| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha : |
11/05/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
21/05/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Documentos |
|
Autor : |
INIA (INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA); INASE (INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE SEMILLAS). |
|
Título : |
Resultados experimentales de la evaluación nacional de cultivares de cebada cervecera: período 2019 |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Montevideo (UY): INASE ; INIA, 2020. |
|
Páginas : |
60 p. |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Notas : |
INIA. Evaluación de Cultivares.Ing. Agr. (Ph.D.) Marina Castro. Ing. Agr. Santiago Manasliski(Ensayos regionales Young). Téc. Agríc. Gan. Ximena Morales-Asistente de Investigación Beatriz Castro-Téc. Univ. en TI Valeria Cardozo(Asistentes de Información y Proc. de datos). Calidad de Granos.Q.F. (Ph.D.) Daniel Vázquez.Téc. Quím. Protección Vegetal.Ing. Agr. (Ph.D.) Silvia Pereyra (fitopatología).Ing. Agr. (Ph.D.) Silvia Germán (Mej. por resistencia).Tec. Agrop. Richard García (Mej. por resistencia). Tec. Lech. Néstor González (fitopatología).Unidad de Comunicación y Transferencia de Tecnología.Ing. Agr. (M.Sc.) Ernesto Restaino-Sebastián Bogliacino Asistente UCTT. Sociedad Rural de Río Negro: Ing.Agr. Virginia Mailhos (Gerente). Ing. Agr. (MBA) Donald Chalkling. INASE. Ing. Agr. Daniel Bayce,Director Ejecutivo.Ing. Agr. (M.Sc.) Virginia Olivieri.Ing. Agr. (M.Sc.) Federico Boschi.Ing. Agr. (M.Sc.) Sebastián Moure.Ing. Agr. Constanza Tarán Téc. Agr. Gustavo Giribaldi. Área Laboratorio de Calidad de Semillas.Lic. Bioq. (Ph.D.) Vanessa Sossa,Gerente. Ing. Agr. Ana Tardáguila.Analista Fabián Makowski Analista Mónica Rojas.Analista Laura Tellechea.Ana Alfaro. Área Administración: Carolina Barbieri-Ana Cáseres. FACULTAD AGRONOMIA UDELAR. Ing. Agr. (Ph.D.) Ariel Castro. Ing. Agr. Sebastián Bartaburu. Ing. Agr. Maximiliano Verocai. Juan Mosqueira. MALTERIA ORIENTAL S.A. Ing. Agr. Fernanda Pardo-Ing. Agr. Fernanda Cardozo. |
|
Contenido : |
Indice: Evaluación de cultivares de cebada. Materiales y métodos:3.1 Ensayos conducidos en La Estanzuela y Young (INIA). 3.2 Ensayo conducido en Dolores (INASE).3.3 Ensayo conducido en Mercedes (MOSA).3.4 Ensayo conducido en Ombúes de Lavalle (MUSA).3.5 Ensayo conducido en Paysandú (FAGRO). 4. Resultados ExperimentalesS – Ensayos sin fungicidas. 4.1 Rendimiento de Grano. 4.2 Calidad de Grano. 4.3 Comportamiento Sanitario . 4.3.1 Comportamiento sanitario en ensayos . 4.3.2 Comportamiento sanitario en colecciones. 4.4 Características Agronómicas .5. RESULTADOS EXPERIMENTALES – Ensayos con fungicidas. 5.1 Rendimiento de Grano. 5.2 Calidad de Grano.5.3 Características Agronómicas . Registros meteorológicos. |
|
Palabras claves : |
CONVENIO INASE-INIA. |
|
Thesagro : |
CEBADA; EVALUACION DE CULTIVARES. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/14418/1/PubCebadaPeriodo2019.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02791nam a2200181 a 4500
001 1061051
005 2021-05-21
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aINIA (INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA)
245 $aResultados experimentales de la evaluación nacional de cultivares de cebada cervecera$bperíodo 2019$h[electronic resource]
260 $aMontevideo (UY): INASE ; INIA$c2020
300 $a60 p.
500 $aINIA. Evaluación de Cultivares.Ing. Agr. (Ph.D.) Marina Castro. Ing. Agr. Santiago Manasliski(Ensayos regionales Young). Téc. Agríc. Gan. Ximena Morales-Asistente de Investigación Beatriz Castro-Téc. Univ. en TI Valeria Cardozo(Asistentes de Información y Proc. de datos). Calidad de Granos.Q.F. (Ph.D.) Daniel Vázquez.Téc. Quím. Protección Vegetal.Ing. Agr. (Ph.D.) Silvia Pereyra (fitopatología).Ing. Agr. (Ph.D.) Silvia Germán (Mej. por resistencia).Tec. Agrop. Richard García (Mej. por resistencia). Tec. Lech. Néstor González (fitopatología).Unidad de Comunicación y Transferencia de Tecnología.Ing. Agr. (M.Sc.) Ernesto Restaino-Sebastián Bogliacino Asistente UCTT. Sociedad Rural de Río Negro: Ing.Agr. Virginia Mailhos (Gerente). Ing. Agr. (MBA) Donald Chalkling. INASE. Ing. Agr. Daniel Bayce,Director Ejecutivo.Ing. Agr. (M.Sc.) Virginia Olivieri.Ing. Agr. (M.Sc.) Federico Boschi.Ing. Agr. (M.Sc.) Sebastián Moure.Ing. Agr. Constanza Tarán Téc. Agr. Gustavo Giribaldi. Área Laboratorio de Calidad de Semillas.Lic. Bioq. (Ph.D.) Vanessa Sossa,Gerente. Ing. Agr. Ana Tardáguila.Analista Fabián Makowski Analista Mónica Rojas.Analista Laura Tellechea.Ana Alfaro. Área Administración: Carolina Barbieri-Ana Cáseres. FACULTAD AGRONOMIA UDELAR. Ing. Agr. (Ph.D.) Ariel Castro. Ing. Agr. Sebastián Bartaburu. Ing. Agr. Maximiliano Verocai. Juan Mosqueira. MALTERIA ORIENTAL S.A. Ing. Agr. Fernanda Pardo-Ing. Agr. Fernanda Cardozo.
520 $aIndice: Evaluación de cultivares de cebada. Materiales y métodos:3.1 Ensayos conducidos en La Estanzuela y Young (INIA). 3.2 Ensayo conducido en Dolores (INASE).3.3 Ensayo conducido en Mercedes (MOSA).3.4 Ensayo conducido en Ombúes de Lavalle (MUSA).3.5 Ensayo conducido en Paysandú (FAGRO). 4. Resultados ExperimentalesS – Ensayos sin fungicidas. 4.1 Rendimiento de Grano. 4.2 Calidad de Grano. 4.3 Comportamiento Sanitario . 4.3.1 Comportamiento sanitario en ensayos . 4.3.2 Comportamiento sanitario en colecciones. 4.4 Características Agronómicas .5. RESULTADOS EXPERIMENTALES – Ensayos con fungicidas. 5.1 Rendimiento de Grano. 5.2 Calidad de Grano.5.3 Características Agronómicas . Registros meteorológicos.
650 $aCEBADA
650 $aEVALUACION DE CULTIVARES
653 $aCONVENIO INASE-INIA
700 1 $aINASE (INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE SEMILLAS).
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha actual : |
16/03/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
25/03/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
CANOZZI, M.E.A.; BORGES, J.A.R.; BARCELLOS, J.O.J. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARÍA EUGENIA ANDRIGHETTO CANOZZI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JOÃO AUGUSTO ROSSI BORGES, Universidade Federal Da Grande Dourados, Rod. Dourados-Itahum, Km 12, Caixa Postal 364, Dourados, Mato Grosso Do Sul, Brazil.; JÚLIO OTÁVIO JARDIM BARCELLOS, Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul, Departamento De Zootecnia, Av. Bento Gonçalves 7.712, 91540-000, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil. |
|
Título : |
Attitudes of cattle veterinarians and animal scientists to pain and painful procedures in Brazil. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Preventive Veterinary Medicine, April 2020, Volume 177, Article number 104909. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.104909 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.104909 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 13 August 2019// Revised 24 January 2020// Accepted 28 January 2020//Available online 30 January 2020. Corresponding author. E-mailaddresses: mecanozzi@inia.org.uy (M.E. Andrighetto Canozzi), joaoborges@ufgd.edu.br (J.A. Rossi Borges), julio.barcellos@ufrgs.br (J.O. Jardim Barcellos). This study was supported by The Brazilian Council of Scientific and Technological Development (C Pq/Project 166250/2015–5). |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract:
Recent studies have shown that cattle practitioners are concerned about painful conditions and procedures. An understanding of the attitudes toward pain is fundamental to encourage the use of pain relief in cattle. The goal of this study was to investigate the factors that influence Brazilian professionals toward the use of pain mitigation in cattle, primarily during castration and horn removal (e.g. dehorning, disbudding). To reach this objective, an online survey was conducted with veterinarians and animal scientists. The analysis was based on descriptive statistics, chi-squares tests, Fisher exact tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests. The final sample was composed of 147 respondents. Results of descriptive statistics showed that the use of medicine before a painful procedure (i.e., anesthetic, anti-inflammatory, or sedative-analgesic), was higher for adult cattle than for suckled and newborn calves. In newborn calves, those respondents who were more likely to use pain relief agreed with the statements that i) there is missing information about pain control during castration and ii) defensive movements shown by an animal during or after a procedure to justify pain mitigation in horn removal. The primary reasons for choosing a medicine were similar for both procedures: cost, anti-inflammatory effect, analgesic potency, duration of analgesic effect, duration of sedative effect, and route of administration. There was no difference in professional?s decade of birth and pain mitigation use. These results may be useful to decide how to optimize the use of drugs by veterinary and animal science professions, and continuing education should help to increase pain mitigation usage. MenosAbstract:
Recent studies have shown that cattle practitioners are concerned about painful conditions and procedures. An understanding of the attitudes toward pain is fundamental to encourage the use of pain relief in cattle. The goal of this study was to investigate the factors that influence Brazilian professionals toward the use of pain mitigation in cattle, primarily during castration and horn removal (e.g. dehorning, disbudding). To reach this objective, an online survey was conducted with veterinarians and animal scientists. The analysis was based on descriptive statistics, chi-squares tests, Fisher exact tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests. The final sample was composed of 147 respondents. Results of descriptive statistics showed that the use of medicine before a painful procedure (i.e., anesthetic, anti-inflammatory, or sedative-analgesic), was higher for adult cattle than for suckled and newborn calves. In newborn calves, those respondents who were more likely to use pain relief agreed with the statements that i) there is missing information about pain control during castration and ii) defensive movements shown by an animal during or after a procedure to justify pain mitigation in horn removal. The primary reasons for choosing a medicine were similar for both procedures: cost, anti-inflammatory effect, analgesic potency, duration of analgesic effect, duration of sedative effect, and route of administration. There was no difference in professional?s decade of birth and pa... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
ANALGESIA; ANALGESICOS; ANIMAL WELFARE; BEEF; BIENESTAR ANIMAL; DAIRY; DOLOR; PAIN; QUESTIONNAIRE. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02992naa a2200277 a 4500
001 1060922
005 2020-03-25
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.104909$2DOI
100 1 $aCANOZZI, M.E.A.
245 $aAttitudes of cattle veterinarians and animal scientists to pain and painful procedures in Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
500 $aArticle history: Received 13 August 2019// Revised 24 January 2020// Accepted 28 January 2020//Available online 30 January 2020. Corresponding author. E-mailaddresses: mecanozzi@inia.org.uy (M.E. Andrighetto Canozzi), joaoborges@ufgd.edu.br (J.A. Rossi Borges), julio.barcellos@ufrgs.br (J.O. Jardim Barcellos). This study was supported by The Brazilian Council of Scientific and Technological Development (C Pq/Project 166250/2015–5).
520 $aAbstract: Recent studies have shown that cattle practitioners are concerned about painful conditions and procedures. An understanding of the attitudes toward pain is fundamental to encourage the use of pain relief in cattle. The goal of this study was to investigate the factors that influence Brazilian professionals toward the use of pain mitigation in cattle, primarily during castration and horn removal (e.g. dehorning, disbudding). To reach this objective, an online survey was conducted with veterinarians and animal scientists. The analysis was based on descriptive statistics, chi-squares tests, Fisher exact tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests. The final sample was composed of 147 respondents. Results of descriptive statistics showed that the use of medicine before a painful procedure (i.e., anesthetic, anti-inflammatory, or sedative-analgesic), was higher for adult cattle than for suckled and newborn calves. In newborn calves, those respondents who were more likely to use pain relief agreed with the statements that i) there is missing information about pain control during castration and ii) defensive movements shown by an animal during or after a procedure to justify pain mitigation in horn removal. The primary reasons for choosing a medicine were similar for both procedures: cost, anti-inflammatory effect, analgesic potency, duration of analgesic effect, duration of sedative effect, and route of administration. There was no difference in professional?s decade of birth and pain mitigation use. These results may be useful to decide how to optimize the use of drugs by veterinary and animal science professions, and continuing education should help to increase pain mitigation usage.
653 $aANALGESIA
653 $aANALGESICOS
653 $aANIMAL WELFARE
653 $aBEEF
653 $aBIENESTAR ANIMAL
653 $aDAIRY
653 $aDOLOR
653 $aPAIN
653 $aQUESTIONNAIRE
700 1 $aBORGES, J.A.R.
700 1 $aBARCELLOS, J.O.J.
773 $tPreventive Veterinary Medicine, April 2020, Volume 177, Article number 104909. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.104909
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
