| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 16 | |
| 16. |  | INIA TREINTA Y TRES.; PROGRAMA NACIONAL PRODUCCIÓN DE CARNE Y LANA.; PROGRAMA NACIONAL PASTURAS Y FORRAJES.; AYALA, W.; BANCHERO, G.; BERMÚDEZ, R.; MONTOSSI, F.; OLIVIERI, V.; QUINTANS, G.; ROVIRA, P.J.; SARAVIA, H.; GARI, C.; TERRA, J.A.; VIÑOLES, C. Unidad Experimental Palo a Pique: día de campo. 2001. Treinta y Tres (Uruguay): INIA, 2001. 28 p. (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión; 259)| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|    |
| Registros recuperados : 16 | |
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
06/10/2022 |
|
Actualizado : |
06/10/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
STAIANO, L.; GALLEGO, F.; ALTESOR, A.; PARUELO, J. |
|
Afiliación : |
LUCIANA STAIANO, Laboratorio de Análisis Regional y Teledetección (LART), IFEVA, CONICET, Fac. Agronomía, Univ. de Buenos Aires, Bs.As., Argentina; Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información, Fac. Agronomía, Univ. de Buenos Aires, Bs.As., Argentina; FEDERICO GALLEGO, Instituto de Ecología y Ciencias Ambientales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay; ALICE ALTESOR, Instituto de Ecología y Ciencias Ambientales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay; JOSÉ PARUELO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Where and why to conserve grasslands socio-ecosystems? A spatially explicit participative approach. |
|
Complemento del título : |
Methods article. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2022; Volume 10, article 820449. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.820449 |
|
ISSN : |
2296-665X |
|
DOI : |
10.3389/fenvs.2022.820449 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 23 November 2021; Accepted 18 July 2022; Published 07 September 2022.
Corresponde author: Staiano, L.; Laboratorio de Análisis Regional y Teledetección (LART), IFEVA, CONICET, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina; email:staiano@agro.uba.ar -- Edited by: Jane Addison, James Cook University, Australia. -- Funding:
This research was also financed by Universidad de Buenos Aires (Argentina), Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica PICT 2150 (Argentina), Universidad de la República (Uruguay), Programa CSIC Grupos ID 71 (Uruguay), and on a grant from the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) CRN III 3095, which is supported by the US National Science Foundation (Grant GEO-1128040). -- This article is part of the Research Topic Ecology, Conservation, and Restoration of Grazing Ecosystems in the Anthropocene: https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/20813/ecology-conservation-and-restoration-of-grazing-ecosystems-in-the-anthropocene#articles |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- Grasslands of southern South America are being replaced by annual crops and forest plantations. The environmental and social consequences of this expansion generate the need for its regulation. If a conservation policy were established, it would be critical to define which areas would have priority for conservation. Multi-criteria analysis techniques are useful tools in territorial planning processes since they allow incorporating diverse and even opposing opinions and objectives. We present a methodological approach to define the Grasslands? Conservation Value (GCV) from a spatially explicit territorial diagnosis, based on multiple criteria and incorporating explicitly and quantitatively the valuations and opinions of stakeholders. The study was developed as part of the strategy of a public inter-institutional entity to contribute in defining grasslands conservation policies. The methodological approach included workshops in which the definitions of the conservation criteria and their weighting were agreed upon. Definitions were based on a multidimensional technical characterization of the territory through indicators, for which the information used was compiled, analyzed, shared, and synthesized. Based on multi-criteria analysis, each of 12 stakeholders? groups representatives established the individual weighting of the criteria for determining the GCV and then, established a consensus weighting. The GCV was mapped by integrating territorial diagnosis of these criteria with the weightings carried out by the stakeholders. The degree of agreement among stakeholders in the differential valuation of the ecological criteria was high for 8 of the 12 stakeholders (Pearson's correlation coefficients >0.92), showing a high agreement between their opinions and those resulting from the group consensus. In all cases, the agreement about the spatial variation of conservation value was higher than on the criteria weights (Pearson's correlation coefficients >0.92 for 10 stakeholders). Furthermore, the sites with lower values in the consensus map corresponded mostly to those sites with lower agreement among stakeholders. The proposed methodology allowed the incorporation of different perceptions not only in the definition of conservation criteria but also in their prioritization, in a transparent and auditable process. This could contribute to the implementation of future regulations that restrict the replacement of grasslands, increasing the legitimacy of territorial planning processes. Copyright © 2022 Staiano, Gallego, Altesor and Paruelo. MenosABSTRACT.- Grasslands of southern South America are being replaced by annual crops and forest plantations. The environmental and social consequences of this expansion generate the need for its regulation. If a conservation policy were established, it would be critical to define which areas would have priority for conservation. Multi-criteria analysis techniques are useful tools in territorial planning processes since they allow incorporating diverse and even opposing opinions and objectives. We present a methodological approach to define the Grasslands? Conservation Value (GCV) from a spatially explicit territorial diagnosis, based on multiple criteria and incorporating explicitly and quantitatively the valuations and opinions of stakeholders. The study was developed as part of the strategy of a public inter-institutional entity to contribute in defining grasslands conservation policies. The methodological approach included workshops in which the definitions of the conservation criteria and their weighting were agreed upon. Definitions were based on a multidimensional technical characterization of the territory through indicators, for which the information used was compiled, analyzed, shared, and synthesized. Based on multi-criteria analysis, each of 12 stakeholders? groups representatives established the individual weighting of the criteria for determining the GCV and then, established a consensus weighting. The GCV was mapped by integrating territorial diagnosis of these c... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Decision-making; Ecosystem services; GIS; Multicriteria analysis; Remote sensing; Socio-ecological systems; Stakeholders; Territorial planning. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
P01 Conservación de la naturaleza y recursos de La tierra |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16812/1/fenvs-10-820449.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 04551naa a2200289 a 4500
001 1063643
005 2022-10-06
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a2296-665X
024 7 $a10.3389/fenvs.2022.820449$2DOI
100 1 $aSTAIANO, L.
245 $aWhere and why to conserve grasslands socio-ecosystems? A spatially explicit participative approach.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aArticle history: Received 23 November 2021; Accepted 18 July 2022; Published 07 September 2022. Corresponde author: Staiano, L.; Laboratorio de Análisis Regional y Teledetección (LART), IFEVA, CONICET, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina; email:staiano@agro.uba.ar -- Edited by: Jane Addison, James Cook University, Australia. -- Funding: This research was also financed by Universidad de Buenos Aires (Argentina), Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica PICT 2150 (Argentina), Universidad de la República (Uruguay), Programa CSIC Grupos ID 71 (Uruguay), and on a grant from the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) CRN III 3095, which is supported by the US National Science Foundation (Grant GEO-1128040). -- This article is part of the Research Topic Ecology, Conservation, and Restoration of Grazing Ecosystems in the Anthropocene: https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/20813/ecology-conservation-and-restoration-of-grazing-ecosystems-in-the-anthropocene#articles
520 $aABSTRACT.- Grasslands of southern South America are being replaced by annual crops and forest plantations. The environmental and social consequences of this expansion generate the need for its regulation. If a conservation policy were established, it would be critical to define which areas would have priority for conservation. Multi-criteria analysis techniques are useful tools in territorial planning processes since they allow incorporating diverse and even opposing opinions and objectives. We present a methodological approach to define the Grasslands? Conservation Value (GCV) from a spatially explicit territorial diagnosis, based on multiple criteria and incorporating explicitly and quantitatively the valuations and opinions of stakeholders. The study was developed as part of the strategy of a public inter-institutional entity to contribute in defining grasslands conservation policies. The methodological approach included workshops in which the definitions of the conservation criteria and their weighting were agreed upon. Definitions were based on a multidimensional technical characterization of the territory through indicators, for which the information used was compiled, analyzed, shared, and synthesized. Based on multi-criteria analysis, each of 12 stakeholders? groups representatives established the individual weighting of the criteria for determining the GCV and then, established a consensus weighting. The GCV was mapped by integrating territorial diagnosis of these criteria with the weightings carried out by the stakeholders. The degree of agreement among stakeholders in the differential valuation of the ecological criteria was high for 8 of the 12 stakeholders (Pearson's correlation coefficients >0.92), showing a high agreement between their opinions and those resulting from the group consensus. In all cases, the agreement about the spatial variation of conservation value was higher than on the criteria weights (Pearson's correlation coefficients >0.92 for 10 stakeholders). Furthermore, the sites with lower values in the consensus map corresponded mostly to those sites with lower agreement among stakeholders. The proposed methodology allowed the incorporation of different perceptions not only in the definition of conservation criteria but also in their prioritization, in a transparent and auditable process. This could contribute to the implementation of future regulations that restrict the replacement of grasslands, increasing the legitimacy of territorial planning processes. Copyright © 2022 Staiano, Gallego, Altesor and Paruelo.
653 $aDecision-making
653 $aEcosystem services
653 $aGIS
653 $aMulticriteria analysis
653 $aRemote sensing
653 $aSocio-ecological systems
653 $aStakeholders
653 $aTerritorial planning
700 1 $aGALLEGO, F.
700 1 $aALTESOR, A.
700 1 $aPARUELO, J.
773 $tFrontiers in Environmental Science, 2022; Volume 10, article 820449. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.820449
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
