|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
Fecha : |
04/11/2019 |
Actualizado : |
03/12/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
DOSTER, E.; ROVIRA, P.J.; NOYES, N.R.; BURGESS, B.A.; YANG, X.; WEINROTH, M.D.; LINKE, L.; MAGNUSON, R.; BOUCHER, C.; BELK, K.E.; MORLEY, P.S. |
Afiliación : |
ENRIQUE DOSTER, Department in Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, USA.; PABLO JUAN ROVIRA SANZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; NOELLE R. NOYES, Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, USA.; BRANDY A. BURGESS, Department of Population Health, University of Georgia, USA.; XIANG YANG, Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.; MARGARET D. WEINROTH, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, USA.; LINDSEY LINKE, Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, USA.; ROBERTA MAGNUSON, Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, USA.; CHRISTINA BOUCHER, Department of Computer and Information Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Florida, USA.; KEITH E. BELK, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Colorado, USA.; PAUL S. MORLEY, Veterinary Education, Research, and Outreach Center, West Texas A&M University, Texas, USA. |
Título : |
A cautionary report for pathogen identification using shotgun metagenomics; a comparison to aerobic culture and polymerase chain reaction for Salmonella enterica identification. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2019 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Frontier in Microbiology, 2019, 10:2499. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02499 |
Páginas : |
7 p. |
DOI : |
10.3389/fmicb.2019.02499 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: received: 8 July 2019 // Accepted 16 October 2019 // Published 01 November 2019.
Open Access Journal. www.frontiersin.org |
Contenido : |
This study was conducted to compare aerobic culture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), lateral flow immunoassay (LFI), and shotgun metagenomics for identification
of Salmonella enterica in feces collected from feedlot cattle. Samples were analyzed in parallel using all four tests. Results from aerobic culture and PCR were 100%
concordant and indicated low S. enterica prevalence (3/60 samples positive). Although low S. enterica prevalence restricted formal statistical comparisons, LFI and deep metagenomic sequencing results were discordant with these results. Specifically, metagenomic analysis using k-mer-based classification against the RefSeq database indicated that 11/60 of samples contained sequence reads that matched to the S. enterica genome and uniquely identified this species of bacteria within the sample. However, further examination revealed that plasmid sequences were often included with bacterial genomic sequence data submitted to NCBI, which can lead to incorrect taxonomic classification. To circumvent this classification problem, we separated all plasmid sequences included in bacterial RefSeq genomes and reassigned them to a unique taxon so that they would not be uniquely associated with specific bacterial species such as S. enterica. Using this revised database and taxonomic structure, we found that only 6/60 samples contained sequences specific for S. enterica, suggesting increased relative specificity. Reads identified as S. enterica in these six samples were further evaluated using BLAST and NCBI?s nr/nt database, which identified that only 2/60 samples contained reads exclusive to S. enterica chromosomal genomes. These two samples were culture- and PCR-negative, suggesting that even deep metagenomic sequencing suffers from lower sensitivity and specificity in comparison to more traditional pathogen detection methods. Additionally, no sample reads were taxonomically classified as S. enterica with two other metagenomic tools, Metagenomic Intra-species Diversity Analysis System (MIDAS) and Metagenomic Phylogenetic Analysis 2 (MetaPhlAn2). This study re-affirmed that the traditional techniques of aerobic culture and PCR provide similar results for S. enterica identification in cattle feces. On the other hand, metagenomic results are highly influenced by the classification method and reference database employed. These results highlight the nuances of computational detection of species-level sequences within short-read metagenomic sequence data, and emphasize the need for cautious interpretation of such results. MenosThis study was conducted to compare aerobic culture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), lateral flow immunoassay (LFI), and shotgun metagenomics for identification
of Salmonella enterica in feces collected from feedlot cattle. Samples were analyzed in parallel using all four tests. Results from aerobic culture and PCR were 100%
concordant and indicated low S. enterica prevalence (3/60 samples positive). Although low S. enterica prevalence restricted formal statistical comparisons, LFI and deep metagenomic sequencing results were discordant with these results. Specifically, metagenomic analysis using k-mer-based classification against the RefSeq database indicated that 11/60 of samples contained sequence reads that matched to the S. enterica genome and uniquely identified this species of bacteria within the sample. However, further examination revealed that plasmid sequences were often included with bacterial genomic sequence data submitted to NCBI, which can lead to incorrect taxonomic classification. To circumvent this classification problem, we separated all plasmid sequences included in bacterial RefSeq genomes and reassigned them to a unique taxon so that they would not be uniquely associated with specific bacterial species such as S. enterica. Using this revised database and taxonomic structure, we found that only 6/60 samples contained sequences specific for S. enterica, suggesting increased relative specificity. Reads identified as S. enterica in these six samples were ... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
CULTURE; PATHOGEN IDENTIFICATION; PCR; SALMONELLA ENTERICA; SHOTGUN METAGENOMICS. |
Thesagro : |
CATTLE; FEEDLOT; VACAS. |
Asunto categoría : |
L73 Enfermedades de los animales |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/13700/1/Rovira-arb-2019-Frontiers-Microbiology.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03789naa a2200373 a 4500 001 1060378 005 2019-12-03 008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.3389/fmicb.2019.02499$2DOI 100 1 $aDOSTER, E. 245 $aA cautionary report for pathogen identification using shotgun metagenomics; a comparison to aerobic culture and polymerase chain reaction for Salmonella enterica identification.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2019 300 $a7 p. 500 $aArticle history: received: 8 July 2019 // Accepted 16 October 2019 // Published 01 November 2019. Open Access Journal. www.frontiersin.org 520 $aThis study was conducted to compare aerobic culture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), lateral flow immunoassay (LFI), and shotgun metagenomics for identification of Salmonella enterica in feces collected from feedlot cattle. Samples were analyzed in parallel using all four tests. Results from aerobic culture and PCR were 100% concordant and indicated low S. enterica prevalence (3/60 samples positive). Although low S. enterica prevalence restricted formal statistical comparisons, LFI and deep metagenomic sequencing results were discordant with these results. Specifically, metagenomic analysis using k-mer-based classification against the RefSeq database indicated that 11/60 of samples contained sequence reads that matched to the S. enterica genome and uniquely identified this species of bacteria within the sample. However, further examination revealed that plasmid sequences were often included with bacterial genomic sequence data submitted to NCBI, which can lead to incorrect taxonomic classification. To circumvent this classification problem, we separated all plasmid sequences included in bacterial RefSeq genomes and reassigned them to a unique taxon so that they would not be uniquely associated with specific bacterial species such as S. enterica. Using this revised database and taxonomic structure, we found that only 6/60 samples contained sequences specific for S. enterica, suggesting increased relative specificity. Reads identified as S. enterica in these six samples were further evaluated using BLAST and NCBI?s nr/nt database, which identified that only 2/60 samples contained reads exclusive to S. enterica chromosomal genomes. These two samples were culture- and PCR-negative, suggesting that even deep metagenomic sequencing suffers from lower sensitivity and specificity in comparison to more traditional pathogen detection methods. Additionally, no sample reads were taxonomically classified as S. enterica with two other metagenomic tools, Metagenomic Intra-species Diversity Analysis System (MIDAS) and Metagenomic Phylogenetic Analysis 2 (MetaPhlAn2). This study re-affirmed that the traditional techniques of aerobic culture and PCR provide similar results for S. enterica identification in cattle feces. On the other hand, metagenomic results are highly influenced by the classification method and reference database employed. These results highlight the nuances of computational detection of species-level sequences within short-read metagenomic sequence data, and emphasize the need for cautious interpretation of such results. 650 $aCATTLE 650 $aFEEDLOT 650 $aVACAS 653 $aCULTURE 653 $aPATHOGEN IDENTIFICATION 653 $aPCR 653 $aSALMONELLA ENTERICA 653 $aSHOTGUN METAGENOMICS 700 1 $aROVIRA, P.J. 700 1 $aNOYES, N.R. 700 1 $aBURGESS, B.A. 700 1 $aYANG, X. 700 1 $aWEINROTH, M.D. 700 1 $aLINKE, L. 700 1 $aMAGNUSON, R. 700 1 $aBOUCHER, C. 700 1 $aBELK, K.E. 700 1 $aMORLEY, P.S. 773 $tFrontier in Microbiology, 2019, 10:2499. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02499
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
14/09/2023 |
Actualizado : |
14/09/2023 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
REBOLLO, I.; AGUILAR, I.; PÉREZ DE VIDA, F.; MOLINA, F.; GUTIÉRREZ, L.; ROSAS, J.E. |
Afiliación : |
MARÍA INÉS REBOLLO PANUNCIO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; Department of Statistics, University de la República, College of Agriculture, Garzón 780, Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay; IGNACIO AGUILAR GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FERNANDO BLAS PEREZ DE VIDA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FEDERICO MOLINA CASELLA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; LUCÍA GUTIÉRREZEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS, UNIVERSITY DE LA REPÚBLICA, COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, GARZÓN 780, MONTEVIDEO, MONTEVIDEO, URUGUAY DEPARTMENT OF AGRONOMY, UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN–MADISON, 1575 LINDEN DRIVE, MADISON, WI, UNITED STATES, Department of Statistics, University de la República, College of Agriculture, Montevideo, Uruguay; Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison, WI, United States; JUAN EDUARDO ROSAS CAISSIOLS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; Department of Statistics, University de la República, College of Agriculture, Garzón 780, Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay. |
Título : |
Genotype by environment interaction characterization and its modeling with random regression to climatic variables in two rice breeding populations. |
Complemento del título : |
Original article. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2023 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Crop Science. 2023, Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages 2220-2240. https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.21029 -- OPEN ACCESS. |
ISSN : |
0011-183X (print); 1435-0653 (electronic). |
DOI : |
10.1002/csc2.21029 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 21 November 2022, Accepted 10 May 2023, Published online 16 June 2023. -- Correspondence: Rosas, J.E.; INIA, Estación Experimental Treinta y Tres, Road 8 km 281, Treinta y Tres, Uruguay; email:jrosas@inia.org.uy -- FUNDING: Funding for this project was provided by Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (Projects AZ35, AZ13, and fellowship to I. R.), Agencia Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (grant MOV_CA_2019_1_156241), Comisión Sectorial de Investigación Científica, Universidad de la República (grant Iniciación a la Investgación 2019 No. 8), Comité Académico de Posgrado (fellowship to I. R.), and the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant 2022-68013-36439 (WheatCAP) from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. -- LICENSE: This is an open access article under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ ) |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- Genotype by environment interaction (GEI) is one of the main challenges in plant breeding. A complete characterization of it is necessary to decide on proper breeding strategies. Random regression models (RRMs) allow a genotype-specific response to each regressor factor. RRMs that include selected environmental variables represent a promising approach to deal with GEI in genomic prediction. They enable to predict for both tested and untested environments, but their utility in a plant breeding scenario remains to be shown. We used phenotypic, climatic, pedigree, and genomic data from two public subtropical rice (Oryza sativa L.) breeding programs; one manages the indica population and the other manages the japonica population. First, we characterized GEI for grain yield (GY) with a set of tools: variance component estimation, mega-environment (ME) definition, and correlation between locations, sowing periods, and MEs. Then, we identified the most influential climatic variables related to GY and its GEI and used them in RRMs for single-step genomic prediction. Finally, we evaluated the predictive ability of these models for GY prediction in tested and untested years and environments using the complete dataset and within each ME. Our results suggest large GEI in both populations while larger in indica than in japonica. In indica, early sowing periods showed crossover (i.e., rank-change) GEI with other sowing periods. Climatic variables related to temperature, radiation, wind, and precipitation affecting GY were identified and differed in each population. RRMs with selected climatic covariates improved the predictive ability in both tested and untested years and environments. Prediction using the complete dataset performed better than predicting within each ME. © 2023 The Authors. Crop Science © 2023 Crop Science Society of America. MenosABSTRACT.- Genotype by environment interaction (GEI) is one of the main challenges in plant breeding. A complete characterization of it is necessary to decide on proper breeding strategies. Random regression models (RRMs) allow a genotype-specific response to each regressor factor. RRMs that include selected environmental variables represent a promising approach to deal with GEI in genomic prediction. They enable to predict for both tested and untested environments, but their utility in a plant breeding scenario remains to be shown. We used phenotypic, climatic, pedigree, and genomic data from two public subtropical rice (Oryza sativa L.) breeding programs; one manages the indica population and the other manages the japonica population. First, we characterized GEI for grain yield (GY) with a set of tools: variance component estimation, mega-environment (ME) definition, and correlation between locations, sowing periods, and MEs. Then, we identified the most influential climatic variables related to GY and its GEI and used them in RRMs for single-step genomic prediction. Finally, we evaluated the predictive ability of these models for GY prediction in tested and untested years and environments using the complete dataset and within each ME. Our results suggest large GEI in both populations while larger in indica than in japonica. In indica, early sowing periods showed crossover (i.e., rank-change) GEI with other sowing periods. Climatic variables related to temperature, radiati... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
Genotype by environment interaction (GEI); Random regression models (RRMs); Rice (Oryza sativa L.). |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
URL : |
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/csc2.21029
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03749naa a2200253 a 4500 001 1064311 005 2023-09-14 008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0011-183X (print); 1435-0653 (electronic). 024 7 $a10.1002/csc2.21029$2DOI 100 1 $aREBOLLO, I. 245 $aGenotype by environment interaction characterization and its modeling with random regression to climatic variables in two rice breeding populations.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2023 500 $aArticle history: Received 21 November 2022, Accepted 10 May 2023, Published online 16 June 2023. -- Correspondence: Rosas, J.E.; INIA, Estación Experimental Treinta y Tres, Road 8 km 281, Treinta y Tres, Uruguay; email:jrosas@inia.org.uy -- FUNDING: Funding for this project was provided by Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (Projects AZ35, AZ13, and fellowship to I. R.), Agencia Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (grant MOV_CA_2019_1_156241), Comisión Sectorial de Investigación Científica, Universidad de la República (grant Iniciación a la Investgación 2019 No. 8), Comité Académico de Posgrado (fellowship to I. R.), and the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant 2022-68013-36439 (WheatCAP) from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. -- LICENSE: This is an open access article under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ ) 520 $aABSTRACT.- Genotype by environment interaction (GEI) is one of the main challenges in plant breeding. A complete characterization of it is necessary to decide on proper breeding strategies. Random regression models (RRMs) allow a genotype-specific response to each regressor factor. RRMs that include selected environmental variables represent a promising approach to deal with GEI in genomic prediction. They enable to predict for both tested and untested environments, but their utility in a plant breeding scenario remains to be shown. We used phenotypic, climatic, pedigree, and genomic data from two public subtropical rice (Oryza sativa L.) breeding programs; one manages the indica population and the other manages the japonica population. First, we characterized GEI for grain yield (GY) with a set of tools: variance component estimation, mega-environment (ME) definition, and correlation between locations, sowing periods, and MEs. Then, we identified the most influential climatic variables related to GY and its GEI and used them in RRMs for single-step genomic prediction. Finally, we evaluated the predictive ability of these models for GY prediction in tested and untested years and environments using the complete dataset and within each ME. Our results suggest large GEI in both populations while larger in indica than in japonica. In indica, early sowing periods showed crossover (i.e., rank-change) GEI with other sowing periods. Climatic variables related to temperature, radiation, wind, and precipitation affecting GY were identified and differed in each population. RRMs with selected climatic covariates improved the predictive ability in both tested and untested years and environments. Prediction using the complete dataset performed better than predicting within each ME. © 2023 The Authors. Crop Science © 2023 Crop Science Society of America. 653 $aGenotype by environment interaction (GEI) 653 $aRandom regression models (RRMs) 653 $aRice (Oryza sativa L.) 700 1 $aAGUILAR, I. 700 1 $aPÉREZ DE VIDA, F. 700 1 $aMOLINA, F. 700 1 $aGUTIÉRREZ, L. 700 1 $aROSAS, J.E. 773 $tCrop Science. 2023, Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages 2220-2240. https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.21029 -- OPEN ACCESS.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|