|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha : |
06/02/2019 |
Actualizado : |
12/03/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Informes Agroclimáticos |
Autor : |
GIMÉNEZ, A.; CAL, A.; TISCORNIA, G.; SCHIAVI, C. |
Afiliación : |
AGUSTIN EDUARDO GIMÉNEZ FUREST, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ADRIAN TABARE CAL ALVAREZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GUADALUPE TISCORNIA TOSAR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CARLOS IGNACIO SCHIAVI RAMPELBERG, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Informe agroclimático 2019 - Situación a Enero. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2019 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 2019. |
Páginas : |
4 p. |
Serie : |
(Informe Agroclimático; 153) |
Idioma : |
Español |
Palabras claves : |
AGROCLIMA; AGROCLIMATOLOGÍA; BOLETIN AGROCLIMÁTICO; CARACTERIZACIÓN AGROCLIMÁTICA; DIRECCION VIENTO; ESTACIONES AGROMETEOROLOGICAS; ESTACIONES AUTOMATICAS; ESTACIONES INIA; ESTADO DEL TIEMPO; ESTRÉS HÍDRICO; GRAFICAS AGROCLIMATICOS; GRAS; HELIOFANOGRAFO; INFORMACION SATELITAL; INFORME AGROCLIMÁTICO 2018; INUNDACIONES; LLUVIAS DIARIAS; MAXIMA; MEDIA; MINIMA; PANEL SOLAR; PERSPECTIVAS CLIMATICAS; PLUVIOMETRO; PRECIPITACION NACIONAL; PREVENCION HELADAS; PRONOSTICO; SENSOR; SIMETRICO; TANQUE A; TERMOCUPLAS; TERMOHIDROGRAFO; VARIABLES AGROCLIMATICAS; VELETA. |
Thesagro : |
AGROCLIMATOLOGIA; CAMBIO CLIMATICO; CLIMA; CLIMATOLOGIA; ESTACIONES METEOROLOGICAS; ESTRES HIDRICO; EVAPORACION; EVAPOTRANSPIRACION; HUMEDAD; HUMEDAD RELATIVA; LLUVIA; METEOROLOGIA; PERSPECTIVAS; PLUVIOMETROS; PRONOSTICO DEL TIEMPO; SENSORES; SISTEMAS; SISTEMAS DE INFORMACION; SUELO; TEMPERATURA; TERMOMETROS. |
Asunto categoría : |
P40 Meteorología y climatología |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/12406/1/Informe-agroclimatico-INIA-GRAS-Enero-de-2019.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02126nam a2200805 a 4500 001 1059481 005 2019-03-12 008 2019 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d 100 1 $aGIMÉNEZ, A. 245 $aInforme agroclimático 2019 - Situación a Enero.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aMontevideo (Uruguay): INIA$c2019 300 $a4 p. 490 $a(Informe Agroclimático; 153) 650 $aAGROCLIMATOLOGIA 650 $aCAMBIO CLIMATICO 650 $aCLIMA 650 $aCLIMATOLOGIA 650 $aESTACIONES METEOROLOGICAS 650 $aESTRES HIDRICO 650 $aEVAPORACION 650 $aEVAPOTRANSPIRACION 650 $aHUMEDAD 650 $aHUMEDAD RELATIVA 650 $aLLUVIA 650 $aMETEOROLOGIA 650 $aPERSPECTIVAS 650 $aPLUVIOMETROS 650 $aPRONOSTICO DEL TIEMPO 650 $aSENSORES 650 $aSISTEMAS 650 $aSISTEMAS DE INFORMACION 650 $aSUELO 650 $aTEMPERATURA 650 $aTERMOMETROS 653 $aAGROCLIMA 653 $aAGROCLIMATOLOGÍA 653 $aBOLETIN AGROCLIMÁTICO 653 $aCARACTERIZACIÓN AGROCLIMÁTICA 653 $aDIRECCION VIENTO 653 $aESTACIONES AGROMETEOROLOGICAS 653 $aESTACIONES AUTOMATICAS 653 $aESTACIONES INIA 653 $aESTADO DEL TIEMPO 653 $aESTRÉS HÍDRICO 653 $aGRAFICAS AGROCLIMATICOS 653 $aGRAS 653 $aHELIOFANOGRAFO 653 $aINFORMACION SATELITAL 653 $aINFORME AGROCLIMÁTICO 2018 653 $aINUNDACIONES 653 $aLLUVIAS DIARIAS 653 $aMAXIMA 653 $aMEDIA 653 $aMINIMA 653 $aPANEL SOLAR 653 $aPERSPECTIVAS CLIMATICAS 653 $aPLUVIOMETRO 653 $aPRECIPITACION NACIONAL 653 $aPREVENCION HELADAS 653 $aPRONOSTICO 653 $aSENSOR 653 $aSIMETRICO 653 $aTANQUE A 653 $aTERMOCUPLAS 653 $aTERMOHIDROGRAFO 653 $aVARIABLES AGROCLIMATICAS 653 $aVELETA 700 1 $aCAL, A. 700 1 $aTISCORNIA, G. 700 1 $aSCHIAVI, C.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
Fecha actual : |
16/11/2015 |
Actualizado : |
15/10/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
A - 1 |
Autor : |
MEDEROS, A.; KELTON, D.; PEREGRINE, A.S.; VANLEEUWEN, J.; FERNÁNDEZ, S.; LEBOEUF, A.; MENZIES, P.; MARTIN, R. |
Afiliación : |
AMERICA ESTHER MEDEROS SILVEIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Evaluation of the utility of subjective clinical parameters for estimating fecal egg counts and packed cell volume in Canadian sheep flocks. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2014 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Veterinary Parasitology, 2014, v.205, p. 568?574. |
ISSN : |
0304-4017 |
DOI : |
10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.08.030 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 12 February 2014 / Received in revised form 8 August 2014 / Accepted 30 August 2014. |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
A study was conducted in sheep on Canadian farms to describe the relationship between packed cell volume (PCV) or fecal egg counts (FEC) and subjective clinical parameters that
may indicate the severity of parasitic gastroenteritis. Twenty-one farms in Ontario (ON) and 8 farms in Quebec (QC) were purposively selected and visited during April?May (spring)
and August (summer) 2007. At each farm visit, blood and fecal samples were collected from 10 ewes and 10 female lambs; body condition score (BCS), dag score (DS), fecal consistency score (FCS) and FAMACHA score were recorded for all sampled sheep. Packed cell volume was determined for all blood samples, and FEC were performed for all fecal samples. Summary statistics and simple correlations were performed for the parameters recorded. Two mixed models with random effects at the farm level were developed; one using PCV as the response variable and another using the natural log of eggs per gram of feces (lnEPG). Finally, the residuals from both models were correlated to the covariates in the models. The mean PCV values during the spring were 29.7% and 36.7% for lambs, and 28.8% and 31.1% for ewes, in ON and QC, respectively. During the summer, the mean PCV was 32.0% and 32.8% for lambs, and 30.1% and 29.9% for ewes, in ON and QC, respectively. The arithmetic mean FEC per gram of feces (EPG) during the spring was 3 and 2 for lambs, and 1266 and 789 for ewes, in ON and QC, respectively, whereas during summer the arithmetic mean EPG was 907 and 237 for lambs, and 458 and 246 for ewes, in ON and QC, respectively. Results from simple correlations indicated that PCV was negatively correlated with lnEPG (r = −0.255; r2 = 6.5%) and FAMACHA (r = −0.312; r2 = 9.7%), and positively correlated with BCS (r = 0.317; r2 = 10%). LnEPG was negatively correlated with BCS (r = −0.232; r2 = 5.4%) and PCV (r = −0.255; r2 = 6.5%), but positively correlated with FAMACHA (r = 0.178; r2 = 3.2%) and DS (r = 0.086; r2 = 0.7%). Results from the models indicated that PCV and lnEPG residuals were negatively correlated with FAMACHA, FCS and almost all categories of BCS and DS, although the correlations were very low. The main results from this study suggested that none of the subjective clinical parameters evaluated were highly correlated with PCV or lnEPG and therefore were not good predictors of lnEPG or PCV on the studied farms in Ontario and Quebec.
© 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved MenosABSTRACT.
A study was conducted in sheep on Canadian farms to describe the relationship between packed cell volume (PCV) or fecal egg counts (FEC) and subjective clinical parameters that
may indicate the severity of parasitic gastroenteritis. Twenty-one farms in Ontario (ON) and 8 farms in Quebec (QC) were purposively selected and visited during April?May (spring)
and August (summer) 2007. At each farm visit, blood and fecal samples were collected from 10 ewes and 10 female lambs; body condition score (BCS), dag score (DS), fecal consistency score (FCS) and FAMACHA score were recorded for all sampled sheep. Packed cell volume was determined for all blood samples, and FEC were performed for all fecal samples. Summary statistics and simple correlations were performed for the parameters recorded. Two mixed models with random effects at the farm level were developed; one using PCV as the response variable and another using the natural log of eggs per gram of feces (lnEPG). Finally, the residuals from both models were correlated to the covariates in the models. The mean PCV values during the spring were 29.7% and 36.7% for lambs, and 28.8% and 31.1% for ewes, in ON and QC, respectively. During the summer, the mean PCV was 32.0% and 32.8% for lambs, and 30.1% and 29.9% for ewes, in ON and QC, respectively. The arithmetic mean FEC per gram of feces (EPG) during the spring was 3 and 2 for lambs, and 1266 and 789 for ewes, in ON and QC, respectively, whereas during summer the arithm... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
NEMATODOS GASTROINTESTINALES. |
Thesagro : |
OVINOS. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- L73 Enfermedades de los animales |
Marc : |
LEADER 03399naa a2200265 a 4500 001 1053920 005 2019-10-15 008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0304-4017 024 7 $a10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.08.030$2DOI 100 1 $aMEDEROS, A. 245 $aEvaluation of the utility of subjective clinical parameters for estimating fecal egg counts and packed cell volume in Canadian sheep flocks.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2014 500 $aArticle history: Received 12 February 2014 / Received in revised form 8 August 2014 / Accepted 30 August 2014. 520 $aABSTRACT. A study was conducted in sheep on Canadian farms to describe the relationship between packed cell volume (PCV) or fecal egg counts (FEC) and subjective clinical parameters that may indicate the severity of parasitic gastroenteritis. Twenty-one farms in Ontario (ON) and 8 farms in Quebec (QC) were purposively selected and visited during April?May (spring) and August (summer) 2007. At each farm visit, blood and fecal samples were collected from 10 ewes and 10 female lambs; body condition score (BCS), dag score (DS), fecal consistency score (FCS) and FAMACHA score were recorded for all sampled sheep. Packed cell volume was determined for all blood samples, and FEC were performed for all fecal samples. Summary statistics and simple correlations were performed for the parameters recorded. Two mixed models with random effects at the farm level were developed; one using PCV as the response variable and another using the natural log of eggs per gram of feces (lnEPG). Finally, the residuals from both models were correlated to the covariates in the models. The mean PCV values during the spring were 29.7% and 36.7% for lambs, and 28.8% and 31.1% for ewes, in ON and QC, respectively. During the summer, the mean PCV was 32.0% and 32.8% for lambs, and 30.1% and 29.9% for ewes, in ON and QC, respectively. The arithmetic mean FEC per gram of feces (EPG) during the spring was 3 and 2 for lambs, and 1266 and 789 for ewes, in ON and QC, respectively, whereas during summer the arithmetic mean EPG was 907 and 237 for lambs, and 458 and 246 for ewes, in ON and QC, respectively. Results from simple correlations indicated that PCV was negatively correlated with lnEPG (r = −0.255; r2 = 6.5%) and FAMACHA (r = −0.312; r2 = 9.7%), and positively correlated with BCS (r = 0.317; r2 = 10%). LnEPG was negatively correlated with BCS (r = −0.232; r2 = 5.4%) and PCV (r = −0.255; r2 = 6.5%), but positively correlated with FAMACHA (r = 0.178; r2 = 3.2%) and DS (r = 0.086; r2 = 0.7%). Results from the models indicated that PCV and lnEPG residuals were negatively correlated with FAMACHA, FCS and almost all categories of BCS and DS, although the correlations were very low. The main results from this study suggested that none of the subjective clinical parameters evaluated were highly correlated with PCV or lnEPG and therefore were not good predictors of lnEPG or PCV on the studied farms in Ontario and Quebec. © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved 650 $aOVINOS 653 $aNEMATODOS GASTROINTESTINALES 700 1 $aKELTON, D. 700 1 $aPEREGRINE, A.S. 700 1 $aVANLEEUWEN, J. 700 1 $aFERNÁNDEZ, S. 700 1 $aLEBOEUF, A. 700 1 $aMENZIES, P. 700 1 $aMARTIN, R. 773 $tVeterinary Parasitology, 2014$gv.205, p. 568?574.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|