Fecha/hora: 03/06/2024 06:54:22

Biblioteca(s): 	INIA La Estanzuela.	
Tipo de la producción científica: 	Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales	
Circulación/Nivel: 	Internacional - --	
Fecha corriente: 	07/12/2020	
Fecha de la última actualización: 	07/12/2020	
Autoria: 	DALAZEN, G.; KASPARY, T. E.; MARKUS, C.; PISONIC, A.; MEROTTO JR, A.	
Afiliación: 	GILIARDI DALAZEN, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Paraná-PR, Brasil.; TIAGO EDU KASPARY, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CATARINE MARKUS, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre - RS, Brasil.; ALEXANDRE PISONIC, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre - RS, Brasil.; ALDO MEROTTO JR.	
Título: 	Soybean tolerance to sulfentrazone and diclosulam in sandy soil.	
Año de publicación: 	2020	
Fuente/Imprenta: 	Planta daninha vol.38  Viçosa  2020  Epub Dec 04, 2020.OPEN ACCESS. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582020380100081	
ISSN: 	1806-9681 (online)	
DOI: 	10.1590/s0100-83582020380100081	
Idioma: 	Inglés	
Notas: 	Article history: Received: June 27, 2019/ Accepted: September 24, 2020. Corresponding author: <giliardidalazen@gmail.com>. Cite this article:
Dalazen G, Kaspary TE, Markus C,Pisoni A, Merotto Jr. A. Soybean tolerance to sulfentrazone and diclosulam in sandy soil. Planta Daninha.
2020;38:e020225717. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582020380100081	
Contenido: 	ABSTRACT: Background: The use of pre-emergent herbicides is an important tool to control weeds, however the tolerance of soybean to these herbicides can vary according to the type of soil. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate sulfentrazone and diclosulam soybean selectivity in a sandy soil, in order to establish these herbicides as supporting tools in weed control. Methods: The treatments consisted of six doses of sulfentrazone (150 to 400 g ha-1) and diclosulam (25.2 to 75.6 g ha-1), and an untreated control. A field study was repeated in two growing seasons (2013/14 and 2014/15) in a sandy soil. Results: The occurrence of injury depended on the growing season. The
first season presented lower rainfall rates during the crop cycle. The recommended dose of sulfentrazone (200 g ha-1) caused 26% and 10%
of plant injury at 15 days after the treatment for the first and second season, respectively. For diclosulam, the recommended dose of
35.3 g ha-1 caused 20% and 8% of plant injury, respectively, for the first and second season. However, at the recommended doses, only for
diclosulam and in the rainy season there was a reduction in soybean productivity. Conclusions: The herbicide sulfentrazone, although causing visual soybean plant injury, present satisfactory selectivity at recommended doses and can be used as an important tool on weed control on sandy
soils. Similar response was observed for diclosulam in 2013/14. However, in a rainfall season diclosulam impacted on soybean yield at
the recommended dose for sandy soils, with selectivity depending of the growth season.	
Palabras-Clave: 	PLANT INJURY; PRE-EMERGENCE HERBICIDE; WEED MANAGEMENT.	
Thesagro: 	GLYCINA MAX; SOJA.	
Categoría del tema: 	--	
URL: 	http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/14831/1/Planta-Dainha2020Kaspary.pdf
https://www.scielo.br/pdf/pd/v38/0100-8358-PD-38-e020225717.pdf	
Registro original: 	INIA La Estanzuela (LE)	
Ejemplares: 	LE - (103252-1) - PXI - AP - DD - PP/Planta Daninha/2020 -  -  - DIS