| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha : |
21/02/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
17/09/2020 |
|
Autor : |
GUIBERT, M.; GROSSO, S.; ARBELETCHE, P.; BELLINI, M.E |
|
Afiliación : |
MARTINE GUIBERT, Université de Toulouse, Département de géographie, Equipe de recherche “Dynamiques rurales”, Toulouse, Francia.; SUSANA GROSSO, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Esperanza, Argentina.; PEDRO ARBELETCHE, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía, Paysandú, Uruguay.; MARÍA EVA BELLINI, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Santa Fe, Argentina. |
|
Título : |
De Argentina a Uruguay: espacios y actores en una nueva lógica de producción agrícola. Suplemento especial temático de la Revista Pampa, n.º 7, 2011. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2011 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Santa Fe, Argentina: Pampa, Revista Interuniversitaria de Estudios Territoriales, v. 7, no. 7, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14409/pampa.v1i7_sup.3202 |
|
ISSN : |
1669-3299 |
|
DOI : |
10.14409/pampa.v1i7_sup.3202 |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Contenido : |
RESUMEN La organización actual de gran parte de la producción agrícola en el Cono Sur (en particular en Argentina y en Uruguay) alimenta una tendencia hacia una menor relación
entre actores y territorios locales, y una mayor vinculación de estos espacios productivos en redes globales y globalizadoras. En efecto, la movilidad y la diversificación de los
actores productivos, la flexibilidad del capital, la simplificación tecnológica, las redes de comunicación y la mundialización se combinan para definir espacios de producción que
van perdiendo ciertas virtudes territoriales (proximidad socio-espacial, manejo económico, construcción política y gobernanza local, etc.) en beneficio de conformaciones socioespaciales más débiles y atravesadas por fuerzas globales que las re-estructuran. SUMMARY: The current organization of a great part of the agricultural production in the Southern Cone (especially in Argentina and Uruguay) reinforces a tendency towards a decreasing relation among actors and local territories and an increasing connection between these productive areas with global and globalizing networks. Actually, the mobility and diversification of productive actors, capital flexibility, technological simplification, communication networks and globalization combine to define production spaces which are losing certain territorial virtues (such as socio-spatial proximity, economic management, political construction and local governance, among others) for the benefit of weaker socio-spatial conformations which are being gone through by global forces that restructure them. MenosRESUMEN La organización actual de gran parte de la producción agrícola en el Cono Sur (en particular en Argentina y en Uruguay) alimenta una tendencia hacia una menor relación
entre actores y territorios locales, y una mayor vinculación de estos espacios productivos en redes globales y globalizadoras. En efecto, la movilidad y la diversificación de los
actores productivos, la flexibilidad del capital, la simplificación tecnológica, las redes de comunicación y la mundialización se combinan para definir espacios de producción que
van perdiendo ciertas virtudes territoriales (proximidad socio-espacial, manejo económico, construcción política y gobernanza local, etc.) en beneficio de conformaciones socioespaciales más débiles y atravesadas por fuerzas globales que las re-estructuran. SUMMARY: The current organization of a great part of the agricultural production in the Southern Cone (especially in Argentina and Uruguay) reinforces a tendency towards a decreasing relation among actors and local territories and an increasing connection between these productive areas with global and globalizing networks. Actually, the mobility and diversification of productive actors, capital flexibility, technological simplification, communication networks and globalization combine to define production spaces which are losing certain territorial virtues (such as socio-spatial proximity, economic management, political construction and local governance, among others) for the benefit of weaker socio... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
AGRICULTURA EMPRESARIAL; ARGENTINA; TERRITORIOS LOCALES; TRANSFORMACIÓN AGRO PRODUCTIVA. |
|
Thesagro : |
URUGUAY. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02493naa a2200241 a 4500
001 1025979
005 2020-09-17
008 2011 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1669-3299
024 7 $a10.14409/pampa.v1i7_sup.3202$2DOI
100 1 $aGUIBERT, M.
245 $aDe Argentina a Uruguay$bespacios y actores en una nueva lógica de producción agrícola. Suplemento especial temático de la Revista Pampa, n.º 7, 2011.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2011
520 $aRESUMEN La organización actual de gran parte de la producción agrícola en el Cono Sur (en particular en Argentina y en Uruguay) alimenta una tendencia hacia una menor relación entre actores y territorios locales, y una mayor vinculación de estos espacios productivos en redes globales y globalizadoras. En efecto, la movilidad y la diversificación de los actores productivos, la flexibilidad del capital, la simplificación tecnológica, las redes de comunicación y la mundialización se combinan para definir espacios de producción que van perdiendo ciertas virtudes territoriales (proximidad socio-espacial, manejo económico, construcción política y gobernanza local, etc.) en beneficio de conformaciones socioespaciales más débiles y atravesadas por fuerzas globales que las re-estructuran. SUMMARY: The current organization of a great part of the agricultural production in the Southern Cone (especially in Argentina and Uruguay) reinforces a tendency towards a decreasing relation among actors and local territories and an increasing connection between these productive areas with global and globalizing networks. Actually, the mobility and diversification of productive actors, capital flexibility, technological simplification, communication networks and globalization combine to define production spaces which are losing certain territorial virtues (such as socio-spatial proximity, economic management, political construction and local governance, among others) for the benefit of weaker socio-spatial conformations which are being gone through by global forces that restructure them.
650 $aURUGUAY
653 $aAGRICULTURA EMPRESARIAL
653 $aARGENTINA
653 $aTERRITORIOS LOCALES
653 $aTRANSFORMACIÓN AGRO PRODUCTIVA
700 1 $aGROSSO, S.
700 1 $aARBELETCHE, P.
700 1 $aBELLINI, M.E
773 $tSanta Fe, Argentina: Pampa, Revista Interuniversitaria de Estudios Territoriales$gv. 7, no. 7, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14409/pampa.v1i7_sup.3202
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha actual : |
02/04/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
24/02/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Capítulo en Libro Técnico-Científico |
|
Autor : |
HELGUERA, M.; ABUGALIEVA, A.; BATTENFIELD, S.; BÉKÉS, F.; BRANLARD, G.; CUNIBERTI, M.; HÜSKEN,A.; JOHANSSON, E.; MORRIS, C.F.; NURIT, E.; SISSONS, M.; VÁZQUEZ, D. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARCELO HELGUERA, National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA), Marcos Juárez, Argentina .; AIGUL ABUGALIEVA, Kazakh Scientific Research Institute of Agriculture and Plant Growing, Almalybak, Kazakhstan.; SARAH BATTENFIELD, Syngenta, Junction City, KS, USA.; FERENC BÉKÉS, FBFD PTY LTD, Sydney, NSW, Australia.; GÉRARD BRANLARD, INRAE, UCA UMR1095 GDEC, Clermont-Ferrand, France.; MARTHA CUNIBERTI, Wheat and Soybean Quality Laboratory, National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.; ALEXANDRA HÜSKEN, Department of Safety and Quality of CerealsMax Rubner-Institut, Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and Food Detmold, Germany.; EVA JOHANSSON, Department of Plant Breeding The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.; CRAIG F. MORRIS, Western Wheat Quality LaboratoryUSDA-ARS,Pullman,USA.; ERIC NURIT, Mazan,France.; MIKE SISSONS, NSW Department of Primary Industries Tamworth Centre for Crop Improvement Calala, Australia.; DANIEL VÁZQUEZ PEYRONEL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Grain Quality in Breeding. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: Igrejas G., Ikeda T., Guzmán C. (eds). Wheat Quality For Improving Processing And Human Health. Cham:Springer. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34163-3_12 |
|
Páginas : |
p. 273-307. |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history:First Online: 18 March 2020. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract:
Technological (processing performance and end-product) and nutritional quality of wheat is in principle determined by a number of compounds within the wheat grain, including proteins, polysaccharides, lipids, minerals, heavy metals, vitamins and phytochemicals, effecting these characters. The genotype and environment is of similar importance for the determination of the content and composition of these compounds. Furthermore, the interaction between genotypes and the cultivation environment may play a significant role. Many studies have evaluated whether the genotype or the environment plays the major role in determining the content of the mentioned compounds. An overall conclusion of these studies is that except for compounds encoded by single major genes, importance of certain factors mainly depend on how wide environments and how diverse cultivars are within these comparative studies. Comparing environments all over, e.g. across Latin America, ends up with a high significance of the environment while large studies including genotypes of wide genetic background result in a significant role for the genotype. In addition, for some technological properties and components, genotype has a higher effect (e.g. grain hardness and gluten proteins), while environment influences stronger on others (e.g. protein and mineral content).Content and concentration of proteins, but also to some extent of starch, some non-starch polysaccharides and lipids, are essential in determining the technological quality of a wheat flour. For nutritional quality of the flour, the majority of the compounds are together the important determinant. Thus an increased understanding of environmental effects is essential. As to how the environment is influencing the content of the compounds, there are some differences. The protein content and composition is strongly affected by environmental factors influencing nitrogen availability and cultivar development time. However, these two factors are impacted by a range of environmental (temperature, precipitation, humidity/sun hours, etc.) and agronomic (soil properties, crop management practices such as seeding density, nitrogen fertilizer application timing and amount, etc.) components. Thus, to understand the interplay between the various environmental and agronomic factors impacting the technological quality of a wheat flour, modeling is a useful tool. Several other compounds, including minerals and heavy metals, are to a higher extent determined by site specific variation, resulting in similar rankings of entries across locations, although the total content is varying among years. The bioactive compounds and vitamins are a part of the defense mechanisms of plants and thus there is a variation in these compounds depending on prevailing biotic and abiotic stresses (heat, drought, excess rainfall, nutrition, diseases and pests). Thus, even for nutritional quality of wheat, incorporating all compounds of relevance in the evaluation would benefit from modeling tools. MenosAbstract:
Technological (processing performance and end-product) and nutritional quality of wheat is in principle determined by a number of compounds within the wheat grain, including proteins, polysaccharides, lipids, minerals, heavy metals, vitamins and phytochemicals, effecting these characters. The genotype and environment is of similar importance for the determination of the content and composition of these compounds. Furthermore, the interaction between genotypes and the cultivation environment may play a significant role. Many studies have evaluated whether the genotype or the environment plays the major role in determining the content of the mentioned compounds. An overall conclusion of these studies is that except for compounds encoded by single major genes, importance of certain factors mainly depend on how wide environments and how diverse cultivars are within these comparative studies. Comparing environments all over, e.g. across Latin America, ends up with a high significance of the environment while large studies including genotypes of wide genetic background result in a significant role for the genotype. In addition, for some technological properties and components, genotype has a higher effect (e.g. grain hardness and gluten proteins), while environment influences stronger on others (e.g. protein and mineral content).Content and concentration of proteins, but also to some extent of starch, some non-starch polysaccharides and lipids, are essential in determini... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
CASE-STUDIES; DURUM-WHEAT; NUTRITIONAL-QUALITY; PLATAFORMA AGROALIMENTOS; QUALITY-SELECTION; SOFT-WHEAT; WILD-RELATIVES. |
|
Thesagro : |
TRIGO. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F30 Genética vegetal y fitomejoramiento |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 04132naa a2200373 a 4500
001 1060983
005 2022-02-24
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aHELGUERA, M.
245 $aGrain Quality in Breeding.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
300 $ap. 273-307.
500 $aArticle history:First Online: 18 March 2020.
520 $aAbstract: Technological (processing performance and end-product) and nutritional quality of wheat is in principle determined by a number of compounds within the wheat grain, including proteins, polysaccharides, lipids, minerals, heavy metals, vitamins and phytochemicals, effecting these characters. The genotype and environment is of similar importance for the determination of the content and composition of these compounds. Furthermore, the interaction between genotypes and the cultivation environment may play a significant role. Many studies have evaluated whether the genotype or the environment plays the major role in determining the content of the mentioned compounds. An overall conclusion of these studies is that except for compounds encoded by single major genes, importance of certain factors mainly depend on how wide environments and how diverse cultivars are within these comparative studies. Comparing environments all over, e.g. across Latin America, ends up with a high significance of the environment while large studies including genotypes of wide genetic background result in a significant role for the genotype. In addition, for some technological properties and components, genotype has a higher effect (e.g. grain hardness and gluten proteins), while environment influences stronger on others (e.g. protein and mineral content).Content and concentration of proteins, but also to some extent of starch, some non-starch polysaccharides and lipids, are essential in determining the technological quality of a wheat flour. For nutritional quality of the flour, the majority of the compounds are together the important determinant. Thus an increased understanding of environmental effects is essential. As to how the environment is influencing the content of the compounds, there are some differences. The protein content and composition is strongly affected by environmental factors influencing nitrogen availability and cultivar development time. However, these two factors are impacted by a range of environmental (temperature, precipitation, humidity/sun hours, etc.) and agronomic (soil properties, crop management practices such as seeding density, nitrogen fertilizer application timing and amount, etc.) components. Thus, to understand the interplay between the various environmental and agronomic factors impacting the technological quality of a wheat flour, modeling is a useful tool. Several other compounds, including minerals and heavy metals, are to a higher extent determined by site specific variation, resulting in similar rankings of entries across locations, although the total content is varying among years. The bioactive compounds and vitamins are a part of the defense mechanisms of plants and thus there is a variation in these compounds depending on prevailing biotic and abiotic stresses (heat, drought, excess rainfall, nutrition, diseases and pests). Thus, even for nutritional quality of wheat, incorporating all compounds of relevance in the evaluation would benefit from modeling tools.
650 $aTRIGO
653 $aCASE-STUDIES
653 $aDURUM-WHEAT
653 $aNUTRITIONAL-QUALITY
653 $aPLATAFORMA AGROALIMENTOS
653 $aQUALITY-SELECTION
653 $aSOFT-WHEAT
653 $aWILD-RELATIVES
700 1 $aABUGALIEVA, A.
700 1 $aBATTENFIELD, S.
700 1 $aBÉKÉS, F.
700 1 $aBRANLARD, G.
700 1 $aCUNIBERTI, M.
700 1 $aHÜSKEN,A.
700 1 $aJOHANSSON, E.
700 1 $aMORRIS, C.F.
700 1 $aNURIT, E.
700 1 $aSISSONS, M.
700 1 $aVÁZQUEZ, D.
773 $tIn: Igrejas G., Ikeda T., Guzmán C. (eds). Wheat Quality For Improving Processing And Human Health. Cham:Springer. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34163-3_12
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
