| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha : |
21/02/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
20/06/2018 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Agropecuarias |
|
Autor : |
MONTOSSI, F.; SAN JULIÁN, R.; DE MATTOS, D.; BERRETTA, E.J.; RÍOS, M. |
|
Afiliación : |
FABIO MARCELO MONTOSSI PORCHILE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ROBERTO SAN JULIAN SANCHEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; DANIEL DE MATTOS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ELBIO JOAQUIN BERRETTA CARVALLO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Herramientas disponibles para reducir las pérdidas de corderos: la experiencia del INIA. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
1999 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
El País Agropecuario, 1999, v. 5, no. 54, p. 25-28 |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Contenido : |
La condición corporal como una herramienta de manejo. Reserva de forraje para manejo de la oveja de cría. Consideraciones finales. Bibliografía consultada. |
|
Palabras claves : |
PÉRDIDAS DE CORDERO. |
|
Thesagro : |
BASALTO; CONDICION CORPORAL; CORDERO; OVEJA. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/10407/1/54.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 00782naa a2200229 a 4500
001 1028029
005 2018-06-20
008 1999 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aMONTOSSI, F.
245 $aHerramientas disponibles para reducir las pérdidas de corderos$bla experiencia del INIA.
260 $c1999
520 $aLa condición corporal como una herramienta de manejo. Reserva de forraje para manejo de la oveja de cría. Consideraciones finales. Bibliografía consultada.
650 $aBASALTO
650 $aCONDICION CORPORAL
650 $aCORDERO
650 $aOVEJA
653 $aPÉRDIDAS DE CORDERO
700 1 $aSAN JULIÁN, R.
700 1 $aDE MATTOS, D.
700 1 $aBERRETTA, E.J.
700 1 $aRÍOS, M.
773 $tEl País Agropecuario, 1999$gv. 5, no. 54, p. 25-28
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
19/02/2024 |
|
Actualizado : |
19/02/2024 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
JEBARI, A.; PEREYRA GODAY, F.; KUMAR, A.; COLLINS, A.L.; RIVERO, M.J.; MCAULIFFE, G.A. |
|
Afiliación : |
ASMA JEBARI, Net Zero and Resilient Farming, Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Devon, Okehampton, EX20 2SB, United Kingdom; FABIANA PEREYRA GODAY, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ATUL KUMAR, Net Zero and Resilient Farming, Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Devon, Okehampton, EX20 2SB, United Kingdom; ADRIAN L. COLLINS, Net Zero and Resilient Farming, Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Devon, Okehampton, EX20 2SB, United Kingdom; JORDANA M. RIVERO, Net Zero and Resilient Farming, Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Devon, Okehampton, EX20 2SB, United Kingdom; GRAHAM A. MCAULIFFE, Net Zero and Resilient Farming, Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Devon, Okehampton, EX20 2SB, United Kingdom. |
|
Título : |
Feasibility of mitigation measures for agricultural greenhouse gas emissions in the UK. A systematic review. |
|
Complemento del título : |
Review article. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2024 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2024, Volume 44, Issue 1, Article 2. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-023-00938-0 -- OPEN ACCESS. |
|
ISSN : |
1774-0746 |
|
DOI : |
10.1007/s13593-023-00938-0 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Accepted 24 November 2023; Published 28 December 2023. -- Correspondence: Jebari, A.; Net Zero and Resilient Farming, Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Devon, Okehampton, United Kingdom; email:asma.jebari@rothamsted.ac.uk -- Document type: Review-Hybrid Gold Open Access. -- Publisher: Springer-Verlag Italia s.r.l. -- FUNDING: Asma Jebari was financially supported by the Science Initiative Catalyst Award (SICA) program, an internal UKRI (UK Research and Innovation) Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (UKRI-BBSRC) award. Fabiana Pereyra was supported by Beca de movilidad ANII (Agencia Nacional de Investigacion e Innovacion) MOV_CA_2021_1_171482. Atul Kumar acknowledges funding from the UK Government's Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs (Defra). Graham McAuliffe and Adrian L. Collins acknowledge funding from Rothamsted Research?s Institute Strategic Program "Soil to Nutrition" (S2N) supported by UKRI-BBSRC BBS/E/C/000I0320 & BBS/E/C/000I0330. -- Supplementary information: https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13593-023-00938-0/MediaObjects/13593_2023_938_MOESM1_ESM.docx -- |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- The UK Government has set an ambitious target of achieving a national "net-zero" greenhouse gas economy by 2050. Agriculture is arguably placed at the heart of achieving net zero, as it plays a unique role as both a producer of GHG emissions and a sector that has the capacity via land use to capture carbon (C) when managed appropriately, thus reducing the concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere. Agriculture?s importance, particularly in a UK-specific perspective, which is also applicable to many other temperate climate nations globally, is that the majority of land use nationwide is allocated to farming. Here, we present a systematic review based on peer-reviewed literature and relevant "grey" reports to address the question "how can the agricultural sector in the UK reduce, or offset, its direct agricultural emissions at the farm level?" We considered the implications of mitigation measures in terms of food security and import reliance, energy, environmental degradation, and value for money. We identified 52 relevant studies covering major foods produced and consumed in the UK. Our findings indicate that many mitigation measures can indeed contribute to net zero through GHG emissions reduction, offsetting, and bioenergy production, pending their uptake by farmers. While the environmental impacts of mitigation measures were covered well within the reviewed literature, corresponding implications regarding energy, food security, and farmer attitudes towards adoption received scant attention. We also provide an open-access, informative, and comprehensive dataset for agri-environment stakeholders and policymakers to identify the most promising mitigation measures. This research is of critical value to researchers, land managers, and policymakers as an interim guideline resource while more quantitative evidence becomes available through the ongoing lab-, field-, and farm-scale trials which will improve the reliability of agricultural sustainability modelling in the future. © 2023, The Author(s). MenosABSTRACT.- The UK Government has set an ambitious target of achieving a national "net-zero" greenhouse gas economy by 2050. Agriculture is arguably placed at the heart of achieving net zero, as it plays a unique role as both a producer of GHG emissions and a sector that has the capacity via land use to capture carbon (C) when managed appropriately, thus reducing the concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere. Agriculture?s importance, particularly in a UK-specific perspective, which is also applicable to many other temperate climate nations globally, is that the majority of land use nationwide is allocated to farming. Here, we present a systematic review based on peer-reviewed literature and relevant "grey" reports to address the question "how can the agricultural sector in the UK reduce, or offset, its direct agricultural emissions at the farm level?" We considered the implications of mitigation measures in terms of food security and import reliance, energy, environmental degradation, and value for money. We identified 52 relevant studies covering major foods produced and consumed in the UK. Our findings indicate that many mitigation measures can indeed contribute to net zero through GHG emissions reduction, offsetting, and bioenergy production, pending their uptake by farmers. While the environmental impacts of mitigation measures were covered well within the reviewed literature, corresponding implications regarding energy, food security, and farmer attitudes ... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Affordable and clean energy - Goal 7; Arable farming; Carbon footprint; Climate action - Goal 13; Decent work and economic growth - Goal 8; Farming interventions; Livestock systems; Mixed farming; Net zero; Partnership for the goals - Goal 17; Responsible consumption and production - Goal 12; Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); Zero hunger - Goal 2. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
URL : |
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-023-00938-0.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 04495naa a2200373 a 4500
001 1064464
005 2024-02-19
008 2024 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1774-0746
024 7 $a10.1007/s13593-023-00938-0$2DOI
100 1 $aJEBARI, A.
245 $aFeasibility of mitigation measures for agricultural greenhouse gas emissions in the UK. A systematic review.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2024
500 $aArticle history: Accepted 24 November 2023; Published 28 December 2023. -- Correspondence: Jebari, A.; Net Zero and Resilient Farming, Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Devon, Okehampton, United Kingdom; email:asma.jebari@rothamsted.ac.uk -- Document type: Review-Hybrid Gold Open Access. -- Publisher: Springer-Verlag Italia s.r.l. -- FUNDING: Asma Jebari was financially supported by the Science Initiative Catalyst Award (SICA) program, an internal UKRI (UK Research and Innovation) Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (UKRI-BBSRC) award. Fabiana Pereyra was supported by Beca de movilidad ANII (Agencia Nacional de Investigacion e Innovacion) MOV_CA_2021_1_171482. Atul Kumar acknowledges funding from the UK Government's Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs (Defra). Graham McAuliffe and Adrian L. Collins acknowledge funding from Rothamsted Research?s Institute Strategic Program "Soil to Nutrition" (S2N) supported by UKRI-BBSRC BBS/E/C/000I0320 & BBS/E/C/000I0330. -- Supplementary information: https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs13593-023-00938-0/MediaObjects/13593_2023_938_MOESM1_ESM.docx --
520 $aABSTRACT.- The UK Government has set an ambitious target of achieving a national "net-zero" greenhouse gas economy by 2050. Agriculture is arguably placed at the heart of achieving net zero, as it plays a unique role as both a producer of GHG emissions and a sector that has the capacity via land use to capture carbon (C) when managed appropriately, thus reducing the concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere. Agriculture?s importance, particularly in a UK-specific perspective, which is also applicable to many other temperate climate nations globally, is that the majority of land use nationwide is allocated to farming. Here, we present a systematic review based on peer-reviewed literature and relevant "grey" reports to address the question "how can the agricultural sector in the UK reduce, or offset, its direct agricultural emissions at the farm level?" We considered the implications of mitigation measures in terms of food security and import reliance, energy, environmental degradation, and value for money. We identified 52 relevant studies covering major foods produced and consumed in the UK. Our findings indicate that many mitigation measures can indeed contribute to net zero through GHG emissions reduction, offsetting, and bioenergy production, pending their uptake by farmers. While the environmental impacts of mitigation measures were covered well within the reviewed literature, corresponding implications regarding energy, food security, and farmer attitudes towards adoption received scant attention. We also provide an open-access, informative, and comprehensive dataset for agri-environment stakeholders and policymakers to identify the most promising mitigation measures. This research is of critical value to researchers, land managers, and policymakers as an interim guideline resource while more quantitative evidence becomes available through the ongoing lab-, field-, and farm-scale trials which will improve the reliability of agricultural sustainability modelling in the future. © 2023, The Author(s).
653 $aAffordable and clean energy - Goal 7
653 $aArable farming
653 $aCarbon footprint
653 $aClimate action - Goal 13
653 $aDecent work and economic growth - Goal 8
653 $aFarming interventions
653 $aLivestock systems
653 $aMixed farming
653 $aNet zero
653 $aPartnership for the goals - Goal 17
653 $aResponsible consumption and production - Goal 12
653 $aSustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
653 $aZero hunger - Goal 2
700 1 $aPEREYRA GODAY, F.
700 1 $aKUMAR, A.
700 1 $aCOLLINS, A.L.
700 1 $aRIVERO, M.J.
700 1 $aMCAULIFFE, G.A.
773 $tAgronomy for Sustainable Development, 2024, Volume 44, Issue 1, Article 2. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-023-00938-0 -- OPEN ACCESS.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
