| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
25/10/2016 |
|
Actualizado : |
25/10/2016 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Abstracts/Resúmenes |
|
Autor : |
SCARLATO, S.; AGUERRE, V.; BORTAGARAY, I.; SCARLATO, M.; RUGGIA, A. |
|
Afiliación : |
SANTIAGO SCARLATO GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIA VERONICA AGUERRE ANTIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ISABEL BORTAGARAY SABARROS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIANA SCARLATO GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANDREA PAOLA RUGGIA CHIESA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Co-inovação em sistemas familiares de gado de corte na região leste do Uruguay. II: Abordagem metodológica em estabelecimentos de referência. [Co-innovation in family livestock systems in eastern Uruguay. II: Methodological approach at farm-scales level] |
|
Complemento del título : |
GRUPO DE TRABALHO (GT) - GT1 - Diagnóstico e Intervenção em Busca de Sistemas de Produção Sustentáveis [Resumos expandidos] |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2014 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: CONGRESSO DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE SISTEMAS DE PRODUÇÃO, 10, "ENFOQUE SISTEMICO E AGRICULTURA FAMILIAR NA CONSTRUÇÃO DO DESENVOLVIMENTO RURAL SUSTENTAVEL", Foz do Iguaçu - PR, 14 a 17 de maio de 2014. [Resumen expandido] |
|
Páginas : |
p. 453-460 |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
In Uruguay, livestock production involves 65% of the family farmers and more than 70% of the total area of the country. Several technologies have been generated by researchers
to increase economic and productive results in beef-cattle production systems. However, these technologies are poorly adopted and have a relative low impact on the sustainability
of the farming systems. Among other reasons, this could be due to the difficulty in combining all the information in a particular productive system. In Uruguay, the sustainability
of horticulture-livestock family farming systems was improved using the co-innovation approach, and till now, no efforts were made with livestock family systems. In the present
work, we hypothesized that is necessary to use a systemic and participative approach for re-designing productive systems in order to improve their sustainability. So the objective
was to adapt the co-innovation approach for livestock family farming systems in the Eastern region of Uruguay through its application in pilot farms. The work was carried out
with 7 pilot farms, using the co-innovation approach and following three steps: 1- characterization and diagnosis, 2- re-design and 3- implementation, monitoring and evaluation.
The social dimension of the changes and the comprehension of the type of learning process, related to the changes that the families involved deal with, were systematized with
in-depth interviews, participant observations and other complementary techniques. The interchange process between technical and local knowledge is a distinctive and relevant
characteristic of the project. The planning of the decision process associated with farming activities is one of the learning that farmers highlight and clearly associate with the project. However, in other areas planning is not so noticeable. For example, one of the most critical limitations is the difficulty to project a model of family farming inside the family. In most of the families, is not possible to visualize new generations to maintain and sustain the model in the future. The co-innovation approach has demonstrated to be appropriate
and of high relevance to facilitate significant changes in the farming systems that are directly involved with the project. A tailored and precise diagnosis along with the re-design of
the farming system with a systemic approach, constructed together between farmers and technicians, were key factors for the successful implementation of the changes. MenosABSTRACT.
In Uruguay, livestock production involves 65% of the family farmers and more than 70% of the total area of the country. Several technologies have been generated by researchers
to increase economic and productive results in beef-cattle production systems. However, these technologies are poorly adopted and have a relative low impact on the sustainability
of the farming systems. Among other reasons, this could be due to the difficulty in combining all the information in a particular productive system. In Uruguay, the sustainability
of horticulture-livestock family farming systems was improved using the co-innovation approach, and till now, no efforts were made with livestock family systems. In the present
work, we hypothesized that is necessary to use a systemic and participative approach for re-designing productive systems in order to improve their sustainability. So the objective
was to adapt the co-innovation approach for livestock family farming systems in the Eastern region of Uruguay through its application in pilot farms. The work was carried out
with 7 pilot farms, using the co-innovation approach and following three steps: 1- characterization and diagnosis, 2- re-design and 3- implementation, monitoring and evaluation.
The social dimension of the changes and the comprehension of the type of learning process, related to the changes that the families involved deal with, were systematized with
in-depth interviews, participant observations and other complementar... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
FAMILY PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; INNOVATION; INVESTIGACIÓN PARTICIPATIVA; LEARNING PROCESS; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; SISTEMAS DE PRODUCCIÓN FAMILIAR; SYSTEMS APPROACH. |
|
Thesagro : |
AGRICULTURA FAMILIAR; AGROECOLOGÍA; APRENDIZAJE; ENFOQUE DE SISTEMAS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/6235/1/Scarlato-S.-X-Anais-SBSP-Sociedade-Brasileira-de-Sistema-2014.pdf
http://www.sbsp.org.br/z1files/pub/147403629942442_Anais-SBSP-Sociedade-Brasileira-de-Sistema.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03766nam a2200301 a 4500
001 1055890
005 2016-10-25
008 2014 bl uuuu u01u1 u #d
100 1 $aSCARLATO, S.
245 $aCo-inovação em sistemas familiares de gado de corte na região leste do Uruguay. II$bAbordagem metodológica em estabelecimentos de referência. [Co-innovation in family livestock systems in eastern Uruguay. II: Methodological approach at farm-scales level]$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: CONGRESSO DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE SISTEMAS DE PRODUÇÃO, 10, "ENFOQUE SISTEMICO E AGRICULTURA FAMILIAR NA CONSTRUÇÃO DO DESENVOLVIMENTO RURAL SUSTENTAVEL", Foz do Iguaçu - PR, 14 a 17 de maio de 2014. [Resumen expandido]$c2014
300 $ap. 453-460
520 $aABSTRACT. In Uruguay, livestock production involves 65% of the family farmers and more than 70% of the total area of the country. Several technologies have been generated by researchers to increase economic and productive results in beef-cattle production systems. However, these technologies are poorly adopted and have a relative low impact on the sustainability of the farming systems. Among other reasons, this could be due to the difficulty in combining all the information in a particular productive system. In Uruguay, the sustainability of horticulture-livestock family farming systems was improved using the co-innovation approach, and till now, no efforts were made with livestock family systems. In the present work, we hypothesized that is necessary to use a systemic and participative approach for re-designing productive systems in order to improve their sustainability. So the objective was to adapt the co-innovation approach for livestock family farming systems in the Eastern region of Uruguay through its application in pilot farms. The work was carried out with 7 pilot farms, using the co-innovation approach and following three steps: 1- characterization and diagnosis, 2- re-design and 3- implementation, monitoring and evaluation. The social dimension of the changes and the comprehension of the type of learning process, related to the changes that the families involved deal with, were systematized with in-depth interviews, participant observations and other complementary techniques. The interchange process between technical and local knowledge is a distinctive and relevant characteristic of the project. The planning of the decision process associated with farming activities is one of the learning that farmers highlight and clearly associate with the project. However, in other areas planning is not so noticeable. For example, one of the most critical limitations is the difficulty to project a model of family farming inside the family. In most of the families, is not possible to visualize new generations to maintain and sustain the model in the future. The co-innovation approach has demonstrated to be appropriate and of high relevance to facilitate significant changes in the farming systems that are directly involved with the project. A tailored and precise diagnosis along with the re-design of the farming system with a systemic approach, constructed together between farmers and technicians, were key factors for the successful implementation of the changes.
650 $aAGRICULTURA FAMILIAR
650 $aAGROECOLOGÍA
650 $aAPRENDIZAJE
650 $aENFOQUE DE SISTEMAS
653 $aFAMILY PRODUCTION SYSTEMS
653 $aINNOVATION
653 $aINVESTIGACIÓN PARTICIPATIVA
653 $aLEARNING PROCESS
653 $aPARTICIPATORY RESEARCH
653 $aSISTEMAS DE PRODUCCIÓN FAMILIAR
653 $aSYSTEMS APPROACH
700 1 $aAGUERRE, V.
700 1 $aBORTAGARAY, I.
700 1 $aSCARLATO, M.
700 1 $aRUGGIA, A.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha actual : |
21/05/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
27/04/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
CLARIGET, J.M.; QUINTANS, G.; BANCHERO, G.; ÁLVAREZ-OXILEY, A.; BENTANCUR, O.; LÓPEZ-MAZZ, C.R.; PÉREZ-CLARIGET, R |
|
Afiliación : |
JUAN MANUEL CLARIGET BRIZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GRACIELA QUINTANS ILARIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GEORGGET ELIZABETH BANCHERO HUNZIKER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANDREA ÁLVAREZ-OXILEY, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía, Montevideo, Uruguay.; OSCAR BENTANCUR, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía, Paysandú, Uruguay.; CARLOS RAFAEL LÓPEZ-MAZZ, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía, Montevideo, Uruguay.; RAQUEL PÉREZ-CLARIGET, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía, Montevideo, Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Effects of rice bran and glycerin supplementation on metabolic and productive responses of beef cows. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia vol.49 Viçosa 2020 Epub May 15, 2020. OPEN ACCESS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz4920190082 |
|
DOI : |
10.37496/rbz4920190082 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received: June 21, 2019/ Accepted: January 19, 2020. Corresponding author: jclariget@inia.org.uy. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1349-0622. We thank ANII for providing a scholarship POS_2011_1_3522 and FMV_3_2011_1_6713 projects, which financed part of this work; ALUR, for providing glycerin with which this work was conducted; and the staff of EEBR, in particular, Oscar Cáceres, Dorrel Bentancour, and agronomist Carlos Mantero. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT:
Fifty-seven primiparous Angus, Hereford, and crossbred cows were used to study the effect of strategic supplementation on metabolic, productive, and reproductive responses. The experiment had two periods including four phases: prepartum supplementation (phase I; 52 days), early postpartum (phase II; 43 days), pre-mating supplementation (phase III; 21 days), and the last phase including mating, gestation, and lactation until weaning (phase IV; 103 days). Phases I and II were considered as period 1, and phases III and IV were considered as period 2. During phase I (−52±2 days before calving to birth), half of the cows received a supplement (S-), and the rest only grazed native swards (C-). For phase III (59±2 days postpartum [DPP] until mating), cows from the previous treatments (C- or S-) were sorted in two levels of pre-mating supplementation, supplemented (-S) or not supplemented (-C), resulting in four treatment combinations (CC, CS, SC, and SS). The supplement was 1 kg dry matter/cow per day of whole rice bran and 550 mL/cow per day of crude glycerin. In period 1, cows receiving prepartum supplementation increased concentration of cholesterol, glucose, and albumin and decreased concentration of non-esterified fatty acids, beta-hydroxybutyrate, and urea. This improvement in energy balance was reflected in a higher body condition score at calving. Alternatively, in period 2, pre-mating supplementation only increased cholesterol concentration. None of the supplementation periods affected the weaning weight of calves. Prepartum, but not pre-mating, supplementation increased total pregnancy rate. A short prepartum supplementation improves pregnancy rate of primiparous cows managed under extensive production systems. However, there is no additional benefit of supplementation during the pre-mating period. MenosABSTRACT:
Fifty-seven primiparous Angus, Hereford, and crossbred cows were used to study the effect of strategic supplementation on metabolic, productive, and reproductive responses. The experiment had two periods including four phases: prepartum supplementation (phase I; 52 days), early postpartum (phase II; 43 days), pre-mating supplementation (phase III; 21 days), and the last phase including mating, gestation, and lactation until weaning (phase IV; 103 days). Phases I and II were considered as period 1, and phases III and IV were considered as period 2. During phase I (−52±2 days before calving to birth), half of the cows received a supplement (S-), and the rest only grazed native swards (C-). For phase III (59±2 days postpartum [DPP] until mating), cows from the previous treatments (C- or S-) were sorted in two levels of pre-mating supplementation, supplemented (-S) or not supplemented (-C), resulting in four treatment combinations (CC, CS, SC, and SS). The supplement was 1 kg dry matter/cow per day of whole rice bran and 550 mL/cow per day of crude glycerin. In period 1, cows receiving prepartum supplementation increased concentration of cholesterol, glucose, and albumin and decreased concentration of non-esterified fatty acids, beta-hydroxybutyrate, and urea. This improvement in energy balance was reflected in a higher body condition score at calving. Alternatively, in period 2, pre-mating supplementation only increased cholesterol concentration. None of the sup... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
BEEF CATTLE; GLICERINA; GRAZING; NATIVE PASTURE; PRODUCCIÒN EXTENSIVA; REPRODUCTION; SALVADO DE ARROZ; VACAS DE CARNE. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/14431/1/Clariget-RBZ-2019.pdf
https://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbz/v49/1806-9290-rbz-49-e20190082.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03268naa a2200313 a 4500
001 1061068
005 2021-04-27
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.37496/rbz4920190082$2DOI
100 1 $aCLARIGET, J.M.
245 $aEffects of rice bran and glycerin supplementation on metabolic and productive responses of beef cows.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
500 $aArticle history: Received: June 21, 2019/ Accepted: January 19, 2020. Corresponding author: jclariget@inia.org.uy. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1349-0622. We thank ANII for providing a scholarship POS_2011_1_3522 and FMV_3_2011_1_6713 projects, which financed part of this work; ALUR, for providing glycerin with which this work was conducted; and the staff of EEBR, in particular, Oscar Cáceres, Dorrel Bentancour, and agronomist Carlos Mantero.
520 $aABSTRACT: Fifty-seven primiparous Angus, Hereford, and crossbred cows were used to study the effect of strategic supplementation on metabolic, productive, and reproductive responses. The experiment had two periods including four phases: prepartum supplementation (phase I; 52 days), early postpartum (phase II; 43 days), pre-mating supplementation (phase III; 21 days), and the last phase including mating, gestation, and lactation until weaning (phase IV; 103 days). Phases I and II were considered as period 1, and phases III and IV were considered as period 2. During phase I (−52±2 days before calving to birth), half of the cows received a supplement (S-), and the rest only grazed native swards (C-). For phase III (59±2 days postpartum [DPP] until mating), cows from the previous treatments (C- or S-) were sorted in two levels of pre-mating supplementation, supplemented (-S) or not supplemented (-C), resulting in four treatment combinations (CC, CS, SC, and SS). The supplement was 1 kg dry matter/cow per day of whole rice bran and 550 mL/cow per day of crude glycerin. In period 1, cows receiving prepartum supplementation increased concentration of cholesterol, glucose, and albumin and decreased concentration of non-esterified fatty acids, beta-hydroxybutyrate, and urea. This improvement in energy balance was reflected in a higher body condition score at calving. Alternatively, in period 2, pre-mating supplementation only increased cholesterol concentration. None of the supplementation periods affected the weaning weight of calves. Prepartum, but not pre-mating, supplementation increased total pregnancy rate. A short prepartum supplementation improves pregnancy rate of primiparous cows managed under extensive production systems. However, there is no additional benefit of supplementation during the pre-mating period.
653 $aBEEF CATTLE
653 $aGLICERINA
653 $aGRAZING
653 $aNATIVE PASTURE
653 $aPRODUCCIÒN EXTENSIVA
653 $aREPRODUCTION
653 $aSALVADO DE ARROZ
653 $aVACAS DE CARNE
700 1 $aQUINTANS, G.
700 1 $aBANCHERO, G.
700 1 $aÁLVAREZ-OXILEY, A.
700 1 $aBENTANCUR, O.
700 1 $aLÓPEZ-MAZZ, C.R.
700 1 $aPÉREZ-CLARIGET, R
773 $tRevista Brasileira de Zootecnia vol.49 Viçosa 2020 Epub May 15, 2020. OPEN ACCESS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz4920190082
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
