Fecha/hora: 16/06/2024 00:17:59

Biblioteca(s): 	INIA Tacuarembó.	
Fecha corriente: 	23/09/2016	
Fecha de la última actualización: 	23/09/2016	
Autoria: 	BASILE, P.; FORMOSO, D.; TISCORNIA, G.; BLUMETTO, O.	
Afiliación: 	PATRICIA CECILIA BASILE LORENZO, Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Centro Universitario Regional Tacuarembó; DANIEL FORMOSO CUNHA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GUADALUPE TISCORNIA TOSAR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; OSCAR RICARDO BLUMETTO VELAZCO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay.	
Título: 	Radiation use efficiency on campos graslands with contrasting grzing methods. [Resumen de poster].	
Año de publicación: 	2016	
Fuente/Imprenta: 	ln: Encuentro de Investigadores de la Región Noreste: Cerro Largo-Rivera-Tacuarembó, 1., 12 de agosto de 2016, Campus Interinstitucional de Tacuarembó, Tacuarembó. Libro de Resúmenes. Tacuarembó: UDELAR; INIA, 2016.	
Páginas: 	p. 64	
Idioma: 	Inglés	
Contenido: 	Introduction: In Uruguay, the Basaltic region has de highest proportion of natural grasslands of the country. In this pastures, livestock management is the main reason of degradation of natural grasslands. Today, it's possible to estimate ANPP (Aboveground Net Primary Production) using remote sensing techniques. The RUE (Radiation Use Efficiency) is the effectiveness with which fPAR (fraction of Photosyntethically Active Radiation absorbed by plants) is transformed in ANPP and is known to vary according to temperature, precipitation and species composition. Objectives; The aims of this work were: a) to calibrate RUE and b) study the temporal variability
of RUE for two contrasting grazing methods. Materials & Methods: The study was conducted on five livestock farms located in the Basaltic region. In each site, two contrasting pastures with different historical grazing management (controlled vs continuous stocking rate) were selected. Data was collected between september 2013 and february 2015. RUE coefficient was estimated following Monteith equation: RUE= ANPP / APAR and APAR= fPAR x PAR. ANPP was estimated using the technique of regrowth in three exclusion cages. Biomass was cut at 1cm in boxes 20 x 50cm with shears every 45-50 days and was dried in forced air oven at 60 ° C. fPAR
was obtained as a function of ENVI images from MODIS sensor (US Geological Survey) and PAR was estimated from agro-climatic stations of INIA. RUE data were analyzed with a oneway ANOVA and the means were compared with T test for paired samples. Results: Between grazing methods, RUE average values were statistically different (p <0.05), with controlled management reporting values above 44%. When analysing seasonal variation between grazing methods, there were no statistical differences in RUE values. Seasonal variation of RUE for each grazing methods separately, was significantly different within seasons (p <0.05). Conclusions: The RUE values obtained could be used in the estimation of a more accurately ANPP in natural grasslands of this region.	
Palabras-Clave: 	GRASSLAND PRODUCTIVITY; LIVESTOCK MANAGEMENT; PPNA.	
Thesagro: 	PASTURAS.	
Categoría del tema: 	P30 Ciencia del suelo y manejo del suelo	
URL: 	http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/6099/1/PAGINA-64.pdf	
Registro original: 	INIA Tacuarembó (TBO)	
Ejemplares: 	TBO - (101480-1) - PXI - PL - DD -  -  -  - DIS