Fecha/hora: 03/06/2024 20:50:59

Biblioteca(s): | INIA Las Brujas.
Fecha corriente: | 25/11/2022
Fecha de la última actualización: | 25/11/2022
Autoria: | CALVO, M.C.; DELGADO, S.; DUARTE, F.; GARCIA, F.; SCATONI, I.; GONZÁLEZ, A.
Afiliación: | MARÍA VICTORIA CALVO, Departamento de Protección Vegetal, Unidad de Entomología, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía, Montevideo, Uruguay; SOLEDAD DELGADO, Departamento de Protección Vegetal, Unidad de Entomología, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía, Montevideo, Uruguay; FELICIA DUARTE, Departamento de Protección Vegetal, Unidad de Entomología, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía, Montevideo, Uruguay; FLAVIO R. M. GARCIA, Departamento de Ecología, Zoología y Genética, Laboratorio de Ecología de Insetos, Universidad Federal de Pelotas, Instituto de Biología, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; IRIS SCATONI, Departamento de Protección Vegetal, Unidad de Entomología, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía, Montevideo, Uruguay; ANDRÉS GONZÁLEZ, Facultad de Química, Laboratorio de Ecología Química, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Título: | Fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and hosts association in different ecosystems in Uruguay.
Año de publicación: | 2022
Fuente/Imprenta: | International Journal of Pest Management, 2022, vol. 68, issue 4: "Uruguayan Society of Phytopathology (SUFIT): Plant protection for a sustainable agriculture", p.369-380. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2022.2126023
ISSN: | 1366-5863 (online)
DOI: | 10.1080/09670874.2022.2126023
Idioma: | Inglés
Notas: | Article history: Received 30 April 2022, Accepted 10 September 2022, Published online: 11 November 2022. Funding: The authors want to thank Emily Silva and Mity Schlesener from UFPel and Eugenia Lorenzo from the UDELAR for their support, to MGAP Salto and growers and the Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación- ANII, CAPES-UDELAR and CAP for financial support.

Contenido:

ABSTRACT.- Thorough and systematic surveys of host associations of Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata are lacking in Uruguay. Our aim was to establish the host status in field conditions and the pattern of use of different fruit species in agroecosystems and wild environments in Uruguay. Tephritid monitoring was conducted in citrus and deciduous fruit orchards using McPhail traps baited with four PBX® yeast/borax pellets. A survey of host fruits was conducted by collecting fruits in commercial and non-commercial orchards and wild vegetation. Ceratitis capitata and A. fraterculus were the only two economically important fruit fly species recorded. Ceratitis capitata prevailed in citrus groves and deciduous fruit orchards associated with commercial and disturbed environments whereas A. fraterculus was associated mostly with
non-commercial fruits and undisturbed ecosystems. The differences in abundance of C. capitata and A. fraterculus observed in different hosts and ecosystems may be related to factors such as host association, resource competition, environmental conditions and parasitism, among others that are discussed. © 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

Palabras-Clave: | Anastrepha fraterculus; Ceratitis capitata; Citrus pests; Deciduous fruit trees; Native fruit hosts.
Categoría del tema: | F01 Cultivo
Registro original: | INIA Las Brujas (LB)
Ejemplares: | LB - (103266-1) - PXI - AP - DD - Int. Jr. Pest Management/SUFIT/2022 -  -  - DIS