| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Tacuarembó. Por información adicional contacte bibliotb@tb.inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha : |
21/02/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
11/05/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
OLIVER, M.A.; NUTE, G.R.; FONT I FURNOLS, M.; SAN JULIÁN, R.; CAMPO, M.M.; SAÑUDO, C.; CAÑEQUE, V.; GUERRERO, L.; ALVAREZ, I.; DIAZ, M.T.; BRANSCHEID, W.; WICKE, M.; MONTOSSI, F. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARIA ANGELS OLIVER, IRTA-Centre de Tecnologia de la Carn, Monells (Girona), Spain; GEOFFREY R. NUTE, Division of Farm Animal Science, University of Bristol, Langford, United Kingdom; M. FONT I FURNOLS, IRTA-Centre de Tecnologia de la Carn, Monells (Girona), Spain; ROBERTO SAN JULIAN SANCHEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; M. M. CAMPO, Facultad de Veterinaria, Zaragoza, Spain; CARLOS SAÑUDO, Facultad de Veterinaria, Zaragoza, Spain; VICENTE CAÑEQUE, SGIT-INIA Madrid, Spain; LUIS GUERRERO ASOREY, IRTA-Centre de Tecnologia de la Carn, Monells (Girona), Spain; INMACULADA ALVAREZ, SGIT-INIA Madrid, Spain; MARÍA TERESA DÍAZ, SGIT-INIA Madrid, Spain; WOLFGANG BRANSCHEID, Institut for Meat Production and Market Research, Kulmbach, Germany; MICHAEL WICKE, Forschungs- und Studienzentrum fur Veredelungswirtschaft der Universitat Gottingen, Vechta, Germany; FABIO MARCELO MONTOSSI PORCHILE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Eating quality of beef, from different production systems, assessed by German, Spanish and British consumers. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2006 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Meat Science, November 2006, Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages 435-442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.03.010 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.03.010 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 3 November 2005 // Received in revised form 10 March 2006 // Accepted 10 March 2006. Acknowledgements: This authors thank the Agencia Espan?ola de Cooperacio´n Internacional (AECI), the Instituto Nacional de Investigacio´n Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA) de Espan?a and the Intituto Nacional de Investigacio´n Agraria (INIA)
from Uruguay for the financial support to the project. We thank the technicians from the different teams as well as Nigel Scollan at the Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research (Wales, UK) for his help in recruiting consumers in Wales. |
|
Contenido : |
The acceptability of beef from Uruguay (UY), based on eating quality, was compared with beef produced in different European countries (Germany, DE, Spain, ES and United Kingdom, UK). Consumer tests were conducted in DE, ES and UK (each comprising 200 consumers) using ?Hall Tests?. In each country four samples were evaluated, two from Hereford steers from UY (finished at 2 and 3 years) and two from local meat (the same meat sample aged 7 or 20 d). Consumers evaluated tenderness, flavour and overall acceptability using 8-point category scales. Hierarchical cluster analysis, highlighted the existence of different clusters of consumers. Two main clusters were identified in DE and UK. The main cluster identified in DE, was labelled as Prefer foreign-imported beef (n = 128). These consumers preferred (P < 0.05) the samples from UY_2y in terms of tenderness and overall acceptability. The other cluster was labelled as Prefer local beef in terms of flavour and overall acceptability (P < 0.05) and comprised the majority of consumers from ES (n = 176) and UK
(n = 153) and the cluster 2 from DE (n = 69). UK, cluster 2 (n = 33) that did not discriminate between origin and ageing time of beef. These results indicate that consumers did not prefer the same type of meat within the same country and it is possible that there are individual preferences that could lead to the concept of market segmentation being based on taste preferences. It would appear that Uruguayan beef would be very acceptable in Germany and to a lesser extent in Britain and Spain, although further studies are required that include labelling information. MenosThe acceptability of beef from Uruguay (UY), based on eating quality, was compared with beef produced in different European countries (Germany, DE, Spain, ES and United Kingdom, UK). Consumer tests were conducted in DE, ES and UK (each comprising 200 consumers) using ?Hall Tests?. In each country four samples were evaluated, two from Hereford steers from UY (finished at 2 and 3 years) and two from local meat (the same meat sample aged 7 or 20 d). Consumers evaluated tenderness, flavour and overall acceptability using 8-point category scales. Hierarchical cluster analysis, highlighted the existence of different clusters of consumers. Two main clusters were identified in DE and UK. The main cluster identified in DE, was labelled as Prefer foreign-imported beef (n = 128). These consumers preferred (P < 0.05) the samples from UY_2y in terms of tenderness and overall acceptability. The other cluster was labelled as Prefer local beef in terms of flavour and overall acceptability (P < 0.05) and comprised the majority of consumers from ES (n = 176) and UK
(n = 153) and the cluster 2 from DE (n = 69). UK, cluster 2 (n = 33) that did not discriminate between origin and ageing time of beef. These results indicate that consumers did not prefer the same type of meat within the same country and it is possible that there are individual preferences that could lead to the concept of market segmentation being based on taste preferences. It would appear that Uruguayan beef would be very accept... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
BEEF; CONSUMERS; OVERALL ACCEPTABILITY; PRODUCTION SYSTEM. |
|
Thesagro : |
CARNE. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03256naa a2200349 a 4500
001 1027449
005 2020-05-11
008 2006 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.03.010$2DOI
100 1 $aOLIVER, M.A.
245 $aEating quality of beef, from different production systems, assessed by German, Spanish and British consumers.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2006
500 $aArticle history: Received 3 November 2005 // Received in revised form 10 March 2006 // Accepted 10 March 2006. Acknowledgements: This authors thank the Agencia Espan?ola de Cooperacio´n Internacional (AECI), the Instituto Nacional de Investigacio´n Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA) de Espan?a and the Intituto Nacional de Investigacio´n Agraria (INIA) from Uruguay for the financial support to the project. We thank the technicians from the different teams as well as Nigel Scollan at the Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research (Wales, UK) for his help in recruiting consumers in Wales.
520 $aThe acceptability of beef from Uruguay (UY), based on eating quality, was compared with beef produced in different European countries (Germany, DE, Spain, ES and United Kingdom, UK). Consumer tests were conducted in DE, ES and UK (each comprising 200 consumers) using ?Hall Tests?. In each country four samples were evaluated, two from Hereford steers from UY (finished at 2 and 3 years) and two from local meat (the same meat sample aged 7 or 20 d). Consumers evaluated tenderness, flavour and overall acceptability using 8-point category scales. Hierarchical cluster analysis, highlighted the existence of different clusters of consumers. Two main clusters were identified in DE and UK. The main cluster identified in DE, was labelled as Prefer foreign-imported beef (n = 128). These consumers preferred (P < 0.05) the samples from UY_2y in terms of tenderness and overall acceptability. The other cluster was labelled as Prefer local beef in terms of flavour and overall acceptability (P < 0.05) and comprised the majority of consumers from ES (n = 176) and UK (n = 153) and the cluster 2 from DE (n = 69). UK, cluster 2 (n = 33) that did not discriminate between origin and ageing time of beef. These results indicate that consumers did not prefer the same type of meat within the same country and it is possible that there are individual preferences that could lead to the concept of market segmentation being based on taste preferences. It would appear that Uruguayan beef would be very acceptable in Germany and to a lesser extent in Britain and Spain, although further studies are required that include labelling information.
650 $aCARNE
653 $aBEEF
653 $aCONSUMERS
653 $aOVERALL ACCEPTABILITY
653 $aPRODUCTION SYSTEM
700 1 $aNUTE, G.R.
700 1 $aFONT I FURNOLS, M.
700 1 $aSAN JULIÁN, R.
700 1 $aCAMPO, M.M.
700 1 $aSAÑUDO, C.
700 1 $aCAÑEQUE, V.
700 1 $aGUERRERO, L.
700 1 $aALVAREZ, I.
700 1 $aDIAZ, M.T.
700 1 $aBRANSCHEID, W.
700 1 $aWICKE, M.
700 1 $aMONTOSSI, F.
773 $tMeat Science, November 2006, Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages 435-442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.03.010
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 136 | |
| 3. |  | GILSANZ, J.C. Abonos verdes. Día de campo. Las Brujas, Canelones, 4 noviembre 2013. In: INIA Las Brujas; Programa Nacional Producción Hortícola; Programa Nacional Producción y Sustentabilidad Ambiental. Abonos verdes. Canelones (UY): INIA, 2013. p. 1-10 (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión; 722)| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|    |
| 4. | | GILSANZ, J.C. Abonos verdes verano. ln: Jornada de Divulgación, Las Brujas, Canelones, 2010 Abonos verdes: jardín de abonos verdes de verano. Las Brujas, Canelones (Uruguay): INIA, 2010. p. 2-11 (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión ; 599) INIA Las Brujas| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 5. | | GILSANZ, J.C. Abonos verdes de verano. Día de campo, INIA Las Brujas, 11 marzo 2014. Canelones (UY): INIA, 2014. 17 p. (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión; 730)| Tipo: Actividades de Difusión |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 9. | | GILSANZ, J.C. Hidroponia Las Brujas, Canelones (Uruguay): INIA, 2007. 30 p. (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión ; 509)| Tipo: Actividades de Difusión |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 10. | | Gilsanz, J.C. Manejo adecuado de los abonos verdes ln: "INIA, Programa Nacional de Investigación en Producción y Sustentabilidad Ambiental; INIA, Programa Nacional de Investigación en Producción Hortícola; DIGEGRA". Jardín de abonos verdes de verano. Módulo de investigación comprobatoria hortícola, Día de campo. Canelones (Uruguay): INIA Las Brujas, 2011. p. 4-9 (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión; 641) "INIA, Programa Nacional de Investigación en Producción y Sustentabilidad Ambiental; INIA, Programa Nacional de Investigación en Producción Hortícola; DIGEGRA"| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 11. | | Gilsanz, J.C. Manejo adecuado de los abonos verdes Las Brujas, Canelones (Uruguay): INIA, 2012. p.1-4 (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión; 673) "INIA Las Brujas, Programa Nacional de Investigación en Producción y Sustentabilidad Ambiental; INIA Las Brujas, Programa Nacional de Investigación Hortícola"| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 12. | | GILSANZ, J.C. Jardín de abonos verdes de invierno. Día de campo "Jornada Abonos Verdes", agosto 2008, INIA Las Brujas. Canelones (UY): INIA Las Brujas, 2008. 13 p. (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión; 546)| Tipo: Actividades de Difusión |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 15. | | GILSANZ, J.C. Mulch de papel. Revista INIA Uruguay, 2017, no.49, p.27-32. (Revista INIA; 49)| Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Agropecuarias |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 20. | | Gilsanz, J.C.; Aranda, S. Abonos verdes verano ln: "INIA, Programa Nacional de Investigación en Producción y Sustentabilidad Ambiental; INIA, Programa Nacional de Investigación en Producción Hortícola; DIGEGRA". Jardín de abonos verdes de verano. Módulo de investigación comprobatoria hortícola, Día de campo. Canelones (Uruguay): INIA Las Brujas, 2011. p. 10-16 (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión; 641) "INIA, Programa Nacional de Investigación en Producción y Sustentabilidad Ambiental; INIA, Programa Nacional de Investigación en Producción Hortícola; DIGEGRA"| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 136 | |
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
