|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
Fecha : |
13/09/2019 |
Actualizado : |
13/09/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Documentos |
Autor : |
INIA (INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA); INASE (INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE SEMILLAS). |
Título : |
Resultados experimentales de la evaluación nacional de cultivares de trigo ciclo largo: período 2018. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2019 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Montevideo (UY): INASE ; INIA, 2019. |
Páginas : |
31 p. |
Idioma : |
Español |
Contenido : |
EQUIPO DE TRABAJO:
INIA:Evaluación de Cultivares-Ing. Agr. (PhD.) Marina Castro.
Ing. Agr. Santiago Manasliski-Ensayos regionales Young.
Téc. Sist. Int. Gan. Máximo Vera-Asistente de Investigación-Beatriz Castro-Valeria Cardozo,Asistentes de Información y Proc. de datos
Protección Vegetal:Ing. Agr. (Ph.D.) Silvia Pereyra (Fitopatología)-Lic. Biol. (Ph.D.) Gustavo Azzimonti (Fitopatología)-Ing. Agr. (Ph.D.) Silvia Germán (Mej. por resistencia)-Tec. Agrop. Richard García (Mej. por resistencia)-Tec. Lech. Néstor González (Fitopatología).
Unidad de Comunicación y Transferencia de Tecnología:Ing. Agr. (M.Sc.) Ernesto Restaino-Amado Vergara (Asistente de UCTT).
SOCIEDAD RURAL DE RÍO NEGRO:Ing. Agr. (MBA) Donald Chalkling-Téc. Agrop. Santiago Salaberry-Martha Roth.
INASE:Área Evaluación y Registro de Cultivares.Ing. Agr. (M.Sc.) Gerardo Camps,Gerente.Ing. Agr. (M.Sc.) Virginia Olivieri-Ing. Agr. (M.Sc.) Sebastián Moure
Ing. Agr. (M.Sc.) Federico Boschi.
Área Laboratorio de Calidad de Semillas:Ph.D. Vanessa Sosa,Gerente.-Ing. Agr. Teresita Farrás-Analista Fabián Makowski-Analista Mónica Rojas Analista Laura Tellechea
Área Administración:Daniel Almeida |
Thesagro : |
EVALUACION DE CULTIVARES; TRIGO. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/13259/1/PubTrigoLargoPeriodo2018.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01735nam a2200157 a 4500 001 1060160 005 2019-09-13 008 2019 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d 100 1 $aINIA (INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA) 245 $aResultados experimentales de la evaluación nacional de cultivares de trigo ciclo largo$bperíodo 2018.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aMontevideo (UY): INASE ; INIA$c2019 300 $a31 p. 520 $aEQUIPO DE TRABAJO: INIA:Evaluación de Cultivares-Ing. Agr. (PhD.) Marina Castro. Ing. Agr. Santiago Manasliski-Ensayos regionales Young. Téc. Sist. Int. Gan. Máximo Vera-Asistente de Investigación-Beatriz Castro-Valeria Cardozo,Asistentes de Información y Proc. de datos Protección Vegetal:Ing. Agr. (Ph.D.) Silvia Pereyra (Fitopatología)-Lic. Biol. (Ph.D.) Gustavo Azzimonti (Fitopatología)-Ing. Agr. (Ph.D.) Silvia Germán (Mej. por resistencia)-Tec. Agrop. Richard García (Mej. por resistencia)-Tec. Lech. Néstor González (Fitopatología). Unidad de Comunicación y Transferencia de Tecnología:Ing. Agr. (M.Sc.) Ernesto Restaino-Amado Vergara (Asistente de UCTT). SOCIEDAD RURAL DE RÍO NEGRO:Ing. Agr. (MBA) Donald Chalkling-Téc. Agrop. Santiago Salaberry-Martha Roth. INASE:Área Evaluación y Registro de Cultivares.Ing. Agr. (M.Sc.) Gerardo Camps,Gerente.Ing. Agr. (M.Sc.) Virginia Olivieri-Ing. Agr. (M.Sc.) Sebastián Moure Ing. Agr. (M.Sc.) Federico Boschi. Área Laboratorio de Calidad de Semillas:Ph.D. Vanessa Sosa,Gerente.-Ing. Agr. Teresita Farrás-Analista Fabián Makowski-Analista Mónica Rojas Analista Laura Tellechea Área Administración:Daniel Almeida 650 $aEVALUACION DE CULTIVARES 650 $aTRIGO 700 1 $aINASE (INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE SEMILLAS).
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Treinta y Tres. Por información adicional contacte bibliott@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
Fecha actual : |
21/02/2014 |
Actualizado : |
11/10/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
A - 1 |
Autor : |
GARCÍA-PRÉCHAC, F.; ERNST, O.; SIRI-PRIETO, G.; TERRA, J.A. |
Afiliación : |
JOSÉ ALFREDO TERRA FERNÁNDEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Integrating no-till into crop-pasture rotations in Uruguay: review. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2004 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Soil & Tillage Research, 2004, v. 77, p. 1-13. |
DOI : |
10.1016/j.still.2003.12.002 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history:Received 21 February 2003 ; received in revised form 27 November 2003 ; accepted 9 December 2003.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2003.12.002 |
Contenido : |
Abstract
Crop pasture rotations (CPR) are unusual around the world but have been the predominant cropping system in Uruguay since the 1960s. Uruguay has a temperate sub-humid climate, 80% of its landscape (16 Mha) is climax grasslands C3 and C4 species. Beef, wool, and dairy are the main commodities. Crops occupy a portion of the remaining 20% land area, primarily on Argiudolls and Vertisols, rotated with seeded grass and legume pastures. Continuous cropping (CC) with conventional tillage (CT) has proven unsustainable due to decreased soil productivity. Seeded pasture periods increased soil productivity. CPR adoption created less variable inter-annual economic results, but soil degradation remained a major concern during the crop cycle using CT. Farmers and technicians became interested in no-till (NT) to reduce erosion and production cost. Currently,
approximately 52% of crop producing farms and 25% of dairy farms have adopted NT. This paper synthesizes research results (mainly from long-term experiments) contrasting CC versus CPR with CT (1960?1990) and NT (from 1990). Soil erosion was reduced more than six times with NT in CC, and almost three times in CPR compared with CC using CT; but combining the use of CPR and NT resulted in the same low erosion rate as under natural pasture. The transition from CT to NT is not always easy. The time between herbicide application to pasture and planting of the first crop of the rotation crop cycle with NT is a critical transition factor to optimize N and water availability, and soil tilth. Chiseling or paraplowing can alleviate plow-pans inherited by NT from previous CT; but higher soil strength at the soil surface under NT contributes to better forage utilization
under grazing. Soil organic carbon (SOC) content in CC decreased with CT, and was maintained with NT only if grain was harvested. In CC systems with harvested forage, SOC decreased even with NT. CPR with NT maintained or increased the original SOC content. The paper concludes with a discussion on the relative sustainability of CC versus CPR with NT. Both are sustainable from the soil quality and productivity standpoints. But compared with CC, CPR is a more economically and climatically buffered system, due to higher diversity. Also, CPR systems are more environmentally sustainable since fuel and agrochemicals usage is reduced approximately 50%. MenosAbstract
Crop pasture rotations (CPR) are unusual around the world but have been the predominant cropping system in Uruguay since the 1960s. Uruguay has a temperate sub-humid climate, 80% of its landscape (16 Mha) is climax grasslands C3 and C4 species. Beef, wool, and dairy are the main commodities. Crops occupy a portion of the remaining 20% land area, primarily on Argiudolls and Vertisols, rotated with seeded grass and legume pastures. Continuous cropping (CC) with conventional tillage (CT) has proven unsustainable due to decreased soil productivity. Seeded pasture periods increased soil productivity. CPR adoption created less variable inter-annual economic results, but soil degradation remained a major concern during the crop cycle using CT. Farmers and technicians became interested in no-till (NT) to reduce erosion and production cost. Currently,
approximately 52% of crop producing farms and 25% of dairy farms have adopted NT. This paper synthesizes research results (mainly from long-term experiments) contrasting CC versus CPR with CT (1960?1990) and NT (from 1990). Soil erosion was reduced more than six times with NT in CC, and almost three times in CPR compared with CC using CT; but combining the use of CPR and NT resulted in the same low erosion rate as under natural pasture. The transition from CT to NT is not always easy. The time between herbicide application to pasture and planting of the first crop of the rotation crop cycle with NT is a critical transition fact... Presentar Todo |
Thesagro : |
COMPACTACIÓN DEL SUELO; EROSIÓN DEL SUELO; PASTURAS; ROTACION DE CULTIVOS; URUGUAY. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
Marc : |
LEADER 03223naa a2200241 a 4500 001 1032788 005 2019-10-11 008 2004 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1016/j.still.2003.12.002$2DOI 100 1 $aGARCÍA-PRÉCHAC, F. 245 $aIntegrating no-till into crop-pasture rotations in Uruguay$breview.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2004 500 $aArticle history:Received 21 February 2003 ; received in revised form 27 November 2003 ; accepted 9 December 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2003.12.002 520 $aAbstract Crop pasture rotations (CPR) are unusual around the world but have been the predominant cropping system in Uruguay since the 1960s. Uruguay has a temperate sub-humid climate, 80% of its landscape (16 Mha) is climax grasslands C3 and C4 species. Beef, wool, and dairy are the main commodities. Crops occupy a portion of the remaining 20% land area, primarily on Argiudolls and Vertisols, rotated with seeded grass and legume pastures. Continuous cropping (CC) with conventional tillage (CT) has proven unsustainable due to decreased soil productivity. Seeded pasture periods increased soil productivity. CPR adoption created less variable inter-annual economic results, but soil degradation remained a major concern during the crop cycle using CT. Farmers and technicians became interested in no-till (NT) to reduce erosion and production cost. Currently, approximately 52% of crop producing farms and 25% of dairy farms have adopted NT. This paper synthesizes research results (mainly from long-term experiments) contrasting CC versus CPR with CT (1960?1990) and NT (from 1990). Soil erosion was reduced more than six times with NT in CC, and almost three times in CPR compared with CC using CT; but combining the use of CPR and NT resulted in the same low erosion rate as under natural pasture. The transition from CT to NT is not always easy. The time between herbicide application to pasture and planting of the first crop of the rotation crop cycle with NT is a critical transition factor to optimize N and water availability, and soil tilth. Chiseling or paraplowing can alleviate plow-pans inherited by NT from previous CT; but higher soil strength at the soil surface under NT contributes to better forage utilization under grazing. Soil organic carbon (SOC) content in CC decreased with CT, and was maintained with NT only if grain was harvested. In CC systems with harvested forage, SOC decreased even with NT. CPR with NT maintained or increased the original SOC content. The paper concludes with a discussion on the relative sustainability of CC versus CPR with NT. Both are sustainable from the soil quality and productivity standpoints. But compared with CC, CPR is a more economically and climatically buffered system, due to higher diversity. Also, CPR systems are more environmentally sustainable since fuel and agrochemicals usage is reduced approximately 50%. 650 $aCOMPACTACIÓN DEL SUELO 650 $aEROSIÓN DEL SUELO 650 $aPASTURAS 650 $aROTACION DE CULTIVOS 650 $aURUGUAY 700 1 $aERNST, O. 700 1 $aSIRI-PRIETO, G. 700 1 $aTERRA, J.A. 773 $tSoil & Tillage Research, 2004$gv. 77, p. 1-13.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|