|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha : |
07/12/2021 |
Actualizado : |
07/12/2021 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Documentos |
Autor : |
BERRUETA, C.; GRASSO, R.; FALERO, M. |
Afiliación : |
MARIA CECILIA BERRUETA MOREIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; RAFAEL GILLSON GRASSO RODRIGUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARCELO FABIAN FALERO DELGADO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Análisis de solución de suelo para monitoreo del fertirriego. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria); Programa Nacional Producción Hortícola. Fertirriego de cultivos basado en monitoreo de la humedad y nutrientes en el campo. Canelones (UY): INIA, 2021. p. 4-8. |
Serie : |
(Serie Actividades de Difusión ; 799). |
ISSN : |
1688-9258 |
Idioma : |
Español |
Contenido : |
Una fertilización precisa requiere de un monitoreo del plan de fertilización en el cultivo. Las sondas de succión de solución de suelo combinadas con los sistemas de análisis
rápido constituyen una eficaz herramienta para monitorear la concentración de nutrientes en la solución de suelo. De esta forma poder corregir la fertilización de
acuerdo a la evolución de cada nutriente en tiempo real. Y así evitar deficiencias o excesos de nutrientes. |
Thesagro : |
ANALISIS DE SUELO; FERTIRRIEGO; FERTIRRIGACION. |
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16133/1/SAD-799-Berrueta-C.-01.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01202nam a2200193 a 4500 001 1062575 005 2021-12-07 008 2021 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d 022 $a1688-9258 100 1 $aBERRUETA, C. 245 $aAnálisis de solución de suelo para monitoreo del fertirriego.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aIn: INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria); Programa Nacional Producción Hortícola. Fertirriego de cultivos basado en monitoreo de la humedad y nutrientes en el campo. Canelones (UY): INIA, 2021. p. 4-8.$c2021 490 $a(Serie Actividades de Difusión ; 799). 520 $aUna fertilización precisa requiere de un monitoreo del plan de fertilización en el cultivo. Las sondas de succión de solución de suelo combinadas con los sistemas de análisis rápido constituyen una eficaz herramienta para monitorear la concentración de nutrientes en la solución de suelo. De esta forma poder corregir la fertilización de acuerdo a la evolución de cada nutriente en tiempo real. Y así evitar deficiencias o excesos de nutrientes. 650 $aANALISIS DE SUELO 650 $aFERTIRRIEGO 650 $aFERTIRRIGACION 700 1 $aGRASSO, R. 700 1 $aFALERO, M.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
Fecha actual : |
12/10/2015 |
Actualizado : |
02/06/2017 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Abstracts/Resúmenes |
Autor : |
CAPURRO, M.C.; RICCETTO, S.; TARLERA, S.; IRISARRI, P.; FERNÁNDEZ, A.; CANTOU, G.; ROEL, A. |
Afiliación : |
MARIA CRISTINA CAPURRO BAZZANO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SARA MAGDALENA RICCETTO AGUIRREZABALA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIA GUILLERMINA CANTOU MAYOL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ALVARO ROEL DELLAZOPPA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Irrigation management and greenhouse gas emissions in Uruguayan rice production systems: abstract. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2015 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agrociencia Uruguay, v. 19, special issue "Inter-Regional CIGR Conference on Land and Water Challenges, 3., La Estanzuela, Colonia, UY. Tools for developing; "Dr. Mario García Petillo"", p. 60, 2015. |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
En versión electrónica difiere la paginación: Agrociencia Uruguay, v. 19, special issue, p. 64, 2015. |
Contenido : |
Environmental impact and sustainability of agricultural systems and management practices leading to climate change mitigation
are one of the most relevant issues to agricultural production nowadays. Mitigation is the process of reducing emissions or
enhancing sinks of greenhouse gases (GHG), to limit global warming potential and restrict future climate change. The most
relevant GHG are Carbon dioxide (CO2), Methane (CH4) and Nitrous Oxide (N2O). The steady increase of its concentrations
in the atmosphere over several decades has led to enhance global warming. CH4 and N2O are the most relevant GHG emitted
mainly in the agricultural sector. It is well known that water management has great impact on GHG emissions from rice paddy
fields. One of the most important tools for rice crop production and mitigation of CH4 emission is the controlled irrigation.
However, it could result in a N2O emission increase and reduced rice yields. For these reasons, it is remarkably important to
assess the tradeoff relationship between both GHG and the effect on rice productivity. A 3 year field experiment with two different
irrigation systems was set at southeast of Uruguay. Conventional water management (continuous flooding after 30 days of
emergence, CF30) and an alternative irrigation system (controlled deficit irrigation allowing wetting and drying, AWDI) were
compared. The objective was to study the effect of water management on GHG emission, water productivity and rice yields in
order to identify strategies for further progress in sustainable intensification of Uruguayan rice. Results showed that mean
cumulative CH4 emission values for AWDI were 55% lower than CF30 systems; on the other hand, there were no significant
differences in N2O emission among systems. Significant yield differences were not observed in two of the rice seasons, while
AWDI recorded a significant yield reduction in one of them. Total irrigation water applied and irrigation water productivity did not
showed differences in two of the rice seasons, while CF30 reported a higher amount of water applied and lower water
productivity in one of the seasons. It can be concluded that AWDI could be an option to enhance water productivity and GHG
emission mitigation. However, grain yield can be compromised in AWDI systems. The adoption of these technology is based
on the indispensable assess of an overall tradeoff between the risk of possible yield losses, total water used and GHG
emissions. MenosEnvironmental impact and sustainability of agricultural systems and management practices leading to climate change mitigation
are one of the most relevant issues to agricultural production nowadays. Mitigation is the process of reducing emissions or
enhancing sinks of greenhouse gases (GHG), to limit global warming potential and restrict future climate change. The most
relevant GHG are Carbon dioxide (CO2), Methane (CH4) and Nitrous Oxide (N2O). The steady increase of its concentrations
in the atmosphere over several decades has led to enhance global warming. CH4 and N2O are the most relevant GHG emitted
mainly in the agricultural sector. It is well known that water management has great impact on GHG emissions from rice paddy
fields. One of the most important tools for rice crop production and mitigation of CH4 emission is the controlled irrigation.
However, it could result in a N2O emission increase and reduced rice yields. For these reasons, it is remarkably important to
assess the tradeoff relationship between both GHG and the effect on rice productivity. A 3 year field experiment with two different
irrigation systems was set at southeast of Uruguay. Conventional water management (continuous flooding after 30 days of
emergence, CF30) and an alternative irrigation system (controlled deficit irrigation allowing wetting and drying, AWDI) were
compared. The objective was to study the effect of water management on GHG emission, water productivity and rice yields in
order to id... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
EMISIONES DE GASES DE EFECTO INVERNADERO; ÓXIDO NITROSO. |
Thesagro : |
ARROZ; MANEJO DEL AGUA; METANO; RIEGO; URUGUAY. |
Asunto categoría : |
F06 Riego |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/5056/1/Agrociencia-Congreso-CIGR2015-v.19.si.p.64-CAPURRO.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03479nam a2200277 a 4500 001 1053552 005 2017-06-02 008 2015 bl uuuu u01u1 u #d 100 1 $aCAPURRO, M.C. 245 $aIrrigation management and greenhouse gas emissions in Uruguayan rice production systems$babstract. 260 $aAgrociencia Uruguay, v. 19, special issue "Inter-Regional CIGR Conference on Land and Water Challenges, 3., La Estanzuela, Colonia, UY. Tools for developing; "Dr. Mario García Petillo"", p. 60$c2015 500 $aEn versión electrónica difiere la paginación: Agrociencia Uruguay, v. 19, special issue, p. 64, 2015. 520 $aEnvironmental impact and sustainability of agricultural systems and management practices leading to climate change mitigation are one of the most relevant issues to agricultural production nowadays. Mitigation is the process of reducing emissions or enhancing sinks of greenhouse gases (GHG), to limit global warming potential and restrict future climate change. The most relevant GHG are Carbon dioxide (CO2), Methane (CH4) and Nitrous Oxide (N2O). The steady increase of its concentrations in the atmosphere over several decades has led to enhance global warming. CH4 and N2O are the most relevant GHG emitted mainly in the agricultural sector. It is well known that water management has great impact on GHG emissions from rice paddy fields. One of the most important tools for rice crop production and mitigation of CH4 emission is the controlled irrigation. However, it could result in a N2O emission increase and reduced rice yields. For these reasons, it is remarkably important to assess the tradeoff relationship between both GHG and the effect on rice productivity. A 3 year field experiment with two different irrigation systems was set at southeast of Uruguay. Conventional water management (continuous flooding after 30 days of emergence, CF30) and an alternative irrigation system (controlled deficit irrigation allowing wetting and drying, AWDI) were compared. The objective was to study the effect of water management on GHG emission, water productivity and rice yields in order to identify strategies for further progress in sustainable intensification of Uruguayan rice. Results showed that mean cumulative CH4 emission values for AWDI were 55% lower than CF30 systems; on the other hand, there were no significant differences in N2O emission among systems. Significant yield differences were not observed in two of the rice seasons, while AWDI recorded a significant yield reduction in one of them. Total irrigation water applied and irrigation water productivity did not showed differences in two of the rice seasons, while CF30 reported a higher amount of water applied and lower water productivity in one of the seasons. It can be concluded that AWDI could be an option to enhance water productivity and GHG emission mitigation. However, grain yield can be compromised in AWDI systems. The adoption of these technology is based on the indispensable assess of an overall tradeoff between the risk of possible yield losses, total water used and GHG emissions. 650 $aARROZ 650 $aMANEJO DEL AGUA 650 $aMETANO 650 $aRIEGO 650 $aURUGUAY 653 $aEMISIONES DE GASES DE EFECTO INVERNADERO 653 $aÓXIDO NITROSO 700 1 $aRICCETTO, S. 700 1 $aTARLERA, S. 700 1 $aIRISARRI, P. 700 1 $aFERNÁNDEZ, A. 700 1 $aCANTOU, G. 700 1 $aROEL, A.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|