| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 42 | |
| 10. |  | GARCÍA-LAMOTHE, A. Selección por eficiencia de uso de nitrógeno (N) y fósforo (P).[Presentación oral]. In: SEMINARIO INTERNACIONAL DE TRIGO, 2014, La Estanzuela, Colonia, UY. GERMÁN, S., et al. (Org.). 1914-2014, un siglo de mejoramiento de trigo en La Estanzuela: un valioso legado para el futuro: presentaciones; resúmenes. La Estanzuela, Colonia, UY: INIA, 2014. p. 30.| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
|    |
| 15. | | Garcia Lamothe, A.; Martino, D. Diagnostico foliar en trigo ln: Dia de Campo Cultivos de Invierno, 1991 nov : La Estanzuela [Memorias]. Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 1991. p31-32 (sic) Dia de Campo Cultivos de Invierno (INIA) Participó el Proyecto Cultivos de La Estanzuela| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 42 | |
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
17/04/2024 |
|
Actualizado : |
17/04/2024 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
RAMOS, B.; BANCHERO, G.; LA MANNA, A.; CANOZZI, M.E.A.; FERNANDEZ, E.; CLARIGET, J.M. |
|
Afiliación : |
BEATRIZ RAMOS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GEORGGET ELIZABETH BANCHERO HUNZIKER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ALEJANDRO FRANCISCO LA MANNA ALONSO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARÍA EUGENIA ANDRIGHETTO CANOZZI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ENRIQUE GENARO FERNANDEZ RODRIGUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JUAN MANUEL CLARIGET BRIZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Applicability of an automated supplement feeder to dose titanium dioxide to estimate forage intake, fecal output, and diet digestibility of beef cattle. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2024 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Applied Animal Science. 2024, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp. 132-141. https://doi.org/10.15232/aas.2023-02448 -- OPEN ACCESS. |
|
ISSN : |
2590-2873 |
|
DOI : |
10.15232/aas.2023-02448 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Available online 27 March 2024, Version of Record 27 March 2024. -- Correspondence: Clariget, J.; Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Ruta 50 km 11, Colonia, Uruguay; email:jclariget@inia.org.uy -- FUNDING: This research was supported by the Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay (grant numbers N-19407, 2016). -- LICENSE: Article under a Creative Commons license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- Objective: Our objective was to evaluate 2 methods of external marker dosing, at 2 levels of forage allowance, to estimate forage intake in beef cattle. Materials and Methods: Sixteen Aberdeen Angus steers (mean age of 18 mo; 350 +- 9 kg BW), kept in individual pens, were used in a quadruplicated 4 × 4 Latin square design experiment, in a 2 × 2 factorial arrange-ment. The factors were forage allowance level (4 vs. 7 kg DM/d of alfalfa plus orchard grass haylage) and supple-ment feeding method (manual vs. automatic). A supplement consisting of 2 kg DM of pelleted corn with 1% ti- tanium dioxide (TiO2) per day was offered to each steer. Total DMI and diet DM digestibility were estimated using the dual-marker technique, with acid insoluble ash (AIA; 2 different methods) or ADL used as the internal marker. Fecal output was estimated by TiO2 concentration using feces from the daily total fecal collection (TFC) samples and others from a morning subsample. The TFC was carried out individually and daily during the last 4 d of each 21-d period. Results and Discussion: The overall mean recovery of TiO2 was 104% (SD: 0.05; range: 101-107%). Fecal subsamples obtained in the morning overestimated fecal production with no difference between dosing methods. The DM digestibility was overestimated with AIA and ADL. The estimation of DM digestibility by ADL was closer than AIA to those obtained by TFC, without differences between the 2 AIA techniques. The overestimation of forage intake using the dual-marker technique was more affected by the overvalued DM digestibility using the internal markers than by fecal production using the external marker, without the effect of the dosing method. Implications and Applications: It is viable and reliable to automatically supply pelleted corn with TiO2 for fecal production estimation. The accuracy could be improved by obtaining at least 2 fecal samples during the day. Under the current experimental conditions, ADL is more accurate than AIA for estimating DM digestibility when the diet offered to cattle is based on alfalfa plus orchard grass haylage and concentrate. © 2024 The Author MenosABSTRACT.- Objective: Our objective was to evaluate 2 methods of external marker dosing, at 2 levels of forage allowance, to estimate forage intake in beef cattle. Materials and Methods: Sixteen Aberdeen Angus steers (mean age of 18 mo; 350 +- 9 kg BW), kept in individual pens, were used in a quadruplicated 4 × 4 Latin square design experiment, in a 2 × 2 factorial arrange-ment. The factors were forage allowance level (4 vs. 7 kg DM/d of alfalfa plus orchard grass haylage) and supple-ment feeding method (manual vs. automatic). A supplement consisting of 2 kg DM of pelleted corn with 1% ti- tanium dioxide (TiO2) per day was offered to each steer. Total DMI and diet DM digestibility were estimated using the dual-marker technique, with acid insoluble ash (AIA; 2 different methods) or ADL used as the internal marker. Fecal output was estimated by TiO2 concentration using feces from the daily total fecal collection (TFC) samples and others from a morning subsample. The TFC was carried out individually and daily during the last 4 d of each 21-d period. Results and Discussion: The overall mean recovery of TiO2 was 104% (SD: 0.05; range: 101-107%). Fecal subsamples obtained in the morning overestimated fecal production with no difference between dosing methods. The DM digestibility was overestimated with AIA and ADL. The estimation of DM digestibility by ADL was closer than AIA to those obtained by TFC, without differences between the 2 AIA techniques. The overestimation of forage i... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Grazing; Herbage; Markers; Ruminant; Self-fed; SISTEMA GANADERO EXTENSIVO - INIA. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L02 Alimentación animal |
|
URL : |
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286524000211/pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03580nam a2200277 a 4500
001 1064598
005 2024-04-17
008 2024 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a2590-2873
024 7 $a10.15232/aas.2023-02448$2DOI
100 1 $aRAMOS, B.
245 $aApplicability of an automated supplement feeder to dose titanium dioxide to estimate forage intake, fecal output, and diet digestibility of beef cattle.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aApplied Animal Science. 2024, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp. 132-141. https://doi.org/10.15232/aas.2023-02448 -- OPEN ACCESS.$c2023
500 $aArticle history: Available online 27 March 2024, Version of Record 27 March 2024. -- Correspondence: Clariget, J.; Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Ruta 50 km 11, Colonia, Uruguay; email:jclariget@inia.org.uy -- FUNDING: This research was supported by the Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay (grant numbers N-19407, 2016). -- LICENSE: Article under a Creative Commons license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).
520 $aABSTRACT.- Objective: Our objective was to evaluate 2 methods of external marker dosing, at 2 levels of forage allowance, to estimate forage intake in beef cattle. Materials and Methods: Sixteen Aberdeen Angus steers (mean age of 18 mo; 350 +- 9 kg BW), kept in individual pens, were used in a quadruplicated 4 × 4 Latin square design experiment, in a 2 × 2 factorial arrange-ment. The factors were forage allowance level (4 vs. 7 kg DM/d of alfalfa plus orchard grass haylage) and supple-ment feeding method (manual vs. automatic). A supplement consisting of 2 kg DM of pelleted corn with 1% ti- tanium dioxide (TiO2) per day was offered to each steer. Total DMI and diet DM digestibility were estimated using the dual-marker technique, with acid insoluble ash (AIA; 2 different methods) or ADL used as the internal marker. Fecal output was estimated by TiO2 concentration using feces from the daily total fecal collection (TFC) samples and others from a morning subsample. The TFC was carried out individually and daily during the last 4 d of each 21-d period. Results and Discussion: The overall mean recovery of TiO2 was 104% (SD: 0.05; range: 101-107%). Fecal subsamples obtained in the morning overestimated fecal production with no difference between dosing methods. The DM digestibility was overestimated with AIA and ADL. The estimation of DM digestibility by ADL was closer than AIA to those obtained by TFC, without differences between the 2 AIA techniques. The overestimation of forage intake using the dual-marker technique was more affected by the overvalued DM digestibility using the internal markers than by fecal production using the external marker, without the effect of the dosing method. Implications and Applications: It is viable and reliable to automatically supply pelleted corn with TiO2 for fecal production estimation. The accuracy could be improved by obtaining at least 2 fecal samples during the day. Under the current experimental conditions, ADL is more accurate than AIA for estimating DM digestibility when the diet offered to cattle is based on alfalfa plus orchard grass haylage and concentrate. © 2024 The Author
653 $aGrazing
653 $aHerbage
653 $aMarkers
653 $aRuminant
653 $aSelf-fed
653 $aSISTEMA GANADERO EXTENSIVO - INIA
700 1 $aBANCHERO, G.
700 1 $aLA MANNA, A.
700 1 $aCANOZZI, M.E.A.
700 1 $aFERNANDEZ, E.
700 1 $aCLARIGET, J.M.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
