| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 99 | |
| 88. |  | ROMAN, L.; LA MANNA, A.; BANCHERO, G.; MORALES-PIÑEYRUA, J.; ACOSTA, Y.; MENDOZA, A. Vacas secas: una categoría a no descuidar en veano. La Lechera, v. 4, n. 12, p. 62-64, 2015.| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
|    |
| 89. | | Durán, H.; Acosta, Y.; Mieres, J.; Arocena, R.; Carrau, A.; Barreneche, G. Valor nutritivo, producción de leche y capacidad de carga de pasto de Sudan y de una mezcla con trebol rojo ln: Reunión Técnica sobre Manejo de Pasturas Cultivadas y suplementación para producción lechera, 1985 jul 1-5 : Rafaela, Santa Fé Molestina, C.J. (ed). Memorias. Montevideo (Uruguay): IICA/PROCISUR, 1985. p137-141 (IICA-PROCISUR. Diálogo ; 10)| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 91. | | ROMAN, L.; SARAVIA, C.; ASTIGARRAGA, L.; BENTANCUR, O.; ACOSTA, Y.; PLA, M.; MENDOZA, A.; MORALES-PIÑEYRUA, J.; LA MANNA, A. El acceso a sombra asociado o no con aspersión y ventilación mejora las variables fisiológicas y el desempeño productivo de vacas holando en el suroeste de Uruguay. In: Día de Campo Manejo de Estrés Térmico en Ganado Lechero. La Estanzuela: INIA, 2014. p. 13-16. (Serie Actividades de Difusión; 728).| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
|  |
| 92. | | Carro, S.; Fraga, M.; Perelmuter, K.; Vera, S.; Zunino, P.; Acosta, Y.; Barneche, M.; Villagrán, M.; Calliari, A.; Delucchi, I. Bacterias ácido lácticas en quesos artesanales: importancia de la producción de bacteriocinas Carnes y alimentos, 2009, v. 10, no. 30, p. 31-35| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 93. | | ROMAN, L.; BANCHERO, G.; MORALES-PIÑEYRUA, J.; ACOSTA, Y.; MENDOZA, A.; PLA, M.; RAGGIO, V.; MEDINA, G.; WALLER, A.; LA MANNA, A. Efecto del acceso a sombra artificial durante el período seco en vacas lecheras Holando. In: Día de Campo Manejo de Estrés Térmico en Ganado Lechero. La Estanzuela: INIA, 2014. p. 19-22. (Serie Actividades de Difusión; 728).| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| 94. | | ROMAN, L.; LA MANNA, A.; ACOSTA, Y.; MENDOZA, A.; AGUILAR, I.; MORALES-PIÑEYRUA, J.; PLA, M.; LAURA ASTIGARRAGA, L.; SARAVIA, C. Evaluación de medidas de mitigación del estrés por calor sobre las respuestas productivas de vacas lecheras de alta producción. In: Día de Campo: producción de forraje y leche en verano. La Estanzuela, Colonia, (Uruguay): INIA, 2013. p. 15. (Serie Actividades de Difusión; 705).| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| 95. | | JORNADA DE PRODUCCIÓN ANIMAL, 2007, COLONIA, URUGUAY - ACOSTA, Y.; BANCHERO, G.; FERNÁNDEZ, E.; FORMOSO, F.; LA MANNA, A.; MIERES, J.; VAZ MARTINS, D. Producción animal: cómo enfrentar el invierno en un año especialmente complicado. La Estanzuela, Colonia (Uruguay): INIA, 2007. 30 p| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 96. | | CHIAIA, H. L.J.; BALDI, F.; PEREIRA, A.S.; BANCHERO, G.; BRITO, G.; LA MANNA, A.; FERNANDEZ, E.; ACOSTA, Y.; MONTOSSI, F.; GASALLA, P.; MIGLIERINA, A.F.; NÚÑEZ, A. Desempenho, características da carcaça e qualidade da carne de novilhos cruzados Hereford-Angus alimentados com silagem de grão úmido de sorgo / Carcass and meat quality traits of crossbred Angus-Hereford calfs fed with Sorghum grain silage. Rev. Bras. Saúde Prod. Anim., Salvador, v.17, n.4, p.685-695, 2016. 2-s2.0-85007614136 Article history: Data de recebimento: 19/03/2015, Data de aprovação: 31/08/2016. Endereço para correspondência: chiaia1@yahoo.com.br| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 97. | | VENTURINI, G.C.; BALDI, F.; ERNANDES, M.; REZENDE, R.G.; PEREIRA, A.S.C.; BANCHERO, G.; BRITO, G.; LA MANNA, A.; FERNANDEZ, E.; ACOSTA, Y.; FORMOSO, F.; MONTOSSI, F. Effect of sorghum grain silage and roughage management on animal performance and meat and carcass traits in steers finished in feedlot. In: International Congress of Meat Science and Technology (ICoMST), 59, 2013, Izmir, Turquía.[Resumen expandido]| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| 98. | | Acosta, Y.; Barreto, A.; Bassewitz, H.; Carámbula, M.; Coll, J.; Croci, G.; Durán, H.; Gimenez, A.; Hoyos, C.; Methol, M.; Mieres, J.; Montossi, F.; Negrin, H.; Pigurina, G.; Rios, A.; Romero, R. Proyecto Desarrollo de Tecnologías para pequeños y medianos productores de leche : informe anual 1989 [Montevideo (Uruguay)]: INIA, 1989. 78p. Version Preliminar| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| 99. | | Jornada sobre presentación de resultados experimentales 1993 Unidad de Lechería - Cavestany, D.; Durán, H.; Alvarez, J.; Blasina, E.; Lussich, N.; Mieres, J.; La Manna, A.; Cozzolino, D.; Delucchi, M.; Acosta, Y. Trabajos presentados Colonia (Uruguay): INIA, 1993. 68 p. INIA La Estanzuela| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 99 | |
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Treinta y Tres. Por información adicional contacte bibliott@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha actual : |
16/10/2018 |
|
Actualizado : |
11/02/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
BORGES, A.; GONZÁLEZ-REYMUNDEZ, A.; ERNST, O.; CADENAZZI, M.; TERRA, J.A.; GUTIÉRREZ, L. |
|
Afiliación : |
ALEJANDRA BORGES, Departamento de Estadística. Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR.; AGUSTÍN GONZÁLEZ-REYMUNDEZ, Departamento de Estadística. Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR.; OSVALDO, ERNST, Departamento de Producción de Cultivos. EEMAC, Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR.; MÓNICA CADENAZZI, Departamento de Estadística. Facultad de Agronomía, UdelaR.; JOSÉ ALFREDO TERRA FERNÁNDEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; LUCÍA GUTIÉRREZ, Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin. |
|
Título : |
Can spatial modeling substitute experimental design in agricultural experiments? |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Crop Science, 2018, v. 59, no. 1, p. 1-10. |
|
DOI : |
10.2135/cropsci2018.03.0177 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Accepted paper, posted 10/05/18. Published online December, 13. 2018. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract:
One of the most critical aspects of agricultural experimentation is the proper choice of experimental design to control field heterogeneity, especially for large experiments. However, even with complex experimental designs, spatial variability may not be properly controlled if it occurs at scales smaller than blocks. Therefore, modeling spatial variability can be beneficial and some studies even propose spatial modeling instead of experimental design. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of experimental design, spatial modeling, and a combination of both under real field conditions using GIS and simulating experiments. Yield data from cultivars was simulated using real spatial variability from a large uniformity trial of one hundred independent locations and different sizes of experiments for four experimental designs: completely randomized design (CRD), randomized complete block design (RCBD), alpha-lattice incomplete block design (ALPHA), and partially replicated design (PREP). Each realization was analyzed using different levels of spatial correction. Models were compared by precision, accuracy, and the recovery of superior genotypes. For moderate and large experiment sizes, ALPHA was the best experimental design in terms of precision and accuracy. In most situations, models that included spatial correlation were better than models with no spatial correlation but they did not outperformed better experimental designs. Therefore, spatial modeling is not a substitute for good experimental design. MenosAbstract:
One of the most critical aspects of agricultural experimentation is the proper choice of experimental design to control field heterogeneity, especially for large experiments. However, even with complex experimental designs, spatial variability may not be properly controlled if it occurs at scales smaller than blocks. Therefore, modeling spatial variability can be beneficial and some studies even propose spatial modeling instead of experimental design. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of experimental design, spatial modeling, and a combination of both under real field conditions using GIS and simulating experiments. Yield data from cultivars was simulated using real spatial variability from a large uniformity trial of one hundred independent locations and different sizes of experiments for four experimental designs: completely randomized design (CRD), randomized complete block design (RCBD), alpha-lattice incomplete block design (ALPHA), and partially replicated design (PREP). Each realization was analyzed using different levels of spatial correction. Models were compared by precision, accuracy, and the recovery of superior genotypes. For moderate and large experiment sizes, ALPHA was the best experimental design in terms of precision and accuracy. In most situations, models that included spatial correlation were better than models with no spatial correlation but they did not outperformed better experimental designs. Therefore, spatial modeling is not a substitut... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
EFFICIENCY STATISTICS; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FIELD VARIABILITY; SPATIAL MODELS; UNIFORMITY TRIAL. |
|
Thesagro : |
DISENO ESTADISTICO; DISENO EXPERIMENTAL; MODELOS ESTADISTICOS; VARIABILIDAD. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
U30 Métodos de investigación |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02512naa a2200313 a 4500
001 1059193
005 2019-02-11
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.2135/cropsci2018.03.0177$2DOI
100 1 $aBORGES, A.
245 $aCan spatial modeling substitute experimental design in agricultural experiments?$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
500 $aArticle history: Accepted paper, posted 10/05/18. Published online December, 13. 2018.
520 $aAbstract: One of the most critical aspects of agricultural experimentation is the proper choice of experimental design to control field heterogeneity, especially for large experiments. However, even with complex experimental designs, spatial variability may not be properly controlled if it occurs at scales smaller than blocks. Therefore, modeling spatial variability can be beneficial and some studies even propose spatial modeling instead of experimental design. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of experimental design, spatial modeling, and a combination of both under real field conditions using GIS and simulating experiments. Yield data from cultivars was simulated using real spatial variability from a large uniformity trial of one hundred independent locations and different sizes of experiments for four experimental designs: completely randomized design (CRD), randomized complete block design (RCBD), alpha-lattice incomplete block design (ALPHA), and partially replicated design (PREP). Each realization was analyzed using different levels of spatial correction. Models were compared by precision, accuracy, and the recovery of superior genotypes. For moderate and large experiment sizes, ALPHA was the best experimental design in terms of precision and accuracy. In most situations, models that included spatial correlation were better than models with no spatial correlation but they did not outperformed better experimental designs. Therefore, spatial modeling is not a substitute for good experimental design.
650 $aDISENO ESTADISTICO
650 $aDISENO EXPERIMENTAL
650 $aMODELOS ESTADISTICOS
650 $aVARIABILIDAD
653 $aEFFICIENCY STATISTICS
653 $aEXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
653 $aFIELD VARIABILITY
653 $aSPATIAL MODELS
653 $aUNIFORMITY TRIAL
700 1 $aGONZÁLEZ-REYMUNDEZ, A.
700 1 $aERNST, O.
700 1 $aCADENAZZI, M.
700 1 $aTERRA, J.A.
700 1 $aGUTIÉRREZ, L.
773 $tCrop Science, 2018$gv. 59, no. 1, p. 1-10.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
