| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
| 1. |  | OLIVEIRA, P. A. DE; RUAS, J. L.; RIET-CORREA, F.; COELHO, A. C. B.; SANTOS, B. L.; MARCOLONGO-PEREIRA, C.; SALLIS, E. S. V.; SCHILD, A. L. Doenças parasitárias em bovinos e ovinos no sul do Brasil: frequência e estimativa de perdas econômicas. (Parasitic diseases of cattle and sheep in southern Brazil: frequency and economic losses estimate. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, Brasília, DF v. 37, n. 8, p. 797-801, ago. 2017. Article History: Recebido em 6 de agosto de 2015.//Aceptado 13 de set 2016.| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
|    |
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha actual : |
03/01/2022 |
|
Actualizado : |
01/09/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - 1 |
|
Autor : |
PORTUGAL, T. B.; SZYMCZAK, L. S.; DE MORAES, A.; FONSECA, L.; MEZZALIRA, J.C.; SAVIAN, J.V.; ZUBIETA, A. S.; BREMM, C.; DE FACCIO CARVALHO, P. C.; MONTEIRO, A. L. G. |
|
Afiliación : |
THALES BAGGIO PORTUGAL, Department of Crop Production and Protection, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80035-050, Brazil. CONSIPA—Consulting on Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems, Ponta Grossa 84015-500, Brazil.; LEONARDO SLVESTRI SZYMCZAK, Department of Crop Production and Protection, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80035-050, Brazil. Grazing Ecology Research Group, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 91540-000, Brazil; ANIBAL DE MORAES, Department of Crop Production and Protection, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80035-050, Brazil.; LIDIANE FONSECA, Department of Crop Production and Protection, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80035-050, Brazil.; JEAN CARLOS MEZZALIRA, CONSIPA—Consulting on Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems, Ponta Grossa 84015-500, Brazil.; JEAN VICTOR SAVIAN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANGEL SÁNCHEZ ZUBIETA, Grazing Ecology Research Group, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 91540-000, Brazil.; CAROLINA BREMM, Grazing Ecology Research Group, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 91540-000, Brazil; PAULO CÉSAR DE FACCIO CARVALHO, Grazing Ecology Research Group, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 91540-000, Brazil; ALDA LÚCIA GOMES MONTEIRO, Department of Crop Production and Protection, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80035-050, Brazil. Department of Crop Production and Protection, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80035-050, Brazil. |
|
Título : |
Low-intensity, high-frequency grazing strategy increases herbage production and beef cattle performance on sorghum pastures. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Animals 2022, volume 12, number 1, 13 pages. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010013 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 17 October 2021 / Revised: 8 November 2021 / Accepted: 10 November 2021 / Published: 22 December 2021 . |
|
Contenido : |
We assessed the effects of high-intensity and low-frequency (HILF) vs. low-intensity and high-frequency (LIHF) grazing on herbage production and performance of beef cattle grazing sorghum pastures. The experimental design was a complete randomized block with two treatments and four replicates (paddocks), carried out in 2014/15. The management target of 50 and 30 cm for pre- and post-grazing, respectively, a LIHF grazing management strategy oriented to maximize beef cattle herbage intake per unit time, was compared with a HILF grazing management strategy of 80 and 20 cm for pre- and post-grazing, respectively, aiming to maximize herbage accumulation and harvest efficiency. Sixteen Brangus steers of 15-month-old and 265 ± 21 kg of live weight (LW) were randomly distributed to paddocks (experimental units). The LIHF resulted in shorter rest periods when compared with the HILF. The greater leaf lamina mass in LIHF allowed greater sward light interception at post-grazing, resulting in greater total herbage production than HILF (7581 and 4154 kg DM/ha, respectively). The average daily gain (ADG) of steers was greater for the LIHF than for the HILF treatment (0.950 and 0.702 kg/animal, respectively); however, even with a greater stocking rate in the HILF, there was no difference for LW gain per ha, with an average of 4 kg LW/ha/day. Our findings demonstrated that the LIHF strategy that is based on offering to the animals an optimal sward structure to favor the maximum herbage intake rate fosters greater herbage production, harvesting efficiency, and ADG without compromising LW gain per area of beef steers, despite the lower herbage harvested per stocking cycle. MenosWe assessed the effects of high-intensity and low-frequency (HILF) vs. low-intensity and high-frequency (LIHF) grazing on herbage production and performance of beef cattle grazing sorghum pastures. The experimental design was a complete randomized block with two treatments and four replicates (paddocks), carried out in 2014/15. The management target of 50 and 30 cm for pre- and post-grazing, respectively, a LIHF grazing management strategy oriented to maximize beef cattle herbage intake per unit time, was compared with a HILF grazing management strategy of 80 and 20 cm for pre- and post-grazing, respectively, aiming to maximize herbage accumulation and harvest efficiency. Sixteen Brangus steers of 15-month-old and 265 ± 21 kg of live weight (LW) were randomly distributed to paddocks (experimental units). The LIHF resulted in shorter rest periods when compared with the HILF. The greater leaf lamina mass in LIHF allowed greater sward light interception at post-grazing, resulting in greater total herbage production than HILF (7581 and 4154 kg DM/ha, respectively). The average daily gain (ADG) of steers was greater for the LIHF than for the HILF treatment (0.950 and 0.702 kg/animal, respectively); however, even with a greater stocking rate in the HILF, there was no difference for LW gain per ha, with an average of 4 kg LW/ha/day. Our findings demonstrated that the LIHF strategy that is based on offering to the animals an optimal sward structure to favor the maximum herbage intak... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
GRAZING MANAGEMENT; OPTIMAL SWARD STRUCTURE; ROTATIONAL STOCKING. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16653/1/animals-12-00013-Baggio-Portugal.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02697naa a2200277 a 4500
001 1062627
005 2022-09-01
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aPORTUGAL, T. B.
245 $aLow-intensity, high-frequency grazing strategy increases herbage production and beef cattle performance on sorghum pastures.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aArticle history: Received: 17 October 2021 / Revised: 8 November 2021 / Accepted: 10 November 2021 / Published: 22 December 2021 .
520 $aWe assessed the effects of high-intensity and low-frequency (HILF) vs. low-intensity and high-frequency (LIHF) grazing on herbage production and performance of beef cattle grazing sorghum pastures. The experimental design was a complete randomized block with two treatments and four replicates (paddocks), carried out in 2014/15. The management target of 50 and 30 cm for pre- and post-grazing, respectively, a LIHF grazing management strategy oriented to maximize beef cattle herbage intake per unit time, was compared with a HILF grazing management strategy of 80 and 20 cm for pre- and post-grazing, respectively, aiming to maximize herbage accumulation and harvest efficiency. Sixteen Brangus steers of 15-month-old and 265 ± 21 kg of live weight (LW) were randomly distributed to paddocks (experimental units). The LIHF resulted in shorter rest periods when compared with the HILF. The greater leaf lamina mass in LIHF allowed greater sward light interception at post-grazing, resulting in greater total herbage production than HILF (7581 and 4154 kg DM/ha, respectively). The average daily gain (ADG) of steers was greater for the LIHF than for the HILF treatment (0.950 and 0.702 kg/animal, respectively); however, even with a greater stocking rate in the HILF, there was no difference for LW gain per ha, with an average of 4 kg LW/ha/day. Our findings demonstrated that the LIHF strategy that is based on offering to the animals an optimal sward structure to favor the maximum herbage intake rate fosters greater herbage production, harvesting efficiency, and ADG without compromising LW gain per area of beef steers, despite the lower herbage harvested per stocking cycle.
653 $aGRAZING MANAGEMENT
653 $aOPTIMAL SWARD STRUCTURE
653 $aROTATIONAL STOCKING
700 1 $aSZYMCZAK, L. S.
700 1 $aDE MORAES, A.
700 1 $aFONSECA, L.
700 1 $aMEZZALIRA, J.C.
700 1 $aSAVIAN, J.V.
700 1 $aZUBIETA, A. S.
700 1 $aBREMM, C.
700 1 $aDE FACCIO CARVALHO, P. C.
700 1 $aMONTEIRO, A. L. G.
773 $tAnimals 2022, volume 12, number 1, 13 pages. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010013
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
