| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 36 | |
| 10. |  | FERNÁNDEZ, M.C.; GIMÉNEZ, R.A.; COVATTA, F. Impacto del imidacloprid como insecticida, sobre los organismos del suelo en el cultivo de duraznero. ln: Congreso Nacional de Horticultura, 8.; Seminario Regional de Frutilla, 2001, Salto, Uruguay. Resúmenes. Montevideo (Uruguay): SUH; INIA, 2001. p. 82 "Sociedad Uruguaya de Horticultura; Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Uruguay"| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas; INIA Salto Grande; INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|    |
| 11. | | BANCHERO, G.; FERNANDEZ, M.; GANZÁBAL, A.; VÁZQUEZ, A.; QUINTANS, G. Manejo genético y nutricional para aumentar la tasa mellicera de nuestras majadas. In: JORNADAS URUGUAYAS DE BUIATRÍA, 34., 2006, Paysandú, Uruguay. Paysandú, UY: Centro Médico Veterinario de Paysandú, SUB, SMVU. 2006. p. 71-76.| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| 18. | | IBÁÑEZ, M.; MANTERO, C.; RESQUÍN, F.; MONTORO, A.; PINTOS, X.; FERNÁNDEZ, M. Natural durability Eucalyptus bosistoana and Eucalyptus sideroxylon TIMBER. [Resumen de poster]. ln: Encuentro de Investigadores de la Región Noreste: Cerro Largo-Rivera-Tacuarembó, 1., 12 de agosto de 2016, Campus Interinstitucional de Tacuarembó, Tacuarembó. Libro de Resúmenes. Tacuarembó: UDELAR; INIA, 2016. p. 58| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 19. | | FERNÁNDEZ, M.; CASAUX, M.L.; FRAGA, M.; VIGNOLI, R.; BADO, I.; ZUNINO, P.; UMPIÉRREZ, A. Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) associated with calf mortality in Uruguay. Microorganisms. 2023, Volume 11, Issue 7, p. 1704. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11071704 ---- OPEN ACCESS. Article history: Received 17 May 2023; Revised 5 June 2023; Accepted 8 June 2023; Published 29 June 2023. -- Academic Editors: Kim Stanford,
Flemming Scheutz, Chad R. Laing, Linda Chui, Nicole Van De Kar, Patricia Griffin, Tim A....| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|  |
| Registros recuperados : 36 | |
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha actual : |
09/09/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
05/09/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
RAEGAN HOEFLER; GONZALEZ-BARRIOS , P.; MADHAV BHATTA; NUNES, J.A.R.; BERRO, I.; NALIN, R.S.; BORGES, A.; COVARRUBIAS, E.; DIAZ-GARCIA, L.; QUINCKE, M.; GUTIERREZ, L. |
|
Afiliación : |
HOEFLER, R., Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin?Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI, 53706, USA.; PABLO GONZALEZ-BARRIOS, Dpartment of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin?Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI, 53706, USA.; BHATTA, M., Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin?Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI, 53706, USA.; JOSE A. R. NUNES, Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin?Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI, 53706, USA.; INES BERRO, Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI, 53706, USA; RAFAEL S. NALIN, Department of Genetics, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, 131418-900, Brazil.; ALEJANDRA BORGES, Statistics Department, Facultad de Agronomía, Univesidad de la República, Garzón 780, Montevideo, Uruguay.; EDUARDO COVARRUBIAS, CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform (EiB), El Batan, Mexico International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), El Batan, Mexico.; LUIS DIAZ-GARCIA, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agricolas y Pecuarias, 20676, Aguascalientes, Mexico.; MARTIN CONRADO QUINCKE WALDEN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; LUCIA GUTIERREZ, Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI, 53706, USA. |
|
Título : |
Do Spatial Designs Outperform Classic Experimental Designs?. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 1 December 2020, volume 25, number 4, pag.523-552, 1 December 2020. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-020-00406-2 |
|
DOI : |
10.1007/s13253-020-00406-2 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 15 October 2019/Accepted 01 July 2020/Published 29 August 2020. This project was partially funded through a USDA_AFRI_NIFA_2018-67013-27620 award and by the Hatch Act Formula Fund WISO1984 and WIS03002. Additionally, JARN received funding from CAPES CAPES_PrInt_UFLA 88887.318846_2019-00 as Senior Visiting Professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. |
|
Contenido : |
Controlling spatial variation in agricultural field trials is the most important step to compare treatments efficiently and accurately. Spatial variability can be controlled at the experimental design level with the assignment of treatments to experimental units and at the modeling level with the use of spatial corrections and other modeling strategies. The goal of this study was to compare the efficiency of methods used to control spatial variation in a wide range of scenarios using a simulation approach based on real wheat data. Specifically, classic and spatial experimental designs with and without a twodimensional autoregressive spatial correction were evaluated in scenarios that include differing experimental unit sizes, experiment sizes, relationships among genotypes, genotype by environment interaction levels, and trait heritabilities. Fully replicated designs outperformed partially and unreplicated designs in terms of accuracy; the alpha-lattice incomplete block design was best in all scenarios of the medium-sized experiments.
However, in terms of response to selection, partially replicated experiments that evaluate large population sizes were superior in most scenarios. The AR1×AR1 spatial correction had little benefit in most scenarios except for the medium-sized experiments with the largest experimental unit size and low GE. Overall, the results from this study provide a guide to researchers designing and analyzing large field experiments. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online. MenosControlling spatial variation in agricultural field trials is the most important step to compare treatments efficiently and accurately. Spatial variability can be controlled at the experimental design level with the assignment of treatments to experimental units and at the modeling level with the use of spatial corrections and other modeling strategies. The goal of this study was to compare the efficiency of methods used to control spatial variation in a wide range of scenarios using a simulation approach based on real wheat data. Specifically, classic and spatial experimental designs with and without a twodimensional autoregressive spatial correction were evaluated in scenarios that include differing experimental unit sizes, experiment sizes, relationships among genotypes, genotype by environment interaction levels, and trait heritabilities. Fully replicated designs outperformed partially and unreplicated designs in terms of accuracy; the alpha-lattice incomplete block design was best in all scenarios of the medium-sized experiments.
However, in terms of response to selection, partially replicated experiments that evaluate large population sizes were superior in most scenarios. The AR1×AR1 spatial correction had little benefit in most scenarios except for the medium-sized experiments with the largest experimental unit size and low GE. Overall, the results from this study provide a guide to researchers designing and analyzing large field experiments. Supplementary materials ... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
AUTOREGRESSIVE PROCESS; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; PREDICTION ACCURACY; RANDOMIZATION-BASED EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS; RESPONSE TO SELECTION; SPATIAL CORRECTION. |
|
Thesagro : |
DISENO EXPERIMENTAL. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16700/1/JABES-2020.pdf
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13253-020-00406-2.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03067naa a2200349 a 4500
001 1061304
005 2022-09-05
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1007/s13253-020-00406-2$2DOI
100 1 $aRAEGAN HOEFLER
245 $aDo Spatial Designs Outperform Classic Experimental Designs?.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
500 $aArticle history: Received 15 October 2019/Accepted 01 July 2020/Published 29 August 2020. This project was partially funded through a USDA_AFRI_NIFA_2018-67013-27620 award and by the Hatch Act Formula Fund WISO1984 and WIS03002. Additionally, JARN received funding from CAPES CAPES_PrInt_UFLA 88887.318846_2019-00 as Senior Visiting Professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
520 $aControlling spatial variation in agricultural field trials is the most important step to compare treatments efficiently and accurately. Spatial variability can be controlled at the experimental design level with the assignment of treatments to experimental units and at the modeling level with the use of spatial corrections and other modeling strategies. The goal of this study was to compare the efficiency of methods used to control spatial variation in a wide range of scenarios using a simulation approach based on real wheat data. Specifically, classic and spatial experimental designs with and without a twodimensional autoregressive spatial correction were evaluated in scenarios that include differing experimental unit sizes, experiment sizes, relationships among genotypes, genotype by environment interaction levels, and trait heritabilities. Fully replicated designs outperformed partially and unreplicated designs in terms of accuracy; the alpha-lattice incomplete block design was best in all scenarios of the medium-sized experiments. However, in terms of response to selection, partially replicated experiments that evaluate large population sizes were superior in most scenarios. The AR1×AR1 spatial correction had little benefit in most scenarios except for the medium-sized experiments with the largest experimental unit size and low GE. Overall, the results from this study provide a guide to researchers designing and analyzing large field experiments. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online.
650 $aDISENO EXPERIMENTAL
653 $aAUTOREGRESSIVE PROCESS
653 $aEXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
653 $aPREDICTION ACCURACY
653 $aRANDOMIZATION-BASED EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS
653 $aRESPONSE TO SELECTION
653 $aSPATIAL CORRECTION
700 1 $aGONZALEZ-BARRIOS , P.
700 1 $aMADHAV BHATTA
700 1 $aNUNES, J.A.R.
700 1 $aBERRO, I.
700 1 $aNALIN, R.S.
700 1 $aBORGES, A.
700 1 $aCOVARRUBIAS, E.
700 1 $aDIAZ-GARCIA, L.
700 1 $aQUINCKE, M.
700 1 $aGUTIERREZ, L.
773 $tJournal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 1 December 2020, volume 25, number 4, pag.523-552, 1 December 2020. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-020-00406-2
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
