Fecha/hora: 12/06/2024 22:32:08

Biblioteca(s): | INIA Tacuarembó.
Fecha corriente: | 10/06/2015
Fecha de la última actualización: | 13/05/2020
Autoria: | DE BARBIERI, I.; HEGARTY, R.S.; SILVEIRA, C.; GULINO, L.M.; ODDY, V.H.; GILBERT, R.A.; KLIEVE, A.V.; OUWERKERK, D.
Afiliación: | LUIS IGNACIO DE BARBIERI ETCHEBERRY, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ROGER STEPHEN HEGARTY, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.; CAROLINA INES SILVEIRA ROJAS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; LISA MAREE GULINO, Rumen Ecology Unit, Queensland Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Centre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.; VICTOR H. ODDY, Beef Industry Centre, Department of Primary Industries NSW, Armidale, NSW, Australia.; ROSALIND A. GILBERT, Rumen Ecology Unit, Queensland Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Centre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; ATHOL V. KLIEVE, Rumen Ecology Unit, Queensland Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Brisbane, QLD, Australia;f School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, Australia; DIANE J. OUWERKERK, Rumen Ecology Unit, Queensland Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Centre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Título: | Programming rumen bacterial communities in newborn Merino lambs.
Año de publicación: | 2015
Fuente/Imprenta: | Small Ruminant Research, Volume 129, August 2015, Pages 48-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2015.05.015
DOI: | 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2015.05.015
Idioma: | Inglés

Notas:

Article history: Received 5 December 2014; Received in revised form 19 May 2015; Accepted 21 May 2015; Available online 3 June 2015. Acknowledgments: 
The authors thank David Paul and Drew Ferguson of CSIRO for their support. Additionally we want to thank Graeme Bremner, Andrew Blakely, Gary Taylor, Dave Lockrey, Andrew Eichorn, Victoire de Raphelis-Soissan, Anita Maguire, Cathy Minchin, and Scott Godwin, for their contributions during the field or lab part of the research. Ignacio De Barbieri was supported by National Institute for Agricultural Research (INIA Uruguay). This work was supported in part by the Australian Government?s the Rumen Pangenome project within Filling the Research Gap (FTRG- 1194147-75) program.

Contenido: | Establishment of the rumen microbiome can be affected by both early-life dietary measuresand rumen microbial inoculation. This study used a 2 × 3 factorial design to evaluate theeffects of inclusion of dietary fat type and the effects of rumen inoculum from differentsources on ruminal bacterial communities present in early stages of the lambs? life. Twodifferent diets were fed ad libitum to 36 pregnant ewes (and their lambs) from 1 month pre-lambing until weaning. Diets consisted of chaffed lucerne and cereal hay and 4% molasses,with either 4% distilled coconut oil (CO) provided as a source of rumen-active fat or 4%Megalac®provided as a source of rumen-protected fat (PF). One of three inoculums wasintroduced orally to all lambs, being either (1) rumen fluid from donor ewes fed the PF diet;(2) rumen fluid from donor ewes fed CO; or (3) a control treatment of MilliQ-water. Afterweaning at 3 months of age, each of the six lamb treatment groups were grazed in spatiallyseparated paddocks. Rumen bacterial populations of ewes and lambs were characterisedusing 454 amplicon pyrosequencing of the V3/V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene. Speciesrichness and biodiversity of the bacterial communities were found to be affected by thediet in ewes and lambs and by inoculation treatment of the lambs. Principal coordinateanalysis and analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) showed between diet differences in bacterialcommunity groups existed in ewes and differential bacterial clusters occurred in lambsdue to both diet and neonatal inoculation. Diet and rumen inoculation acted together toclearly differentiate the bacterial communities through to weaning, however the micro-biome effects of these initial early life interventions diminished with time so that rumenbacterial communities showed greater similarity 2 months after weaning. These resultsdemonstrate that ruminal bacterial communities of newborn lambs can be altered by mod-ifying the diet of their mothers. Moreover, the rumen microbiome of lambs can be changedby diet while they are suckling or by inoculating their rumen, and resulting changes in therumen bacterial microbiome can persist beyond weaning
Palabras-Clave: | COCONUT OIL; EARLY-LIFE INTERVENTION; PROTECTED FAT; RUMEN FLUID INOCULATION; RUMEN MICROBIOME.
Thesagro: | MERINO; OVINOS; RUMEN.
Categoría del tema: | L01 Ganadería
Registro original: | INIA Tacuarembó (TBO)
Ejemplares: | TBO - (100704-1) - PXI - AP - PP - PP/SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH/2015 -  -  - DIS