| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha : |
27/04/2021 |
|
Actualizado : |
28/04/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
RUGGIA, A.; DOGLIOTTI, S.; AGUERRE, V.; ALBICETTE, M.M.; ALBÍN, A.; BLUMETTO, O.; CARDOZO, G.; LEONI, C.; QUINTANS, G.; SCARLATO, S.; TITTONELL, P.; ROSSING, W. A.H. |
|
Afiliación : |
ANDREA PAOLA RUGGIA CHIESA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; Farming Systems Ecology, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands; SANTIAGO DOGLIOTTI, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía, Departamento de Producción Vegetal, Montevideo, Uruguay; MARIA VERONICA AGUERRE ANTIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIA MARTA ALBICETTE BASTRERI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ALFREDO SANTIAGO ALBÍN FERREIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; OSCAR RICARDO BLUMETTO VELAZCO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GERONIMO AGUSTIN CARDOZO CABANELAS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CAROLINA LEONI VELAZCO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GRACIELA QUINTANS ILARIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SANTIAGO SCARLATO GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; PABLO TITTONELL, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Grupo de Agroecología, Ambiente y Sistemas de Producción, San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina; WALTER A.H. ROSSING, Farming Systems Ecology, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands. |
|
Título : |
The application of ecologically intensive principles to the systemic redesign of livestock farms on native grasslands: A case of co-innovation in Rocha, Uruguay. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agricultural Systems, June 2021, Volume 191, Article 103148. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103148 |
|
ISSN : |
0308-521X |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103148 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 30 November 2020; Received in revised form 5 April 2021; Accepted 6 April 2021.
Editor: Guillaume Martin.
The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Corresponding author at: Instituto Nacional de Investigaci´on Agropecuaria (INIA), Estación Experimental INIA Las Brujas, Ruta 48 km 10, Canelones, Uruguay
and P.O. Box 430, 6700 AK, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Corresponding author: Andrea Ruggia - E-mail: aruggia@inia.org.uy, andrea.ruggia@wur.nl Corresponding author: Santiago Dogliotte - E-mail: sandog@fagro.edu.uy |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
CONTEXT: Family-run cow-calf farms based on native grasslands exhibit low economic and social sustainability, as reflected in low family incomes and high workloads. Experimental results have shown that pasture?herd interaction management could improve native grasslands and animal productivity.
OBJECTIVE: This paper analyzes the extent to which the sustainability of family-run livestock farms based on native grasslands could be enhanced by a systemic redesign informed by ecological intensification practices. The research questions address the initial state of farm sustainability, key bottlenecks to improving farm sustainability,
and changes in sustainability criteria achieved over three years of farm redesign.
METHODS: The study was executed as part of a multi-level co-innovation project in Uruguay in which a team of scientist-practitioners and seven farm families participated in farm characterization, diagnosis, and redesign. The farm characterization took the form of indicators to describe the farms' management and bio-physical subsystems. Redesign plans were negotiated between the research team and the farmers. Frequent monitoring and evaluation cycles enabled finetuning across the years of implementation. |
|
Palabras claves : |
Monitoring and evaluation; Native grasslands; Participatory approach; Pasture-herd interactions; Reflexivity; Systems thinking. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
P01 Conservación de la naturaleza y recursos de La tierra |
|
URL : |
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X21001013/pdfft?md5=b2bbe53881026f740faf29e35f3350ce&pid=1-s2.0-S0308521X21001013-main.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03040naa a2200361 a 4500
001 1062001
005 2021-04-28
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0308-521X
024 7 $a10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103148$2DOI
100 1 $aRUGGIA, A.
245 $aThe application of ecologically intensive principles to the systemic redesign of livestock farms on native grasslands$bA case of co-innovation in Rocha, Uruguay.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
500 $aArticle history: Received 30 November 2020; Received in revised form 5 April 2021; Accepted 6 April 2021. Editor: Guillaume Martin. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Corresponding author at: Instituto Nacional de Investigaci´on Agropecuaria (INIA), Estación Experimental INIA Las Brujas, Ruta 48 km 10, Canelones, Uruguay and P.O. Box 430, 6700 AK, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Corresponding author: Andrea Ruggia - E-mail: aruggia@inia.org.uy, andrea.ruggia@wur.nl Corresponding author: Santiago Dogliotte - E-mail: sandog@fagro.edu.uy
520 $aABSTRACT. CONTEXT: Family-run cow-calf farms based on native grasslands exhibit low economic and social sustainability, as reflected in low family incomes and high workloads. Experimental results have shown that pasture?herd interaction management could improve native grasslands and animal productivity. OBJECTIVE: This paper analyzes the extent to which the sustainability of family-run livestock farms based on native grasslands could be enhanced by a systemic redesign informed by ecological intensification practices. The research questions address the initial state of farm sustainability, key bottlenecks to improving farm sustainability, and changes in sustainability criteria achieved over three years of farm redesign. METHODS: The study was executed as part of a multi-level co-innovation project in Uruguay in which a team of scientist-practitioners and seven farm families participated in farm characterization, diagnosis, and redesign. The farm characterization took the form of indicators to describe the farms' management and bio-physical subsystems. Redesign plans were negotiated between the research team and the farmers. Frequent monitoring and evaluation cycles enabled finetuning across the years of implementation.
653 $aMonitoring and evaluation
653 $aNative grasslands
653 $aParticipatory approach
653 $aPasture-herd interactions
653 $aReflexivity
653 $aSystems thinking
700 1 $aDOGLIOTTI, S.
700 1 $aAGUERRE, V.
700 1 $aALBICETTE, M.M.
700 1 $aALBÍN, A.
700 1 $aBLUMETTO, O.
700 1 $aCARDOZO, G.
700 1 $aLEONI, C.
700 1 $aQUINTANS, G.
700 1 $aSCARLATO, S.
700 1 $aTITTONELL, P.
700 1 $aROSSING, W. A.H.
773 $tAgricultural Systems, June 2021, Volume 191, Article 103148. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103148
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
21/02/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
05/12/2018 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Capítulo en Libro Técnico-Científico |
|
Autor : |
SCHOLBERG, J. M. S.; DOGLIOTTI, S.; ZOTARELLI, L.; CHERR, C. M.; LEONI, C.; ROSSING, W. A. H. |
|
Afiliación : |
JOHANNES M. S. SCHOLBERG, Biological Farming Systems, Wageningen University, The Netherlands; SANTIAGO DOGLIOTTI, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Uruguay; LINCOLN ZOTARELLI, Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, University of Florida, USA; COREY M. CHERR, Department of Plant Sciences and Graduate Group in Ecology, University of California, USA; CAROLINA LEONI VELAZCO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; WALTER A. H. ROSSING, Biological Farming Systems, Wageningen University, The Netherlands. |
|
Título : |
Cover crops in agrosystems: innovations and applications. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2010 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: Lichtfouse E. (eds) Genetic Engineering, Biofertilisation, Soil Quality and Organic Farming. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. |
|
Páginas : |
pp 59-97. |
|
Serie : |
(Sustainable Agriculture Reviews; volume 4) |
|
ISBN : |
978-90-481-8740-9 // Online ISBN 978-90-481-8741-6 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Chapter history: First Online 23 March 2010. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Cover crops can reduce the dependence of farmers on agrochemicals while enhancing overall agrosystem?s performance. However, the inherent complexity of cover-crop-based systems hampers their adoption by conventional farmers. Therefore, special management skills and alternative research and technology transfer approaches may be required to facilitate their adoptive use by conventional farmers. We propose that development and adoption of suitable cover-crop-based production systems may require the use of an ?innovation framework? that includes (1) identification of system constraints, (2) analysis of system behavior, (3) exploration of alternative systems, and (4) system design and selection. We describe case studies from four regions of the Americas (Florida, USA; Paraná and Santa Catarina, Brazil; and Canelones, Uruguay) that illustrate the relationships between this innovation framework and the development and adoption of cover-crop-based production systems. Where successful, development and adoption of such systems appear to relate to a number of attributes including (1) active involvement by farmers in research and dissemination programs; (2) integration of cover crops into production systems without net loss of land or labor resources; (3) informing farmers of the (direct) benefits of cover crop use; (4) provision of multiple benefits by cover crops, (5) sufficient access to information, inputs, and technologies required for cover crop use; and (6) provision of skills and experience necessary to manage cover crops effectively. Where these attributes are absent and failure to innovate has prevented development and adoption of cover-crop-based systems, policy initiatives to reward farmers for ecological services provided by cover crops may be required.
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 MenosABSTRACT.
Cover crops can reduce the dependence of farmers on agrochemicals while enhancing overall agrosystem?s performance. However, the inherent complexity of cover-crop-based systems hampers their adoption by conventional farmers. Therefore, special management skills and alternative research and technology transfer approaches may be required to facilitate their adoptive use by conventional farmers. We propose that development and adoption of suitable cover-crop-based production systems may require the use of an ?innovation framework? that includes (1) identification of system constraints, (2) analysis of system behavior, (3) exploration of alternative systems, and (4) system design and selection. We describe case studies from four regions of the Americas (Florida, USA; Paraná and Santa Catarina, Brazil; and Canelones, Uruguay) that illustrate the relationships between this innovation framework and the development and adoption of cover-crop-based production systems. Where successful, development and adoption of such systems appear to relate to a number of attributes including (1) active involvement by farmers in research and dissemination programs; (2) integration of cover crops into production systems without net loss of land or labor resources; (3) informing farmers of the (direct) benefits of cover crop use; (4) provision of multiple benefits by cover crops, (5) sufficient access to information, inputs, and technologies required for cover crop use; and (6) provision of... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
ADOPTION; AMERICAS; COVER CROPS; GREEN MANURE; GREEN TECHNOLOGIES; INNOVATION; LIVING MULCH; SUSTAINABILITY; SYSTEM ANALYSIS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02864naa a2200325 a 4500
001 1003120
005 2018-12-05
008 2010 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aSCHOLBERG, J. M. S.
245 $aCover crops in agrosystems$binnovations and applications.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2010
300 $app 59-97.
490 $a(Sustainable Agriculture Reviews; volume 4)
500 $aChapter history: First Online 23 March 2010.
520 $aABSTRACT. Cover crops can reduce the dependence of farmers on agrochemicals while enhancing overall agrosystem?s performance. However, the inherent complexity of cover-crop-based systems hampers their adoption by conventional farmers. Therefore, special management skills and alternative research and technology transfer approaches may be required to facilitate their adoptive use by conventional farmers. We propose that development and adoption of suitable cover-crop-based production systems may require the use of an ?innovation framework? that includes (1) identification of system constraints, (2) analysis of system behavior, (3) exploration of alternative systems, and (4) system design and selection. We describe case studies from four regions of the Americas (Florida, USA; Paraná and Santa Catarina, Brazil; and Canelones, Uruguay) that illustrate the relationships between this innovation framework and the development and adoption of cover-crop-based production systems. Where successful, development and adoption of such systems appear to relate to a number of attributes including (1) active involvement by farmers in research and dissemination programs; (2) integration of cover crops into production systems without net loss of land or labor resources; (3) informing farmers of the (direct) benefits of cover crop use; (4) provision of multiple benefits by cover crops, (5) sufficient access to information, inputs, and technologies required for cover crop use; and (6) provision of skills and experience necessary to manage cover crops effectively. Where these attributes are absent and failure to innovate has prevented development and adoption of cover-crop-based systems, policy initiatives to reward farmers for ecological services provided by cover crops may be required. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010
653 $aADOPTION
653 $aAMERICAS
653 $aCOVER CROPS
653 $aGREEN MANURE
653 $aGREEN TECHNOLOGIES
653 $aINNOVATION
653 $aLIVING MULCH
653 $aSUSTAINABILITY
653 $aSYSTEM ANALYSIS
700 1 $aDOGLIOTTI, S.
700 1 $aZOTARELLI, L.
700 1 $aCHERR, C. M.
700 1 $aLEONI, C.
700 1 $aROSSING, W. A. H.
773 $tIn: Lichtfouse E. (eds) Genetic Engineering, Biofertilisation, Soil Quality and Organic Farming. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
