| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
19/07/2021 |
|
Actualizado : |
19/07/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Informes Agroclimáticos |
|
Autor : |
INIA (INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA); GRAS |
|
Afiliación : |
UNIDAD DE AGROCLIMA Y SISTEMAS DE INFORMACIÓN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Informe agroclimático 2021- Situación a Junio. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 2021. |
|
Páginas : |
5 p. |
|
Serie : |
(Informe Agroclimático; Año 16, No.6) |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Notas : |
Equipo de trabajo INIA-GRAS (Unidad de Agtech y sistemas de Información): Adrián Cal, Guadalupe Tiscornia, Carlos Schiavi, Gabriel García. |
|
Contenido : |
Contenido. Síntesis de la Situación Agroclimática de Junio-- Perspectivas Climáticas Trimestrales elaboradas por el IRI de la Universidad de Columbia -- Índice de Vegetación (NDVI) -- Precipitaciones -- Porcentaje de Agua Disponible (PAD) -- Índice de Bienestar Hídrico (IBH) -- Agua No Retenida (ANR) -- Perspectivas Climáticas --Jul-Ago-Set elaboradas por el IRI de la Universidad de Columbia. Destacamos para este mes: Previsión de condiciones ambientales para corderos recién nacidos. Link directo: http://www.inia.uy/gras/Alertas-y-herramientas/Prevision%20Corderos |
|
Palabras claves : |
AGROCLIMA; AGTECH; BOLETIN AGROCLIMÁTICO; CARACTERIZACIÓN AGROCLIMÁTICA; DIRECCION VIENTO; ESTACIONES AGROMETEOROLOGICAS; ESTACIONES AUTOMATICAS; ESTACIONES INIA; ESTADO DEL TIEMPO; GRAFICAS AGROCLIMATICAS; GRAS; INFORMACION SATELITAL; INFORME AGROCLIMÁTICO 2021; INUNDACIONES; LLUVIAS DIARIAS; MAXIMA; MEDIA; MINIMA; PANEL SOLAR; PERSPECTIVAS CLIMATICAS; PLUVIOMETRO; PRECIPITACION NACIONAL; PREVENCION HELADAS; PRONOSTICO; SENSOR; SIMETRICO; TANQUE A; TERMOCUPLAS; TERMOHIDROGRAFO; VARIABLES AGROCLIMATICAS; VELETA. |
|
Thesagro : |
AGROCLIMATOLOGIA; CAMBIO CLIMÁTICO; CLIMA; CLIMATOLOGIA; ESTACIONES METEOROLOGICAS; ESTRES HIDRICO; EVAPOTRANSPIRACION; HUMEDAD; HUMEDAD RELATIVA; LLUVIA; METEOROLOGIA; PERSPECTIVAS; PLUVIOMETROS; PRONOSTICO DEL TIEMPO; SENSORES; SISTEMAS; SISTEMAS DE INFORMACION; TEMPERATURA; TERMOMETROS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
P40 Meteorología y climatología |
|
URL : |
http://inia.uy/Publicaciones/Documentos%20compartidos/Informe%20agroclimatico%20INIA-GRAS%20Junio%20de%202021.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02750nam a2200757 a 4500
001 1062314
005 2021-07-19
008 2021 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d
100 1 $aINIA (INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA)
245 $aInforme agroclimático 2021- Situación a Junio.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aMontevideo (Uruguay): INIA$c2021
300 $a5 p.
490 $a(Informe Agroclimático; Año 16, No.6)
500 $aEquipo de trabajo INIA-GRAS (Unidad de Agtech y sistemas de Información): Adrián Cal, Guadalupe Tiscornia, Carlos Schiavi, Gabriel García.
520 $aContenido. Síntesis de la Situación Agroclimática de Junio-- Perspectivas Climáticas Trimestrales elaboradas por el IRI de la Universidad de Columbia -- Índice de Vegetación (NDVI) -- Precipitaciones -- Porcentaje de Agua Disponible (PAD) -- Índice de Bienestar Hídrico (IBH) -- Agua No Retenida (ANR) -- Perspectivas Climáticas --Jul-Ago-Set elaboradas por el IRI de la Universidad de Columbia. Destacamos para este mes: Previsión de condiciones ambientales para corderos recién nacidos. Link directo: http://www.inia.uy/gras/Alertas-y-herramientas/Prevision%20Corderos
650 $aAGROCLIMATOLOGIA
650 $aCAMBIO CLIMÁTICO
650 $aCLIMA
650 $aCLIMATOLOGIA
650 $aESTACIONES METEOROLOGICAS
650 $aESTRES HIDRICO
650 $aEVAPOTRANSPIRACION
650 $aHUMEDAD
650 $aHUMEDAD RELATIVA
650 $aLLUVIA
650 $aMETEOROLOGIA
650 $aPERSPECTIVAS
650 $aPLUVIOMETROS
650 $aPRONOSTICO DEL TIEMPO
650 $aSENSORES
650 $aSISTEMAS
650 $aSISTEMAS DE INFORMACION
650 $aTEMPERATURA
650 $aTERMOMETROS
653 $aAGROCLIMA
653 $aAGTECH
653 $aBOLETIN AGROCLIMÁTICO
653 $aCARACTERIZACIÓN AGROCLIMÁTICA
653 $aDIRECCION VIENTO
653 $aESTACIONES AGROMETEOROLOGICAS
653 $aESTACIONES AUTOMATICAS
653 $aESTACIONES INIA
653 $aESTADO DEL TIEMPO
653 $aGRAFICAS AGROCLIMATICAS
653 $aGRAS
653 $aINFORMACION SATELITAL
653 $aINFORME AGROCLIMÁTICO 2021
653 $aINUNDACIONES
653 $aLLUVIAS DIARIAS
653 $aMAXIMA
653 $aMEDIA
653 $aMINIMA
653 $aPANEL SOLAR
653 $aPERSPECTIVAS CLIMATICAS
653 $aPLUVIOMETRO
653 $aPRECIPITACION NACIONAL
653 $aPREVENCION HELADAS
653 $aPRONOSTICO
653 $aSENSOR
653 $aSIMETRICO
653 $aTANQUE A
653 $aTERMOCUPLAS
653 $aTERMOHIDROGRAFO
653 $aVARIABLES AGROCLIMATICAS
653 $aVELETA
700 1 $aGRAS
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
12/11/2015 |
|
Actualizado : |
09/10/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
LOURENCO, D.A.L.; FRAGOMENI, B.O.; TSURUTA, S.; AGUILAR, I.; ZUMBACH, B.; HAWKEN, R.J.; LEGARRA, A.; MISZTAL, I. |
|
Afiliación : |
IGNACIO AGUILAR GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Accuracy of estimated breeding values with genomic information on males, females, or both: An example on broiler chicken. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2015 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Genetics Selection Evolution, 2015, v. 242, p. 47-56. OPEN ACCESS. |
|
DOI : |
10.1186/s12711-015-0137-1 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 14 October 2014 / Accepted: 22 June 2015 / Published: 02 July 2015. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Background: As more and more genotypes become available, accuracy of genomic evaluations can potentially increase. However, the impact of genotype data on accuracy depends on the structure of the genotyped cohort. For populations such as dairy cattle, the greatest benefit has come from genotyping sires with high accuracy,
whereas the benefit due to adding genotypes from cows was smaller. In broiler chicken breeding programs, males have less progeny than dairy bulls, females have more progeny than dairy cows, and most production traits are recorded for both sexes. Consequently, genotyping both sexes in broiler chickens may be more advantageous than
in dairy cattle.
Methods: We studied the contribution of genotypes from males and females using a real dataset with genotypes on 15 723 broiler chickens. Genomic evaluations used three training sets that included only males (4648), only females (8100), and both sexes (12 748). Realized accuracies of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) were
used to evaluate the benefit of including genotypes for different training populations on genomic predictions of young genotyped chickens.
Results: Using genotypes on males, the average increase in accuracy of GEBV over pedigree-based EBV for males and females was 12 and 1 percentage points, respectively. Using female genotypes, this increase was 1 and 18 percentage points, respectively. Using genotypes of both sexes increased accuracies by 19 points for males and 20
points for females. For two traits with similar heritabilities and amounts of information, realized accuracies from cross-validation were lower for the trait that was under strong selection.
Conclusions: Overall, genotyping males and females improves predictions of all young genotyped chickens, regardless of sex. Therefore, when males and females both contribute to genetic progress of the population, genotyping both sexes may be the best option.
© 2015 Lourenco et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. MenosABSTRACT.
Background: As more and more genotypes become available, accuracy of genomic evaluations can potentially increase. However, the impact of genotype data on accuracy depends on the structure of the genotyped cohort. For populations such as dairy cattle, the greatest benefit has come from genotyping sires with high accuracy,
whereas the benefit due to adding genotypes from cows was smaller. In broiler chicken breeding programs, males have less progeny than dairy bulls, females have more progeny than dairy cows, and most production traits are recorded for both sexes. Consequently, genotyping both sexes in broiler chickens may be more advantageous than
in dairy cattle.
Methods: We studied the contribution of genotypes from males and females using a real dataset with genotypes on 15 723 broiler chickens. Genomic evaluations used three training sets that included only males (4648), only females (8100), and both sexes (12 748). Realized accuracies of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) were
used to evaluate the benefit of including genotypes for different training populations on genomic predictions of young genotyped chickens.
Results: Using genotypes on males, the average increase in accuracy of GEBV over pedigree-based EBV for males and females was 12 and 1 percentage points, respectively. Using female genotypes, this increase was 1 and 18 percentage points, respectively. Using genotypes of both sexes increased accuracies by 19 points for males and 20
points for fe... Presentar Todo |
|
Thesagro : |
POLLO DE ENGORDE. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L10 Genética y mejoramiento animal |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/5172/1/Aguilar-I.-2015.-GSE-p.47-56.pdf
https://gsejournal.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s12711-015-0137-1
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03232nam a2200229 a 4500
001 1053861
005 2019-10-09
008 2015 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1186/s12711-015-0137-1$2DOI
100 1 $aLOURENCO, D.A.L.
245 $aAccuracy of estimated breeding values with genomic information on males, females, or both$bAn example on broiler chicken.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aGenetics Selection Evolution, 2015, v. 242, p. 47-56. OPEN ACCESS.$c2015
500 $aArticle history: Received: 14 October 2014 / Accepted: 22 June 2015 / Published: 02 July 2015.
520 $aABSTRACT. Background: As more and more genotypes become available, accuracy of genomic evaluations can potentially increase. However, the impact of genotype data on accuracy depends on the structure of the genotyped cohort. For populations such as dairy cattle, the greatest benefit has come from genotyping sires with high accuracy, whereas the benefit due to adding genotypes from cows was smaller. In broiler chicken breeding programs, males have less progeny than dairy bulls, females have more progeny than dairy cows, and most production traits are recorded for both sexes. Consequently, genotyping both sexes in broiler chickens may be more advantageous than in dairy cattle. Methods: We studied the contribution of genotypes from males and females using a real dataset with genotypes on 15 723 broiler chickens. Genomic evaluations used three training sets that included only males (4648), only females (8100), and both sexes (12 748). Realized accuracies of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) were used to evaluate the benefit of including genotypes for different training populations on genomic predictions of young genotyped chickens. Results: Using genotypes on males, the average increase in accuracy of GEBV over pedigree-based EBV for males and females was 12 and 1 percentage points, respectively. Using female genotypes, this increase was 1 and 18 percentage points, respectively. Using genotypes of both sexes increased accuracies by 19 points for males and 20 points for females. For two traits with similar heritabilities and amounts of information, realized accuracies from cross-validation were lower for the trait that was under strong selection. Conclusions: Overall, genotyping males and females improves predictions of all young genotyped chickens, regardless of sex. Therefore, when males and females both contribute to genetic progress of the population, genotyping both sexes may be the best option. © 2015 Lourenco et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
650 $aPOLLO DE ENGORDE
700 1 $aFRAGOMENI, B.O.
700 1 $aTSURUTA, S.
700 1 $aAGUILAR, I.
700 1 $aZUMBACH, B.
700 1 $aHAWKEN, R.J.
700 1 $aLEGARRA, A.
700 1 $aMISZTAL, I.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
