were correlated with yield in all treatments. Soil and terrain attributes explained 16 to 64% of yield variation, however, their significance fluctuated between years and treatments. In dry years, factor analyses suggested variables related with soil quality and field-scale water dynamics had greater impacts on CT yields than NT yields. Our results indicate that management zones developed using relatively static soil-landscape data are relatively more suitable for conservation systems, and these zones are affected by soil management. In addition, the impact of NT on yields is most apparent on degraded soils in dry years. MenosA better understanding of interactions between soil management and landscape variability and their effects on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) productivity is needed for precision management. We assessed management practices and landscape variability effects on seed cotton yield in a 9-ha, Alabama field (Typic and Aquic Paleudults) during 2001–2003. We hypothesize that landscapes have major effects on cotton productivity, but these effects vary based on management and climate. Treatments were established in replicated strips traversing the landscape in a corn (Zea mays L.)–cotton rotation.
Treatments included a conventional system with or without 10 Mg ha21 yr21 dairy manure (CTmanure or CT), and a conservation system with and without manure (NTmanure or NT). Conventional systems consisted of chisel plowing/disking 1 in-row subsoiling without cover crops. Conservation systems combined no surface tillage with in-row subsoiling and winter cover crops. A soil survey, topographic survey, and interpolated surfaces of soil electrical conductivity (EC), soil organic carbon (SOC), and surface soil texture were used to delineate five zones using fuzzy k-means clustering. Overall (2001–2003), conservation systems improved cotton yield compared with conventional systems (2710 vs. 2380 kg ha21 ); neither manure nor treatment 3 year interactions were significant. The conservation system was more
productive than the conventional system in 87% of the cluster 3 year combinations. Slope, EC, S... Presentar Todo |
|
Thesagro : |
ALGODON; SUELOS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
P36 Erosión conservación y recuperación del suelo |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02913naa a2200253 a 4500
001 1032797
005 2019-10-11
008 2006 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0361-5995
024 7 $a10.2136/sssaj2005.0179$2DOI
100 1 $aTERRA, J.A.
245 $aSoil management and landscape variability affects field-scale cotton productivity.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2006
500 $aArtilce history: Received 8 June 2005 // Published Jan. 2006.
520 $aA better understanding of interactions between soil management and landscape variability and their effects on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) productivity is needed for precision management. We assessed management practices and landscape variability effects on seed cotton yield in a 9-ha, Alabama field (Typic and Aquic Paleudults) during 2001–2003. We hypothesize that landscapes have major effects on cotton productivity, but these effects vary based on management and climate. Treatments were established in replicated strips traversing the landscape in a corn (Zea mays L.)–cotton rotation. Treatments included a conventional system with or without 10 Mg ha21 yr21 dairy manure (CTmanure or CT), and a conservation system with and without manure (NTmanure or NT). Conventional systems consisted of chisel plowing/disking 1 in-row subsoiling without cover crops. Conservation systems combined no surface tillage with in-row subsoiling and winter cover crops. A soil survey, topographic survey, and interpolated surfaces of soil electrical conductivity (EC), soil organic carbon (SOC), and surface soil texture were used to delineate five zones using fuzzy k-means clustering. Overall (2001–2003), conservation systems improved cotton yield compared with conventional systems (2710 vs. 2380 kg ha21 ); neither manure nor treatment 3 year interactions were significant. The conservation system was more productive than the conventional system in 87% of the cluster 3 year combinations. Slope, EC, SOC, and clay content were correlated with yield in all treatments. Soil and terrain attributes explained 16 to 64% of yield variation, however, their significance fluctuated between years and treatments. In dry years, factor analyses suggested variables related with soil quality and field-scale water dynamics had greater impacts on CT yields than NT yields. Our results indicate that management zones developed using relatively static soil-landscape data are relatively more suitable for conservation systems, and these zones are affected by soil management. In addition, the impact of NT on yields is most apparent on degraded soils in dry years.
650 $aALGODON
650 $aSUELOS
700 1 $aSHAW, J.
700 1 $aREEVES, D. W.
700 1 $aRAPER, R.L.
700 1 $aVAN SANTEN, E.
700 1 $aSCHWAB, E.B.
700 1 $aMASK, P.L.
773 $tSoil Science Society of America Journal, 2006$gv.70 (1), p. 98-107.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha actual : |
09/07/2015 |
|
Actualizado : |
07/11/2018 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Capítulo en Libro Técnico-Científico |
|
Autor : |
MORALES, P.; GARCÍA, M.; GARCIA, C.; BERETTA, A.; MORENO, G.; GAMIO, G. |
|
Afiliación : |
CLAUDIO CESAR GARCIA GALLARRETA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANDRES NICOLAS BERETTA BLANCO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GONZALO MORENO LAITANO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Pivotes en Uruguay: evaluación de su funcionamiento. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2014 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
En: GIMÉNEZ, L.; PUPPO, L.; BENTANCOR, L.; HAYASHI, R.; SAWCHIK, J.; GARCIA, C. (Eds.). Riego en cultivos y pasturas. 3er. Seminario Internacional, 2014, Paysandú. (Uruguay). Montevideo : INIA, 2014. |
|
Páginas : |
p. 67-76. |
|
ISBN : |
978-9974-38-356-4 |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Notas : |
Instituciones: Grupo de Desarrollo de Riego (GDR), Facultad de Agronomía (FAGRO), Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA). - Editores: Luis Giménez, Lucía Puppo, Lisette Bentancor, Raquel Hayashi, Jorge Sawchik, Claudio García, Bernardo Bocking. |
|
Palabras claves : |
PIVOTES CENTRALES. |
|
Thesagro : |
RIEGO; URUGUAY. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F06 Riego |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/11850/1/Riego-en-cultivos-y-pasturas-2014.-Garcia-C.-et-al.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 00996nam a2200229 a 4500
001 1053026
005 2018-11-07
008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
020 $a978-9974-38-356-4
100 1 $aMORALES, P.
245 $aPivotes en Uruguay$bevaluación de su funcionamiento.
260 $aEn: GIMÉNEZ, L.; PUPPO, L.; BENTANCOR, L.; HAYASHI, R.; SAWCHIK, J.; GARCIA, C. (Eds.). Riego en cultivos y pasturas. 3er. Seminario Internacional, 2014, Paysandú. (Uruguay). Montevideo : INIA$c2014
300 $ap. 67-76.
500 $aInstituciones: Grupo de Desarrollo de Riego (GDR), Facultad de Agronomía (FAGRO), Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA). - Editores: Luis Giménez, Lucía Puppo, Lisette Bentancor, Raquel Hayashi, Jorge Sawchik, Claudio García, Bernardo Bocking.
650 $aRIEGO
650 $aURUGUAY
653 $aPIVOTES CENTRALES
700 1 $aGARCÍA, M.
700 1 $aGARCIA, C.
700 1 $aBERETTA, A.
700 1 $aMORENO, G.
700 1 $aGAMIO, G.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
