|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
Fecha : |
21/02/2014 |
Actualizado : |
24/01/2020 |
Autor : |
ELHORDOY, D.; BOWLEY, R.; FERREIRA, O.; HERNÁNDEZ, S.; CIRIACOS, C. |
Título : |
Fertilidad de toros Hereford con alta capacidad de servicio en diferente relación macho/hembra. |
Fecha de publicación : |
1996 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
ln: Congreso Uruguayo de Producción Animal, 1 : 1996 Oct 2-4 : Montevideo Memorias. Montevideo (Uruguay): Asociación Uruguaya de Producción Animal, 1996. |
Páginas : |
p. 226-228 |
Idioma : |
Español |
Notas : |
Declarado de interés nacional. |
Thesagro : |
COMPORTAMIENTO SEXUAL; REPRODUCTIVIDAD; TORO. |
Asunto categoría : |
L53 Fisiología Animal - Reproducción |
Marc : |
LEADER 00718nam a2200205 a 4500 001 1024419 005 2020-01-24 008 1996 bl uuuu u01u1 u #d 100 1 $aELHORDOY, D. 245 $aFertilidad de toros Hereford con alta capacidad de servicio en diferente relación macho/hembra. 260 $aln: Congreso Uruguayo de Producción Animal, 1 : 1996 Oct 2-4 : Montevideo Memorias. Montevideo (Uruguay): Asociación Uruguaya de Producción Animal$c1996 300 $ap. 226-228 500 $aDeclarado de interés nacional. 650 $aCOMPORTAMIENTO SEXUAL 650 $aREPRODUCTIVIDAD 650 $aTORO 700 1 $aBOWLEY, R. 700 1 $aFERREIRA, O. 700 1 $aHERNÁNDEZ, S. 700 1 $aCIRIACOS, C.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Treinta y Tres. Por información adicional contacte bibliott@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
Fecha actual : |
16/10/2018 |
Actualizado : |
11/02/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
BORGES, A.; GONZÁLEZ-REYMUNDEZ, A.; ERNST, O.; CADENAZZI, M.; TERRA, J.A.; GUTIÉRREZ, L. |
Afiliación : |
ALEJANDRA BORGES, Departamento de Estadística. Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR.; AGUSTÍN GONZÁLEZ-REYMUNDEZ, Departamento de Estadística. Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR.; OSVALDO, ERNST, Departamento de Producción de Cultivos. EEMAC, Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR.; MÓNICA CADENAZZI, Departamento de Estadística. Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR.; JOSÉ ALFREDO TERRA FERNÁNDEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; LUCÍA GUTIÉRREZ, Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin. |
Título : |
Can spatial modeling substitute experimental design in agricultural experiments? |
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Crop Science, 2018, v. 59, no. 1, p. 1-10. |
DOI : |
10.2135/cropsci2018.03.0177 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Accepted paper, posted 10/05/18. Published online December, 13. 2018. |
Contenido : |
Abstract:
One of the most critical aspects of agricultural experimentation is the proper choice of experimental design to control field heterogeneity, especially for large experiments. However, even with complex experimental designs, spatial variability may not be properly controlled if it occurs at scales smaller than blocks. Therefore, modeling spatial variability can be beneficial and some studies even propose spatial modeling instead of experimental design. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of experimental design, spatial modeling, and a combination of both under real field conditions using GIS and simulating experiments. Yield data from cultivars was simulated using real spatial variability from a large uniformity trial of one hundred independent locations and different sizes of experiments for four experimental designs: completely randomized design (CRD), randomized complete block design (RCBD), alpha-lattice incomplete block design (ALPHA), and partially replicated design (PREP). Each realization was analyzed using different levels of spatial correction. Models were compared by precision, accuracy, and the recovery of superior genotypes. For moderate and large experiment sizes, ALPHA was the best experimental design in terms of precision and accuracy. In most situations, models that included spatial correlation were better than models with no spatial correlation but they did not outperformed better experimental designs. Therefore, spatial modeling is not a substitute for good experimental design. MenosAbstract:
One of the most critical aspects of agricultural experimentation is the proper choice of experimental design to control field heterogeneity, especially for large experiments. However, even with complex experimental designs, spatial variability may not be properly controlled if it occurs at scales smaller than blocks. Therefore, modeling spatial variability can be beneficial and some studies even propose spatial modeling instead of experimental design. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of experimental design, spatial modeling, and a combination of both under real field conditions using GIS and simulating experiments. Yield data from cultivars was simulated using real spatial variability from a large uniformity trial of one hundred independent locations and different sizes of experiments for four experimental designs: completely randomized design (CRD), randomized complete block design (RCBD), alpha-lattice incomplete block design (ALPHA), and partially replicated design (PREP). Each realization was analyzed using different levels of spatial correction. Models were compared by precision, accuracy, and the recovery of superior genotypes. For moderate and large experiment sizes, ALPHA was the best experimental design in terms of precision and accuracy. In most situations, models that included spatial correlation were better than models with no spatial correlation but they did not outperformed better experimental designs. Therefore, spatial modeling is not a substitut... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
EFFICIENCY STATISTICS; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FIELD VARIABILITY; SPATIAL MODELS; UNIFORMITY TRIAL. |
Thesagro : |
DISENO ESTADISTICO; DISENO EXPERIMENTAL; MODELOS ESTADISTICOS; VARIABILIDAD. |
Asunto categoría : |
U30 Métodos de investigación |
Marc : |
LEADER 02512naa a2200313 a 4500 001 1059193 005 2019-02-11 008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.2135/cropsci2018.03.0177$2DOI 100 1 $aBORGES, A. 245 $aCan spatial modeling substitute experimental design in agricultural experiments?$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2018 500 $aArticle history: Accepted paper, posted 10/05/18. Published online December, 13. 2018. 520 $aAbstract: One of the most critical aspects of agricultural experimentation is the proper choice of experimental design to control field heterogeneity, especially for large experiments. However, even with complex experimental designs, spatial variability may not be properly controlled if it occurs at scales smaller than blocks. Therefore, modeling spatial variability can be beneficial and some studies even propose spatial modeling instead of experimental design. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of experimental design, spatial modeling, and a combination of both under real field conditions using GIS and simulating experiments. Yield data from cultivars was simulated using real spatial variability from a large uniformity trial of one hundred independent locations and different sizes of experiments for four experimental designs: completely randomized design (CRD), randomized complete block design (RCBD), alpha-lattice incomplete block design (ALPHA), and partially replicated design (PREP). Each realization was analyzed using different levels of spatial correction. Models were compared by precision, accuracy, and the recovery of superior genotypes. For moderate and large experiment sizes, ALPHA was the best experimental design in terms of precision and accuracy. In most situations, models that included spatial correlation were better than models with no spatial correlation but they did not outperformed better experimental designs. Therefore, spatial modeling is not a substitute for good experimental design. 650 $aDISENO ESTADISTICO 650 $aDISENO EXPERIMENTAL 650 $aMODELOS ESTADISTICOS 650 $aVARIABILIDAD 653 $aEFFICIENCY STATISTICS 653 $aEXPERIMENTAL DESIGN 653 $aFIELD VARIABILITY 653 $aSPATIAL MODELS 653 $aUNIFORMITY TRIAL 700 1 $aGONZÁLEZ-REYMUNDEZ, A. 700 1 $aERNST, O. 700 1 $aCADENAZZI, M. 700 1 $aTERRA, J.A. 700 1 $aGUTIÉRREZ, L. 773 $tCrop Science, 2018$gv. 59, no. 1, p. 1-10.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|