|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Tacuarembó. Por información adicional contacte bibliotb@tb.inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
Fecha : |
21/02/2014 |
Actualizado : |
11/05/2020 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
OLIVER, M.A.; NUTE, G.R.; FONT I FURNOLS, M.; SAN JULIÁN, R.; CAMPO, M.M.; SAÑUDO, C.; CAÑEQUE, V.; GUERRERO, L.; ALVAREZ, I.; DIAZ, M.T.; BRANSCHEID, W.; WICKE, M.; MONTOSSI, F. |
Afiliación : |
MARIA ANGELS OLIVER, IRTA-Centre de Tecnologia de la Carn, Monells (Girona), Spain; GEOFFREY R. NUTE, Division of Farm Animal Science, University of Bristol, Langford, United Kingdom; M. FONT I FURNOLS, IRTA-Centre de Tecnologia de la Carn, Monells (Girona), Spain; ROBERTO SAN JULIAN SANCHEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; M. M. CAMPO, Facultad de Veterinaria, Zaragoza, Spain; CARLOS SAÑUDO, Facultad de Veterinaria, Zaragoza, Spain; VICENTE CAÑEQUE, SGIT-INIA Madrid, Spain; LUIS GUERRERO ASOREY, IRTA-Centre de Tecnologia de la Carn, Monells (Girona), Spain; INMACULADA ALVAREZ, SGIT-INIA Madrid, Spain; MARÍA TERESA DÍAZ, SGIT-INIA Madrid, Spain; WOLFGANG BRANSCHEID, Institut for Meat Production and Market Research, Kulmbach, Germany; MICHAEL WICKE, Forschungs- und Studienzentrum fur Veredelungswirtschaft der Universitat Gottingen, Vechta, Germany; FABIO MARCELO MONTOSSI PORCHILE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Eating quality of beef, from different production systems, assessed by German, Spanish and British consumers. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2006 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Meat Science, November 2006, Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages 435-442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.03.010 |
DOI : |
10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.03.010 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 3 November 2005 // Received in revised form 10 March 2006 // Accepted 10 March 2006. Acknowledgements: This authors thank the Agencia Espan?ola de Cooperacio´n Internacional (AECI), the Instituto Nacional de Investigacio´n Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA) de Espan?a and the Intituto Nacional de Investigacio´n Agraria (INIA)
from Uruguay for the financial support to the project. We thank the technicians from the different teams as well as Nigel Scollan at the Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research (Wales, UK) for his help in recruiting consumers in Wales. |
Contenido : |
The acceptability of beef from Uruguay (UY), based on eating quality, was compared with beef produced in different European countries (Germany, DE, Spain, ES and United Kingdom, UK). Consumer tests were conducted in DE, ES and UK (each comprising 200 consumers) using ?Hall Tests?. In each country four samples were evaluated, two from Hereford steers from UY (finished at 2 and 3 years) and two from local meat (the same meat sample aged 7 or 20 d). Consumers evaluated tenderness, flavour and overall acceptability using 8-point category scales. Hierarchical cluster analysis, highlighted the existence of different clusters of consumers. Two main clusters were identified in DE and UK. The main cluster identified in DE, was labelled as Prefer foreign-imported beef (n = 128). These consumers preferred (P < 0.05) the samples from UY_2y in terms of tenderness and overall acceptability. The other cluster was labelled as Prefer local beef in terms of flavour and overall acceptability (P < 0.05) and comprised the majority of consumers from ES (n = 176) and UK
(n = 153) and the cluster 2 from DE (n = 69). UK, cluster 2 (n = 33) that did not discriminate between origin and ageing time of beef. These results indicate that consumers did not prefer the same type of meat within the same country and it is possible that there are individual preferences that could lead to the concept of market segmentation being based on taste preferences. It would appear that Uruguayan beef would be very acceptable in Germany and to a lesser extent in Britain and Spain, although further studies are required that include labelling information. MenosThe acceptability of beef from Uruguay (UY), based on eating quality, was compared with beef produced in different European countries (Germany, DE, Spain, ES and United Kingdom, UK). Consumer tests were conducted in DE, ES and UK (each comprising 200 consumers) using ?Hall Tests?. In each country four samples were evaluated, two from Hereford steers from UY (finished at 2 and 3 years) and two from local meat (the same meat sample aged 7 or 20 d). Consumers evaluated tenderness, flavour and overall acceptability using 8-point category scales. Hierarchical cluster analysis, highlighted the existence of different clusters of consumers. Two main clusters were identified in DE and UK. The main cluster identified in DE, was labelled as Prefer foreign-imported beef (n = 128). These consumers preferred (P < 0.05) the samples from UY_2y in terms of tenderness and overall acceptability. The other cluster was labelled as Prefer local beef in terms of flavour and overall acceptability (P < 0.05) and comprised the majority of consumers from ES (n = 176) and UK
(n = 153) and the cluster 2 from DE (n = 69). UK, cluster 2 (n = 33) that did not discriminate between origin and ageing time of beef. These results indicate that consumers did not prefer the same type of meat within the same country and it is possible that there are individual preferences that could lead to the concept of market segmentation being based on taste preferences. It would appear that Uruguayan beef would be very accept... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
BEEF; CONSUMERS; OVERALL ACCEPTABILITY; PRODUCTION SYSTEM. |
Thesagro : |
CARNE. |
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
Marc : |
LEADER 03256naa a2200349 a 4500 001 1027449 005 2020-05-11 008 2006 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.03.010$2DOI 100 1 $aOLIVER, M.A. 245 $aEating quality of beef, from different production systems, assessed by German, Spanish and British consumers.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2006 500 $aArticle history: Received 3 November 2005 // Received in revised form 10 March 2006 // Accepted 10 March 2006. Acknowledgements: This authors thank the Agencia Espan?ola de Cooperacio´n Internacional (AECI), the Instituto Nacional de Investigacio´n Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA) de Espan?a and the Intituto Nacional de Investigacio´n Agraria (INIA) from Uruguay for the financial support to the project. We thank the technicians from the different teams as well as Nigel Scollan at the Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research (Wales, UK) for his help in recruiting consumers in Wales. 520 $aThe acceptability of beef from Uruguay (UY), based on eating quality, was compared with beef produced in different European countries (Germany, DE, Spain, ES and United Kingdom, UK). Consumer tests were conducted in DE, ES and UK (each comprising 200 consumers) using ?Hall Tests?. In each country four samples were evaluated, two from Hereford steers from UY (finished at 2 and 3 years) and two from local meat (the same meat sample aged 7 or 20 d). Consumers evaluated tenderness, flavour and overall acceptability using 8-point category scales. Hierarchical cluster analysis, highlighted the existence of different clusters of consumers. Two main clusters were identified in DE and UK. The main cluster identified in DE, was labelled as Prefer foreign-imported beef (n = 128). These consumers preferred (P < 0.05) the samples from UY_2y in terms of tenderness and overall acceptability. The other cluster was labelled as Prefer local beef in terms of flavour and overall acceptability (P < 0.05) and comprised the majority of consumers from ES (n = 176) and UK (n = 153) and the cluster 2 from DE (n = 69). UK, cluster 2 (n = 33) that did not discriminate between origin and ageing time of beef. These results indicate that consumers did not prefer the same type of meat within the same country and it is possible that there are individual preferences that could lead to the concept of market segmentation being based on taste preferences. It would appear that Uruguayan beef would be very acceptable in Germany and to a lesser extent in Britain and Spain, although further studies are required that include labelling information. 650 $aCARNE 653 $aBEEF 653 $aCONSUMERS 653 $aOVERALL ACCEPTABILITY 653 $aPRODUCTION SYSTEM 700 1 $aNUTE, G.R. 700 1 $aFONT I FURNOLS, M. 700 1 $aSAN JULIÁN, R. 700 1 $aCAMPO, M.M. 700 1 $aSAÑUDO, C. 700 1 $aCAÑEQUE, V. 700 1 $aGUERRERO, L. 700 1 $aALVAREZ, I. 700 1 $aDIAZ, M.T. 700 1 $aBRANSCHEID, W. 700 1 $aWICKE, M. 700 1 $aMONTOSSI, F. 773 $tMeat Science, November 2006, Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages 435-442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.03.010
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
Fecha actual : |
07/08/2018 |
Actualizado : |
07/08/2018 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Capítulo en Libro Técnico-Científico |
Autor : |
LUIZZI, D.; QUINCKE, M.; CONDON, F.; ABADIE, T.; GATTI, I. |
Afiliación : |
DOMINGO LUIZZI, ex CIAAB (Centro de Investigaciones Agrícolas "Alberto Boerger").; MARTIN CONRADO QUINCKE WALDEN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FEDERICO CONDON PRIANO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; TABARÉ ABADIE, DuPont Pioneer, 7300 NW 62nd Av, Johnston, Iowa 50131, EUA.; IRENE GATTI, Dow AgroSciences, 9330 Zionsville Rd, Indianapolis, Indianapolis 46268, EUA. |
Título : |
Uso del germoplasma en el Programa de Mejoramiento Genético de Trigo. |
Complemento del título : |
Capítulo 3. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: GERMAN, S.; LUIZZI, D. (Ed.). 100 años de mejoramiento de trigo en INIA La Estanzuela. Montevideo (UY): INIA, 2018. |
Páginas : |
p. 17-36. |
Idioma : |
Español |
Contenido : |
El germoplasma utilizado en un programa de mejoramiento es un indicador de los objetivos que en él se persiguen. Estudiando los cultivares lanzados por el PMGT, se puede seguir la evolución que tuvo el manejo del material genético y conocer las pautas que se siguieron en su selección.Ya en 1912, al Dr. Boerger se le presentó el dilema de tener que partir de los trigos criollos o utilizar materiales extranjeros. El material criollo que había sufrido un proceso más o menos prolongado de selección natural, mostró superioridad para soportar las condiciones ecológicas tan variables de Uruguay. Las primeras selecciones se realizaron dentro de las poblaciones criollas, que presentaban heterogeneidad, y dio lugar a los primeros trigos de pedigree de Latinoamérica, liberados en el año 1918: Pelón 33c, Americano 26n y Americano 44d. Estos cultivares y otros derivados de sus cruzas, fueron el material genético básico utilizado durante el período 1918-1933 (Boerger 1937). |
Palabras claves : |
MEJORAMIENTO DE TRIGO. |
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/10972/1/INIA-100-anos-de-mejoramiento-de-trigo-en-INIA-La-Estanzuela.cap.3.p.17-36.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01596naa a2200193 a 4500 001 1058879 005 2018-08-07 008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aLUIZZI, D. 245 $aUso del germoplasma en el Programa de Mejoramiento Genético de Trigo.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2018 300 $ap. 17-36. 520 $aEl germoplasma utilizado en un programa de mejoramiento es un indicador de los objetivos que en él se persiguen. Estudiando los cultivares lanzados por el PMGT, se puede seguir la evolución que tuvo el manejo del material genético y conocer las pautas que se siguieron en su selección.Ya en 1912, al Dr. Boerger se le presentó el dilema de tener que partir de los trigos criollos o utilizar materiales extranjeros. El material criollo que había sufrido un proceso más o menos prolongado de selección natural, mostró superioridad para soportar las condiciones ecológicas tan variables de Uruguay. Las primeras selecciones se realizaron dentro de las poblaciones criollas, que presentaban heterogeneidad, y dio lugar a los primeros trigos de pedigree de Latinoamérica, liberados en el año 1918: Pelón 33c, Americano 26n y Americano 44d. Estos cultivares y otros derivados de sus cruzas, fueron el material genético básico utilizado durante el período 1918-1933 (Boerger 1937). 653 $aMEJORAMIENTO DE TRIGO 700 1 $aQUINCKE, M. 700 1 $aCONDON, F. 700 1 $aABADIE, T. 700 1 $aGATTI, I. 773 $tIn: GERMAN, S.; LUIZZI, D. (Ed.). 100 años de mejoramiento de trigo en INIA La Estanzuela. Montevideo (UY): INIA, 2018.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|