|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha : |
21/02/2014 |
Actualizado : |
10/05/2018 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Trabajos en Congresos/Conferencias |
Autor : |
GARCIA, C.; CARLESSO, R.; ROSA, G.M.; PETRY, M.T.; MELO, G.L. |
Afiliación : |
CLAUDIO CESAR GARCIA GALLARRETA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; R. CARLESSO; G.M. ROSA; M.T. PETRY; G.L. MELO. |
Título : |
Water deficit effects on maize yield in southern Brazil. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2002 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
ln: Workshop em Engenharia Agrícola (2002 : Santa Maria, RS), Mostra dos trabalhos científicos do PPGEA do ano de 2002 / Santa Maria, RS : Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Centro de Ciências Rurais, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenh 2002. |
Páginas : |
p. 224-228 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Trabajo presentado en la ASAE Annual International Meeting 2002 / CIGR XV World Congress Sponsored by ASAE and CIGR, Hyatt Regency Chicago, Chicago, Illinnois, USA July 28-July 31, 2002 Brasil. Ministério da Educaçao; Universidade Federal de Santa María. Centro de Ciencias Rurais. Programa de Pós-Graduaçao em Engenharia Agrícola |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT:
The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the water deficit effects on maize yield and yield components. The maize hybrid Pioneer 30F33 was submitted to five irrigation water management treatments. Irrigation management was based on crop maximum evapotranspiration (ETm). Irrigations were applied when cumulative ETm reached values of 14, 22, 30, 38 and 46 mm. The experiment was conducted on a set of 20 drainage lysimeters under a mobile rain shelter. Leaf area index and plant height were measured twice a weak in each
treatment from 29 days after emergency to harvest. Soil moisture were measure in each soil !ayer (0-20; 20-40; 40-53; 53-66 and 66-100 cm), twice a weak. Results of leaf area and plant height were similar during crop growing season for ali irrigation strátegies, and aboveground biomass accumulation at harvest was also similar for ali treatments. Maximum technical maize yield was obtained applying irrigation when cumulative ETm reached value of the 34 mm. Total irrigation depth applied was 264, 281, 278, 279, and 282 mm using the irrigation
management of 14, 22, 30, 38 e 46 mm of cumulative ETm. The use of irrigation application based on cumulative ETm values in Southern Brazil results in a easier practice to increase water use efficiency, increase maize yield and reduce application cost. |
Palabras claves : |
EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT; MAIZE. |
Thesagro : |
EVAPOTRANSPIRACION; MAIZ; MANEJO DEL SUELO; RIEGO. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- P10 Recursos hídricos y su ordenación |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/9533/1/Garcia-C.-2002.-PPGEA-2002-p.224-228.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02564naa a2200277 a 4500 001 1010843 005 2018-05-10 008 2002 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aGARCIA, C. 245 $aWater deficit effects on maize yield in southern Brazil. 260 $c2002 300 $ap. 224-228 500 $aTrabajo presentado en la ASAE Annual International Meeting 2002 / CIGR XV World Congress Sponsored by ASAE and CIGR, Hyatt Regency Chicago, Chicago, Illinnois, USA July 28-July 31, 2002 Brasil. Ministério da Educaçao; Universidade Federal de Santa María. Centro de Ciencias Rurais. Programa de Pós-Graduaçao em Engenharia Agrícola 520 $aABSTRACT: The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the water deficit effects on maize yield and yield components. The maize hybrid Pioneer 30F33 was submitted to five irrigation water management treatments. Irrigation management was based on crop maximum evapotranspiration (ETm). Irrigations were applied when cumulative ETm reached values of 14, 22, 30, 38 and 46 mm. The experiment was conducted on a set of 20 drainage lysimeters under a mobile rain shelter. Leaf area index and plant height were measured twice a weak in each treatment from 29 days after emergency to harvest. Soil moisture were measure in each soil !ayer (0-20; 20-40; 40-53; 53-66 and 66-100 cm), twice a weak. Results of leaf area and plant height were similar during crop growing season for ali irrigation strátegies, and aboveground biomass accumulation at harvest was also similar for ali treatments. Maximum technical maize yield was obtained applying irrigation when cumulative ETm reached value of the 34 mm. Total irrigation depth applied was 264, 281, 278, 279, and 282 mm using the irrigation management of 14, 22, 30, 38 e 46 mm of cumulative ETm. The use of irrigation application based on cumulative ETm values in Southern Brazil results in a easier practice to increase water use efficiency, increase maize yield and reduce application cost. 650 $aEVAPOTRANSPIRACION 650 $aMAIZ 650 $aMANEJO DEL SUELO 650 $aRIEGO 653 $aEVAPOTRANSPIRATION 653 $aIRRIGATION MANAGEMENT 653 $aMAIZE 700 1 $aCARLESSO, R. 700 1 $aROSA, G.M. 700 1 $aPETRY, M.T. 700 1 $aMELO, G.L. 773 $tln: Workshop em Engenharia Agrícola (2002 : Santa Maria, RS), Mostra dos trabalhos científicos do PPGEA do ano de 2002 / Santa Maria, RS : Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Centro de Ciências Rurais, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenh 2002.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
Fecha actual : |
22/10/2021 |
Actualizado : |
22/10/2021 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
-- - -- |
Autor : |
RIVERO, M. J.; EVANS, A.C.O.; BERNADT, A.; CARTMILL, A.; DOWSEY, A.; FARRUGIA, A.; MIGNOLET, C.; ENRIQUEZ-HIDALGO, D.; CHADWICK, D.; MCCRACKEN, D. I.; BUSCH, D.; PEREYRA GODAY, F.; MARTIN, G. B.; SANDFORD, G. R.; SHERIDAN, H.; WRIGHT, I.; BRUNET, L.; EISLER, M. C.; LOPEZ,VILLALOBOS, N.; ROVIRA, P.J.; HARRIS, P.; MURPHY, P.; WILLIAMS, A. P.; JACKSON, R. D.; MACHADO, R.; SURAJ, P. T.; PUECH, T.; BOLAND, T. M.; AYALA, W.; LEE, M. R. F. |
Afiliación : |
M. JORDANA RIVERO, Sustainable Agriculture Sciences, Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB, UK; ALEX C. O. EVANS, School of Agriculture & Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland; ALEXANDRE BERNADT, Embrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos, São Paulo 13560-970, Brazil.; ANDREW CARTMILL, School of Agriculture, University of Wisconsin–Platteville, Platteville, WI 53818, USA; ANDREW DOWSEY, Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford, Somerset BS40 5DU, UK.; ANNE FARRUGIA, INRAE—ACT UE 0057 DSLP, 17450 Saint Laurent de la Prée, France.; CATHERINE MIGNOLET, INRAE—ACT, UR 0055 ASTER, 88500 Mirecourt, France.; DANIEL ENRIQUEZ-HIDALGO, Sustainable Agriculture Sciences, Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB, UK. //Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford, Somerset BS40 5DU, UK; DAVE CHADWICK, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2UW, UK.; DAVY I. MCCRACKEN, Hill & Mountain Research Centre, SRUC: Scotland’s Rural College, Kirkton Farm, Crianlarich FK20 8RU, UK.; DENNIS BUSCH, School of Agriculture, University of Wisconsin–Platteville, Platteville, WI 53818, USA.; FABIANA PEREYRA GODAY, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GRAEME B. MARTIN, UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Crawley 6009, Australia.; GREGG R. SANFORD, Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.; HELEN SHERIDAN, School of Agriculture & Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.; IAIN WRIGHT, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Nairobi, Kenya.; LAURENT BRUNET, INRAE—ACT, UR 0055 ASTER, 88500 Mirecourt, France.; MARK C. EISLER, Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford, Somerset BS40 5DU, UK.; NICOLÁS LÓPEZ-VILLALOBOS, School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4410, New Zealand.; PABLO JUAN ROVIRA SANZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; PAUL HARRIS, Sustainable Agriculture Sciences, Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB, UK.; PAUL MURPHY, School of Agriculture & Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.; A. PRYSOR WILLIAMS, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2UW, UK.; RANDALL D. JACKSON, Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.; RUI MACHADO, Embrapa Southeast Livestock, São Carlos, São Paulo 13560-970, Brazil.; P.T. JURAJ, Livestock Research Station Thiruvazamkunnu, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Kerala-678601, India; THOMAS PUECH, INRAE—ACT, UR 0055 ASTER, 88500 Mirecourt, France.; TOMMY M. BOLAND, School of Agriculture & Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.; WALTER FELIZARDO AYALA SILVERA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MICHAEL R. F. LEE, Harper Adams University, Newport, Shropshire TF10 8NB, UK. |
Título : |
Taking the steps toward sustainable livestock: our multidisciplinary global farm platform journey. [Open Access]. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Animal Frontiers, Volume 11, Issue 5, October 2021, Pages 52?58, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfab048 |
ISSN : |
Online 2160-6064 |
DOI : |
10.1093/af/vfab048 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
The Global Farm Platform initiative (www.globalfarmplatform.org) is a network of research farms and institute members working collaboratively to enhance the sustainability of ruminant livestock systems through the development of transformational regional solutions to global challenges and promote their adoption. This multidisciplinary international network will provide a
unique combination of research and practice for diverse ruminant production systems in a wide range of cultural, socioeconomic, and climatic zones. |
Contenido : |
Ruminant livestock are a vital global source of highquality protein and bioavailable minerals and vitamins. They support healthy dietary choices by providing milk and meat produced from less productive land and food industry byproducts. However, despite the contribution of ruminants to food systems and the circular bioeconomy, ruminant production systems are increasingly questioned due to their environmental impact, particularly their significant contribution to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and associated global warming. There is a need, therefore, to identify a pathway to sustainable global ruminant production. In 2014, our group defined eight strategies or ?steps? (Eisler et al., 2014), to mitigate the environmental impacts
of ruminant production while optimizing the quantity and quality of the food they produce. To realize these goals, we established the ?Global Farm Platform? initiative (www.globalfarmplatform.org), a network of ?farm platforms? or research farms (RFs), to explore multidisciplinary strategies and evaluate different production systems around the
globe (Table 1). Here, we provide a perspective on our approach and the steps we are taking to realize the ambition of supporting sustainable ruminant livestock production as a part of future food systems contributing to both human and planetary health. |
Palabras claves : |
CIRCULARITY; GRAZING SYSTEMS; MIXED FARMING; PRECISION FARMING; RESEARCH FARMS; RUMINANT LIVESTOCK; SISTEMAS DE PRODUCCIÓN. |
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16077/1/Animal-Frontiers-Rivero-2021.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03500naa a2200589 a 4500 001 1062492 005 2021-10-22 008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $aOnline 2160-6064 024 7 $a10.1093/af/vfab048$2DOI 100 1 $aRIVERO, M. J. 245 $aTaking the steps toward sustainable livestock$bour multidisciplinary global farm platform journey. [Open Access].$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2021 500 $aThe Global Farm Platform initiative (www.globalfarmplatform.org) is a network of research farms and institute members working collaboratively to enhance the sustainability of ruminant livestock systems through the development of transformational regional solutions to global challenges and promote their adoption. This multidisciplinary international network will provide a unique combination of research and practice for diverse ruminant production systems in a wide range of cultural, socioeconomic, and climatic zones. 520 $aRuminant livestock are a vital global source of highquality protein and bioavailable minerals and vitamins. They support healthy dietary choices by providing milk and meat produced from less productive land and food industry byproducts. However, despite the contribution of ruminants to food systems and the circular bioeconomy, ruminant production systems are increasingly questioned due to their environmental impact, particularly their significant contribution to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and associated global warming. There is a need, therefore, to identify a pathway to sustainable global ruminant production. In 2014, our group defined eight strategies or ?steps? (Eisler et al., 2014), to mitigate the environmental impacts of ruminant production while optimizing the quantity and quality of the food they produce. To realize these goals, we established the ?Global Farm Platform? initiative (www.globalfarmplatform.org), a network of ?farm platforms? or research farms (RFs), to explore multidisciplinary strategies and evaluate different production systems around the globe (Table 1). Here, we provide a perspective on our approach and the steps we are taking to realize the ambition of supporting sustainable ruminant livestock production as a part of future food systems contributing to both human and planetary health. 653 $aCIRCULARITY 653 $aGRAZING SYSTEMS 653 $aMIXED FARMING 653 $aPRECISION FARMING 653 $aRESEARCH FARMS 653 $aRUMINANT LIVESTOCK 653 $aSISTEMAS DE PRODUCCIÓN 700 1 $aEVANS, A.C.O. 700 1 $aBERNADT, A. 700 1 $aCARTMILL, A. 700 1 $aDOWSEY, A. 700 1 $aFARRUGIA, A. 700 1 $aMIGNOLET, C. 700 1 $aENRIQUEZ-HIDALGO, D. 700 1 $aCHADWICK, D. 700 1 $aMCCRACKEN, D. I. 700 1 $aBUSCH, D. 700 1 $aPEREYRA GODAY, F. 700 1 $aMARTIN, G. B. 700 1 $aSANDFORD, G. R. 700 1 $aSHERIDAN, H. 700 1 $aWRIGHT, I. 700 1 $aBRUNET, L. 700 1 $aEISLER, M. C. 700 1 $aLOPEZ,VILLALOBOS, N. 700 1 $aROVIRA, P.J. 700 1 $aHARRIS, P. 700 1 $aMURPHY, P. 700 1 $aWILLIAMS, A. P. 700 1 $aJACKSON, R. D. 700 1 $aMACHADO, R. 700 1 $aSURAJ, P. T. 700 1 $aPUECH, T. 700 1 $aBOLAND, T. M. 700 1 $aAYALA, W. 700 1 $aLEE, M. R. F. 773 $tAnimal Frontiers, Volume 11, Issue 5, October 2021, Pages 52?58, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfab048
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|