| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
27/01/2021 |
|
Actualizado : |
27/01/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
BERRUETA, C.; GIMÉNEZ, G.; DOGLIOTTI, S. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARIA CECILIA BERRUETA MOREIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GUSTAVO GIMÉNEZ FRANQUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SANTIAGO DOGLIOTTI, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Scaling up from crop to farm level: Co-innovation framework to improve vegetable farm systems sustainability. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agricultural Systems, April 2021, Volume 189, Article number 103055. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103055 |
|
ISSN : |
0308-521X |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103055 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 6 July 2020; Received in revised form 7 January 2021; Accepted 8 January 2021; Available online 15 January 2021.
Corresponding author: Cecilia Berrueta. E-mail address: cberrueta@inia.org.uy |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract-
CONTEXT: Successful scaling up from crop level research to adoption by farmers depends on its practitioners being aware of the constraints that arise as scaling up proceeds. Promising ideas from crop level research are not adopted by farmers in many cases. OBJECTIVE: Scaling up is explored here in a study conducted in five vegetable farms in south Uruguay, where tomato production was one of the main sources of income. We aimed to evaluate the redesign process at both levels (crop and farm) focusing on: synergies and trade-offs between crop yield and farm system improvement and how critical crop constraints could be solved at farm level. METHODS: Improved crop management practices were proposed following yield gap analysis recommendations developed in previous studies, aiming to maximise crop yield and inputs use efficiency. At the farm level, a multi-year plan defining crops choice, crops area and allocation of fields to crops was designed to match resource demands to supply, especially for labour. Redesign plans were implemented for one year, with 66% of redesigned activities adopted at farm level and 86% at crop level. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We found several examples where farm system adjustment conflicted with crop yield maximization. We also found constraints prioritised as bottlenecks for crop yield improvement, which require solutions at the farm level. For instance, fertigation problems (quantity and timing) explained part of the yield gap in tomato. Overcoming these constraints requires farm system settings, e.g. adjustment of cropping area to water availability, development of suitable water reservoirs and infrastructure for water distribution and fertilisers injection, besides adjustment of a fertigation plan according to crop demand, soil fertility and greenhouse environment at crop level. Crop yield limiting factors identified through yield gap analysis, considered inside a farm system redesign process, could be a powerful tool to better targeting crop management recommendations to overall farm performance improvement. SIGNIFICANCE: The consideration of farm systems as a whole showed greater economic and environmental impacts than focusing only on the main crop due to synergies and trade-offs among farm system components. Multi-scale analysis showed that recommendations from crop research need to be tailored to farm context and objectives considering synergies and trade-offs.
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd MenosAbstract-
CONTEXT: Successful scaling up from crop level research to adoption by farmers depends on its practitioners being aware of the constraints that arise as scaling up proceeds. Promising ideas from crop level research are not adopted by farmers in many cases. OBJECTIVE: Scaling up is explored here in a study conducted in five vegetable farms in south Uruguay, where tomato production was one of the main sources of income. We aimed to evaluate the redesign process at both levels (crop and farm) focusing on: synergies and trade-offs between crop yield and farm system improvement and how critical crop constraints could be solved at farm level. METHODS: Improved crop management practices were proposed following yield gap analysis recommendations developed in previous studies, aiming to maximise crop yield and inputs use efficiency. At the farm level, a multi-year plan defining crops choice, crops area and allocation of fields to crops was designed to match resource demands to supply, especially for labour. Redesign plans were implemented for one year, with 66% of redesigned activities adopted at farm level and 86% at crop level. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We found several examples where farm system adjustment conflicted with crop yield maximization. We also found constraints prioritised as bottlenecks for crop yield improvement, which require solutions at the farm level. For instance, fertigation problems (quantity and timing) explained part of the yield gap in tomato. Overc... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Crop management; Family farms; Farm system; Redesign at farm level; Yield gap analysis. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03464naa a2200241 a 4500
001 1061687
005 2021-01-27
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0308-521X
024 7 $a10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103055$2DOI
100 1 $aBERRUETA, C.
245 $aScaling up from crop to farm level$bCo-innovation framework to improve vegetable farm systems sustainability.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
500 $aArticle history: Received 6 July 2020; Received in revised form 7 January 2021; Accepted 8 January 2021; Available online 15 January 2021. Corresponding author: Cecilia Berrueta. E-mail address: cberrueta@inia.org.uy
520 $aAbstract- CONTEXT: Successful scaling up from crop level research to adoption by farmers depends on its practitioners being aware of the constraints that arise as scaling up proceeds. Promising ideas from crop level research are not adopted by farmers in many cases. OBJECTIVE: Scaling up is explored here in a study conducted in five vegetable farms in south Uruguay, where tomato production was one of the main sources of income. We aimed to evaluate the redesign process at both levels (crop and farm) focusing on: synergies and trade-offs between crop yield and farm system improvement and how critical crop constraints could be solved at farm level. METHODS: Improved crop management practices were proposed following yield gap analysis recommendations developed in previous studies, aiming to maximise crop yield and inputs use efficiency. At the farm level, a multi-year plan defining crops choice, crops area and allocation of fields to crops was designed to match resource demands to supply, especially for labour. Redesign plans were implemented for one year, with 66% of redesigned activities adopted at farm level and 86% at crop level. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We found several examples where farm system adjustment conflicted with crop yield maximization. We also found constraints prioritised as bottlenecks for crop yield improvement, which require solutions at the farm level. For instance, fertigation problems (quantity and timing) explained part of the yield gap in tomato. Overcoming these constraints requires farm system settings, e.g. adjustment of cropping area to water availability, development of suitable water reservoirs and infrastructure for water distribution and fertilisers injection, besides adjustment of a fertigation plan according to crop demand, soil fertility and greenhouse environment at crop level. Crop yield limiting factors identified through yield gap analysis, considered inside a farm system redesign process, could be a powerful tool to better targeting crop management recommendations to overall farm performance improvement. SIGNIFICANCE: The consideration of farm systems as a whole showed greater economic and environmental impacts than focusing only on the main crop due to synergies and trade-offs among farm system components. Multi-scale analysis showed that recommendations from crop research need to be tailored to farm context and objectives considering synergies and trade-offs. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd
653 $aCrop management
653 $aFamily farms
653 $aFarm system
653 $aRedesign at farm level
653 $aYield gap analysis
700 1 $aGIMÉNEZ, G.
700 1 $aDOGLIOTTI, S.
773 $tAgricultural Systems, April 2021, Volume 189, Article number 103055. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103055
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha actual : |
08/09/2017 |
|
Actualizado : |
18/02/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Libros |
|
Autor : |
ALANIZ, S.; GEPP, V.; MONDINO, P.; LEONI, C.; MUJICA, V.; NUÑEZ, S.; SCATONI, I. |
|
Afiliación : |
SANDRA ALANIZ, Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Agronomía; VIVIENNE GEPP, Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Agronomía; PEDRO MONDINO, Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Agronomía; CAROLINA LEONI VELAZCO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIA VALENTINA MUJICA TELIZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SATURNINO NUÑEZ BUA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; IRIS BEATRIZ SCATONI, Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Agronomía. |
|
Título : |
Guía de identificación y monitoreo de enfermedades y plagas en frutales de hoja caduca y vid bajo manejo integrado. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2016 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Montevideo (UY): AFRUPI, 2016. |
|
Páginas : |
135 p. |
|
ISBN : |
978-9974-8604-0-7 |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Notas : |
AFRUPI (Asociación de Fruticultores de Producción Integrada), es una organización de productores que tiene por fin promover un modelo de producción que respeta el medio ambiente, cuida los recursos naturales y al consumidor (fundada el 31 de agosto de 1999 por un grupo de productores y promovidos por el Programa PREDEG.GTZ)) |
|
Contenido : |
La Asociación de Fruticultores de Producción Integrada - AFRUPI - es una organización de productores que tiene por fin promover un modelo de producción que respeta el medio ambiente, cuida los recursos naturales y al consumidor. La asociación participa en planes de negocios y facilita la implementación de subsidios y otros programas que lleva a cabo la Dirección General de la Granja (DIGEGRA) y la Dirección General de Desarrollo Rural (DGDR); favorece el desarrollo local y la investigación, especialmente con el Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA) Las Brujas y Facultad de Agronomía (Fagro), permitiendo a sus socios y la comunidad ser beneficiarios de dichos recursos, así como de sus resultados.
La presente Guía para la identificación y el monitoreo de las principales enfermedades y plagas en cultivos frutícolas bajo manejo integrado, pretende ser una herramienta de ayuda a técnicos asesores, productores u otras personas encargadas de realizar la tarea de monitoreo, tanto de los estadios fenológicos, como de las enfermedades y plagas de importancia en frutales de carozo, pepita y uva de mesa.
El objetivo fundamental de la Guía es aportar herramientas para la mejora de las prácticas productivas y así avanzar hacia un manejo cuidadoso del ambiente. |
|
Palabras claves : |
ESTADIOS FENOLÓGICOS. |
|
Thesagro : |
ARBOLES FRUTALES; DURAZNERO; ENFERMEDADES DE LAS PLANTAS; FRUTALES DE CAROZO; GESTIÓN DE LUCHA INTEGRADA; GUIAS; MANZANO; MONITOREO; PLAGAS DE PLANTAS; VID. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
H20 Enfermedades de las plantas |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/15011/1/ManualAfrupiFrutales2016.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02562nam a2200349 a 4500
001 1057549
005 2021-02-18
008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
020 $a978-9974-8604-0-7
100 1 $aALANIZ, S.
245 $aGuía de identificación y monitoreo de enfermedades y plagas en frutales de hoja caduca y vid bajo manejo integrado.
260 $aMontevideo (UY): AFRUPI$c2016
300 $a135 p.
500 $aAFRUPI (Asociación de Fruticultores de Producción Integrada), es una organización de productores que tiene por fin promover un modelo de producción que respeta el medio ambiente, cuida los recursos naturales y al consumidor (fundada el 31 de agosto de 1999 por un grupo de productores y promovidos por el Programa PREDEG.GTZ))
520 $aLa Asociación de Fruticultores de Producción Integrada - AFRUPI - es una organización de productores que tiene por fin promover un modelo de producción que respeta el medio ambiente, cuida los recursos naturales y al consumidor. La asociación participa en planes de negocios y facilita la implementación de subsidios y otros programas que lleva a cabo la Dirección General de la Granja (DIGEGRA) y la Dirección General de Desarrollo Rural (DGDR); favorece el desarrollo local y la investigación, especialmente con el Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA) Las Brujas y Facultad de Agronomía (Fagro), permitiendo a sus socios y la comunidad ser beneficiarios de dichos recursos, así como de sus resultados. La presente Guía para la identificación y el monitoreo de las principales enfermedades y plagas en cultivos frutícolas bajo manejo integrado, pretende ser una herramienta de ayuda a técnicos asesores, productores u otras personas encargadas de realizar la tarea de monitoreo, tanto de los estadios fenológicos, como de las enfermedades y plagas de importancia en frutales de carozo, pepita y uva de mesa. El objetivo fundamental de la Guía es aportar herramientas para la mejora de las prácticas productivas y así avanzar hacia un manejo cuidadoso del ambiente.
650 $aARBOLES FRUTALES
650 $aDURAZNERO
650 $aENFERMEDADES DE LAS PLANTAS
650 $aFRUTALES DE CAROZO
650 $aGESTIÓN DE LUCHA INTEGRADA
650 $aGUIAS
650 $aMANZANO
650 $aMONITOREO
650 $aPLAGAS DE PLANTAS
650 $aVID
653 $aESTADIOS FENOLÓGICOS
700 1 $aGEPP, V.
700 1 $aMONDINO, P.
700 1 $aLEONI, C.
700 1 $aMUJICA, V.
700 1 $aNUÑEZ, S.
700 1 $aSCATONI, I.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
