| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
27/01/2021 |
|
Actualizado : |
27/01/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
BERRUETA, C.; GIMÉNEZ, G.; DOGLIOTTI, S. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARIA CECILIA BERRUETA MOREIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GUSTAVO GIMÉNEZ FRANQUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SANTIAGO DOGLIOTTI, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Scaling up from crop to farm level: Co-innovation framework to improve vegetable farm systems sustainability. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agricultural Systems, April 2021, Volume 189, Article number 103055. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103055 |
|
ISSN : |
0308-521X |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103055 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 6 July 2020; Received in revised form 7 January 2021; Accepted 8 January 2021; Available online 15 January 2021.
Corresponding author: Cecilia Berrueta. E-mail address: cberrueta@inia.org.uy |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract-
CONTEXT: Successful scaling up from crop level research to adoption by farmers depends on its practitioners being aware of the constraints that arise as scaling up proceeds. Promising ideas from crop level research are not adopted by farmers in many cases. OBJECTIVE: Scaling up is explored here in a study conducted in five vegetable farms in south Uruguay, where tomato production was one of the main sources of income. We aimed to evaluate the redesign process at both levels (crop and farm) focusing on: synergies and trade-offs between crop yield and farm system improvement and how critical crop constraints could be solved at farm level. METHODS: Improved crop management practices were proposed following yield gap analysis recommendations developed in previous studies, aiming to maximise crop yield and inputs use efficiency. At the farm level, a multi-year plan defining crops choice, crops area and allocation of fields to crops was designed to match resource demands to supply, especially for labour. Redesign plans were implemented for one year, with 66% of redesigned activities adopted at farm level and 86% at crop level. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We found several examples where farm system adjustment conflicted with crop yield maximization. We also found constraints prioritised as bottlenecks for crop yield improvement, which require solutions at the farm level. For instance, fertigation problems (quantity and timing) explained part of the yield gap in tomato. Overcoming these constraints requires farm system settings, e.g. adjustment of cropping area to water availability, development of suitable water reservoirs and infrastructure for water distribution and fertilisers injection, besides adjustment of a fertigation plan according to crop demand, soil fertility and greenhouse environment at crop level. Crop yield limiting factors identified through yield gap analysis, considered inside a farm system redesign process, could be a powerful tool to better targeting crop management recommendations to overall farm performance improvement. SIGNIFICANCE: The consideration of farm systems as a whole showed greater economic and environmental impacts than focusing only on the main crop due to synergies and trade-offs among farm system components. Multi-scale analysis showed that recommendations from crop research need to be tailored to farm context and objectives considering synergies and trade-offs.
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd MenosAbstract-
CONTEXT: Successful scaling up from crop level research to adoption by farmers depends on its practitioners being aware of the constraints that arise as scaling up proceeds. Promising ideas from crop level research are not adopted by farmers in many cases. OBJECTIVE: Scaling up is explored here in a study conducted in five vegetable farms in south Uruguay, where tomato production was one of the main sources of income. We aimed to evaluate the redesign process at both levels (crop and farm) focusing on: synergies and trade-offs between crop yield and farm system improvement and how critical crop constraints could be solved at farm level. METHODS: Improved crop management practices were proposed following yield gap analysis recommendations developed in previous studies, aiming to maximise crop yield and inputs use efficiency. At the farm level, a multi-year plan defining crops choice, crops area and allocation of fields to crops was designed to match resource demands to supply, especially for labour. Redesign plans were implemented for one year, with 66% of redesigned activities adopted at farm level and 86% at crop level. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We found several examples where farm system adjustment conflicted with crop yield maximization. We also found constraints prioritised as bottlenecks for crop yield improvement, which require solutions at the farm level. For instance, fertigation problems (quantity and timing) explained part of the yield gap in tomato. Overc... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Crop management; Family farms; Farm system; Redesign at farm level; Yield gap analysis. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03464naa a2200241 a 4500
001 1061687
005 2021-01-27
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0308-521X
024 7 $a10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103055$2DOI
100 1 $aBERRUETA, C.
245 $aScaling up from crop to farm level$bCo-innovation framework to improve vegetable farm systems sustainability.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
500 $aArticle history: Received 6 July 2020; Received in revised form 7 January 2021; Accepted 8 January 2021; Available online 15 January 2021. Corresponding author: Cecilia Berrueta. E-mail address: cberrueta@inia.org.uy
520 $aAbstract- CONTEXT: Successful scaling up from crop level research to adoption by farmers depends on its practitioners being aware of the constraints that arise as scaling up proceeds. Promising ideas from crop level research are not adopted by farmers in many cases. OBJECTIVE: Scaling up is explored here in a study conducted in five vegetable farms in south Uruguay, where tomato production was one of the main sources of income. We aimed to evaluate the redesign process at both levels (crop and farm) focusing on: synergies and trade-offs between crop yield and farm system improvement and how critical crop constraints could be solved at farm level. METHODS: Improved crop management practices were proposed following yield gap analysis recommendations developed in previous studies, aiming to maximise crop yield and inputs use efficiency. At the farm level, a multi-year plan defining crops choice, crops area and allocation of fields to crops was designed to match resource demands to supply, especially for labour. Redesign plans were implemented for one year, with 66% of redesigned activities adopted at farm level and 86% at crop level. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We found several examples where farm system adjustment conflicted with crop yield maximization. We also found constraints prioritised as bottlenecks for crop yield improvement, which require solutions at the farm level. For instance, fertigation problems (quantity and timing) explained part of the yield gap in tomato. Overcoming these constraints requires farm system settings, e.g. adjustment of cropping area to water availability, development of suitable water reservoirs and infrastructure for water distribution and fertilisers injection, besides adjustment of a fertigation plan according to crop demand, soil fertility and greenhouse environment at crop level. Crop yield limiting factors identified through yield gap analysis, considered inside a farm system redesign process, could be a powerful tool to better targeting crop management recommendations to overall farm performance improvement. SIGNIFICANCE: The consideration of farm systems as a whole showed greater economic and environmental impacts than focusing only on the main crop due to synergies and trade-offs among farm system components. Multi-scale analysis showed that recommendations from crop research need to be tailored to farm context and objectives considering synergies and trade-offs. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd
653 $aCrop management
653 $aFamily farms
653 $aFarm system
653 $aRedesign at farm level
653 $aYield gap analysis
700 1 $aGIMÉNEZ, G.
700 1 $aDOGLIOTTI, S.
773 $tAgricultural Systems, April 2021, Volume 189, Article number 103055. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103055
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 142 | |
| 1. |  | Giménez, G. Aportes de la investigación en INIA para el cultivo de frutilla ln: Jornada sobre resultados experimentales en frutilla: mejoramiento genético, cultivares y fertilización, 2000 Trabajos presentados. Las Brujas, Canelones (Uruguay): INIA, 2000. p. 1-6 (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión ; 244) INIA Las Brujas| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
|    |
| 2. | | GIMENEZ, G. Asegurando la salud de la población. Suplemento El Observador, 22 de agosto 2014. p. 19 Suplemento: 100 años de INIA La Estanzuela: un siglo promoviendo el desarrollo agropecuario.| Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Agropecuarias |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 3. | | GIMÉNEZ, G. Cultivares locales y mejoramiento hortícola en procesos de trayectoria agroecológica. (Capítulo 15). Tercera sección. Tecnologías con enfoque en la productividad y la calidad. Editores: Roberto Zoppolo y Gabriel Ciappesoni. In: Georgina Paula García-Inza; José María Paruelo; Roberto Zoppolo. (eds). Aportes científicos y tecnológicos del Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA) del Uruguay a las trayectorias agroecológicas. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires : Fundación CICCUS, 2023. p.301-327. p.301-327.| Tipo: Capítulo en Libro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 4. | | GIMÉNEZ, G. Enfermedades causadas por hongos y bacterias In: GIMENEZ, G.; PAULLIER, J.; MAESO, D.; LEONI, C. Identificación y manejo de las principales enfermedades y plagas en el cultivo de frutilla Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 2003. p. 9-32 (INIA Boletín de Divulgación ; 82)| Tipo: Capítulo en Libro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 5. | | GIMÉNEZ, G. Introducción: producción de frutilla en el Uruguay, la planta de frutilla, la corona, el sistema radicular, las hojas, las flores y los frutos, los estolones, manejo integrado de enfermedades y plagas, monitoreo del cultivo In: GIMENEZ, G.; PAULLIER, J.; MAESO, D.; LEONI, C. Identificación y manejo de las principales enfermedades y plagas en el cultivo de frutilla Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 2003. p. 1-8 (INIA Boletín de Divulgación ; 82)| Tipo: Capítulo en Libro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 6. | | GIMÉNEZ, G. Jardin de introducción de variedades de frutilla. In: SUH (Sociedad Uruguay de Horticultura); COLHOR (Confederación Latinoamericana de Horticultura); Congreso Iberoamericano, 1., Congreso Latinoamericano, 5., Congreso Nacional de Horticultura, 4. Resúmenes. Montevideo (Uruguay): SUH, COLHOR, 1992. p151| Tipo: Abstracts/Resúmenes |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 11. | | GIMÉNEZ, G.; LENZI, A. El primer cultivar de frutilla de día neutro de INIA: LBK 36.1. In: INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria); COOPUNSA (Cooperativa Agraria Punta del Sarandí); MGAP/ DGDR (Dirección General de Desarrollo Rural)- Rocha. Nuevo sistema de producción de frutilla en el sur del país. Más (+) Tecnologías para la Producción Familiar, Promoción y Desarrollo de Tecnologías Apropiadas. Jornada de Divulgación. Canelones (Uruguay): INIA, 2015. p. 11-13 (Serie Actividades de Difusión ; 758).| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 17. | | GONZÁLEZ-ARCOS, M.; GIMÉNEZ, G. (Ed.). Catálogo de cultivares hortícolas 2017 (2a.edición ampliada) Montevido (Uruguay): INIA, 2017. 56 p. (INIA Boletín de Divulgación; 113) Agradecimiento: Equipo de colaboradores del Proyecto Nacional de Mejoramiento Genético y Producción de Semilla en Horticultura: INIA Salto Grande (Ana Arruabarrena, Joanna Lado, Leticia Rubio, Pablo Varela, Brian Ghelfi, Johan Ghelfi,...| Tipo: Boletín de Divulgación |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 142 | |
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
