| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha : |
07/12/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
07/12/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
DALAZEN, G.; KASPARY, T. E.; MARKUS, C.; PISONIC, A.; MEROTTO JR, A. |
|
Afiliación : |
GILIARDI DALAZEN, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Paraná-PR, Brasil.; TIAGO EDU KASPARY, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CATARINE MARKUS, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre - RS, Brasil.; ALEXANDRE PISONIC, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre - RS, Brasil.; ALDO MEROTTO JR. |
|
Título : |
Soybean tolerance to sulfentrazone and diclosulam in sandy soil. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Planta daninha vol.38 Viçosa 2020 Epub Dec 04, 2020.OPEN ACCESS. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582020380100081 |
|
ISSN : |
1806-9681 (online) |
|
DOI : |
10.1590/s0100-83582020380100081 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received: June 27, 2019/ Accepted: September 24, 2020. Corresponding author: . Cite this article:
Dalazen G, Kaspary TE, Markus C,Pisoni A, Merotto Jr. A. Soybean tolerance to sulfentrazone and diclosulam in sandy soil. Planta Daninha.
2020;38:e020225717. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582020380100081 |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT: Background: The use of pre-emergent herbicides is an important tool to control weeds, however the tolerance of soybean to these herbicides can vary according to the type of soil. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate sulfentrazone and diclosulam soybean selectivity in a sandy soil, in order to establish these herbicides as supporting tools in weed control. Methods: The treatments consisted of six doses of sulfentrazone (150 to 400 g ha-1) and diclosulam (25.2 to 75.6 g ha-1), and an untreated control. A field study was repeated in two growing seasons (2013/14 and 2014/15) in a sandy soil. Results: The occurrence of injury depended on the growing season. The
first season presented lower rainfall rates during the crop cycle. The recommended dose of sulfentrazone (200 g ha-1) caused 26% and 10%
of plant injury at 15 days after the treatment for the first and second season, respectively. For diclosulam, the recommended dose of
35.3 g ha-1 caused 20% and 8% of plant injury, respectively, for the first and second season. However, at the recommended doses, only for
diclosulam and in the rainy season there was a reduction in soybean productivity. Conclusions: The herbicide sulfentrazone, although causing visual soybean plant injury, present satisfactory selectivity at recommended doses and can be used as an important tool on weed control on sandy
soils. Similar response was observed for diclosulam in 2013/14. However, in a rainfall season diclosulam impacted on soybean yield at
the recommended dose for sandy soils, with selectivity depending of the growth season. MenosABSTRACT: Background: The use of pre-emergent herbicides is an important tool to control weeds, however the tolerance of soybean to these herbicides can vary according to the type of soil. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate sulfentrazone and diclosulam soybean selectivity in a sandy soil, in order to establish these herbicides as supporting tools in weed control. Methods: The treatments consisted of six doses of sulfentrazone (150 to 400 g ha-1) and diclosulam (25.2 to 75.6 g ha-1), and an untreated control. A field study was repeated in two growing seasons (2013/14 and 2014/15) in a sandy soil. Results: The occurrence of injury depended on the growing season. The
first season presented lower rainfall rates during the crop cycle. The recommended dose of sulfentrazone (200 g ha-1) caused 26% and 10%
of plant injury at 15 days after the treatment for the first and second season, respectively. For diclosulam, the recommended dose of
35.3 g ha-1 caused 20% and 8% of plant injury, respectively, for the first and second season. However, at the recommended doses, only for
diclosulam and in the rainy season there was a reduction in soybean productivity. Conclusions: The herbicide sulfentrazone, although causing visual soybean plant injury, present satisfactory selectivity at recommended doses and can be used as an important tool on weed control on sandy
soils. Similar response was observed for diclosulam in 2013/14. However, in a rainfall season diclosulam impacted on ... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
PLANT INJURY; PRE-EMERGENCE HERBICIDE; WEED MANAGEMENT. |
|
Thesagro : |
GLYCINA MAX; SOJA. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/14831/1/Planta-Dainha2020Kaspary.pdf
https://www.scielo.br/pdf/pd/v38/0100-8358-PD-38-e020225717.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02753naa a2200265 a 4500
001 1061540
005 2020-12-07
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1806-9681 (online)
024 7 $a10.1590/s0100-83582020380100081$2DOI
100 1 $aDALAZEN, G.
245 $aSoybean tolerance to sulfentrazone and diclosulam in sandy soil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
500 $aArticle history: Received: June 27, 2019/ Accepted: September 24, 2020. Corresponding author: . Cite this article: Dalazen G, Kaspary TE, Markus C,Pisoni A, Merotto Jr. A. Soybean tolerance to sulfentrazone and diclosulam in sandy soil. Planta Daninha. 2020;38:e020225717. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582020380100081
520 $aABSTRACT: Background: The use of pre-emergent herbicides is an important tool to control weeds, however the tolerance of soybean to these herbicides can vary according to the type of soil. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate sulfentrazone and diclosulam soybean selectivity in a sandy soil, in order to establish these herbicides as supporting tools in weed control. Methods: The treatments consisted of six doses of sulfentrazone (150 to 400 g ha-1) and diclosulam (25.2 to 75.6 g ha-1), and an untreated control. A field study was repeated in two growing seasons (2013/14 and 2014/15) in a sandy soil. Results: The occurrence of injury depended on the growing season. The first season presented lower rainfall rates during the crop cycle. The recommended dose of sulfentrazone (200 g ha-1) caused 26% and 10% of plant injury at 15 days after the treatment for the first and second season, respectively. For diclosulam, the recommended dose of 35.3 g ha-1 caused 20% and 8% of plant injury, respectively, for the first and second season. However, at the recommended doses, only for diclosulam and in the rainy season there was a reduction in soybean productivity. Conclusions: The herbicide sulfentrazone, although causing visual soybean plant injury, present satisfactory selectivity at recommended doses and can be used as an important tool on weed control on sandy soils. Similar response was observed for diclosulam in 2013/14. However, in a rainfall season diclosulam impacted on soybean yield at the recommended dose for sandy soils, with selectivity depending of the growth season.
650 $aGLYCINA MAX
650 $aSOJA
653 $aPLANT INJURY
653 $aPRE-EMERGENCE HERBICIDE
653 $aWEED MANAGEMENT
700 1 $aKASPARY, T. E.
700 1 $aMARKUS, C.
700 1 $aPISONIC, A.
700 1 $aMEROTTO JR, A.
773 $tPlanta daninha vol.38 Viçosa 2020 Epub Dec 04, 2020.OPEN ACCESS. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582020380100081
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha actual : |
21/02/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
24/06/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Ediciones Especiales |
|
Autor : |
PAREJA, M.; BERVEJILLO, J.; BIANCO, M.; RUIZ, A.; TORRES, A. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARIO PAREJA, Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura (IICA); Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA); JOSÉ BERVEJILLO, Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura (IICA); Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA); MARIELA BIANCO, Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura (IICA); Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA); A. RUIZ, Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura (IICA); Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA); A. TORRES, Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura (IICA); Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA). |
|
Título : |
Evaluación de los impactos económicos, sociales, ambientales e institucionales de 20 años de inversión en investigación e innovación agropecuaria por parte del Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA) - Uruguay. Resumen ejecutivo |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2011 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Montevideo (UY): INIA, 2011. |
|
Páginas : |
41 p. |
|
Serie : |
(INIA Ediciones Especiales) |
|
ISBN : |
978-9974-38-334-0 |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Thesagro : |
ECONOMIA AGRICOLA; EVALUACION DEL IMPACTO AMBIENTAL; IMPACTO SOCIAL; INNOVACION TECNOLOGICA; INSTITUCIONES DE INVESTIGACION; URUGUAY. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
--
A50 Investigación agraria |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/1252/1/18429151211092410.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 00895nam a2200253 a 4500
001 1003469
005 2021-06-24
008 2011 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
020 $a978-9974-38-334-0
100 1 $aPAREJA, M.
245 $aEvaluación de los impactos económicos, sociales, ambientales e institucionales de 20 años de inversión en investigación e innovación agropecuaria por parte del Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA) - Uruguay. Resumen ejecutivo
260 $aMontevideo (UY): INIA$c2011
300 $a41 p.
490 $a(INIA Ediciones Especiales)
650 $aECONOMIA AGRICOLA
650 $aEVALUACION DEL IMPACTO AMBIENTAL
650 $aIMPACTO SOCIAL
650 $aINNOVACION TECNOLOGICA
650 $aINSTITUCIONES DE INVESTIGACION
650 $aURUGUAY
700 1 $aBERVEJILLO, J.
700 1 $aBIANCO, M.
700 1 $aRUIZ, A.
700 1 $aTORRES, A.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
