|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
Fecha : |
21/02/2014 |
Actualizado : |
03/02/2018 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Capítulo en Libro Técnico-Científico |
Autor : |
SOCA, P.; CARRIQUIRY, M.; DO CARMO, M.; SCARLATO, S.; ASTESSIANO, A.L.; GENRO, C.; CLARAMUNT, M.; ESPASANDÍN, A. |
Afiliación : |
PABLO SOCA; MARIANA CARRIQUIRY, UDELAR, Facultad de Agronomía, Uruguay; MARTIN DO CARMO CORUJO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SANTIAGO SCARLATO GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANA L. ASTESSIANO, UDELAR, Facultad de Agronomía, Uruguay; CRISTINA GENRO, Embrapa Pecuaria do Sul; MARTIN CLARAMUNT, UDELAR, Facultad de Agronomía, Uruguay; ANA ESPASANDIN, UDELAR, Facultad de Agronomía, Uruguay. |
Título : |
Oferta de forraje del campo natural y resultado productivo de los sistemas de cría vacuna del Uruguay: I. Producción, uso y conservación del forraje aportado por campo natural |
Fecha de publicación : |
2013 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: QUINTANS, G.; SCARSI, A. (Eds.). Seminario de actualización técnica: cría vacuna Montevideo (UY): INIA, 2013. |
Páginas : |
p. 97-117 |
Serie : |
(INIA Serie Técnica; 208) |
ISSN : |
1688-9266 |
Idioma : |
Español |
Thesagro : |
ALIMENTACION DE LOS ANIMALES; BOVINOS; CRIA; EFICIENCIA DE CONVERSION DEL PIENSO; PASTIZAL NATURAL; SISTEMAS DE PRODUCCION; URUGUAY. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/7569/1/st-208-2013.-p.97-117.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01039naa a2200313 a 4500 001 1020262 005 2018-02-03 008 2013 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1688-9266 100 1 $aSOCA, P. 245 $aOferta de forraje del campo natural y resultado productivo de los sistemas de cría vacuna del Uruguay$bI. Producción, uso y conservación del forraje aportado por campo natural 260 $c2013 300 $ap. 97-117 490 $a(INIA Serie Técnica; 208) 650 $aALIMENTACION DE LOS ANIMALES 650 $aBOVINOS 650 $aCRIA 650 $aEFICIENCIA DE CONVERSION DEL PIENSO 650 $aPASTIZAL NATURAL 650 $aSISTEMAS DE PRODUCCION 650 $aURUGUAY 700 1 $aCARRIQUIRY, M. 700 1 $aDO CARMO, M. 700 1 $aSCARLATO, S. 700 1 $aASTESSIANO, A.L. 700 1 $aGENRO, C. 700 1 $aCLARAMUNT, M. 700 1 $aESPASANDÍN, A. 773 $tIn: QUINTANS, G.; SCARSI, A. (Eds.). Seminario de actualización técnica: cría vacuna Montevideo (UY): INIA, 2013.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
No copia registrada de este documento.
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
Fecha actual : |
26/07/2021 |
Actualizado : |
26/07/2021 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
-- - -- |
Autor : |
TSENG, C-M.; ROEL, A.; MACEDO, I.; MARELLA, M.; TERRA, J.A.; PITTELKOW, C. M. |
Afiliación : |
MENG-CHUN TSENG, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA; ALVARO ROEL DELLAZOPPA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; IGNACIO MACEDO YAPOR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MUZIO MARELLA, Sociedad Anónima Molinos Arroceros Nacionales (SAMAN), Uruguay; JOSÉ ALFREDO TERRA FERNÁNDEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CAMERON M. PITTELKOW, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA. |
Título : |
Synergies and tradeoffs among yield, resource use efficiency, and environmental footprint indicators in rice systems. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 2021, volume 3, 100070. OPEN ACCESS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100070 |
DOI : |
10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100070 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 30 April 2021 / / Revised 12 July 2021 // Accepted 13 July 2021 // Available online 24 July 2021. |
Contenido : |
A major question facing global rice systems is the extent to which yield and resource use efficiency indicators can be simultaneously optimized to sustainably meet future food demand. However, research approaches for evaluating synergies and tradeoffs among multiple indicators have been limited to date. Using the case study of rice production in Uruguay, we quantified five cropping system performance indicators at the farm-level from 2012 to 2017, covering approximately 40% of national rice area. Results suggest that maximizing performance in one
indicator is associated with tradeoffs for other indicators, with no farm simultaneously ranking as a topperformer (defined as top 10% of farms) across all indicators. The gaps between the average and topperforming farms were largest for agrochemical contamination risk (33%) and smallest for yield (11%). Comparing the groups of top-performing farms within each indicator revealed opportunities for improving system-level performance via synergistic effects between yield and resource use efficiencies, but not between carbon footprint, agrochemical contamination risk, and other indicators. Importantly, synergistic effects were more pronounced for farms at lower compared to higher productivity levels, suggesting less room for ustainability improvements at higher yield levels, unless yields can be further increased without elevated inputs. Important factors to improve the aggregated sustainability index included N fertilizer rate and seeding date. With potential application to rice production systems worldwide, this study highlights an integrated research approach for quantifying synergies and tradeoffs among multiple indicators to understand opportunities for increasing crop yields without negatively impacting resource use efficiency and environmental footprint. MenosA major question facing global rice systems is the extent to which yield and resource use efficiency indicators can be simultaneously optimized to sustainably meet future food demand. However, research approaches for evaluating synergies and tradeoffs among multiple indicators have been limited to date. Using the case study of rice production in Uruguay, we quantified five cropping system performance indicators at the farm-level from 2012 to 2017, covering approximately 40% of national rice area. Results suggest that maximizing performance in one
indicator is associated with tradeoffs for other indicators, with no farm simultaneously ranking as a topperformer (defined as top 10% of farms) across all indicators. The gaps between the average and topperforming farms were largest for agrochemical contamination risk (33%) and smallest for yield (11%). Comparing the groups of top-performing farms within each indicator revealed opportunities for improving system-level performance via synergistic effects between yield and resource use efficiencies, but not between carbon footprint, agrochemical contamination risk, and other indicators. Importantly, synergistic effects were more pronounced for farms at lower compared to higher productivity levels, suggesting less room for ustainability improvements at higher yield levels, unless yields can be further increased without elevated inputs. Important factors to improve the aggregated sustainability index included N fertilizer rate and seed... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
CARBON FOOTPRINT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; NITROGEN USE EFFICIENCE; RICE; SUSTAINABILITY; TRADEOFFS. |
Asunto categoría : |
P01 Conservación de la naturaleza y recursos de La tierra |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/15908/1/Current-Research-Environmental-Sustainability-2021-3-100070.pdf
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666049021000463
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02847naa a2200277 a 4500 001 1062325 005 2021-07-26 008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100070$2DOI 100 1 $aTSENG, C-M. 245 $aSynergies and tradeoffs among yield, resource use efficiency, and environmental footprint indicators in rice systems.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2021 500 $aArticle history: Received 30 April 2021 / / Revised 12 July 2021 // Accepted 13 July 2021 // Available online 24 July 2021. 520 $aA major question facing global rice systems is the extent to which yield and resource use efficiency indicators can be simultaneously optimized to sustainably meet future food demand. However, research approaches for evaluating synergies and tradeoffs among multiple indicators have been limited to date. Using the case study of rice production in Uruguay, we quantified five cropping system performance indicators at the farm-level from 2012 to 2017, covering approximately 40% of national rice area. Results suggest that maximizing performance in one indicator is associated with tradeoffs for other indicators, with no farm simultaneously ranking as a topperformer (defined as top 10% of farms) across all indicators. The gaps between the average and topperforming farms were largest for agrochemical contamination risk (33%) and smallest for yield (11%). Comparing the groups of top-performing farms within each indicator revealed opportunities for improving system-level performance via synergistic effects between yield and resource use efficiencies, but not between carbon footprint, agrochemical contamination risk, and other indicators. Importantly, synergistic effects were more pronounced for farms at lower compared to higher productivity levels, suggesting less room for ustainability improvements at higher yield levels, unless yields can be further increased without elevated inputs. Important factors to improve the aggregated sustainability index included N fertilizer rate and seeding date. With potential application to rice production systems worldwide, this study highlights an integrated research approach for quantifying synergies and tradeoffs among multiple indicators to understand opportunities for increasing crop yields without negatively impacting resource use efficiency and environmental footprint. 653 $aCARBON FOOTPRINT 653 $aENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 653 $aNITROGEN USE EFFICIENCE 653 $aRICE 653 $aSUSTAINABILITY 653 $aTRADEOFFS 700 1 $aROEL, A. 700 1 $aMACEDO, I. 700 1 $aMARELLA, M. 700 1 $aTERRA, J.A. 700 1 $aPITTELKOW, C. M. 773 $tCurrent Research in Environmental Sustainability, 2021, volume 3, 100070. OPEN ACCESS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100070
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|