Fecha/hora: 16/06/2024 02:12:17

Biblioteca(s): | INIA Las Brujas.
Fecha corriente: | 08/04/2020
Fecha de la última actualización: | 08/04/2020
Autoria: | AUER, A.; VON BELOW, J.; NAHUELHUAL, L.; MASTRANGELO, M.; GONZÁLEZ, A.; GLUCH, M.; VALLEJOS, M.; STAIANO, L.; LATERRA, P.; PARUELO, J.
Afiliación: | A. AUER, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; EEA Balcarce, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Balcarce, Argentina.; J. VON BELOW, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Instituto de Biología Subtropical (Nodo Iguazú/CONICET), Misiones, Argentina.; L. NAHUELHUAL, Universidad Austral de Chile. Valdivia, Chile; Fundación Bariloche, Prov. de Río Negro, Argentina.; M. MASTRANGELO, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Balcarce, 7620, Argentina.; A. GONZÁLEZ, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; EEA Balcarce, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Balcarce, Argentina; M. GLUCH, Fundación Bariloche, Prov. de Río Negro, Argentina.; MARÍA VALLEJOS, Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina; INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; L. STAIANO, Fac. Agronomía, Univ. Buenos Aires, Argentina; Lab. Análisis Regional y Teledetección (LART), Inst. Inv. Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA), Fac. Agronomía, Univ. Buenos Aires–CONICET, Bs.As., Argentina.; P. LATERRA, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Balcarce, Argentina.; JOSÉ PARUELO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Mdeo, Uruguay; Depto. Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información, Facultad de Agronomía and IFEVA, UBA and CONICET, Bs.As., Argentina.
Título: | The role of social capital and collective actions in natural capital conservation and management.
Año de publicación: | 2020
Fuente/Imprenta: | Environmental Science and Policy, May 2020, Volume 107, Pages 168-178. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.024
ISSN: | 1462-9011
DOI: | 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.024
Idioma: | Inglés

Notas:

Article history: Received 24 May 2019; Revised 21 December 2019; Accepted 27 February 2020; Available online 12 March 2020.
Corresponding author: Auer, A.; EEA Balcarce, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Balcarce, Argentina; email:aleauer@gmail.com
Funding text: The following projects funded this study: Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) CRN3 095, which is supported by the US National Science Foundation (Grant GEO-1128040) ; PICT 2016-2150; PICT 2015 0672; FONDECYT 1190207. We want to thank all the interviewers and the interviewees for their valuable help.

Contenido:

ABSTRACT.
The relationships among social capital (SC) and collective actions (CA) for nature conservation and management were analyzed across five case studies characterised by specific land-use dynamics in the South American continent. Data on SC and CA were obtained through a semi-structured questionnaire to groups of selected social actors. Multivariate statistical analysis was used to identify SC components and to evaluate SC across actors and cases. The results reaffirm that: i) the multidimensional nature and complexity of SC; ii) Higher levels of SC are related to higher levels of CA; iii) social actors with developed internal and external SC can better counter adverse conditions through CA compared to actors who only have one type of SC; iv) vulnerable social actors do not necessarily have a higher SC or engage in more CA, despite their higher dependence on natural resources; v) those who hold more power or influence in the territory, have higher levels of SC and CA; vi) vulnerable actors often carry out civil/community, economic and judicial actions, while dominant and structuring actors carry out more educational/technical and political actions. Therefore, the formation and maintenance of SC of the most vulnerable actors and those who support them must be a priority for political action, in order to counteract the asymmetric power relations that lead to the exclusion and marginalization of many rural actors. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd

Palabras-Clave: | Ecosystem services; Governance; Social networks; Social-Ecological systems; Stakeholder analysis.
Categoría del tema: | A50 Investigación agraria
Registro original: | INIA Las Brujas (LB)
Ejemplares: | LB - (102285-1) - PXI - AP - DD - PP/Environmental Sci.& Policy/2020 -  -  - DIS