| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha : |
24/03/2021 |
|
Actualizado : |
25/03/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
DEL CAMPO, M.; MANTECA, X.; SOARES DE LIMA, J.M.; BRITO, G.; HERNÁNDEZ, P.; SAÑUDO, C.; MONTOSSI, F. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARCIA DEL CAMPO GIGENA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; XAVIER MANTECA, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain; JUAN MANUEL SOARES DE LIMA LAPETINA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GUSTAVO WALTER BRITO DIAZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; PILAR HERNÁNDEZ, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain; CARLOS SAÑUDO, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain; FABIO MARCELO MONTOSSI PORCHILE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Effect of different finishing strategies and steer temperament on animal welfare and instrumental meat tenderness. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Animals, 2021 Volume 11, Issue 3, Article number 859, pages 1-21. OPEN ACCESS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030859 |
|
ISSN : |
2076-2615 |
|
DOI : |
10.3390/ani11030859 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 19 February 2021; Revised: 5 March 2021; Accepted: 6 March 2021; Published: 18 March 2021.
Academic Editors: Maria Camila Ceballos and Aline Sant'Anna.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Human-Animal Interactions and Their Relationships with Animal Welfare, Emotions, and Personality: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/animals/special_issues/Human-Animal_Interactions_Connection_Animal_Welfare_Emotions_Personality |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
The aim of this experiment was to evaluate the effect of different fattening systems from pasture to concentrate and temperament on animal welfare (AW) and meat quality (MQ). Eighty-four Hereford steers were randomly assigned to the following groups: T1, pasture (4% of animal live weight: LW); T2, pasture (3% LW) plus concentrate (0.6% LW); T3, pasture (3% LW) plus concentrate (1.2% LW); T4, an ad libitum concentrate treatment. Temperament was assessed by three individual tests: crush score, flight time, and exit speed, building a multicriterial temperament index (TIndex). The flight zone was also registered for each treatment. AW was assessed through the integration of indicators of productivity, physiology, and behavior, as well as by monitoring the health status within each treatment. Shear force was registered for MQ. Differences in average daily gain were due to the different energetic composition of the diets (T4 > T3 > T2 > T1) and were not attributable to animal welfare problems. Animals from T4 had the higher average daily gain (ADG) but welfare was negatively affected, being evident through physiological indicators, the restriction or deprivation of relevant behaviors, diet-related diseases, and mortality. T1, T2, and T3 did not appear to compromise animal welfare. However, strict preventive measures and monitoring should be taken during the habituation process and when using any new diet that includes concentrate, because of possible dietary diseases. Shear force values were lower in T1. None of the animals in our experiment were excitable or aggressive, but there was a positive response to handling in all treatments. In addition, regardless of diet, calmer animals had higher average daily gain and lower shear force values; thus, temperament appears to have a significant influence on productivity and meat quality.
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. MenosABSTRACT.
The aim of this experiment was to evaluate the effect of different fattening systems from pasture to concentrate and temperament on animal welfare (AW) and meat quality (MQ). Eighty-four Hereford steers were randomly assigned to the following groups: T1, pasture (4% of animal live weight: LW); T2, pasture (3% LW) plus concentrate (0.6% LW); T3, pasture (3% LW) plus concentrate (1.2% LW); T4, an ad libitum concentrate treatment. Temperament was assessed by three individual tests: crush score, flight time, and exit speed, building a multicriterial temperament index (TIndex). The flight zone was also registered for each treatment. AW was assessed through the integration of indicators of productivity, physiology, and behavior, as well as by monitoring the health status within each treatment. Shear force was registered for MQ. Differences in average daily gain were due to the different energetic composition of the diets (T4 > T3 > T2 > T1) and were not attributable to animal welfare problems. Animals from T4 had the higher average daily gain (ADG) but welfare was negatively affected, being evident through physiological indicators, the restriction or deprivation of relevant behaviors, diet-related diseases, and mortality. T1, T2, and T3 did not appear to compromise animal welfare. However, strict preventive measures and monitoring should be taken during the habituation process and when using any new diet that includes concentrate, because of possible dietary diseases. Sh... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Acute phase proteins; Fecal glucocorticoids; Meat tenderness; STEERS; TEMPERAMENT. |
|
Thesagro : |
ANIMAL WELFARE; BIENESTAR ANIMAL. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
|
URL : |
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/3/859/htm
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/3/859/pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03334naa a2200313 a 4500
001 1061852
005 2021-03-25
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a2076-2615
024 7 $a10.3390/ani11030859$2DOI
100 1 $aDEL CAMPO, M.
245 $aEffect of different finishing strategies and steer temperament on animal welfare and instrumental meat tenderness.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
500 $aArticle history: Received: 19 February 2021; Revised: 5 March 2021; Accepted: 6 March 2021; Published: 18 March 2021. Academic Editors: Maria Camila Ceballos and Aline Sant'Anna. This article belongs to the Special Issue Human-Animal Interactions and Their Relationships with Animal Welfare, Emotions, and Personality: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/animals/special_issues/Human-Animal_Interactions_Connection_Animal_Welfare_Emotions_Personality
520 $aABSTRACT. The aim of this experiment was to evaluate the effect of different fattening systems from pasture to concentrate and temperament on animal welfare (AW) and meat quality (MQ). Eighty-four Hereford steers were randomly assigned to the following groups: T1, pasture (4% of animal live weight: LW); T2, pasture (3% LW) plus concentrate (0.6% LW); T3, pasture (3% LW) plus concentrate (1.2% LW); T4, an ad libitum concentrate treatment. Temperament was assessed by three individual tests: crush score, flight time, and exit speed, building a multicriterial temperament index (TIndex). The flight zone was also registered for each treatment. AW was assessed through the integration of indicators of productivity, physiology, and behavior, as well as by monitoring the health status within each treatment. Shear force was registered for MQ. Differences in average daily gain were due to the different energetic composition of the diets (T4 > T3 > T2 > T1) and were not attributable to animal welfare problems. Animals from T4 had the higher average daily gain (ADG) but welfare was negatively affected, being evident through physiological indicators, the restriction or deprivation of relevant behaviors, diet-related diseases, and mortality. T1, T2, and T3 did not appear to compromise animal welfare. However, strict preventive measures and monitoring should be taken during the habituation process and when using any new diet that includes concentrate, because of possible dietary diseases. Shear force values were lower in T1. None of the animals in our experiment were excitable or aggressive, but there was a positive response to handling in all treatments. In addition, regardless of diet, calmer animals had higher average daily gain and lower shear force values; thus, temperament appears to have a significant influence on productivity and meat quality. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
650 $aANIMAL WELFARE
650 $aBIENESTAR ANIMAL
653 $aAcute phase proteins
653 $aFecal glucocorticoids
653 $aMeat tenderness
653 $aSTEERS
653 $aTEMPERAMENT
700 1 $aMANTECA, X.
700 1 $aSOARES DE LIMA, J.M.
700 1 $aBRITO, G.
700 1 $aHERNÁNDEZ, P.
700 1 $aSAÑUDO, C.
700 1 $aMONTOSSI, F.
773 $tAnimals, 2021 Volume 11, Issue 3, Article number 859, pages 1-21. OPEN ACCESS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030859
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 8 | |
| 2. |  | DEL CAMPO, M.; SOARES DE LIMA, J.M.; MANTECA, X.; HERNÁNDEZ, P.; SAÑUDO, C.; MONTOSSI, F. Effects of intensification on animal behaviour and welfare. [Poster Abstracts]. In: Reciprocal Meat Conference, 66., 16-19, Auburn University Auburn, Alabama. Proceedings. Alabama: American Meat Science Association, 2013. p. 48| Tipo: Trabajos en Congresos/Conferencias |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
|   |
| 4. | | DEL CAMPO, M.; DARRICARRERE, N.; BRITO, G.; HERNANDEZ, P.; MANTECA, X.; SOARES DE LIMA, J.M.; MONTOSSI, F. Bienestar animal y calidad de carne en bovinos. Resultados experimentales: sistemas de terminación, manejo pre faena, calidad de producto. I. Efecto del sistema de alimentación y el manejo previo a la faena sobre el animal y calidad de producto. Año 1. In: BERRETTA, E.; MONTOSSI, F.; BRITO, G. (Ed.). Alternativas tecnológicas para los sistemas ganaderos del basalto. Montevideo, UY: INIA, 2014. p. 529-538 (Serie Técnica; 217)| Tipo: Capítulo en Libro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|  |
| 5. | | CANOZZI, M.E.A.; MEDEROS, A.; TURNER, S.; MANTECA, X.; MCMANNUS, C.; MENEGASSI, S.R.; BARCELLOS, J.O. Dehorning and welfare indicators in beef cattle: A meta-analysis. Review. Animal Production Science, 2019, Volume 59, Issue 5, p. 801-814. doi: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17752 History Article: Received 27 January 2017 // accepted 11 April 2018 // published online 30 May 2018. -- Corresponding author: Barcellos, J.O.J.; Centre for Research on Production Systems and Beef Cattle Supply Chain (NESPro/UFRGS),...| Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales | Circulación / Nivel : Internacional - -- |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
|  |
| 6. | | DEL CAMPO, M.; MANTECA, X.; SOARES DE LIMA, J.M.; BRITO, G.; HERNÁNDEZ, P.; SAÑUDO, C.; MONTOSSI, F. Effect of different finishing strategies and steer temperament on animal welfare and instrumental meat tenderness. Animals, 2021 Volume 11, Issue 3, Article number 859, pages 1-21. OPEN ACCESS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030859 Article history: Received: 19 February 2021; Revised: 5 March 2021; Accepted: 6 March 2021; Published: 18 March 2021.
Academic Editors: Maria Camila Ceballos and Aline Sant'Anna.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Human-Animal...| Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales | Circulación / Nivel : Internacional - -- |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
|  |
| 7. | | ANDRIGHETTO CANOZZIA, M.E.; MEDEROS, A.; MANTECA, X.; TURNER, S.; MCMANUS, C.; ZAGO, D.; JARDIM BARCELLOS, J.O. A meta-analysis of cortisol concentration, vocalization, and average daily gain associated with castration in beef cattle. Research in Veterinary Science, 2017, no. 114, p. 430-443. Article history: Received: 21 December 2016 // Received in revised form: 4 July 2017 // Accepted 16 July 2017| Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales | Circulación / Nivel : Internacional - -- |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 8. | | MONTOSSI, F.; DE BARBIERI, I.; LUZARDO, S.; NOLLA, M.; PLATERO, P.; RODRÍGUEZ, A.; ARMAND,UGON, R.; ROVIRA, F.; MARTÍNEZ, H.; FRUGONI, J.C.; LEVRATTO, J.; DUTRA, F.; VIÑOLES, C.; BANCHERO, G.; QUINTANS, G.; MEDEROS, A.; SAN JULIÁN, R.; MANTECA, X. Estrategias de alimentación y manejo de ovejas melliceras. ln: INIA TACUAREMBÓ. ESTACIÓN EXPERIMENTAL GLENCOE. Día de campo. Producción animal, pasturas y forestal. Estación Experimental Glencoe, Paysandú, octubre, 2005. Tacuarembó (Uruguay): INIA, 2005. p. 35-36 (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión ; 431)| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 8 | |
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
