| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha : |
15/09/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
23/09/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Documentos |
|
Autor : |
DEVINCENZI, T.; MARÍN, M.F.; CUADRO, P.; RUGGIA, A.; DEL PINO, M.L.; FRUGONI, J.C.; LEMA, O.M.; CALISTRO, A.; LUZARDO, S.; BRITO, G.; CARRIQUIRY, M.; ARMSTRONG, E.; PEÑAGARICANO, F.; JARA, E. |
|
Afiliación : |
THAIS DEVINCENZI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARÍA FEDERICA MARÍN2, Fagro, UdelaR, Montevideo, Uruguay.; PABLO ANDRES CUADRO BRAS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANDREA PAOLA RUGGIA CHIESA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIA LILIANA DEL PINO BALADON, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JULIO CESAR FRUGONI SILVEIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; OSCAR MARIO LEMA QUEIJO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SERGIO ARIEL CALISTRO PEREZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SANTIAGO FELIPE LUZARDO VILLAR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GUSTAVO WALTER BRITO DIAZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIANA CARRIQUIRY, Fagro, UdelaR, Montevideo, Uruguay.; EILEEN ARMSTRONG, FVet, UdelaR, Montevideo, Uruguay.; FRANCISCO PEÑAGARICANO, University of Florida, USA.; EUGENIO JARA, FVet, UdelaR, Montevideo, Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Núcleo Informativo Hereford de la Unidad Glencoe? INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Anuario Hereford (Montevideo), 2020, p. 214-215. |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Thesagro : |
MEJORAMIENTO GENETICO ANIMAL. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
--
A50 Investigación agraria |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 00766naa a2200277 a 4500
001 1061317
005 2020-09-23
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aDEVINCENZI, T.
245 $aNúcleo Informativo Hereford de la Unidad Glencoe? INIA Tacuarembó.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
650 $aMEJORAMIENTO GENETICO ANIMAL
700 1 $aMARÍN, M.F.
700 1 $aCUADRO, P.
700 1 $aRUGGIA, A.
700 1 $aDEL PINO, M.L.
700 1 $aFRUGONI, J.C.
700 1 $aLEMA, O.M.
700 1 $aCALISTRO, A.
700 1 $aLUZARDO, S.
700 1 $aBRITO, G.
700 1 $aCARRIQUIRY, M.
700 1 $aARMSTRONG, E.
700 1 $aPEÑAGARICANO, F.
700 1 $aJARA, E.
773 $tAnuario Hereford (Montevideo), 2020, p. 214-215.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
20/05/2022 |
|
Actualizado : |
20/05/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
SESSIM, A. G.; CANOZZI, M.E.A.; PEREIRA, G. R.; CASTILHO, E. M.; BARCELLOS, J. O. J. |
|
Afiliación : |
AMIR GIL SESSIM, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MARÍA EUGENIA ANDRIGHETTO CANOZZI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GABRIEL RIBAS PEREIRA, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; EDUARDO MADEIRA CASTILHO, Federal University of Pelotas, UFPEL, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Pelotas, Brazil; JÚLIO OTÁVIO JARDIM BARCELLOS, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil. |
|
Título : |
Financial performance and opportunistic commercialization of beef production systems in southern Brazil. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Pecuarias, 2022, Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 127 - 144. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v13i1.5888 |
|
ISSN : |
2007-1124; e-ISSN: 2448-6698 |
|
DOI : |
10.22319/RMCP.V13I1.5888 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 3 December 2020; Accepted 07 June 2021; Published January 2022.
Publisher: INIFAP-CENID Parasitologia Veterinaria. Corresponding author: Sessim, A.G.; Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; email:amirsessim@hotmail.com -- This study was supported by the Brazilian Council of Scientific and Technological Development (Project CNPq No. 133454/2014-2) and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel/CAPES, Brazil (Project CAPES/PNPD No. 2842/2010). Licencia: licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- This study compares the technical and financial performance of different beef cattle production systems and assesses the opportunistic commercialization practiced in these systems. It was evaluated data from four production units located in southern Brazil: cow-calf in native pastures (CCNP; 1,155 ha; 1,529 animals); cow-calf with agriculture (CCA; 1,008 ha; 1,313 animals); rearing-fattening (RFU; 360 ha; 435 animals); and fattening (FU; 205 ha; 168 animals) as well as an integrated system simulating the physical and economic parameters of the four units (IAS; 2,728 ha; 3,445 animals). The four independent units were considered as opportunistic commercialization and IAS as non-opportunistic. The highest yield was obtained for RFU (297 kg/ha), followed by IAS (114 kg/ha), FU (98 kg/ha), CCNP (87 kg/ha), and CCA (83 kg/ha). The CCNP was the most economically efficient, considering the gross margin per kilogram (GM/kg) (US$ 0.93). The GM/kg value of IAS (US$ 0.74) was 37 % higher compared to the sum of the average of the four units (US$ 0.54), and IAS had the lowest total production costs per kg (22.5 %). It was concluded that each independent unit could increase GM/kg (37 %) and GM/ha (3.8 %) and use calves in a rearing-fattening unit for further sale. Hence, the integration of beef production systems increases the gross margin of firms, presenting a profitable business advantage to rural entrepreneurs through non-opportunistic commercialization.
© 2022 INIFAP-CENID Parasitologia Veterinaria. All rights reserved. MenosABSTRACT.- This study compares the technical and financial performance of different beef cattle production systems and assesses the opportunistic commercialization practiced in these systems. It was evaluated data from four production units located in southern Brazil: cow-calf in native pastures (CCNP; 1,155 ha; 1,529 animals); cow-calf with agriculture (CCA; 1,008 ha; 1,313 animals); rearing-fattening (RFU; 360 ha; 435 animals); and fattening (FU; 205 ha; 168 animals) as well as an integrated system simulating the physical and economic parameters of the four units (IAS; 2,728 ha; 3,445 animals). The four independent units were considered as opportunistic commercialization and IAS as non-opportunistic. The highest yield was obtained for RFU (297 kg/ha), followed by IAS (114 kg/ha), FU (98 kg/ha), CCNP (87 kg/ha), and CCA (83 kg/ha). The CCNP was the most economically efficient, considering the gross margin per kilogram (GM/kg) (US$ 0.93). The GM/kg value of IAS (US$ 0.74) was 37 % higher compared to the sum of the average of the four units (US$ 0.54), and IAS had the lowest total production costs per kg (22.5 %). It was concluded that each independent unit could increase GM/kg (37 %) and GM/ha (3.8 %) and use calves in a rearing-fattening unit for further sale. Hence, the integration of beef production systems increases the gross margin of firms, presenting a profitable business advantage to rural entrepreneurs through non-opportunistic commercialization.
© 2022 INIFAP-CENI... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Animal production; Economy; Gross revenue; Integration; PLATAFORMA SALUD ANINMAL; Production cost. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
|
URL : |
https://cienciaspecuarias.inifap.gob.mx/index.php/Pecuarias/article/download/5888/4707
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03152naa a2200277 a 4500
001 1063153
005 2022-05-20
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a2007-1124; e-ISSN: 2448-6698
024 7 $a10.22319/RMCP.V13I1.5888$2DOI
100 1 $aSESSIM, A. G.
245 $aFinancial performance and opportunistic commercialization of beef production systems in southern Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aArticle history: Received 3 December 2020; Accepted 07 June 2021; Published January 2022. Publisher: INIFAP-CENID Parasitologia Veterinaria. Corresponding author: Sessim, A.G.; Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; email:amirsessim@hotmail.com -- This study was supported by the Brazilian Council of Scientific and Technological Development (Project CNPq No. 133454/2014-2) and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel/CAPES, Brazil (Project CAPES/PNPD No. 2842/2010). Licencia: licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.
520 $aABSTRACT.- This study compares the technical and financial performance of different beef cattle production systems and assesses the opportunistic commercialization practiced in these systems. It was evaluated data from four production units located in southern Brazil: cow-calf in native pastures (CCNP; 1,155 ha; 1,529 animals); cow-calf with agriculture (CCA; 1,008 ha; 1,313 animals); rearing-fattening (RFU; 360 ha; 435 animals); and fattening (FU; 205 ha; 168 animals) as well as an integrated system simulating the physical and economic parameters of the four units (IAS; 2,728 ha; 3,445 animals). The four independent units were considered as opportunistic commercialization and IAS as non-opportunistic. The highest yield was obtained for RFU (297 kg/ha), followed by IAS (114 kg/ha), FU (98 kg/ha), CCNP (87 kg/ha), and CCA (83 kg/ha). The CCNP was the most economically efficient, considering the gross margin per kilogram (GM/kg) (US$ 0.93). The GM/kg value of IAS (US$ 0.74) was 37 % higher compared to the sum of the average of the four units (US$ 0.54), and IAS had the lowest total production costs per kg (22.5 %). It was concluded that each independent unit could increase GM/kg (37 %) and GM/ha (3.8 %) and use calves in a rearing-fattening unit for further sale. Hence, the integration of beef production systems increases the gross margin of firms, presenting a profitable business advantage to rural entrepreneurs through non-opportunistic commercialization. © 2022 INIFAP-CENID Parasitologia Veterinaria. All rights reserved.
653 $aAnimal production
653 $aEconomy
653 $aGross revenue
653 $aIntegration
653 $aPLATAFORMA SALUD ANINMAL
653 $aProduction cost
700 1 $aCANOZZI, M.E.A.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, G. R.
700 1 $aCASTILHO, E. M.
700 1 $aBARCELLOS, J. O. J.
773 $tRevista Mexicana De Ciencias Pecuarias, 2022, Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 127 - 144. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v13i1.5888
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
