|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
Fecha : |
09/09/2020 |
Actualizado : |
05/09/2022 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
RAEGAN HOEFLER; GONZALEZ-BARRIOS , P.; MADHAV BHATTA; NUNES, J.A.R.; BERRO, I.; NALIN, R.S.; BORGES, A.; COVARRUBIAS, E.; DIAZ-GARCIA, L.; QUINCKE, M.; GUTIERREZ, L. |
Afiliación : |
HOEFLER, R., Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin?Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI, 53706, USA.; PABLO GONZALEZ-BARRIOS, Dpartment of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin?Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI, 53706, USA.; BHATTA, M., Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin?Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI, 53706, USA.; JOSE A. R. NUNES, Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin?Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI, 53706, USA.; INES BERRO, Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI, 53706, USA; RAFAEL S. NALIN, Department of Genetics, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, 131418-900, Brazil.; ALEJANDRA BORGES, Statistics Department, Facultad de Agronomía, Univesidad de la República, Garzón 780, Montevideo, Uruguay.; EDUARDO COVARRUBIAS, CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform (EiB), El Batan, Mexico International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), El Batan, Mexico.; LUIS DIAZ-GARCIA, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agricolas y Pecuarias, 20676, Aguascalientes, Mexico.; MARTIN CONRADO QUINCKE WALDEN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; LUCIA GUTIERREZ, Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI, 53706, USA. |
Título : |
Do Spatial Designs Outperform Classic Experimental Designs?. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 1 December 2020, volume 25, number 4, pag.523-552, 1 December 2020. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-020-00406-2 |
DOI : |
10.1007/s13253-020-00406-2 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 15 October 2019/Accepted 01 July 2020/Published 29 August 2020. This project was partially funded through a USDA_AFRI_NIFA_2018-67013-27620 award and by the Hatch Act Formula Fund WISO1984 and WIS03002. Additionally, JARN received funding from CAPES CAPES_PrInt_UFLA 88887.318846_2019-00 as Senior Visiting Professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. |
Contenido : |
Controlling spatial variation in agricultural field trials is the most important step to compare treatments efficiently and accurately. Spatial variability can be controlled at the experimental design level with the assignment of treatments to experimental units and at the modeling level with the use of spatial corrections and other modeling strategies. The goal of this study was to compare the efficiency of methods used to control spatial variation in a wide range of scenarios using a simulation approach based on real wheat data. Specifically, classic and spatial experimental designs with and without a twodimensional autoregressive spatial correction were evaluated in scenarios that include differing experimental unit sizes, experiment sizes, relationships among genotypes, genotype by environment interaction levels, and trait heritabilities. Fully replicated designs outperformed partially and unreplicated designs in terms of accuracy; the alpha-lattice incomplete block design was best in all scenarios of the medium-sized experiments.
However, in terms of response to selection, partially replicated experiments that evaluate large population sizes were superior in most scenarios. The AR1×AR1 spatial correction had little benefit in most scenarios except for the medium-sized experiments with the largest experimental unit size and low GE. Overall, the results from this study provide a guide to researchers designing and analyzing large field experiments. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online. MenosControlling spatial variation in agricultural field trials is the most important step to compare treatments efficiently and accurately. Spatial variability can be controlled at the experimental design level with the assignment of treatments to experimental units and at the modeling level with the use of spatial corrections and other modeling strategies. The goal of this study was to compare the efficiency of methods used to control spatial variation in a wide range of scenarios using a simulation approach based on real wheat data. Specifically, classic and spatial experimental designs with and without a twodimensional autoregressive spatial correction were evaluated in scenarios that include differing experimental unit sizes, experiment sizes, relationships among genotypes, genotype by environment interaction levels, and trait heritabilities. Fully replicated designs outperformed partially and unreplicated designs in terms of accuracy; the alpha-lattice incomplete block design was best in all scenarios of the medium-sized experiments.
However, in terms of response to selection, partially replicated experiments that evaluate large population sizes were superior in most scenarios. The AR1×AR1 spatial correction had little benefit in most scenarios except for the medium-sized experiments with the largest experimental unit size and low GE. Overall, the results from this study provide a guide to researchers designing and analyzing large field experiments. Supplementary materials ... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
AUTOREGRESSIVE PROCESS; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; PREDICTION ACCURACY; RANDOMIZATION-BASED EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS; RESPONSE TO SELECTION; SPATIAL CORRECTION. |
Thesagro : |
DISENO EXPERIMENTAL. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16700/1/JABES-2020.pdf
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13253-020-00406-2.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03067naa a2200349 a 4500 001 1061304 005 2022-09-05 008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1007/s13253-020-00406-2$2DOI 100 1 $aRAEGAN HOEFLER 245 $aDo Spatial Designs Outperform Classic Experimental Designs?.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2020 500 $aArticle history: Received 15 October 2019/Accepted 01 July 2020/Published 29 August 2020. This project was partially funded through a USDA_AFRI_NIFA_2018-67013-27620 award and by the Hatch Act Formula Fund WISO1984 and WIS03002. Additionally, JARN received funding from CAPES CAPES_PrInt_UFLA 88887.318846_2019-00 as Senior Visiting Professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. 520 $aControlling spatial variation in agricultural field trials is the most important step to compare treatments efficiently and accurately. Spatial variability can be controlled at the experimental design level with the assignment of treatments to experimental units and at the modeling level with the use of spatial corrections and other modeling strategies. The goal of this study was to compare the efficiency of methods used to control spatial variation in a wide range of scenarios using a simulation approach based on real wheat data. Specifically, classic and spatial experimental designs with and without a twodimensional autoregressive spatial correction were evaluated in scenarios that include differing experimental unit sizes, experiment sizes, relationships among genotypes, genotype by environment interaction levels, and trait heritabilities. Fully replicated designs outperformed partially and unreplicated designs in terms of accuracy; the alpha-lattice incomplete block design was best in all scenarios of the medium-sized experiments. However, in terms of response to selection, partially replicated experiments that evaluate large population sizes were superior in most scenarios. The AR1×AR1 spatial correction had little benefit in most scenarios except for the medium-sized experiments with the largest experimental unit size and low GE. Overall, the results from this study provide a guide to researchers designing and analyzing large field experiments. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online. 650 $aDISENO EXPERIMENTAL 653 $aAUTOREGRESSIVE PROCESS 653 $aEXPERIMENTAL DESIGN 653 $aPREDICTION ACCURACY 653 $aRANDOMIZATION-BASED EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS 653 $aRESPONSE TO SELECTION 653 $aSPATIAL CORRECTION 700 1 $aGONZALEZ-BARRIOS , P. 700 1 $aMADHAV BHATTA 700 1 $aNUNES, J.A.R. 700 1 $aBERRO, I. 700 1 $aNALIN, R.S. 700 1 $aBORGES, A. 700 1 $aCOVARRUBIAS, E. 700 1 $aDIAZ-GARCIA, L. 700 1 $aQUINCKE, M. 700 1 $aGUTIERREZ, L. 773 $tJournal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 1 December 2020, volume 25, number 4, pag.523-552, 1 December 2020. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-020-00406-2
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
19/05/2023 |
Actualizado : |
19/05/2023 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Abstracts/Resúmenes |
Autor : |
VIERA, L.; ALCOBA, F.; GONZÁLEZ-BARRIOS, P.; RODRÍGUEZ, G.; GONZÁLEZ-ARCOS, M.; FERREIRA, V.; GALVÁN, G.; SIRI, M.I.; GAIERO, P.; VILARÓ, F. |
Afiliación : |
LUCIANA VIERA, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad de la Empresa (UDE); FLORENCIA ALCOBA, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la República; PABLO GONZÁLEZ-BARRIOS, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República; GUSTAVO ROBERTO RODRÍGUEZ LAGOUTTE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MATIAS GONZÁLEZ-ARCOS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; VIRGINIA FERREIRA, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la República; GUILLERMO GALVÁN, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República; MARÍA INÉS SIRI, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la República; PAOLA GAIERO, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República; FRANCISCO LUIS VILARO PAREJA, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad de la Empresa; Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República. |
Título : |
Evaluación de la resistencia a marchitez bacteriana en germoplasma avanzado de Papa (Solanum tuberosum). 153. (resúmen). |
Complemento del título : |
Áreas temáticas: Genética. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: Physiological Mini Reviews, 2022, volume 15, Special Issue: III (3er) Congreso Nacional de Biociencias Octubre 2022, Montevideo, Uruguay. p.151-152. |
ISSN : |
1669-5410 |
Idioma : |
Español |
Notas : |
Resumen publicado en las jornadas de BIOCIENCIAS: II Jornadas Binacionales Argentina-Uruguay; III Congreso Nacional 2022 "Ciencia para el desarrollo sustentable". |
Contenido : |
Una de las principales enfermedades que afecta al cultivo de la papa es la marchitez bacteriana, causada por Ralstonia solanacearum. Con este trabajo se busca caracterizar la resistencia a marchitez bacteriana en germoplasma seleccionado del Programa nacional de papa y otros materiales promisorios de diverso origen. |
Palabras claves : |
Introgresión; Murchera; Parientes silvestres de la papa; Ralstonia solanacearum; Retrocruza. |
Asunto categoría : |
H20 Enfermedades de las plantas |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/17150/1/Viera-L.-et.al-p151-152-3er-Congreso-Nacional-Biociencias-2022.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01464nam a2200301 a 4500 001 1064134 005 2023-05-19 008 2022 bl uuuu u01u1 u #d 022 $a1669-5410 100 1 $aVIERA, L. 245 $aEvaluación de la resistencia a marchitez bacteriana en germoplasma avanzado de Papa (Solanum tuberosum). 153. (resúmen).$h[electronic resource] 260 $aIn: Physiological Mini Reviews, 2022, volume 15, Special Issue: III (3er) Congreso Nacional de Biociencias Octubre 2022, Montevideo, Uruguay. p.151-152.$c2022 500 $aResumen publicado en las jornadas de BIOCIENCIAS: II Jornadas Binacionales Argentina-Uruguay; III Congreso Nacional 2022 "Ciencia para el desarrollo sustentable". 520 $aUna de las principales enfermedades que afecta al cultivo de la papa es la marchitez bacteriana, causada por Ralstonia solanacearum. Con este trabajo se busca caracterizar la resistencia a marchitez bacteriana en germoplasma seleccionado del Programa nacional de papa y otros materiales promisorios de diverso origen. 653 $aIntrogresión 653 $aMurchera 653 $aParientes silvestres de la papa 653 $aRalstonia solanacearum 653 $aRetrocruza 700 1 $aALCOBA, F. 700 1 $aGONZÁLEZ-BARRIOS, P. 700 1 $aRODRÍGUEZ, G. 700 1 $aGONZÁLEZ-ARCOS, M. 700 1 $aFERREIRA, V. 700 1 $aGALVÁN, G. 700 1 $aSIRI, M.I. 700 1 $aGAIERO, P. 700 1 $aVILARÓ, F.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|